Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Noninvasive PET Imaging and Tracking of Engineered Human Muscle Precursor Cells for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering

Deana Haralampieva, Thomas Betzel, Ivana Dinulovic, Souzan Salemi, Meline Stoelting, Stefanie D. Krämer, Roger Schibli, Tullio Sulser, Christoph Handschin, Daniel Eberli and Simon M. Ametamey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2016, 57 (9) 1467-1473; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170548
Deana Haralampieva
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, Zurich, Switzerland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Betzel
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivana Dinulovic
4Focal Area of Growth and Development, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Souzan Salemi
2Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meline Stoelting
2Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie D. Krämer
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Schibli
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tullio Sulser
2Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Handschin
4Focal Area of Growth and Development, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Eberli
2Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy, Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, Zurich, Switzerland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon M. Ametamey
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, Zurich, Switzerland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Transplantation of human muscle precursor cells (hMPCs) is envisioned for the treatment of various muscle diseases. However, a feasible noninvasive tool to monitor cell survival, migration, and integration into the host tissue is still missing. Methods: In this study, we designed an adenoviral delivery system to genetically modify hMPCs to express a signaling-deficient form of human dopamine D2 receptor (hD2R). The gene expression levels of the receptor were evaluated by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and infection efficiency was evaluated by fluorescent microscopy. The viability, proliferation, and differentiation capacity of the transduced cells, as well as their myogenic phenotype, were determined by flow cytometry analysis and fluorescent microscopy. 18F-fallypride and 18F-fluoromisonidazole, two well-established PET radioligands, were assessed for their potential to image engineered hMPCs in a mouse model and their uptakes were evaluated at different time points after cell inoculation in vivo. Biodistribution studies, autoradiography, and PET experiments were performed to determine the extent of signal specificity. To address feasibility for tracking hMPCs in an in vivo model, the safety of the adenoviral gene delivery was evaluated. Finally, the harvested tissues were histologically examined to determine whether survival of the transplanted cells was sustained at different time points. Results: Adenoviral gene delivery was shown to be safe, with no detrimental effects on the primary human cells. The viability, proliferation, and differentiation capacity of the transduced cells were confirmed, and flow cytometry analysis and fluorescent microscopy showed that their myogenic phenotype was sustained. 18F-fallypride and 18F-fluoromisonidazole were successfully synthesized. Specific binding of 18F-fallypride to hD2R hMPCs was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the 18F-fluoromisonidazole signal was high at the early stages. Finally, sustained survival of the transplanted cells at different time points was confirmed histologically, with formation of muscle tissue at the site of injection. Conclusion: Our proposed use of a signaling-deficient hD2R as a potent reporter for in vivo hMPC PET tracking by 18F-fallypride is a significant step toward potential noninvasive tracking of hD2R hMPCs and bioengineered muscle tissues in the clinic.

  • human muscle precursor cells
  • dopamine 2 receptor
  • hypoxia
  • in vivo imaging
  • PET

Organ transplantation is currently the gold standard for rescuing damaged tissues but has several drawbacks such as dependence on donor organs and the high morbidity of immunosuppressive therapy. Regenerative medicine using autologous stem cells for organ and tissue replacement may offer an alternative that overcomes the known pitfalls (1–3). Tissue engineering, a major component of regenerative medicine, follows the principles of cell transplantation, materials science, and engineering toward development of biologic substitutes that can restore and maintain normal function (4). Because of their regenerative capacity, muscle precursor cells are investigated for skeletal muscle tissue reconstruction and replacement (5). These adult stem cells reside on the periphery of muscle fibers and are activated after injury, proliferating, differentiating into myoblasts, and later fusing to form new myofibers, thereby granting sufficient progeny for repetitive tissue repair (6). Most muscle precursor cells are committed to the myogenic lineage and are therefore the most suitable source for muscle engineering (7). Recent preclinical studies have shown that muscle reconstruction using muscle precursor cells is a promising and feasible therapy (8); however, the fate of the cells after implantation needs to be further investigated.

Currently, these issues are addressed by histologic assessment, which has one major shortcoming: the invasiveness of biopsies and the destruction of bioengineered muscle tissue. Novel noninvasive imaging technologies are therefore needed.

Molecular imaging is an emerging field providing essential information about heterogeneous human disorders. While bioluminescence has poor spatial resolution and MRI lacks the high sensitivity of radionuclide-based tools, PET/CT is a system with both high resolution and high sensitivity (9). Imaging reporter genes are available for fluorescence imaging, bioluminescence imaging, and MRI, but only radionuclide-based reporter genes are currently being investigated for use in patients (10–12). One such system is based on dopamine D2 receptor imaging using PET. Natively, expression of the dopamine D2 receptor is limited largely to the striata nigra (13). A large number of specific and high-affinity dopamine D2 receptor PET ligands are available, some of which have found routine application in the clinic (14). Thus, PET imaging of exogenously added human dopamine D2 receptor (hD2R) in cells injected into peripheral body regions would be an attractive method to track hD2R in vivo. One potential shortcoming of this approach, however, is the possible induction of undesired biologic effects by gene introduction and by alteration of intracellular signaling pathways. As binding of the dopamine D2 receptor ligand would activate the G-protein–linked signaling pathway, a mutated rat receptor (D2R80A) has been reported that uncouples ligand binding from intracellular signal transduction (15,16). However, the amount of signal production is limited, as one receptor interacts with only one ligand molecule and can potentially be blocked by nonlabeled endogenous ligands (17).

Skeletal muscle cells are a key target for many stem cell and gene therapy applications. With PET imaging gaining increasing importance in regenerative medicine, an area of keen interest is the potential use of transfected muscle precursor cells to restore muscle function. In this study, our main aim was to investigate the location, level of expression, and survival duration of engineered human muscle precursor cells (hMPCs) using hD2R as a reporter gene to determine the possibility of applying PET/CT imaging to noninvasively monitor implanted and genetically modified hD2R hMPCs in a mouse model. The accomplishment of this goal would help to improve our understanding of the behavior of hMPCs during in vivo differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and Expansion of hMPCs

Human biopsy samples from the musculus rectus abdominis were randomly collected after approval by the local institutional review board and after written informed consent had been obtained from hospitalized patients undergoing abdominal surgery. All samples were processed according to established protocols (18).

Adenoviral Design

The AdEasy system (Stratagene) (19) was used for recombinant adenovirus construction. Briefly, we mutated the phenylalanine-411 of hD2R into alanine (F411A) to obtain a signaling-deficient hD2R that still binds ligands in a normal manner but will not activate intracellular signaling on ligand binding (20). In detail, IRAUp969E0451D vector containing hD2R (ImaGenes) and pcDNA3 plasmid containing monomer red fluorescent protein (Addgene) were purchased. The hD2R was subcloned into the pcDNA3.1 TOPO expressional vector (Invitrogen), which resulted in addition of C-terminal hexahistidine and V5 tags. Next, the F411A point mutation was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). The hD2R and monomer red fluorescent protein sequences were then subcloned into the backbone of the pShuttle cytomegalovirus vector (Addgene), ensuring a robust, constitutive expression. The final vector thus contained hD2R and red fluorescent protein sequences, both running under two separate cytomegalovirus promoters. Successful cloning was validated by sequencing, whereas viral infection and gene expression were monitored by visualizing red fluorescent protein and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, respectively. The transduced cells were expanded for 2 d after infection and were subcutaneously injected into nude mice.

Fiber Formation Assay

Differentiation of hMPCs into myofibers in vitro was assayed as previously reported (22). The fusion rate was calculated by dividing the number of nuclei per myofiber by the number of nuclei per high-power field (%). The imaging software ImageJ for Microscopy was used for data assessment.

Cell Characterization

After the expansion of hMPCs to passage 3, they were infected with the designed hD2R adenovirus and cultured for 2 d. The cells were characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, using the following primary antibodies: anti-Pax7 (1:100; Sigma), anti-MyoD (1:100; BD), anti–myosin heavy-chain antibody (1:1; DSHB), antidesmin (1:50; Sigma), anti–sarcomeric α-actinin (1:200; Sigma), anti-CD34 (1:100; BD), and anti-IgG isotype control (1:100; Santa Cruise). Fluorescein isothiocyanate antimouse IgM IgG polyclonal antibody (1:200; BD) was used as a secondary antibody. In total, 50,000 events were registered by fluorescence-activated cell sorting FACSCanto flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software, version 7.5 (Tree Star Inc.). All data are expressed as the percentage of maximum.

Additionally, the transduced hMPCs were cultured to 70%–80% confluency and stained with antidesmin (1:50), anti–sarcomeric α-actinin (1:200), and anti-CD34 (negative control) (1:100). After the cells had been washed with phosphate-buffered saline, they were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate antimouse IgG IgM secondary antibody (1:500) or phalloidin (1:200; Sigma) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1:100; Sigma) and finally mounted (Dako). Images were acquired with a model DM6000 B microscope (Leica) at exposures normalized to unstained controls (secondary antibody and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole only).

Cell Viability and Proliferation

In all cases, cell numbers and viability were confirmed by trypan blue staining. To evaluate the proliferation and viability of the infected cells at different time points, hMPCs were cultured for 6 d. The cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (Roche) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To further confirm cell viability, hMPCs were stained with 10 μM CellTrace calcein green acetoxymethyl (Life Technologies) for 30 min at 37°C. Viable cells were detected using a fluorescence microscope. All measurements were repeated at least 3 times, and samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Radiosynthesis of 18F-Fallypride

18F-fallypride was synthesized in a 1-step reaction according to a published procedure (23). The radiotracer was obtained in a radiochemical purity of more than 95%, and specific activity ranged from 32 to 168 GBq/μmol.

Radiosynthesis of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole

18F-fluoromisonidazole was obtained in a 2-step reaction in analogy to a previously published method (24). The final formulated product was obtained in a decay-corrected radiochemical yield ranging from 25% to 37%. Radiochemical purity was more than 95%, and specific activities ranged from 34 to 190 GBq/μmol.

In Vitro 18F-Fallypride Uptake Assay

The experiment was performed in longitudinally truncated 24-well plates testing 2 AV-hD2R constructs in 3 concentrations (500 ng, 1 μg, 2 μg/well). Approximately 20,000 hMPCs per well were seeded, and after 24 h the cells were infected with the corresponding constructs for 2 d. The modified cells were incubated with 18F-fallypride (1 nM) for 15 min and scanned 26 min after the start of incubation. The cells were imaged using a small-animal PET scanner. The scan duration was 45 min. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Animal Experimentation

All animal experiments were approved by the local animal care committee. The study used a total of 46 female 8-wk-old nude mice (Charles River). The hMPCs were expanded to passage 3–4 for the in vivo experiments. Each sample contained 30 × 106 transduced hMPCs, which were gently mixed with 500 μL of collagen type I carrier (final concentration, 2 mg/mL) (BD) and prepared for injection (25). Each animal received 2 subcutaneous injections, one on either side of the back (including control collagen-only injections). The engineered skeletal muscle tissues were harvested after 1, 2, and 4 wk.

Tracking of Bioengineered Muscle Tissues via PET/CT Imaging

PET experiments were performed with a dedicated small-animal PET/CT tomograph (eXplore VISTA; General Electric), which uses phoswich detector technology in a dual-ring setup (26). For 18F-fallypride administration, the mice were restrained and injected via a lateral tail vein with 4.38–26.25 MBq (0.17–2.34 nmol) of the radioligand. For blockage experiments, haloperidol (1 mg/kg) was injected. Ten minutes after radiotracer injection, the animals were anesthetized with isoflurane in an air–oxygen mixture and were positioned and fixed on the bed of the camera. PET data were acquired to yield dynamic images with sufficient count statistics. Depth of anesthesia and body temperature were monitored and controlled according to a previously published protocol (27). In addition, respiratory frequency was controlled with a model 1025T monitoring system from SA Instruments. After the PET scan, the animals were allowed to recover from the anesthesia and were rescanned at a later time with the next tracer. Raw data were reconstructed by 2-dimensional ordered-subsets expectation maximization, and the obtained image data were evaluated by visual inspection and semiquantitative volume-of-interest analysis (28) using the dedicated software PMOD (PMOD Technologies Ltd.).

Biodistribution Studies

The subsequent postmortem biodistribution was assessed 60 min after intravenous injection of 18F-fallypride. Tracer uptake in engineered muscle tissue, striatum nigra, native muscle tissue, cerebellum, and injected collagen was evaluated in a γ-counter (Cobra II Auto-Gamma; Canberra Packard).

Autoradiography

Cryosections (20 μm) of samples were preincubated on ice for 12 min in Tris/HCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4. Then, the slides were incubated with 18F-fallypride (0.03 nM) in the presence and absence of haloperidol (10 μM) as a blocker for 60 min. After the tissue slices had been air-dried, they were exposed to phosphor imager plates, which were analyzed with a BAS-5000 phosphor imager (Fuji).

Histologic Assessment

The harvested engineered muscle tissues were embedded in a cryopreservative optimal-cutting-temperature medium (CellPath) immediately after isolation. Cryosections were prepared (10 μm) and further processed. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (Sigma) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

The infected cells were cultured for 2 d and harvested for analysis of hD2R gene expression. Total RNA was isolated using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primers (high-capacity complementary DNA reverse transcription kit; Life Technologies). Predesigned primers for hD2R (Hs00241436_m1) and human vascular endothelial growth factor A (Hs00900055_m1) were purchased from Life Technologies. 18S ribosomal RNA (4319413E; Life Technologies) was used to normalize complementary DNA concentrations. For quantification, the expression of each gene was normalized to the 18S expression in the corresponding sample. The entire experiment was repeated at least three times, and samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting

Total protein was measured with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific), and protein lysate (30–50 μg) was loaded on a 10% or 12% gel (Bio-Rad). The primary antibodies used were anti–myosin heavy-chain (1:5, DSHB), anti–sarcomeric α-actinin (1:2,000; Sigma), anti–Von Willebrand factor (1:500; Sigma), anti-hD2R (1:200; Santa Cruz), and anti–glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1:2,500; Sigma). Finally, the membranes were washed and incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (1:500; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h. The signals were detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence method (Amersham). Data were analyzed by Image Studio Lite (Li-Cor) software and were represented as protein expression relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Statistics

For statistical analysis, SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM), was used and graphs were drawn with Prism, version 5.04 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All data were analyzed by Student t tests or 1-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni or least-significant-difference post hoc analysis (P < 0.05 was considered significant). All presented data are expressed as mean with corresponding SEM.

RESULTS

Viability, Proliferation, and Differentiation Rates of Genetically Modified hD2R hMPCs

The adenoviral construct containing hD2R (F411A) was generated and amplified for further use in hMPCs. Nontoxicity of the viral infection was visualized by a cell viability assay (calcein) (Fig. 1A) in which no significant differences between wild-type (WT) and hD2R-infected cells were detected. The transduction efficiency of approximately 25% infected cells was confirmed by fluorescent imaging, as the designed construct contained a red fluorophore, expressed under a separate cytomegalovirus promoter. This construct allowed assessment of cell transduction efficiency before transplantation. Using a fiber formation assay (29), we evaluated the ability of hMPCs to form myofibers in vitro. Comparison between WT and hD2R-overexpressing cells (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) did not reveal any significant difference in number of nuclei per fiber (P = 0.8629) (WT: 8.325 ± 0.6818, n = 83; hD2R: 8.184 ± 0.4635, n = 87), number of nuclei per high-power field (WT: 230.6 ± 14.34, n = 10; hD2R: 216.9 ± 10.71, n = 10 [P = 0.4539]), or number of fibers per high-power field (WT: 8.3 ± 0.8699, n = 10; hD2R: 8.4 ± 0.5812, n = 10 [P = 0.9249]). The calculated overall fusion did not differ between infected and WT cells either (WT: 30.95 ± 3.289, n = 10; hD2R: 32.40 ± 3.085, n = 10 [P = 0.7512]). Successful transduction was also confirmed by hD2R gene expression levels (Fig. 1B) (n = 3 × 3, P = 0.005). Furthermore, the proliferation capacity of the WT and hD2R-overexpressing hMPCs was determined by cell proliferation assay over 3 d of culturing after transduction, showing no significant variations between the different groups (Fig. 1C) (WT: 2.2173 ± 0.364, n = 6; hD2R: 2.0843 ± 0314, n = 6 [P = 0.787 at 3 d]).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Evidence that hD2R adenoviral infection did not show adverse effects on hMPC. (A) Adenoviral transduction of hMPCs with hD2R did not affect cell viability (calcein assay, left, green). Transduction efficiency was shown by fluorescence microscopy (middle, red). Ability to form fibers (29) was also not affected by virus (right). (B) hD2R gene expression was evaluated. (C) Proliferation rate did not differ between WT noninfected and infected hMPCs. All measurements were performed in duplicate from at least 3 different biopsies. *P < 0.05, Student t test. CaAM = calcein acetoxymethyl; FFA = fiber-formation assay; OD = optical density; RFP = red fluorescent protein.

Flow Cytometry and Immunocytochemistry Analysis of hD2R hMPCs

The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2A) initially and in parallel by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 2B) 2 d after infection, revealing a sustained muscle phenotype without significant alterations between the groups.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Evidence that adenoviral infection with hD2R did not change well-defined hMPC phenotype. (A) hMPCs were analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Expression of typical muscle markers (green) in cells expressing hD2R (red) was further confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Nuclei are shown in blue. *P < 0.05, Student t test (n = 4 biopsies). Scale bar = 25 μm.

In Vitro PET/CT Imaging of hD2R hMPCs Using 18F-Fallypride

Before each experiment, the infection efficiency was assessed by fluorescent microscopy, and positive cells were further processed for in vitro or in vivo studies. Initially, the capacity of the transduced hD2R hMPCs to efficiently bind 18F-fallypride was evaluated in vitro. When using the designed adenovirus, testing 3 different concentrations of viral particles for tracer uptake, we observed a high binding affinity (Fig. 3A). As expected, the cells infected with the highest nontoxic concentration (×10) showed the highest detectable PET signal and were thus used for further experiments. These data confirmed the efficiency of the presented hD2R adenoviral construct for hMPC genetic modification.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Tracking of hMPCs and engineered muscle tissue via PET/CT using 18F-fallypride in vitro and in vivo. (A) 18F-fallypride uptake in hD2R hMPCs was detected at different adenoviral hD2R transduction levels. (B) In vivo PET/CT imaging visualized specific tracer uptake in bioengineered tissues over time, and VOI analysis illustrated gradual decrease in signal after 1 wk (n = 6–8). VOI = volume of interest.

In Vivo PET/CT Imaging of hD2R hMPCs Using 18F-Fallypride

Encouraged by our in vitro results, we evaluated the capability of transduced hMPCs to specifically bind 18F-fallypride in an established ex situ model for skeletal muscle tissue formation in vivo. The hD2R hMPCs showed a high SUV after 1 wk (0.259 ± 0.019, n = 8). This SUV decreased after 2 wk (0.169 ± 0.019, n = 8 [P = 0.005]), and no significant difference from background was observed after 4 wk (0.134 ± 0.014, n = 6 [P < 0.0001]) (Fig. 3B). Animals injected with only collagen did not show a significant radiotracer accumulation at any time (0.115 ± 0.011, n = 10). Cerebellum was used as a negative control, showing negligible nonspecific uptake (0.124 ± 0.006, n = 16). This was confirmed by volume-of-interest analysis (28), by which a significantly higher signal-to-background ratio of at least 2.08 at the earliest time point was observed (Fig. 3B). Biodistribution assessment also showed a significant decrease in tracer uptake in engineered tissues over time (Fig. 4A, n = 4–16 per time point). Signal specificity was demonstrated by in vivo PET studies using haloperidol as an hD2R-blocking agent; the striatum was visualized as a positive control (Fig. 4B). Additionally, radioligand binding specificity was demonstrated by autoradiography studies, whereby hD2R-expressing tissues (including native controls) showed a reduction of radioligand uptake after incubation with haloperidol (Fig. 4C), confirming the in vivo data.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Specificity of 18F-fallypride signal. (A) Significant enhancement of 18F-fallypride uptake in engineered hD2R hMPC tissue, compared with collagen and control muscle, was observed in biodistribution study (n = 4–16). (B) Tracer specificity was evaluated after blockage experiment with haloperidol. (C) Autoradiography (top) showed specific tracer binding. Blockage (bottom) was performed with haloperidol, and mouse muscle and rat brain sections were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Images were averaged from 60 to 120 min. Arrows indicate hMPC injection site. ID = injected dose. *P < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis.

PET Imaging of Hypoxia Using 18F-Fluoromisonidazole During Formation of Bioengineered Skeletal Muscle Tissue

After successful tracking of the injected hD2R hMPCs, we were further interested in studying the oxygenation status of the cells after implantation. To address this, we used 18F-fluoromisonidazole, a PET radiotracer for visualizing hypoxic regions. One week after cell inoculation, we observed a relatively high 18F-fluoromisonidazole uptake, which decreased at later time points (Fig. 5A). Volume-of-interest analysis of the 1-wk samples (0.315 ± 0.02, n = 8) showed a mean signal change ratio of 1.6, compared with later time points (0.189 ± 0.019, n = 8 [2 wk]; 0.205 ± 0.009, n = 6 [4 wk]) and negative controls (cerebellum: 0.206 ± 0.017, n = 16; collagen: 0.251 ± 0.003, n = 10) (Fig. 5B).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Hypoxia PET/CT monitoring with 18F-fluoromisonidazole during formation of bioengineered muscle tissues. (A) Redox state of forming tissues was illustrated with 18F-fluoromisonidazole (injected activity, 0.49–5.86 nmol, 14.86–35.83 MBq). (B) VOI signal was calculated for 3 different time points. Images were averaged from 90 to 110 min. Arrows indicate hMPC injection sites.

Histologic Assessment and Gene and Protein Analysis of Harvested Tissues

Western blotting was used to evaluate the relative protein expression of typical skeletal muscle protein markers (sarcomeric α-actinin, myosin heavy-chain), Von Willebrand factor, and hD2R after tissue harvesting (Fig. 6A). The tibialis anterior and striatum nigra were used as controls. The protein expression levels of sarcomeric markers gradually increased in the bioengineered tissue samples (myosin heavy-chain: 0.4211 ± 0.033, n = 4 [1 wk]; 2.1915 ± 0.407, n = 6 [2 wk]; 3.0734 ± 0.72, n = 8 [4 wk] [P = 0.012]; α-actinin: 0.4065 ± 0.111, n = 4 [1 wk]; 0.6734 ± 0.113, n = 6 [2 wk]; 1.2696 ± 0.315, n = 8 [4 wk] [P = 0.043]), corresponding to the expected timeline of muscle fiber formation (Fig. 6A). The relative hD2R protein expression decreased steadily over time (2.4072 ± 0.608, n = 3 [1 wk]; 1.5881 ± 0.25, n = 6 [2 wk]; 1.0394 ± 0.294, n = 12 [4 wk] [P = 0.031]) (Fig. 6A), concomitant with the observed decrease in 18F-fallypride uptake (Fig. 3B). The decrease in 18F-fluoromisonidazole uptake over time coincided with an increase in Von Willebrand factor protein levels (endothelial cell marker, n = 4) (Fig. 6A), as well as with rising expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A gene (Supplemental Fig. 2B, n = 9) in the bioengineered muscle tissues. Although hD2R protein levels were decreasing over time, the corresponding gene expression levels were increasing (Supplemental Fig. 2B). The gradual decrease in size due to collagen remodeling and myofiber formation has previously been reported (25) (Supplemental Fig. 2A). Histologic analysis revealed successful myofiber formation in the harvested tissues and was able to illustrate the individual cells of the samples at week 1 and the myotube formation at weeks 2 and 4 (Fig. 6B).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Evaluation of protein expression levels by Western blot. (A) Changes in expression of Von Willebrand factor, myosin heavy-chain, sarcomeric α-actinin, and hD2R were visualized graphically. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed increasing fiber-formation capacity over time. Tibialis anterior was used as control. *P < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni or least-significant-difference post hoc analysis. Scale bar = 100 μm; GAPDH = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MyHC = myosin heavy-chain; SN = striatum nigra; TA = tibialis anterior; vWf = Von Willebrand factor.

DISCUSSION

Transplantation of muscle precursor cells has been contemplated as a treatment option for genetic and acquired muscle disorders (25,30) and as a prospective way to reestablish damaged muscle function in patients with muscle degeneration (31). Various research groups have demonstrated the formation of muscle tissue after cellular inoculation (32). However, the long-term noninvasive tracking of bioengineered muscle tissue has not been addressed so far.

The need for a system combining well-established PET probes and a novel engineered vector for expression of hD2R in hMPCs has prompted our research toward noninvasive visualization of a cell therapy for application in skeletal muscle bioengineering. The generation of a vector coding for a signaling-deficient hD2R was an important milestone, as redundant cell-signaling is a major issue in gene therapies.

In this paper, we have described a method for metabolic imaging and tracking of hMPCs using PET/CT, thereby illustrating their exact position and the oxygenation state of the newly formed skeletal muscle tissue over time. Our study indicated that the signaling-deficient hD2R could be efficiently introduced into primary hMPCs, that there were no detrimental effects on cell viability or differentiation, that myogenic marker gene expression was unaltered, that the receptor could be traced with high specificity using 18F-fallypride both in cells in vitro and after injection in vivo, and that receptor expression in the engineered tissues could be validated by autoradiography. We found that the capacity to track hD2R hMPCs is excellent in the first week and declines later. Interestingly, although the messenger RNA expression of hD2R remained high, its protein levels steadily declined. This finding indicates that the ectopically expressed hD2R is either posttranslationally modified or internalized on constitutive expression and ultimately degraded during the final differentiation to myofibers. Our data showed that the use of a high-affinity PET ligand and a mutated hD2R can provide important information on localization, survival, and metabolic features in the early phase after cell injection.

A general problem in tissue engineering is the increased oxygen demand and lack of initial vascularization during the early phases of tissue formation, leading to central necrosis (33). Any engineered tissue larger than 0.3 cm3 requires rapid vascularization to guarantee survival of cells within the core of the construct. Vascularization of bioengineered tissue is therefore a bottleneck. Tissue hypoxia, which is inversely proportional to the degree of vascularization, can be analyzed by invasive and noninvasive methods. The oxygenation status of cells and tissues can be determined by invasive pO2 measurements using polarographic needle electrodes or with fiber-optic probes (34–36). Noninvasive methods include the use of bioreductive chemical markers such as 2-nitroimidazoles (37), which form adducts under hypoxic conditions and are irreversibly bound in hypoxic cells. 18F-fluoromisonidazole is the most widely used PET radioligand for imaging hypoxia in humans (38–40).

In our study with 18F-fluoromisonidazole, we detected metabolically active bioengineered tissues with low oxygen levels, that is, tissues in which reductive reactions dominate because of a low oxygen supply or a high oxygen consumption, typical of the early stages of cell-to-myofiber formation. It has been shown that the level of oxygenation is influenced by the degree of vascularization and by the metabolic consumption of oxygen by engineered tissue (41). Concomitant with our in vivo observations, increased release of vascular endothelial growth factor in a hypoxic environment has been shown to lead to enhanced differentiation (42). Histologic analysis confirmed the cell-to-myofiber transition, correlating with normalized vascularization levels. In line with these observations, the use of 18F-fluoromisonidazole for hypoxia imaging of bioengineered constructs seems feasible.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the fate of the inoculated primary hMPCs is a prerequisite for future clinical implementation of this cell therapy. Combining the recent developments in designing robust vectors along with novel, highly specific PET imaging probes, we were able to offer an elegant solution, obviating a destructive tissue biopsy. Our study marks a significant step toward the noninvasive tracking of hD2R hMPCs and bioengineered muscle tissues in the clinic using PET.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank Damina Balmer for critical assessment of the manuscript and Claudia Keller for technical assistance with the PET/CT scanner.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 19, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chun SY,
    2. Cho DH,
    3. Chae SY,
    4. et al
    . Human amniotic fluid stem cell-derived muscle progenitor cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:1300–1307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Nikolavasky D,
    2. Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K,
    3. Stec M,
    4. et al
    . Stem cell therapy: a future treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:61–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Aref-Adib M,
    2. Lamb BW,
    3. Lee HB,
    4. et al
    . Stem cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review in human subjects. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:1213–1221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Olson JL,
    2. Atala A,
    3. Yoo JJ
    . Tissue engineering: current strategies and future directions. Chonnam Med J. 2011;47:1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Smaldone MC,
    2. Chancellor MB
    . Muscle derived stem cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence. World J Urol. 2008;26:327–332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hill M,
    2. Wernig A,
    3. Goldspink G
    . Muscle satellite (stem) cell activation during local tissue injury and repair. J Anat. 2003;203:89–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Benchaouir R,
    2. Rameau P,
    3. Decraene C,
    4. et al
    . Evidence for a resident subset of cells with SP phenotype in the C2C12 myogenic line: a tool to explore muscle stem cell biology. Exp Cell Res. 2004;294:254–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eberli D,
    2. Aboushwareb T,
    3. Soker S,
    4. et al
    . Muscle precursor cells for the restoration of irreversibly damaged sphincter function. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:2089–2098.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Eberli D
    1. Haralampieva DG,
    2. Ametamey SM,
    3. Sulser T,
    4. Eberli D
    . Non-invasive imaging modalities for clinical investigation in regenerative medicine. In: Eberli D, ed. Cells and Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2014:175–197.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Peñuelas I,
    2. Mazzolini G,
    3. Boan JF,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography imaging of adenoviral-mediated transgene expression in liver cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1787–1795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    1. Peñuelas I,
    2. Haberkorn U,
    3. Yaghoubi S,
    4. et al
    . Gene therapy imaging in patients for oncological applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32(suppl 2):S384–S403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dempsey MF,
    2. Wyper D,
    3. Owens J,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of 123I-FIAU imaging of herpes simplex viral gene expression in the treatment of glioma. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:611–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. MacLaren DC,
    2. Gambhir SS,
    3. Satyamurthy N,
    4. et al
    . Repetitive, non-invasive imaging of the dopamine D2 receptor as a reporter gene in living animals. Gene Ther. 1999;6:785–791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Siessmeier T,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Buchholz HG,
    4. et al
    . Parametric mapping of binding in human brain of D2 receptor ligands of different affinities. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:964–972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Liang Q,
    2. Satyamurthy N,
    3. Barrio JR,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive, quantitative imaging in living animals of a mutant dopamine D2 receptor reporter gene in which ligand binding is uncoupled from signal transduction. Gene Ther. 2001;8:1490–1498.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Schönitzer V,
    2. Haasters F,
    3. Kasbauer S,
    4. et al
    . In vivo mesenchymal stem cell tracking with PET using the dopamine type 2 receptor and 18F-fallypride. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1342–1347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rodriguez-Porcel M
    . In vivo imaging and monitoring of transplanted stem cells: clinical applications. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:51–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Eberli D,
    2. Soker S,
    3. Atala A,
    4. et al
    . Optimization of human skeletal muscle precursor cell culture and myofiber formation in vitro. Methods. 2009;47:98–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Luo J,
    2. Deng ZL,
    3. Luo X,
    4. et al
    . A protocol for rapid generation of recombinant adenoviruses using the AdEasy system. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1236–1247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cho W,
    2. Taylor LP,
    3. Mansour A,
    4. et al
    . Hydrophobic residues of the D2 dopamine receptor are important for binding and signal transduction. J Neurochem. 1995;65:2105–2115.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Herzog H,
    2. Langen KJ,
    3. Weirich C,
    4. et al
    . High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI. Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50:74-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Eberli D,
    2. Soker S,
    3. Atala A,
    4. et al
    . Optimization of human skeletal muscle precursor cell culture and myofiber formation in vitro. Methods. 2009;47:98-103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mukherjee J,
    2. Yang ZY,
    3. Das MK,
    4. et al
    . Fluorinated benzamide neuroleptics—III. Development of (S)-N-[(1-allyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-5-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-2, 3-dimethoxybenzamide as an improved dopamine D-2 receptor tracer. Nucl Med Biol. 1995;22:283–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lim JL,
    2. Berridge MS
    . An efficient radiosynthesis of [18F]fluoromisonidazole. Appl Radiat Isot. 1993;44:1085–1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Delo DM,
    2. Eberli D,
    3. Williams JK,
    4. et al
    . Angiogenic gene modification of skeletal muscle cells to compensate for ageing-induced decline in bioengineered functional muscle tissue. BJU Int. 2008;102:878–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Seidel J,
    3. Tsui BM,
    4. et al
    . Performance evaluation of the GE Healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1891–1900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Honer M,
    2. Bruhlmeier M,
    3. Missimer J,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic imaging of striatal D2 receptors in mice using quad-HIDAC PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:464–470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Dubé D,
    2. Brideau C,
    3. Deschenes D,
    4. et al
    . 2-heterosubstituted-3-(4-methylsulfonyl)phenyl-5-trifluoromethyl pyridines as selective and orally active cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9:1715–1720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Herzog H,
    2. Langen KJ,
    3. Weirich C,
    4. et al
    . High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI. Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50:74–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mitchell PO,
    2. Pavlath GK
    . Skeletal muscle atrophy leads to loss and dysfunction of muscle precursor cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C1753–C1762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Stölting MN,
    2. Hefermehl LJ,
    3. Tremp M,
    4. et al
    . The role of donor age and gender in the success of human muscle precursor cell transplantation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. July 23, 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
  32. 32.↵
    1. Putman CT,
    2. Sultan KR,
    3. Wassmer T,
    4. et al
    . Fiber-type transitions and satellite cell activation in low-frequency-stimulated muscles of young and aging rats. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:B510–B519.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lovett M,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Edwards A,
    4. et al
    . Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2009;15:353–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hockel M,
    2. Schlenger K,
    3. Aral B,
    4. et al
    . Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4509–4515.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.
    1. Nordsmark M,
    2. Overgaard M,
    3. Overgaard J
    . Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Radiother Oncol. 1996;41:31–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Nordsmark M,
    2. Alsner J,
    3. Keller J,
    4. et al
    . Hypoxia in human soft tissue sarcomas: adverse impact on survival and no association with p53 mutations. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:1070–1075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Machulla H-J
    , ed. Imaging of Hypoxia: Tracer Developments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999.
  38. 38.↵
    1. Bruehlmeier M,
    2. Roelcke U,
    3. Schubiger PA,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 15O-H2O. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1851–1859.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.
    1. Kawai N,
    2. Lin W,
    3. Cao WD,
    4. et al
    . Correlation between 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET and expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF in newly diagnosed and recurrent malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1870–1878.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Muzi M,
    2. Peterson LM,
    3. O’Sullivan JN,
    4. et al
    . 18F-fluoromisonidazole quantification of hypoxia in human cancer patients using image-derived blood surrogate tissue reference regions. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1223–1228.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Phelps EA,
    2. Garcia AJ
    . Update on therapeutic vascularization strategies. Regen Med. 2009;4:65–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Bryan BA,
    2. Walshe TE,
    3. Mitchell DC,
    4. et al
    . Coordinated vascular endothelial growth factor expression and signaling during skeletal myogenic differentiation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:994–1006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication December 2, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication February 8, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 9
September 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noninvasive PET Imaging and Tracking of Engineered Human Muscle Precursor Cells for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Noninvasive PET Imaging and Tracking of Engineered Human Muscle Precursor Cells for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
Deana Haralampieva, Thomas Betzel, Ivana Dinulovic, Souzan Salemi, Meline Stoelting, Stefanie D. Krämer, Roger Schibli, Tullio Sulser, Christoph Handschin, Daniel Eberli, Simon M. Ametamey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1467-1473; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170548

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Noninvasive PET Imaging and Tracking of Engineered Human Muscle Precursor Cells for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
Deana Haralampieva, Thomas Betzel, Ivana Dinulovic, Souzan Salemi, Meline Stoelting, Stefanie D. Krämer, Roger Schibli, Tullio Sulser, Christoph Handschin, Daniel Eberli, Simon M. Ametamey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1467-1473; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170548
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Imaging the Biodistribution and Performance of Transplanted Stem Cells with PET
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • human muscle precursor cells
  • dopamine 2 receptor
  • hypoxia
  • in vivo imaging
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire