Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

Best practices in NaF-PET/CT bone imaging in oncology

Michael Everding, Richelle Millican-Campbell, Tracy Moody, Tinsu Pan, Brandon Simon, Michael Stancel, Nancy Swanston and Eric Rohren
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2502;
Michael Everding
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richelle Millican-Campbell
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracy Moody
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tinsu Pan
2Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon Simon
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Stancel
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy Swanston
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Rohren
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2502

Objectives PET/CT bone imaging with 18F-NaF is currently covered by Medicare through a Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program. The objective was to determine the added value of utilizing 18F-NaF alongside new imaging technologies for castrate resistant prostate cancer patients that qualified for the 18F-NaF NOPR program.

Methods The patient experience was reviewed from ordering of exam to image interpretation, focusing on enhancing patient satisfaction and incorporating new imaging technologies to current clinical practices. Current radiotracer availability was analyzed along with new emerging lines of therapy to assess demand moving forward.

Results Total study time for the patient decreased from 3.5-4hrs (typical study duration using methylene diphosphonate (MDP)) to 1.5 hours by using 18F-NaF. Additionally, the use of continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisition, coupled with a time-of-flight (TOF) + point-spread-function (PSF) reconstruction, has decreased imaging time from 45 minutes to 28 minutes; resulting in an increase in patient satisfaction. Even though total radiation dose to the patient is higher with 18F-NaF (24.7 mSv) when compared to MDP (8.05 mSv), the enhanced spatial resolution and sensitivity of 18F-NaF has led to more accurate image interpretation and more complete staging of the patient's disease process. Finally, recent global shortages of Tc-99m have caused alterations to clinical practices, increasing the demand for the more available 18F-NaF radiotracer.

Conclusions By utilizing 18F-NaF instead of the less dependable MDP for skeletal imaging, we have saved our patients over 2 hours of time in the clinic. Incorporating CBM with TOF+PSF has decreased our imaging time to 28 minutes and vastly increased our patient satisfaction. Finally, higher spatial resolution has increased the accuracy of image interpretation and disease staging.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Best practices in NaF-PET/CT bone imaging in oncology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Best practices in NaF-PET/CT bone imaging in oncology
Michael Everding, Richelle Millican-Campbell, Tracy Moody, Tinsu Pan, Brandon Simon, Michael Stancel, Nancy Swanston, Eric Rohren
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2502;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Best practices in NaF-PET/CT bone imaging in oncology
Michael Everding, Richelle Millican-Campbell, Tracy Moody, Tinsu Pan, Brandon Simon, Michael Stancel, Nancy Swanston, Eric Rohren
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2502;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • The effects of reconstruction parameters on the heterogeneity of the F-18 distribution analyzed according to three analytic methods
  • Validation of performance characteristic of non-metallic silica based adsorbent 68Ge/68Ga generator system: single institution experience
  • Correlation of Ictal/Interictal SPECT subtraction with MEG and EEG
Show more Technologist

Technologist Papers I: Professional Practices, Radiopharmaceutical Science, Biology, Dosimetry, Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

  • Initial clinical experience in digital PET/CT
  • Evaluation of the effect of fasting and exercise on uptake of Tc-99m sestamibi in breast tissue
Show more Technologist Papers I: Professional Practices, Radiopharmaceutical Science, Biology, Dosimetry, Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire