Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Basic Science Track

Therapeutic response assessment of bone metastatic prostate carcinoma treated by abiraterone using x-SPECT Quant®: preliminary results.

Romain De Laroche, Philippe ROBIN, Ulrike Schick, Pierre Yves Le Roux, Solene Querellou, Catherine Guezennec, Jean-Pierre Malhaire, David Bourhis, Pierre-Yves Salaun and Ronan Abgral
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1422;
Romain De Laroche
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe ROBIN
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrike Schick
2Radiation Therapy Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Yves Le Roux
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Solene Querellou
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Guezennec
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Malhaire
2Radiation Therapy Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Bourhis
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Yves Salaun
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronan Abgral
1Nuclear medicine Brest University Hospital Brest France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1422

Objectives The therapeutic response assessment is a major challenge in patients with bone metastatic prostate carcinoma (BMPC). BMPC progression criteria recommended by the Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines [Scher et al. J Clin Oncol 2008] take into account serum PSA level changes or appearance of 2 or more new bone scan lesions. Interpretation of SPECT-CT with a visual analysis limits its performance, making difficult an objective response evaluation. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the feasibility to use a SPECT-CT quantification method for BMPC response evaluation.

Methods Patients with castrate-resistant BMPC treated by abiraterone were prospectively included. Three different double-bed SPECT-CT were planned for each patient (Symbia, Intevo, Siemens®) in our institution: baseline (M0), at 3 (M3) and 6 (M6) months of treatment. SUVmax and SUVpeak quantification were performed using the xSPECT-Quant® software on the highest uptake target lesions (maximum of 5). European Organization for Research and Treatment criteria (EORTC99) [Young et al. Eur J Cancer 1999] and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST1.0) [Wahl et al. J Nucl Med 2009] were arbitrarily used as recommended in oncologic PET-CT studies for therapeutic assessment (PR=partial response, SD=stable disease, PD=progressive disease). Results were compared with serum PSA level changes and PCWG2 criteria.

Results Sixteen consecutive eligible patients (74.7 +/- 8.1 years) were included from April 2014 to December 2015. Two patients died before M3 and 4 stopped treatment before M6 due to side effects or obvious PD. Mean SUVmax and SUVpeak on target lesions were respectively 42.8 and 37.1 at M0, 31.2 and 28.5 at M3 and 31.7 and 30.3 at M6. At M3, therapeutic assessment revealed 5 PR, 5 SD, and 3 PD according to EORTC99 criteria and 3 PR, 6 SD and 4 PD according to PERCIST1.0 criteria. Comparatively to M3, therapeutic assessment at M6 revealed 1 PR, 5 SD and 4 PD according to EORTC99 criteria and 1 PR, 6 SD and 3 PD according to PERCIST1.0 criteria. Using EORTC99 and PERCIST1.0 criteria, 80% and 90% therapeutic response assessments respectively matched with both PCWG2 evaluation and serum PSA level changes.

Conclusions These preliminary results show the feasibility to use the xSPECT Quant® software in bone scans interpretation for the response assessment of BMPC treated by abiraterone. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating a SPECT-CT quantification tool in a clinical oncologic series.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Therapeutic response assessment of bone metastatic prostate carcinoma treated by abiraterone using x-SPECT Quant®: preliminary results.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Therapeutic response assessment of bone metastatic prostate carcinoma treated by abiraterone using x-SPECT Quant®: preliminary results.
Romain De Laroche, Philippe ROBIN, Ulrike Schick, Pierre Yves Le Roux, Solene Querellou, Catherine Guezennec, Jean-Pierre Malhaire, David Bourhis, Pierre-Yves Salaun, Ronan Abgral
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1422;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Therapeutic response assessment of bone metastatic prostate carcinoma treated by abiraterone using x-SPECT Quant®: preliminary results.
Romain De Laroche, Philippe ROBIN, Ulrike Schick, Pierre Yves Le Roux, Solene Querellou, Catherine Guezennec, Jean-Pierre Malhaire, David Bourhis, Pierre-Yves Salaun, Ronan Abgral
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1422;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Basic Science Track

  • Imaging adult glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR
  • Evaluation of L-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-Tryptophan for PET Imaging of Cancer
  • Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with 225Ac-proteus-DOTA hapten.
Show more Oncology, Basic Science Track

MTA I: Technical Advances and Quantification Posters

  • Quantitative Na-18F PET/CT Methodologies for Assessing Osteoblastic Tumor Burden
  • Inter-observer agreement for tumor uptake quantification of 89Zr-labeled anti-CD20 antibodies with PET
  • Monitoring Tumor Response to Vascular Disrupting Agent Using Photoacoustic Tomography and Multiparametric MRI
Show more MTA I: Technical Advances and Quantification Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire