Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Science Track

Comparative assessment of skeletal uptake on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT versus F-18 Fluoride PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer

AVIRAL SINGH, Harshad Kulkarni, Karin Niepsch and Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1543;
AVIRAL SINGH
1THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging (PET/CT) Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harshad Kulkarni
1THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging (PET/CT) Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Niepsch
1THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging (PET/CT) Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Baum
1THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging (PET/CT) Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1543

Objectives F-18 Fluoride PET/CT has been used for assessing metastases from various cancers, including prostate cancer. Recently, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has become the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis and restaging of metastatic prostate cancer in certain European countries. In this study the uptake of Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 Fluoride in skeletal metastases of prostate cancer has been compared.

Methods Thirty patients (mean age: 68.8y) with skeletal metastases from prostate cancer undergoing Lu-177 PSMA-radioligand therapy (PRLT) had both Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT (mean radioactivity: 158.9 MBq) and F-18 Fluoride PET/CT (mean radioactivity: 259.6 MBq) for restaging using Biograph mCT Flow 64 PET/CT, within a period of three months. All lesions were counted and SUVmax measured. Where disseminated metastases were observed, at least 5 lesions with distinguishably higher uptake and SUVmax were included. A lesion was considered a ‘match’, when it had comparably similar uptake of both Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 Fluoride in identical lesions, and a ‘mismatch’ if a lesion was PSMA-positive and Fluoride-negative. Lesions with negative-PSMA and positive-Fluoride were considered as ‘reverse mismatch’.

Results A total of 196 lesions were analyzed. Match was found in 106, mismatch in 37, and reverse mismatch in 53 lesions. All the osteoblastic lesions on CT were positive on F-18 fluoride PET/CT; 53/196 osteoblastic lesions were Ga-68 PSMA negative. Out of the 37 F-18 fluoride negative lesions, 28 were localized in the bone marrow, and unable to be identified by CT. Nine osteolytic lesions were positive on Ga-68 PSMA, but not on F-18 fluoride PET/CT.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that in comparison to F-18 Fluoride PET/CT, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has a better ability to identify active bone metastases from prostate cancer. The lesions which showed uptake of F-18 Fluoride, but no uptake of Ga-68 PSMA, were related to other disease processes such as degenerative or inflammatory changes, possible Paget’s disease, reactive changes post previous post fracture, and possibly healed previous metastases. However, the possibility of F-18 Fluoride uptake of non-PSMA expressing metastases cannot be ruled out, except by follow-up studies.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative assessment of skeletal uptake on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT versus F-18 Fluoride PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparative assessment of skeletal uptake on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT versus F-18 Fluoride PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer
AVIRAL SINGH, Harshad Kulkarni, Karin Niepsch, Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1543;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparative assessment of skeletal uptake on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT versus F-18 Fluoride PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer
AVIRAL SINGH, Harshad Kulkarni, Karin Niepsch, Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1543;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Science Track

  • External Validation of Therapy Response Interpretation Criteria (Hopkins Criteria) with inter-reader reliability, accuracy and Progression free survival outcomes.
  • Relationships between preoperative FMISO- and FDG-PET parameters and the prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • Radiographic and laboratory assessment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing Radium-223 dichloride therapy
Show more Oncology, Clinical Science Track

MTA I: Prostate/GU Posters

  • Radiographic and laboratory assessment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing Radium-223 dichloride therapy
  • A retrospective comparative study of sodium fluoride (NaF-18)-PET/CT and fluorocholine (F-18-CH) PET/CT in the evaluation skeletal metastases in metastatic prostate cancer using a volumetric 3-D analysis
  • The effects of androgen deprivation therapy on the 18f-choline uptake in prostate cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment
Show more MTA I: Prostate/GU Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire