Abstract
This paper discusses the benefits of obtaining 99mTc from non–fission reactor–produced low-specific-activity 99Mo. This scenario is based on establishing a diversified chain of facilities for the distribution of 99mTc separated from reactor-produced 99Mo by (n,γ) activation of natural or enriched Mo. Such facilities have expected lower investments than required for the proposed chain of cyclotrons for the production of 99mTc. Facilities can receive and process reactor-irradiated Mo targets then used for extraction of 99mTc over a period of 2 wk, with 3 extractions on the same day. Estimates suggest that a center receiving 1.85 TBq (50 Ci) of 99Mo once every 4 d can provide 1.48–3.33 TBq (40–90 Ci) of 99mTc daily. This model can use research reactors operating in the United States to supply current 99Mo needs by applying natural natMo targets. 99Mo production capacity can be enhanced by using 98Mo-enriched targets. The proposed model reduces the loss of 99Mo by decay and avoids proliferation as well as waste management issues associated with fission-produced 99Mo.
Several options are under consideration to ensure the uninterrupted supply of 99mTc for nuclear medicine applications (1–3). A recent article suggested the potential advantages of a diversified production approach using medium-energy cyclotrons to enhance 99mTc availability (4). Highly enriched 100Mo targets are irradiated with 18- to 25-MeV protons to yield 99mTc [100Mo(p,2n)99mTc]. As an example, a 1.5-g 100Mo solid target irradiated with 18-MeV protons at 240-μA beam current for 6 h can provide about 333 GBq (9 Ci) of 99mTc at end of bombardment (EOB) (5). The possibility of such a strategy will depend on daily irradiation of 100Mo targets and radiochemical processing to recover 99mTc as pertechnetate solution before distribution (Fig. 1). A large network of new cyclotron facilities having compliance with title 21 of Code of Federal Regulations part 212 or U.S. Pharmacopeia <823> for 99mTc production similar to existing PET radiopharmaceutical production facilities would be needed for the success of this model.
In this communication, we propose a similar scheme of diversified radiochemical processing facilities for reactor-produced low-specific-activity 99Mo for the preparation of 99mTc-pertechnetate (6). The distinct advantage of this strategy is based on optimal use of reactor-produced 99Mo by minimizing decay loss. It is estimated that, currently, approximately 60%–80% of 99Mo is lost from radioactive decay before facility receipt of 99Mo/99mTc generators (7). We estimate that by using only 1 or 2 of the existing U.S. nuclear reactors, our model could provide sufficient 99mTc to meet the entire U.S. requirement for 99mTc (Fig. 2).
HOW MUCH 99mTc IS REQUIRED?
Approximately 50,000 diagnostic procedures are estimated to be performed with 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals in the United States daily (3). Patient doses vary from a few hundred megabecquerels to a maximum of 1.1 GBq. The daily activity levels of 99mTc administered to all patients in the United States can be as high as 55.5 TBq (1,500 Ci). The total available 99mTc activity is not used because significant activity is lost through radioactive decay, and the actual U.S. 99mTc activity requirement could be about 111 TBq (3,000 Ci). If the proposed cyclotron route is used as the principal U.S. source of 99mTc, it would be expected that more than 300 distributed cyclotrons may be required, whereas the use of a couple of existing nuclear reactors would be expected to suffice for our alternative strategy.
DIVERSIFIED PROCESSING FACILITIES FOR REACTOR-PRODUCED LOW-SPECIFIC-ACTIVITY 99Mo
The reactor production of 99Mo by irradiating natural molybdenum trioxide was used earlier for the preparation of 99mTc but was mostly abandoned after the introduction and wide availability of the alumina-based 99Mo/99mTc column generator using fission-produced high-specific-activity 99Mo. We propose to revive this earlier accepted technology using a network of geographically diversified radiochemical processing facilities for the separation of 99mTc from 99Mo. The irradiated molybdenum targets can be transported to these radiochemical processing facilities, and the expected transportation time is less than 24 h either by road or air. As an example, irradiation of 25 g of a natMo powder target (i.e., as the oxide; 24.13% 98Mo) for 6 d in a reactor with an approximate flux of 6 × 1014 neutrons/cm2/s would result in the production of about 1.85 TBq (50 Ci) of 99Mo at EOB. Assuming a decay loss of about 25% during transport, 1.4 TBq (38 Ci) of 99Mo will be available for radiochemical processing. Recovering the irradiated dry powder and simple dissolution in sodium hydroxide solution provides sodium (99Mo) molybdate, the source of 99mTc. 99mTc can be separated using any one of the established methods (8). Solvent extraction using methyl ethyl ketone is effective and simple, and cost-effective automated modules can be developed for the preparation of high concentrations of no-carrier-added 99mTc activity (9). Alternatively, solid-phase extraction chromatographic separation also can be adapted (10).
Instead of a single 99mTc extraction from the irradiated target by the cyclotron route, the 99mTc can be extracted from 99Mo stock solution at frequent intervals—for instance, every 6 h beginning in the early morning—and transported to users either as pertechnetate or as finished radiopharmaceuticals. The 6-h 99mTc half-life allows easy distribution of radiopharmaceutical products. If the 99Mo processing facilities are established in the same location as cyclotron facilities used for 18F production, the existing 18F-FDG distribution network can be used for 99mTc products. Figure 3 shows the amount of 99mTc available from a single batch of 1.85 TBq (50 Ci) of 99Mo at EOB over a period of 12 d, with 3 extractions on the same day at 6-h intervals. About 9.62 TBq (260 Ci) of 99mTc can be obtained from a single 1.85-TBq (50-Ci) batch of 99Mo. This is in contrast to a single separation possible from a cyclotron-irradiated enriched 100Mo target.
An important cost-saving advantage of using reactor-produced low-specific-activity 99Mo is that usable quantities of 99mTc activity can be repeatedly extracted, for as long as 2 wk. Fresh lots of 99Mo could be supplied at 4-d intervals. Simultaneous operation of 3 batches of 99Mo and multiple daily extractions could manage to produce a sustained supply of 99mTc on a daily basis. Figure 4 illustrates the activity levels of 99Mo available on each day and the activity of 99mTc extractable on a daily basis. If 3 batches of 99Mo are available simultaneously in a processing center, the 99mTc activity available is expected to vary from 1.48 to 3.33 TBq (40–90 Ci) of 99mTc. In such a scenario, 60 such processing facilities could produce 111 TBq (3,000 Ci) of 99mTc, which is sufficient to conduct 50,000 daily investigations, the estimated current U.S. demand. Depending on the capacity available for irradiation, participation by a limited number of reactors in the United States could thus provide the entire U.S. 99mTc requirement. Such a 99Mo production scenario can be scaled up by a factor of approximately 4 with enriched 98Mo targets (>95% 98Mo), theoretically yielding up to 444 TBq (12,000 Ci) of 99mTc daily. Enriched targets can be recovered for reuse, a scenario similar to the recovery and reuse of 100Mo targets in the case of cyclotron production.
INVESTMENT NEEDED AT EACH PROCESSING FACILITY
Only moderate investment would be expected for each processing facility, with the basic essential requirements being based on the availability of licensed facilities equipped with the required shielding, ventilation, and waste-handling capabilities, which would also include 1 hot cell for processing the irradiated targets and 1 or 2 hot cells for installation of 99mTc/99Mo separation systems. Additional investment would be required for installation of automated modules for separation of 99mTc from 99Mo. The facility, as well as the hot cells used for placing the module for separation of 99mTc, must be compliant with good manufacturing practices, since the pertechnetate will be used for the formulation of radiopharmaceuticals. Facility compliance with title 21 of Code of Federal Regulations parts 210 and 211, and U.S. Pharmacopeia <797>, may in fact be expected to be easier with the reactor route than with processing of cyclotron targets, since both methyl ethyl ketone extraction and solid-phase chromatographic procedures have already received Food and Drug Administration approval.
The expected cost for equipment to set up such a facility having 2–3 hot cells together with a couple of automated modules would be in the range of 2–4 million dollars. The production capabilities of each 99mTc/99Mo separation unit could be as high as 1.48–1.85 TBq (40–50 Ci) of 99mTc per day, which translates to about 555 TBq (15,000 Ci) of 99mTc annually, or the equivalent of 500,000 patient doses. In conjunction with existing central radiopharmacies or cyclotron centers, it is possible that the 99Mo/99mTc radiochemical processing units could be economically operated, since the additional operational and infrastructure costs would be minimized.
ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED MODEL
Such a proposed production scenario would have several advantages that could improve the economics of the 99Mo/99mTc supply chain, since the concern about highly enriched uranium proliferation, waste generation, and disposal issues from the use of low enriched uranium would be avoided. The irradiation capacity of existing U.S. nuclear reactors would be used with no additional reactor facility investments, and the inherently difficult local production challenges required for direct cyclotron production of 99mTc using enriched 100Mo targets would also be avoided. Also, it remains to be seen whether the combined use of medical cyclotrons for routine production of both 18F and 99mTc will limit the available beam time required for PET tracer development. Such an effect would be expected to reduce the ability of these facilities to develop new agents and, in turn, might negatively impact patient care. The basic radiochemical processing concepts for 99Mo from reactor production are simpler than for processing of cyclotron targets for 99mTc production. Although cyclotron-irradiated 100Mo targets yield 99mTc only once, reactor-irradiated 98Mo targets provide 99mTc available from continuous ingrowth over an extended period. Although not required for 99Mo production from natMo, use of more expensive 98Mo-enriched targets will scale up 99Mo production by a factor of approximately 4. With enriched 98Mo targets, the unused 98Mo target can be recovered for future use much as is the necessary enriched 100Mo recovery from cyclotron targets. There would be minimum expected loss (<25%) of 99Mo in the proposed strategy from parent radioactive decay, since 99mTc can be extracted from the irradiated target within 24 h after EOB, whereas decay of about 70%–80% of 99Mo produced at EOB occurs before the initiation of alumina-based 99Mo/99mTc column generator use.
CONCLUSION
We have suggested a model for enhancing the availability of 99mTc by having a diversified chain of radiochemical processing laboratories for processing low-specific-activity 99Mo. The model can work with the cooperation of a couple of existing U.S. reactors and with far lower investment than what is anticipated for evolving alternative models. We suggest the timeliness of a serious effort on the part of the nuclear medicine community, reactor facilities, commercial radiopharmaceutical entities, and policy makers to discuss the merit of the proposed model and implement the same to enhance the availability of 99mTc and to address proliferation issues.
DISCLOSURE
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Footnotes
Published online Dec. 23, 2014.
- © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
REFERENCES
- Received for publication October 24, 2014.
- Accepted for publication December 4, 2014.