Research ArticleBrief Communications

225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-Targeted α-Radiation Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Clemens Kratochwil, Frank Bruchertseifer, Frederik L. Giesel, Mirjam Weis, Frederik A. Verburg, Felix Mottaghy, Klaus Kopka, Christos Apostolidis, Uwe Haberkorn and Alfred Morgenstern
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2016, 57 (12) 1941-1944; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.178673

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising target in prostate cancer. Recently, we started the first-in-human treatment with an α-radionuclide–labeled PSMA ligand. Although the case series is still ongoing, we here report in advance about two patients in highly challenging clinical situations who showed a complete response to 225Ac-PSMA-617 therapy. Methods: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT validated the presence of the PSMA-positive tumor phenotype. A 100-kBq activity of 225Ac-PSMA-617 per kilogram of body weight was administered bimonthly. Prostate-specific antigen response and hematologic toxicity were measured at least every 4 wk. Restaging was performed with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Results: Both patients experienced a prostate-specific antigen decline to below the measurable level and showed a complete response on imaging. No relevant hematologic toxicity was observed. Xerostomia was the only mentionable clinical side effect. Conclusion: Targeted α-therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-617, although still experimental, obviously has strong potential to significantly benefit advanced-stage prostate cancer patients.

After the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting 68Ga-labeled PSMA-11 as a new PET tracer for prostate cancer (1), PSMA-617, a ligand with optimized tumor cell internalization and lowered kidney uptake containing the more universal DOTA chelator, was developed for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (2,3). For therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), various centers confirmed 177Lu-PSMA-617 to have a favorable dosimetry (4–6) and a convincing response in terms of both serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and radiologic findings (4,7). Nevertheless, about 30% of patients do not respond to 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands, and despite good tolerability in general, diffuse red marrow infiltration has been suggested as a risk factor for developing relevant hematologic toxicity (4). It has already been demonstrated that targeted α-radiation therapy with 213Bi-DOTATOC could break radioresistance to β-emitters while simultaneously reducing hematologic toxicity in patients with diffuse red marrow infiltration of neuroendocrine tumors (8).

Here, we report our initial experience with targeted 225Ac-PSMA-617 α-therapy in one patient in whom treatment with β-emitters was contraindicated (patient A) and one patient resistant to 177Lu-PSMA-617 (patient B).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Because these cases concern retrospective reports on findings in regular clinical care but not a systematic clinical trial, ethical approval was not needed. The patients were informed about the experimental nature of this therapy and gave written informed consent to receive it; both agreed to the publication of their individual patient history.

Patients

225Ac-PSMA-617 was offered as salvage therapy in accordance with paragraph 37, “Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice,” of the updated Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with German regulations, which include priority of approved treatments and confirmation of the indication by a nuclear medicine physician and an expert in urologic oncology. Patient A presented with diffuse red marrow infiltration of mCRPC, which was considered a contraindication for treatment with β-emitters, and patient B presented with peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases that were progressive under 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Both patients had undergone extensive pretreatment (Table 1).

View this table:
TABLE 1

Overview of Pretreatments

Radiopharmaceuticals

Good manufacturing practice–grade PSMA-11 and PSMA-617 were obtained from ABX. 225Ac was produced by radiochemical extraction from 229Th (9,10). 68Ga was eluted from a 68Ge/68Ga-generator on site. 177Lu was obtained from ITG. The labeling conditions for 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 177Lu-PSMA-617 have been described previously (4).

For radiolabeling of 225Ac-PSMA-617, an aliquot of 225Ac stock solution was added to a microwave vial containing 0.1 M Tris buffer (pH 9) and an appropriate amount of PSMA-617 stock solution. The reaction mixture was heated to 95°C for 5 min using a microwave synthesizer (Biotage Initiator).

Quality control was performed by instant thin-layer chromatography with 0.05 M citric acid (pH 5) as the solvent. After development, the chromatography strip was stored for at least 1 h until radiochemical equilibrium was obtained between 225Ac (half-life [T½], 9.9 d) and its daughter nuclide 221Fr (T½, 4.8 min). Subsequently, radiochemical purity was determined by measuring the activity of the 218-keV γ-emission of 221Fr on the upper and lower parts of the strip using high-resolution γ-spectrometry (Ortec). The mean radiochemical purity (±SD) of the radiolabeled peptide was 98.8% ± 0.8% at a specific activity of 0.17 ± 0.05 MBq/nmol.

After synthesis, an aliquot of ascorbic acid was added to the reaction mixture (to minimize radiolytic degradation of 225Ac-PSMA-617) together with an aliquot of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (to scavenge free radiometals). The final pH of the formulation was 7.4. Sterility was ensured via sterile filtration.

Imaging

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 177Lu-PSMA-617 emission scans were performed as described previously (1,6).

Posttherapy 225Ac-PSMA-617 scans were acquired using the 440-keV γ-coemission of 213Bi (26% emission probability), the 218-keV γ-coemission of 221Fr (12%), and the bremsstrahlung of 209Pb with a scan speed of 10 cm/min on a 2.54-cm-crystal (1-in) γ-camera (Hawkeye; GE Healthcare) equipped with a high-energy collimator.

RESULTS

Clinical Course of Patient A

After exhausting conventional therapies (Table 1), imaging with PSMA PET/CT was suggestive of diffuse red marrow infiltration (Fig. 1A). This was considered a contraindication for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Therefore, patient A was treated with 3 cycles of 9–10 MBq (100 kBq per kilogram of body weight) of 225Ac-PSMA-617 at bimonthly intervals. Posttherapeutic emission scans validated sufficient tumor targeting (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). Two months later, all previously PSMA-positive lesions had visually disappeared on PSMA PET/CT (Fig. 1B) and, accordingly, the PSA level had dropped from more than 3,000 ng/mL to 0.26 ng/mL. The patient received an additional 6 MBq of 225Ac-PSMA-617 as consolidation therapy, resulting in a further PSA decline to less than 0.1 ng/mL along with a complete imaging response (Fig. 1C).

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of patient A. Pretherapeutic tumor spread (A), restaging 2 mo after third cycle of 225Ac-PSMA-617 (B), and restaging 2 mo after one additional consolidation therapy (C).

After each cycle, the blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase level were checked every 2 wk. The platelet level never dropped below 100/nL (grade 1 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0), the total white blood cell count never dropped below 2.5/nL (grade 1), and the hemoglobin level never dropped below 9.5 g/dL (grade 2) (Fig. 2A). Moderate but enduring xerostomia was the only clinically reported side effect. A concordant decline in PSA level and alkaline phosphatase level (Fig. 2B) further underlined the excellent treatment response.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

Laboratory test follow-up of patient A. Arrows indicate administration of treatment cycles. (A) Blood cell count demonstrates moderate hematologic toxicity. (B) Decline of tumor markers to none measurable or reference range correlates with imaging response. AP = alkaline phosphatase; Hb = hemoglobin; PLT = platelets; WBC = white blood cells.

Clinical Course of Patient B

Conventional treatments were also exhausted for patient B, who had peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver infiltration (Fig. 3A) at the time that 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq per cycle) was offered as salvage therapy. The initial PSA level was 294 ng/mL. Despite sufficient tumor targeting as demonstrated by posttherapeutic emission scans (Supplemental Fig. 2), after cycle 2 the PSA level increased to 419 ng/mL and most lesions demonstrated tumor progression on PSMA PET/CT (Fig. 3B). Therapy was changed to 225Ac-PSMA-617, and the patient received 3 cycles of 6.4 MBq (100 kBq per kilogram of body weight) at bimonthly intervals. Restaging based on the PSMA PET/CT results finally indicated a partial response after 2 cycles (Fig. 3C) and a complete remission after 3 cycles (Fig. 3D). Laboratory tests revealed no relevant hematologic toxicity; PSA dropped to below the measurable level (<0.1 ng/mL) (Fig. 4). However, spray substitution of saliva had to be prescribed after the last cycle because of severe xerostomia.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of patient B. In comparison to initial tumor spread (A), restaging after 2 cycles of β-emitting 177Lu-PSMA-617 presented progression (B). In contrast, restaging after second (C) and third (D) cycles of α-emitting 225Ac-PSMA-617 presented impressive response.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Laboratory test follow-up of patient B. Arrows indicate administration of treatment cycles. Blood cell count (A) always stayed in reference range, and tumor marker PSA (B) finally declined to none measurable.

DISCUSSION

Here, we present a novel treatment concept for patients with mCRPC that is progressive under conventional therapy or β-emitting 177Lu-PSMA-617. Two patients in a clinically critical situation experienced remarkable benefit from targeted α-therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-617. This early observation from our study is of such high interest for scientists and clinicians in the field that we wanted to share it as a brief communication in advance of the full report.

PSMA radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617, itself an investigational treatment, has already demonstrated promising results (6,7). However, radioligand therapies based on β-particle emitters can have typical shortcomings, especially during treatment of patients with late-stage cancer.

One challenge is that the dose contribution of β-particles arising from bone metastases to the red marrow cannot be modeled sufficiently. If only a limited number of solid bone metastases are present, it is possible to neglect this dose contribution because the 498-keV β-energy of 177Lu corresponds to a tissue range of only 1.5 mm and the red marrow dose is typically estimated by sampling of peripheral blood. However, the blood-dose–based models are valid only if specific red marrow uptake of the radiopharmaceutical can be excluded; in the case of diffuse tumor infiltration, the red marrow self-dose can become the limiting factor. In this setting, targeted α-therapy can be beneficial because the 50- to 100-μm range of an α-particle (2–3 cell diameters) translates into a much more cell-specific radiotherapy (11). In analogy, targeting myeloblasts with a β-labeled 131I-CD33 antibody translates into bone marrow ablation (12), whereas an α-labeled 213Bi-CD33 antibody can eliminate myeloblasts cell-selectively with tolerable hematologic toxicity (13). Therefore, the remarkable low hematologic toxicity observed after treatment of patient A is reasonable.

In the available reports about 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands, approximately 30% of the patients were refractory a priori (6,7). In patients with neuroendocrine tumors refractory to 177Lu-labeled somatostatin analogs, it has already been demonstrated that targeted α-therapy can break radioresistance to β-radiation (8). In mCRPC, the α-emitting 223RaCl2 but not its β-emitting analog 89SrCl2 was demonstrated to improve survival (14). Therefore, it seems comprehensible that patient B, despite being refractory to 177Lu-radioligand therapy, could still be treated successfully with 225Ac-targeted α-therapy.

On the other hand, radioligand therapies based on α-particle emitters face other challenges. The nuclides suitable for medical application often are either hampered by an unfavorable half-life or decay with multiple unstable daughter nuclides. Because of the recoil of the α-decay and different chemical properties, the daughter nuclides can leave the chelator of the radioconjugate. If this happens on the cell surface, the bloodstream can translocate the activity into nontumor tissue. 225Ac (T½, 9.9 d) decays to the daughters 221Fr (T½, 4.8 min), 217At (T½, 33 ms), and 213Bi (T½, 45.6 min); each of these nuclides disintegrates with emission of one α-particle. To ensure that most of the 4 resulting α-emissions are on target, carrier-mediated internalization into the tumor cells is desired for 225Ac-targeted α-therapy.

The ligand PSMA-617 induces fast cellular internalization, with 54% and 75% of the total cell-associated activity internalized after 1 h and 3 h, respectively, of incubation in the LNCaP cell line (2). For the PSMA-targeted and then internalized antibody 225Ac-J591, sufficient tumor retention of the 225Ac daughter nuclides has already been demonstrated in vitro (15). Thus, radioligand therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-617 ideally matches the theoretic considerations for targeted α-therapy of mCRPC.

Nevertheless, the limited availability of 225Ac is still a key challenge for its clinical translation, and this shortage has to be solved before large studies are feasible. However, several methods of accelerator-driven production of 225Ac have already been described (16,17), and routine production of this radionuclide can be realized with manageable effort once a relevant demand is predictable. Our early results already indicate that 225Ac-targeted α-therapy has high potential for the epidemiologically important tumor entity prostate cancer, which presumably will further accelerate the routine availability of 225Ac for systematic clinical trials, for example.

CONCLUSION

The two impressive responses reported here demonstrate the high potential of 225Ac-PSMA-617 to significantly benefit mCRPC patients who are in a clinically critical situation, that is, patients with diffuse red marrow infiltration and resistance to other therapies. Investigation of this therapeutic modality in larger patient cohorts is warranted.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. A patent application for PSMA-617 (regardless of the radiolabeling nuclide) was submitted by Drs. Kopka and Haberkorn. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Jul. 7, 2016.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Avtzi E,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Benešová M,
    2. Schäfer M,
    3. Bauder-Wüst U,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation of a tailor-made DOTA-conjugated PSMA inhibitor with optimized linker moiety for imaging and endoradiotherapy of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:914–920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Benešová M,
    2. Bauder-Wüst U,
    3. Schäfer M,
    4. et al
    . Linker modification strategies to control the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting and pharmacokinetic properties of DOTA-conjugated PSMA inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2016;59:1761–1775.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Delker A,
    2. Fendler WP,
    3. Kratochwil C,
    4. et al
    . Dosimetry for 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617: a new radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:42–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Kabasakal L,
    2. AbuQbeitah M,
    3. Aygün A,
    4. et al
    . Pre-therapeutic dosimetry of normal organs and tissues of 177Lu-PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1976–1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Stefanova M,
    4. et al
    . PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with Lu-177 labeled PSMA-617. J Nucl Med. March 16, 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ahmadzadehfar H,
    2. Eppard E,
    3. Kürpig S,
    4. et al
    . Therapeutic response and side effects of repeated radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-DKFZ-617 of castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:12477–12488.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Bruchertseifer F,
    4. et al
    . 213Bi-DOTATOC receptor-targeted alpha-radionuclide therapy induces remission in neuroendocrine tumours refractory to beta radiation: a first-in-human experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2106–2119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Apostolidis C,
    2. Molinet R,
    3. Rasmussen G,
    4. Morgenstern A
    . Production of Ac-225 from Th-229 for targeted alpha therapy. Anal Chem. 2005;77:6288–6291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zielinska B,
    2. Apostolidis C,
    3. Bruchertseifer F,
    4. Morgenstern A
    . An improved method for the production of Ac-225/Bi-213 from Th-229 for targeted alpha therapy. Solvent Extr Ion Exch. 2007;25:339–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sgouros G,
    2. Roeske JC,
    3. McDevitt MR,
    4. et al
    . MIRD pamphlet no. 22 (abridged): radiobiology and dosimetry of alpha-particle emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:311–328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Schwartz MA,
    2. Lovett DR,
    3. Redner A,
    4. et al
    . Dose-escalation trial of M195 labeled with iodine 131 for cytoreduction and marrow ablation in relapsed or refractory myeloid leukemias. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:294–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Jurcic JG,
    2. Larson SM,
    3. Sgouros G,
    4. et al
    . Targeted alpha particle immunotherapy for myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2002;100:1233–1239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rubini G,
    2. Nicoletti A,
    3. Rubini D,
    4. Asabella AN
    . Radiometabolic treatment of bone-metastasizing cancer: from 186rhenium to 223radium. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2014;29:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. McDevitt MR,
    2. Ma D,
    3. Lai LT,
    4. et al
    . Tumor therapy with targeted atomic nanogenerators. Science. 2001;294:1537–1540.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Apostolidis C,
    2. Molinet R,
    3. McGinley J,
    4. Abbas K,
    5. Möllenbeck J,
    6. Morgenstern A
    . Cyclotron production of Ac-225 for targeted alpha therapy. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005;62:383–387.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Weidner JW,
    2. Mashnik SG,
    3. John KD,
    4. et al
    . 225Ac and 223Ra production via 800 MeV proton irradiation of natural thorium targets. Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70:2590–2595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication May 25, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication June 18, 2016.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

Keywords