Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties Track

Evaluation of the Feasibility of Low Dose 18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Oncology: How Low Can It Be?

Jun Zhang, Nathan Hall, Katherine Binzel, Mona Natwa and Michael Knopp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 431;
Jun Zhang
2Radiology Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus OH United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Hall
5Veterans Affairs Medical Center Philadelphia PA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Binzel
1Ohio State University Columbus OH United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona Natwa
4Department of Radiology The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus OH United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Knopp
3The Ohio State University Columbus OH United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

431

Objectives 18F-FDG administration for pediatric patients is generally computed in dose formulas using adult activities as reference. The typical administrated 18F-FDG dose in children and adolescents as recommended by North American Consensus Guidelines (NACG) is about 3.7-5.2 MBq/kg (7-10mCi at 70kg), while higher administered activities are commonly used if applying patient BSA and Webster’s formula. Of increasing importance has been whether or not 18F-FDG PET imaging can be performed at the lowest practical dose levels for pediatric patients in particular infants and young children. This study evaluates and demonstrates the feasibility of low dose FDG PET in pediatric oncology patients using both virtual low dose PET simulation and clinical validation PET/CT scans.

Methods Wholebody 18F-FDG (5.9±2.2 MBq/kg or 0.16±0.06 mCi/kg) PET/CT of 39 pediatric oncologic patients was acquired on a time-of-flight PET/CT system (Gemini TF 64) at 75±5 min post FDG injection using 3min/bed. Listmode data was rebinned and reconstructed in 15s, 30s, 60s, 90s, 120s and 180s per bed position to simulate corresponding lower dose PET (1/12, 1/6, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3 and the reference, respectively). Considering that the data rebin is based on discrete count subsets with time gaps between bed positions, 26 recons of each PET (12x15s, 6x30s, 3x60s, 2x90s, 2x120s and 1x180s volumes over all bed positions) were also performed and compared to verify variances and feasibility. VOIs were placed on lesions and normal anatomical tissues. Quantitative assessment (Body mass index (BMI), counts, count density, SUVmax and SNR) and qualitative assessment (blinded image reviews) were performed and compared. Supportive dedicated phantom experiments (hollow spheres varying with volumes and sphere-to-background ratios of Flangeless Jaszczak PET Phantoms) were performed to evaluate and validate the methodology of virtual low dose PET simulation. For validation, low dose FDG PET (~ 92.5MBq / 2.5mCi) of 5 research adolescents were performed to further validate the methodology.

Results While PET image quality appears to be influenced in a multi-factorial way by acquisition frame duration, dose administration level and patient BMI, all lesions are visible even on the 1/12th orginal dose or count density PET scans (15s/bed). A 30%-60% dose reduction from current standard of care dosing can be proposed to maintain equivalent quality and PET quantification with a SUV and SNR variability of <6% depending on BMIs. An optimized BMI-based instead of weight-dependent FDG administration is recommended (40±19MBq for BMI<18.5; 74±26MBq for BMI of 18.5-25.0; 107MBq±19MBq for BMI of 25-30 and 177±56MBq for BMI >30). A linear relationship between the lowest proposed FDG dose vs BMI was also found. Consistent SUVs from 15s, 30s, 60s, 120s and 180s/bed PETs with correlation to the local standard 90s/bed PET (R2 = 1.08, 0.99, 1.01, 1.00 and 0.98) were determined. No significant variance of CR, SUV and SNR were found in normal anatomical regions or 18F-FDG avid focal lesions in regard to different frame durations (p<0.01).

Conclusions This 5-yr study investigated and validated the feasibility of reducing 18F-FDG-PET dose by 30-60% to a substantially lower level than current standard of care practice without compromising qualitative and quantitative image quality. This enables a considerable radiation dose reduction in the pediatric patient population. A BMI-based approach (30 MBq to 222 MBq for BMI of <18.5 to >30) instead of a weight-dependent is recommended for 18F-FDG PET pediatric imaging at the lowest practical dose levels in particular in infants and smaller children. This justifies to challenge the current practice of either just fixed or weight dependent dosing.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Feasibility of Low Dose 18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Oncology: How Low Can It Be?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Feasibility of Low Dose 18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Oncology: How Low Can It Be?
Jun Zhang, Nathan Hall, Katherine Binzel, Mona Natwa, Michael Knopp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 431;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the Feasibility of Low Dose 18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Oncology: How Low Can It Be?
Jun Zhang, Nathan Hall, Katherine Binzel, Mona Natwa, Michael Knopp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 431;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties Track

  • Quantitative Evaluation of Parathyroid Adenoma and Hyperplasia in Reference to Thyroid using Tc-99m MIBI SPECT/CT
  • A primitive study for clinical application of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in combination with 18F-FDG PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine neoplasms
  • Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of disease burden and response assessment in patients with myeloid sarcoma
Show more General Clinical Specialties Track

Pediatric Nuclear Medicine

  • The phenomenon of non-FDG-avid tumor volumes - A prognostic factor in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma?
  • Application of Statistical Parametric Mapping in Children with Medically Intractable Epilepsy
Show more Pediatric Nuclear Medicine

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire