Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess microglial activation in lesions and in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using PET. Methods: Thirty-four MS patients (7 with secondary progressive MS [SPMS], 27 with relapsing remitting MS [RRMS]) and 30 healthy volunteers, genetically stratified for translocator protein (TSPO) binding status, underwent PET scanning with TSPO radioligands (11C-PBR28 or 18F-PBR111). Regional TSPO availability was measured as a distribution volume ratio (DVR) relative to the caudate (a pseudoreference region). White matter lesions (WMLs) were classified as “active” (DVR highest in the lesion), “peripherally active” (perilesional DVR highest), “inactive” (DVR highest in surrounding NAWM), or “undifferentiated” (similar DVR across lesion, perilesional and NAWM volumes). Results: The mean DVR in NAWM of patients was greater than that of the healthy volunteer white matter for both radioligands. Uptake for individual WML in patients was heterogeneous, but the median WML DVR and NAWM DVR for individual patients were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.94, P = 4 × 10−11). A higher proportion of lesions were inactive in patients with SPMS (35%) than RRMS (23%), but active lesions were found in all patients, including those on highly efficacious treatments. Conclusion: TSPO radioligand uptake was increased in the brains of MS patients relative to healthy controls with 2 TSPO radiotracers. WML showed heterogeneous patterns of uptake. Active lesions were found in patients with both RRMS and SPMS. Their independent prognostic significance needs further investigation.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by multifocal inflammatory demyelinating lesions. The number and distribution of the T2-hyperintense lesions (white matter lesions [WMLs]) in white matter found with MRI have a central role in the diagnosis of MS, but explain little of the future risk of disability progression (1,2).
The low predictive significance of WML may partially be explained by more diffuse inflammatory neuropathology evident in the white matter postmortem that appears normal on conventional MRI (3). Individual WML in the same brain and at different stages of disease also can have different neuropathologic characteristics not well distinguished by MRI (4). Innate immune responses involving proinflammatory microglia are associated with both the focal and the diffuse inflammation (5–8).
The 18-kDa mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) is highly expressed in activated microglia (9). Clinical studies using the first-generation TSPO PET radioligand 11C-PK11195 reported higher global brain uptake in MS than healthy volunteers (HVs) (10). WML showed variably increased or decreased TSPO radioligand uptake (11,12). Recent studies have highlighted more diffuse uptake (13,14). However, a challenge to interpretation of the literature overall is the use of different radioligands and different analytic methods.
In the present study, we have assessed in vivo PET TSPO radioligand binding in MS patients with 11C-PBR28 and reanalyzed previously published data obtained with 18F-PBR111 (13) and in HVs with 11C-PBR28 (15–17) using identical methodology. This allowed us to assess the consistency of results obtained with different radioligands and to compare characteristics of regional TSPO radioligand binding as an index of microglial/macrophage inflammatory activity in the MS normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and within WML. We explored whether individual lesions could be distinguished by patterns of TSPO ligand binding in ways analogous to histopathologic classifications of lesions based on the distribution and abundance of activated microglia/macrophages (18).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
The study protocol was approved by the West Bromley Research Ethics Committee (reference no. 14/LO/0445). All subjects signed a written informed consent form. MS was diagnosed according to the revised McDonald criteria (2010) (19). Subjects had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 7.0 or less, and none was treated with steroids or had a clinical relapse within 3 mo of scanning. MS patients and HVs scanned with 18F-PBR111 and HVs scanned with 11C-PBR28 were described previously (13,15,17).
Imaging Methods
MR Scanning
MRI scans were obtained on a 3 T Trio scanner (11C-PBR28 cohort) or a 3 T Verio scanner (11C-PBR28 cohort) (both from Siemens Healthcare). Volumetric T1-weighted images were acquired for all subjects using a 1-mm isotropic resolution, before and 5 min after intravenous gadolinium chelate (Dotarem; Guerbet Laboratories Ltd.) administration. Volumetric T2-weighted images were acquired using a 1-mm isotropic resolution.
MR Image Processing and Definition of Regions of Interest
WMLs were segmented on the T2 image using Jim (Xinapse Systems, version 7). The WML mask was used for lesion-filling the T1 image before segmentation into white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid with FMRIB Software Library tools (22). Perilesional masks were generated by dilating the WML mask in 3 dimensions by 6 mm and subtracting the WML mask. A NAWM mask was created by subtracting the dilated WML mask from the total white matter mask and eroding by 3 mm. The Clinical Imaging Centre Neuroanatomical Atlas was nonlinearly deformed into each individual’s T1 brain space for anatomic parcellations of regions of interest for PET analyses (23).
PET Scanning and Radioligand Synthesis
PET scanning (Discovery RX PET/CT scanner; Siemens Healthcare Ltd.) was performed with a transaxial resolution of 5.0 mm and a radial resolution of 5.1 mm. 11C-PBR28 or 18F-PBR111 was injected as an intravenous bolus over approximately 20 s at the start of 90- and 120-min dynamic PET acquisitions, respectively (15,21).
Radiosynthesis and quality control were performed on site also as previously described, with radiochemical purities of greater than 95% (15,21).
PET Image and Kinetic Analysis
T1 images, NAWM, WML, caudate, and thalamus masks and reconstructed dynamic PET scans were used as inputs for the Molecular Imaging and Kinetic Analysis Toolbox software (www.miakat.org) for kinetic analysis of PET data. PET images were motion-corrected using SPM5 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) for frame-by-frame rigid realignment. SUVs were calculated from the time–activity curves between 60 and 90 min for 11C-PBR28 and 90 and 120 min for 18F-PBR111 (15,21). Transformed 4-dimensional PET images were integrated over time to obtain 3-dimensional PET summation images in Montreal Neurologic Institute 2-mm space (23).
Reference-based PET analyses enhance patient tolerance because arterial blood sampling is not needed. Here, we used the Logan graphical reference method (24) to estimate regional brain DVR using the caudate time–activity curve as the reference tissue input (25). Most previous MS studies also have used reference-based methods (10–12,14,26–28). We and others have confirmed that reference-based methods are strongly correlated with direct estimates of volume of distribution, VT (13,26,27,29). However, the reference tissue ideally does not show specific (displaceable) ligand TSPO, which is expressed ubiquitously in the brain (29). Reference methods for TSPO have differed by the choice of reference tissue, broadly distinguished by those that use an individually variable reference, defined on the basis of appearing most similar to the behavior expected for the healthy brain (26,27) and those that are anatomically defined and selected identical for all subjects (12,28). We chose to use the latter, because the interpretation and assumptions of lack of interpatient heterogeneity are more directly tested.
All of these approaches technically define a pseudoreference region and vary in dynamic range or sensitivity by the extent and variance in radioligand uptake in the region selected. We used the caudate nucleus because it can be defined reliably using automated segmentation methods and shows relatively lower levels of microglial activation in MS patients and TSPO binding relative to other brain regions (21). We confirmed that there were no significant differences in the caudate SUV between people with MS and the HVs for 18F-PBR111 (0.40 ± 0.11 for MS, 0.38 ± 0.07 for HVs, P = 0.67) and similarly for caudate SUV for 11C-PBR28 (0.60 ± 0.14 for MS, 0.66 ± 0.13 for HV, P = 0.26). We directly tested the accuracy of the relative uptake estimated from the DVR calculated with the caudate pseudoreference region, and the ratio of SUV in brain regions to the SUV in caudate was strongly correlated with the DVR measure for MS and HVs for both radioligands (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).
Individual Lesion Analysis and Classification
For the final analysis, WMLs with volume greater than 8 mm3 were sampled to match the full width at half maximum of the PET scanner of approximately 5 mm. On the basis of earlier results (30) and new test–retest PET data (Supplemental Fig. 2), 4 classes of lesions were identified based on the presence of differences in DVR greater than 5% in the lesion core and in the perilesional volume relative to surrounding NAWM: high uptake relative to surrounding NAWM (active lesions), highest uptake in the perilesional volume (peripherally active lesions), uptake similar to the NAWM (undifferentiated lesions), and low uptake (inactive lesions).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS version 22; IBM). The 1-way ANOVA was used to analyze the variance of between-subject factors. Homogeneity of variance was confirmed with the Levene test of equal variances. Post hoc analysis to assess differences between group means was performed, with correction for multiple comparisons (Tukey honest significant difference). Descriptive statistics were reported as mean ± SD, unless otherwise stated. For correlational analyses, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated, unless otherwise stated. A P value (Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons) of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants are summarized in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2. Data from 24 MS patients and 20 HVs scanned with 11C-PBR28 and from 10 MS patients and 10 HVs scanned with 18F-PBR111 are included. The MS patients studied with the 2 radioligands were well matched for age, sex, EDSS, and disease duration. However, approximately 30% of the 11C-PBR28 PET cohort had SPMS, whereas all of those in the 18F-PBR111 PET group had RRMS.
Brain TSPO Radioligand Uptake
There were significant differences in the 11C-PBR28 DVR across brain regions for the MS and HVs (1-way ANOVA, P = 4 × 10−19). Uptake was highest in the thalamus; the thalamic 11C-PBR28 DVR in patients with MS (1.52 ± 0.04) was higher than in HVs (1.39 ± 0.05, P = 0.03). The DVR of NAWM (1.17 ± 0.04) in the MS patients also was higher than in the white matter of HVs (1.02 ± 0.05, P = 0.02; Fig. 1A). 11C-PBR28 uptake in the NAWM was greater for patients than the mean uptake across WML (1.03 ± 0.04, P = 0.03).
Our reanalysis of the smaller 18F-PBR111 dataset found similar trends. Differences in DVR again were found between the MS and HV groups (P = 1 × 10−6). 18F-PBR111DVR in the NAWM of the MS patients (1.27 ± 0.04) was greater than that in the HV white matter (1.13 ± 0.04, P = 0.02; Fig. 1B). The mean thalamic DVR for MS patients (1.50 ± 0.04) was greater than for HVs (1.41 ± 0.04), although not statistically significantly (P = 0.08). We did not find differences between the mean DVR in the NAWM and WML (P = 0.93).
Baseline disability (EDSS) was not correlated with DVR in any brain region studied for either radioligand.
TSPO Binding in NAWM and Individual WML of MS Patients
We evaluated differences in white matter DVR between subjects (Fig. 2). The ranges in DVR for 11C-PBR28 (median, 1.10; range, 0.80–1.85; Supplemental Fig. 3) and for 18F-PBR111 (median, 1.28; range, 1.06–1.45) among MS patients both were greater than for the white matter of HVs (11C-PBR28: median, 1.04, and range, 0.82–1.21; 18F-PBR111: median, 1.12, and range, 0.98–1.25). Individual lesions in all subjects also showed a wide variation in DVR (Fig. 2). There was a strong correlation between the median WML DVR and NAWM DVR (Spearman ρ = 0.94 for both radioligands; P = 4 × 10−11 [11C-PBR28] or P = 1 × 10−4 [18F-PBR111]) (Fig. 3).
We found only 2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions in scans from the MS patients. The gadolinium-enhancing lesions (1 in a patient scanned with 11C-PBR28 and 1 with 18F-PBR111) had high DVR (1.81 and 1.19, respectively), but not the highest DVR of lesions within those subjects (Fig. 2, A22 and B3).
Classification of Individual Lesions Based on Relative TSPO Uptake
We pooled data from the 11C-PBR28 and 18F-PBR111 cohorts after classification of WML on the basis of the magnitude and spatial distribution of the relative TSPO ligand uptake as active, inactive, peripherally active, or undifferentiated (“Materials and Methods” section; Fig. 4). A higher proportion of lesions were inactive in patients with SPMS (35%, 39/112) than in those with RRMS (23%, 103/446, P = 0.01) (Fig. 5A). Inactive lesions were more common (31%, 39/126) in patients with a longer disease duration than in those with shorter disease duration (18%, 26/145, P = 0.036) (Fig. 5B). However, active lesions were found in both clinical stages of disease (RRMS: 18%, 82/446; SPMS: 28%, 31/112), across all quartiles of disease duration and in patients receiving any of the treatments represented in our population, as well as those not being treated (Fig. 5). Twenty-one percent (28/131) of sampled lesions in people being treated with nataluzimab (treated between 1 and 5.5 y) and 35% (24/69) of the lesions in those who had received alemtuzimab were classified as active. Undifferentiated lesions were relatively most common in the patients with RRMS who were treatment naïve (70%, 70/100).
DISCUSSION
We found similar relative differences between MS patients and HVs using both TSPO PET radioligands. Both were associated with heterogeneity of TSPO tracer uptake in NAWM and between lesions in the MS patients. The strong correlation between the NAWM and WML TSPO uptake for individual patients suggests that these measures both reflect the same individually variable, innate inflammatory phenotype. The differences in inflammatory activity were not well reflected in the conventional MRI measures; gadolinium enhancement identified only 2 lesions of a total of 558 lesions with increased TSPO radioligand uptake (Fig. 2). We found that lesions with diffusely high TSPO radioligand uptake (which we have called active lesions) can be found in all disease stages and treatment groups.
Although activated astrocytes can contribute to increased TSPO binding in some diseases, postmortem neuropathology suggests that activated microglia rather than astrocytes likely account for most TSPO binding in MS (9). The potential confound to quantitative estimation of the uptake of second-generation TSPO ligand differences in second-generation TSPO ligand affinity arising from the rs 6971 polymorphism can be addressed by genetic stratification (20). Interpretation of differences in binding in terms of microglial activation in MS can thus be done with some confidence.
Neuropathology studies and in vivo PET TSPO imaging both provide evidence for a diffuse inflammatory process in white matter. This is associated with evidence of neuronal injury (18,31,32). Focal clusters or nodules of white matter microglial activation may precede the formation of WML (33). Consistent with these observations (and prior studies using 11C-PK11195), we found that TSPO binding was higher in the NAWM than in the white matter of HVs (11,12,14). Increased uptake in the NAWM of patients with clinically isolated syndrome is associated with early development of clinically definite MS (34).
We found a heterogeneous pattern of microglial activation in WML relative to the NAWM both between and within MS patients. This heterogeneity is consistent with postmortem histopathology, which shows variable microglial activation between lesions (6,35). Prior studies also have shown variable TSPO radioligand uptake within lesions relative to NAWM (11,12). What has not been noted before is the strong correlation between the TSPO binding in NAWM and in WML. This suggests that patients are better described in terms of a global inflammatory state of their white matter rather than by individual lesion activity. Extending the earlier observations with clinically isolated syndrome (34), measures of this global white matter innate inflammatory activity may be predictive of the short-term disease course generally for patients with MS.
We classified individual lesions into 4 different classes based on the patterns of TSPO radioligand uptake relative to that in the surrounding NAWM. The classification is similar conceptually to that used histopathologically for WML in MS brains: both rely on differences in distributions of activated microglia (35). In our study, we identified all 4 of these lesion types in vivo in all disease stages. There was a higher proportion of inactive lesions in patients with longer disease duration and with SPMS than with RRMS. These findings in vivo are reflected in a recent study of brains postmortem, in which histopathologically defined inactive lesions are more common with SPMS and longer disease duration (5). However, we also found that TSPO PET active lesions were more common in brains of patients with SPMS than in those from patients with RRMS. Unexpectedly, we found active lesions even in patients receiving either of 2 of the most efficacious pharmacologic immunomodulators (alemtuzimab and nataluzimab).
These data thus provide further evidence for substantial persistent innate inflammatory activity in SPMS (10). They also suggest that current treatments classed as highly efficacious based on suppression of T2 hyperintense lesion activity do not suppress microglial activity fully. Persistent, proinflammatory microglia could explain the progression of neurodegenerative changes reflected as brain atrophy or disability progression that are seen in some patients (35). However, alternative microglial activation phenotypes also can contribute to reparative processes (36).
Baseline T2 lesion load and clinical progression are weakly correlated (37). Previous TSPO PET studies have reported positive correlations between disability (EDSS) and TSPO ligand uptake (10,13), but we did not observe this with either of our 2 patient groups. This may be related to sample sizes, as neither study was powered for this outcome. The lack of correlation between disability and TSPO uptake could reflect limitations of a cross-sectional design: disability measures reflect the summary impact of relevant injury to date, whereas the PET measures are determined by inflammatory activity only at the time of the scan. Insensitivity of EDSS to all relevant dimensions of disability could also contribute (38). Finally, quantifying TSPO binding using a pseudoreference region method may have led to an underestimation of regional radioligand uptake (35). The reduced dynamic range of the reference-based measure could limit discrimination of differences between tissues, despite the gain in precision. We also did not have repeated examinations on all subjects, so we had to define meaningful differences in DVR based on a hard threshold estimated from independent test–retest estimates.
In vitro, ex vivo, and in silico data indicate that 11C-PBR28 has a higher binding affinity for TSPO and higher displaceable-to-nondisplaceable binding than 18F-PBR111, when matched for TSPO binding status (39). A study using a TSPO agonist (XBD173) to block binding of 11C-PBR28 in HVs directly confirmed estimates of relatively high displaceable (specific) binding for this ligand (15). The dynamic range of DVR in the MS patients measured with 11C-PBR28 was greater than with 18F-PBR111. Finally, defluorination of the 18F-PBR111 and skull uptake of 18F (40) limit accuracy of assessment of uptake in the adjacent neocortex. Together, these factors suggest that for many applications, 11C-PBR28 is a preferable radioligand. However, the longer half-life of 18F-PBR111 (110 min) than 11C-PBR28 (20 min) makes the former more practical for transportation between sites without the need for having an on-site cyclotron to produce the radioligand. Further work needs to be done, for instance, with blocking studies of 18F-PBR111, to characterize the in vivo binding characteristics of both radioligands, but depending on manufacturer/supply arrangements 18F-PBR111 could have advantages at some sites.
CONCLUSION
Our report provides further evidence for continuing inflammation and heterogeneity in the innate immune inflammatory activity of individual lesions and NAWM of patients with MS that is not captured by conventional MRI. Our results highlight that gadolinium contrast enhancement underestimates the total inflammatory activity. We also found that the overall innate inflammatory activity was not appreciably lower in patients with RRMS relative to SPMS. We hypothesize that this inflammation contributes to determining the prognosis of individual patients. PET may provide a pharmacodynamic marker for treatments targeting this activity. Longitudinal studies now are needed to establish the clinical significance of these and related observations from other laboratories.
DISCLOSURE
Paul M. Matthews, Anne Lingford-Hughes, Alessandro Colasanti, Nicola Kalk, and Gourab Datta received support from grants from GSK during the conduct of these studies. Eugenii A. Rabiner and Paul M. Matthews are past employees and current shareholders in GSK. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Acknowledgments
Gourab Datta is grateful for support as a fellow through the Imperial Wellcome Trust-GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Fellowship Training Scheme. This article presents independent research funded by this fellowship scheme and supported by the NIHR CRF at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Paul M. Matthews acknowledges generous support from the Edmond J Safra Foundation and Lily Safra and research funding through the Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Investigator programme.
Footnotes
Published online Mar. 16, 2017.
- © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
REFERENCES
- Received for publication November 14, 2016.
- Accepted for publication February 28, 2017.