Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

Nuclear facility perception of accreditation. Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Survey

Mary Farrell, Louis Bezold, John Choi, Kevin Cockroft, Heather Gornik, Gary Heller, Scott Jerome, Sandra Katanick and Warren Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2501;
Mary Farrell
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis Bezold
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Choi
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Cockroft
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Gornik
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Heller
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Jerome
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Katanick
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warren Manning
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2501

Objectives The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) requires accreditation for all nonhospital suppliers of Nuclear Medicine and PET studies as a condition of reimbursement. The perceptions of these facilities regarding the value and impact of the accreditation process are unknown. We conducted an electronic survey to assess the value of accreditation.

Methods A request to participate in an electronic survey was sent to the medical and technical directors (n=5271) of all Nuclear Medicine/PET facilities who had received IAC accreditation. Demographic information; as well as, opinions on the value of accreditation as it relates to 16 quality metrics were obtained.

Results There were 664 Nuclear Medicine/PET respondents of which 26% were hospital-based and 74% were nonhospital-based. Of the quality metrics examined, the process was perceived as leading to improvements by a majority of all respondents for 10 (63%) metrics including report standardization, report completeness, guideline adherence, deficiency identification, report timeliness, staff knowledge, facility distinction, deficiency correction, acquisition standardization, and image quality. Overall, the global perceived improvement was greater for hospital-based facilities (63% vs. 57%; p<0.001). Ninety-five percent of respondents felt that accreditation was important. Hospital-based facilities were more likely to feel that accreditation demonstrates a commitment to quality (43% vs. 33%, p=0.029), while nonhospital-based facilities were more likely to feel accreditation is important for reimbursement (50% vs. 29%, p=<0.001).

Conclusions Although the accreditation process is demanding, the results of the IAC survey indicate that the accreditation process has a positive perceived impact for the majority of examined quality metrics, suggesting the facilities find the process to be valuable. The perceived improvement was greater for hospital-based facilities for which accreditation is voluntary.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear facility perception of accreditation. Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Nuclear facility perception of accreditation. Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Survey
Mary Farrell, Louis Bezold, John Choi, Kevin Cockroft, Heather Gornik, Gary Heller, Scott Jerome, Sandra Katanick, Warren Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2501;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nuclear facility perception of accreditation. Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Survey
Mary Farrell, Louis Bezold, John Choi, Kevin Cockroft, Heather Gornik, Gary Heller, Scott Jerome, Sandra Katanick, Warren Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2501;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • The effects of reconstruction parameters on the heterogeneity of the F-18 distribution analyzed according to three analytic methods
  • Facile automated synthesis of [18F]fluoromethyl-d2 group in a commercial 18F-synthetic module
  • Correlation of Ictal/Interictal SPECT subtraction with MEG and EEG
Show more Technologist

Technologist Papers I: Professional Practices, Radiopharmaceutical Science, Biology, Dosimetry, Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

  • Initial clinical experience in digital PET/CT
  • Evaluation of the effect of fasting and exercise on uptake of Tc-99m sestamibi in breast tissue
  • Best practices in NaF-PET/CT bone imaging in oncology
Show more Technologist Papers I: Professional Practices, Radiopharmaceutical Science, Biology, Dosimetry, Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire