Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Value of FDG PET/CT in the assessment of chemotherapy response of germ cell cancer

Yamin Dou, Lawrence Rickabaugh, Jian Yu and Edward Pinkus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1655;
Yamin Dou
1Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence Rickabaugh
1Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Yu
2Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Pinkus
1Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1655

Objectives The goal of this study is to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT for monitoring chemotherapy response in patients with metastatic germ cell cancer.

Methods 16 pts age between 28 to 61y (42.1y±10.2y) who underwent chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell cancer (9 seminoma, 6 non-seminoma) and post-therapy FDG PET/CT scans were included. 14 had both pre and post-therapy scans, among them 5 also had interim scans (before the completion of therapy regiments). 2 pts did not have a pre-therapy scan and one of them had an interim scan. PET/CT was performed on a GE 64 slice scanner (Discovery STE) with average 15 mci of F-18 FDG . Correlation CT scans were performed with contrast (7 pts) or without contrast (9 pts). Pts with negative FDG PET/CT scans were followed clinically. Positive scans were compared with pathology.

Results All pre-therapy scans showed abnormal FDG uptake in metastatic lesions with SUVmax ranges from 1.6 to 17.5, average 8.8±5.7. Post-therapy scans in 13 pts had no abnormal FDG uptake (SUVmax below or equal to background activity). Among these 13 responders, 10 patients had residual adenopathy and only 2 pts had resolution of adenopathy on CT. One pt had only bone metastases which were not appreciated on CT. All 13 pts that had negative FDG uptake after therapy remained disease free during clinical follow up an average of 27.8 ±14.8 months (ranges 6 to 60 months). All six interim studies showed complete resolution of abnormal uptake and was confirmed by post-therapy scans. One seminoma and two non-seminoma patients had positive uptake ( SUVmax >2.8) after standard chemotherapy. All had confirmed active disease pathologically. Two pts died shortly after completion of initial therapy. One had recurrence even after resection of positive nodal disease. The sensitivity and specificity of predicting post-therapy response based on FDG activity were both 100%.

Conclusions Post-therapy and likely interim FDG PET/CT are very accurate in the assessment of chemotherapy response for metastatic germ cell cancer.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Value of FDG PET/CT in the assessment of chemotherapy response of germ cell cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Value of FDG PET/CT in the assessment of chemotherapy response of germ cell cancer
Yamin Dou, Lawrence Rickabaugh, Jian Yu, Edward Pinkus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1655;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Value of FDG PET/CT in the assessment of chemotherapy response of germ cell cancer
Yamin Dou, Lawrence Rickabaugh, Jian Yu, Edward Pinkus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1655;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Interim FDG-PET/CT Interpreted with Qualitative Visual Trichotomous Assessment Criteria Predict Treatment Failure in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of amino acid transporters in 136 prostate cancer samples
  • F-18 FDG PET/CT and SLN scintigraphy in primary penile cancer - a comparison with histopathology
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Prostate/GU Posters

  • Radiographic and laboratory assessment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing Radium-223 dichloride therapy
  • Comparative assessment of skeletal uptake on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT versus F-18 Fluoride PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of asymptomatic RCC patients after surgery : Can substitute conventional imaging?
Show more MTA I: Prostate/GU Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire