Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Preclinical Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Fluorescence Imaging

Michael A. Liss, Salman Farshchi-Heydari, Zhengtao Qin, Sean A. Hickey, David J. Hall, Christopher J. Kane and David R. Vera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2014, 55 (9) 1552-1556; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.140871
Michael A. Liss
1Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
2UCSD Moores Cancer Center. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salman Farshchi-Heydari
3Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
4UCSD In Vivo Cancer and Molecular Imaging Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhengtao Qin
3Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
4UCSD In Vivo Cancer and Molecular Imaging Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
5Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean A. Hickey
6Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Hall
3Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
4UCSD In Vivo Cancer and Molecular Imaging Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Kane
1Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
2UCSD Moores Cancer Center. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
6Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Vera
2UCSD Moores Cancer Center. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
3Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
4UCSD In Vivo Cancer and Molecular Imaging Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
6Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

An ideal substance to provide convenient and accurate targeting for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping during robotic-assisted surgery has yet to be found. We used an animal model to determine the ability of the FireFly camera system to detect fluorescent SLNs after administration of a dual-labeled molecular imaging agent. Methods: We injected the footpads of New Zealand White rabbits with 1.7 or 8.4 nmol of tilmanocept labeled with 99mTc and a near-infrared fluorophore, IRDye800CW. One and 36 h after injection, popliteal lymph nodes, representing the SLNs, were dissected with the assistance of the FireFly camera system, a fluorescence-capable endoscopic imaging system. After excision of the paraaortic lymph nodes, which represented non-SLNs, we assayed all lymph nodes for radioactivity and fluorescence intensity. Results: Fluorescence within all popliteal lymph nodes was easily detected by the FireFly camera system. Fluorescence within the lymph channel could be imaged during the 1-h studies. When compared with the paraaortic lymph nodes, the popliteal lymph nodes retain greater than 95% of the radioactivity at both 1 and 36 h after injection. At both doses (1.7 and 8.4 nmol), the popliteal nodes had higher (P < 0.050) optical fluorescence intensity than the paraaortic nodes at the 1- and 36-h time points. Conclusion: The FireFly camera system can easily detect tilmanocept labeled with a near-infrared fluorophore at least 36 h after administration. This ability will permit image acquisition and subsequent verification of fluorescence-labeled SLNs during robotic-assisted surgery.

  • fluorescent tilmanocept
  • sentinel lymph node mapping
  • robotic-assisted surgery

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection and excision is becoming incorporated in breast cancer and melanoma surgery (1,2). However, there has been less progress with genitourinary cancers largely because of the limitations in available agents with favorable timing parameters from injection to imaging and surgery. For example, prostate cancer has considerable variation regarding the decision to perform, or the extent of, pelvic lymph node dissection based on preoperative risk factors (3–5). The previously limited pelvic lymph node dissection usually does not include high-risk nodes, causing the current risk of positive lymph nodes to be lower than predicted (5). SLN biopsy in prostate cancer has been shown to accurately predict positive lymph nodes and, pending further research, may parallel the excellent results of SLN biopsy in breast cancer and melanoma (6,7).

Limitations in previous studies include logistics and cumbersome intraoperative γ detectors. However, the endoscope used in minimally invasive surgery has provided a platform for fluorescence-guided surgery. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved 99mTc-labeled tilmanocept (8), which is the first receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical approved for lymphatic mapping (9–12). The benefits of receptor targeting allow the agent to bind and remain within SLN, providing logistic flexibility. Radiolabeled tilmanocept can be used to provide a preoperative roadmap using imaging with SPECT/CT (11) or PET/CT (13); however, a laparoscopic γ detector would still be necessary (14). The ideal agent for robotic surgery would be the use of tilmanocept also labeled with a fluorophore for intraoperative visualization by the currently used FireFly endoscope (Da Vinci Si surgical robot; Intuitive Surgical) and the option of preoperative imaging.

In preparation for a phase 1 clinical trial, we investigated the use of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept for SLN imaging using the FireFly endoscope. Our primary goal was to confirm the ability of the robotic camera to visualize the fluorescence accumulated within the SLN. We tested this ability at different molar doses of fluorescent tilmanocept and at different times after administration. Confirmation of SLN fluorescence imaging by the FireFly camera will provide us with the approximate molar dose and timing parameters with which to perform robotic-assisted fluorescence-based mapping of pelvic SLNs many hours after an ultrasound-guided transrectal injection of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept into the canine prostate gland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Design

These experiments were designed to test the ability of the Da Vinci Si FireFly camera system to detect fluorescent SLNs resulting from the accumulation of 800CW-tilmanocept. Our goal was to determine the amount of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept that could be detected by the FireFly system but would not saturate the SLN and carry fluorescence to downstream lymph nodes, which would be falsely identified as SLNs. We elected to use a rabbit model that was used during the development of 99mTc-tilmanocept (15–17). In this model, a hind-limb administration of the fluorescence-labeled radiotracer would define the popliteal lymph node as the sentinel node and the paraaortic lymph nodes as the downstream lymph nodes. At a predetermined time point, the rabbits were euthanized before fluorescence-guided dissection using the FireFly endoscope attached to the Da Vinci Si robotic surgical system. Images were acquired with the standard clinical software and a modification that permitted the visualization of only the green fluorescence image in the operator console of the surgical robot. This modification, which will be incorporated into future versions of the da Vinci software, essentially turned off the white light of the camera system. After euthanasia, images were acquired over the popliteal fossa before surgical incision and after surgical exposure, when the SLN can be viewed without attenuation by overlying tissue. Four rabbits were used for each of 2 dose levels (1.7 and 8.4 nmol) and each of 2 imaging time points (1 and 36 h), for a total of 16 rabbits. After euthanasia, the popliteal and paraaortic lymph nodes were excised via open dissection.

Imaging Agent Preparation and Administration

The preparation and quality control of 99mTc-labeled 800CW-tilmanocept was performed using a previously described method (18). The 800CW-tilmanocept used in this study consisted of an average of 1.5 IRDye800CW molecules covalently attached to each tilmanocept molecule. The resulting molecular weight was approximately 18,000 g/mol. Quality control before each animal study was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography and instant thin-layer chromatography; both methods used fluorescence and radioactivity detection. Acceptance criteria required that both the radiochemical purity and the fluorescence purity be greater than 97%.

Our animal protocol was approved by the University of California, San Diego, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and the research staff was appropriately trained. We anesthetized New Zealand White rabbits with ketamine (Fort Dodge Animal Health) and xylazine (Vedco Inc.). The 0.10-mL injections each contained 3.7–7.4 MBq (0.10–0.20 mC) of 99mTc and 1 of 2 quantities of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept (1.7 or 8.4 nmol). Each volume was administered to both hind footpads of each rabbit with a 28-gauge needle. We monitored the rabbits after anesthesia visually and with an oximeter that measures heart rate and functional oxygen saturation.

FireFly Fluorescence Imaging Endoscope

The FireFly fluorescence imaging endoscope is an optional component of the DaVinci Si robotic-assisted surgical system. The endoscope uses near-infrared light with an 805-nm-wavelength excitation laser source. We investigated the ideal visualization characteristics of 800CW-tilmanocept by turning off the background white light of the FireFly system. We also tested the detection ability of the camera system using the standard clinical firmware and hardware.

Nuclear Counting

Each node was placed in a plastic scintillation vial and assayed for radioactivity using a γ well counter (100- to 200-keV energy window, Gamma 9000; Beckman Instruments). The nodes were compared with a counting standard that was prepared from a known dilution of the injected material. The accumulation of 99mTc-800CW-tilmanocept within each SLN was expressed as percentage injected dose, which was calculated by comparing the tissue counts with the counting standard. The amount of fluorescent dye, IRDye800CW, was calculated by multiplying the percentage injected dose times the number of dyes per tilmanocept times the amount of 800CW-tilmanocept administered to each hind paw times 0.01. The percentage extraction ESLN of popliteal lymph nodes for each animal was calculated by Equation 1, where the cpmLP, cpmRP, and cpmPA represent the counts per minute within the left popliteal, right popliteal, and paraaortic lymph nodes, respectively.Embedded ImageEq. 1

Fluorescence Imaging

Ex vivo optical imaging was performed with a time-correlated single-photon fluorescence imaging system (Optix MX2; Advanced Research Technologies). Images were acquired for each excised lymph node using a scan resolution of 1 mm2 and a 758-nm pulsed laser diode with an 800-MHz frequency and a 0.3-s integration time. Emitted photons were collected through a pair of 780-nm long-pass filters and a 782-nm band-pass filter, both with a 20-nm bandwidth. For each node, the total fluorescence intensity (counts per minute) was determined by an operator-defined region of interest and reported in kilocounts per second per microwatt (kcts·s−1·μW−1).

Statistical Analysis

The Friedman test for nonparametric paired samples (right popliteal, left popliteal, and paraaortic lymph nodes) was used, with a P value of less than 0.05 needed for statistical significance. Data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package (version 21; IBM) and reported as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Visualization of Fluorescent SLNs

The FireFly endoscope attached to the Da Vinci Si robotic surgical system visualized all of the popliteal lymph nodes at 1 and 36 h after administration of 1.7 or 8.4 nmol of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept. Fluorescence visualization of all lymph nodes was possible with the FireFly endoscope using both the factory settings and the modified software, which turned off the white-light image at the viewing consol. Visualization of afferent lymph channels was possible 1 h after injection. Surgical exposure was not required for visualization of the SLN fluorescence when the duration between imaging and injection was 36 h. Four lymph nodes of the 1-h studies were also visualized behind the muscle layer without the need for surgical exposure.

Figure 1 demonstrates the fluorescence detection of an SLN and its afferent lymph channels by the FireFly camera. This was accomplished at the lower of the 2 doses, 1.7 nmol of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept, and without surgical exposure of the lymph node or the afferent lymph channels. Figure 1A is a bright-field image of a rabbit hind-limb acquired 1 h after a 1.7-nmol injection of 800CW-tilmanocept. After the switch to fluorescence mode (Fig. 1B), fluorescence could be visualized traveling up the lymphatic channel (arrow) to the SLN located in the popliteal fossa (arrow in Fig. 1C). Figure 1D is a fluorescence-mode image of the SLN (arrow), which accumulated 15 pmol of fluorescence-labeled tilmanocept to which 25 pmol of IRDye800CW was covalently attached. After excision, the SLN produced a fluorescence intensity of 8.6 kcts·s−1·μW−1. The paraaortic lymph nodes contained 0.14 pmol of 800CW-tilmanocept (0.20 pmol IRDye800CW), which produced a fluorescence intensity of 0.16 kcts·s−1·μW−1. The percentage extraction was 98.3%. The fluorescence images (Figs. 1B and 1D) use a modification of the console software that allows visualization of only the fluorescence image from the FireFly camera.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

The FireFly endoscope attached to Da Vinci Si robotic surgical system visualized all popliteal lymph nodes at 1 and 36 h after administration of 1.7 or 8.4 nmol of 99mTc-labeled fluorescent tilmanocept. (A) Bright-field image of rabbit hind-limb was acquired 1 h after 1.7-nmol injection of 800CW-tilmanocept. (B) After switch to fluorescence mode, lymphatic channel (arrow) was visualized. (C and D) On repositioning of camera to visualize popliteal region (arrow, C), fluorescence mode visualized SLN (arrow, D) without surgical exposure. SLN accumulated 0.87% of injected dose (25 pmol of IRDye800CW).

SLN Accumulation

Table 1 lists the means and relative SDs of the various measurements of SLN accumulation—percentage injected dose, amount of fluorescent dye, percentage extraction, and fluorescence intensity—for each of the experimental groups (1 h after a 1.7-nmol 800CW-tilmanocept injection, 36 h after a 1.7-mol injection, 1 h after an 8.4-nmol injection, and 36 h after an 8.4-nmol injection).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

SLN Accumulation

SLN accumulation was higher at 1 h after injection than at the later time point. At 1 h, the mean and SD of the percentage injected dose from the 8 SLNs receiving the 1.7-nmol dose of 800CW-tilmanocept was 0.95% ± 0.78%; at 36 h the percentage injected dose was 0.56% ± 0.39%. The 8.4-nmol dose delivered 1.64% ± 0.77% at 1 h and 1.21% ± 0.33% at 36 h. 800CW-tilmanocept delivered more fluorescent dye using the higher dose (8.4 nmol) at 1 h from injection (0.21 ± 0.10 vs. 0.024 ± 0.020 pmol; P < 0.05) and at 36 h after injection (0.15 ± 0.04 vs. 0.014 ± 0.0.010 pmol; P < 0.05). The fluorescence intensity of all the paraaortic nodes was less than 10% of the popliteal lymph nodes. At both doses (1.7 and 8.4 nmol), the popliteal nodes had higher (P < 0.050) optical fluorescence intensity than the paraaortic nodes at the 1- and 36-h time points. The percentage SLN extraction for all the experimental groups was greater than 95%, indicating the lack of SLN saturation at both low and high doses (1.7 and 8.4 nmol) of 800CW-tilmanocept. The 8.4-nmol dose produced higher fluorescence intensity with the SLNs at both time points: 19.1 ± 9.23 kcts·s−1·μW−1 1 h after injection and 11.6 ± 4.24 kcts·s−1·μW−1 36 h after injection. The 1.7-nmol dose of 800CW-tilmanocept produced a fluorescence intensity of 6.22 ± 2.45 kcts·s−1·μW−1 at 1 h and 8.62 ± 3.72 kcts·s−1·μW−1 at 36 h. Increasing the amount of 800CW-tilmanocept injected produced a significantly higher (P < 0.05) fluorescence intensity at both time points.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that the FireFly endoscopic camera system of the Da Vinci Si surgical system can image fluorescent SLNs resulting from an 8.4-nmol injection of 800CW-tilmanocept and that this can be accomplished without receptor saturation within the SLN. Moreover, when imaging is performed at the appropriate time, the FireFly camera can visualize fluorescence from afferent lymph channels.

Previous animal studies using the New Zealand White rabbit model have shown that without a molecular or physiologic mechanism to retain the imaging agent within the lymph node, nearly all 99mTc had passed through the SLNs by 6 h after injection (15–17). Using 99mTc-labeled 800CW-tilmanocept, we show that radioactivity levels can be detected in popliteal lymph nodes at 1 and 36 h after footpad injection in a rabbit model. The molecule is retained within the popliteal lymph node and does not significantly migrate to the next level of lymph nodes (paraaortic) or significantly dissipate over time. These results suggest that the receptor binds within 1 h and will stay localized up to 36 h, allowing for flexibility in image acquisition with nuclear medicine scanning before surgery. The use of imaging before surgery to identify SLNs has been shown to reduce operative time when compared with γ probe–guided lymph node dissections during radical prostatectomy (19,20).

Pelvic lymphadenectomy during radical prostatectomy provides staging information that may guide adjuvant therapy (21–25). The extent and definition of the pelvic lymph node dissection are controversial (5,26,27). Studies have shown that limited pelvic lymph node dissection resects only 35% of the primary landing zones of prostate-draining lymph nodes (28). Therefore, the SLN dissection has become an emerging concept during radical prostatectomy to tailor surgery and decrease the risk-to-benefit ratio of lymph node dissection by resecting only high-yield nodes (7,29,30). Moreover, this technique may reduce the complications of increasingly extensive lymph node dissections (i.e., lymphocele, lymphedema, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) (31). One of the initial studies of SLN dissection was performed by Wawroschek et al. by injecting 99mTc-labeled colloid into the prostate and performing dynamic lymphoscintigraphy followed by surgery with γ-probe guidance the next day (29). This concept was later confirmed in a study with over 1,000 prostatectomies. That study noted that only 1% of metastases were found in patients with negative SLNs; however, the study did not provide intraoperative visual confirmation with fluorescence (32).

Previous investigations have added indocyanine green (ICG) to fluorescently image lymph channels and SLNs. One study used 99mTc-labeled Nanocoll (GE Healthcare) to image before radical prostatectomy followed by a separate ICG injection at the time of surgery (33). A separate study used a mixture of ICG and 99mTc-labeled Nanocoll imaged by SPECT/CT 2 h after injection, followed by surgery within the hour (20). The use of an ICG-radiolabeled Nanocoll mixture assumes that the dye binds to Nanocoll with adequate affinity for valid SLN mapping. Both studies using ICG detection showed accurate results (34); however, the use of ICG in this manner requires multiple injections or an extra compounding step by a pharmacist. Moreover, Nanocoll is prepared from human blood and can have similar risks to transfusion. Lastly, Nanocoll is not available in the United States. Therefore, using a non–blood-based dual-labeled receptor-targeted molecule such as 800CW-tilmanocept may have better logistic properties with reduced risk. In addition to determining the benefit of the 36-h interval, we also established that the larger dose (8.4 nmol) provided improved fluorescence without saturation and migration to next-level lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

99mTc-tilmanocept covalently tagged with IRDye800CW can provide fluorescence detection of SLNs by the FireFly endoscope used during robotic surgery. Detection can be achieved with and without background white light. The molecule remains in the SLN at the 2 tested doses for at least 36 h to allow image acquisition and subsequent surgical verification via fluorescence guidance. Further in vivo (35) and subsequent human studies are needed to provide more information on the feasibility and accuracy of this technology during robotic surgery.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (P50 CA114745, P30 CA023100) and Intuitive Surgical. Intuitive provided software modifications to the Da Vinci Si robotic system and the FireFly endoscope adjustments. Otherwise they were not involved in the design, analysis, or writing of this article. Dr. Vera is the inventor of tilmanocept. Dr. Kane is a consultant or has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical Inc. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank LiCOR Biosciences for supplying the IRDye 800CW NHS-ester dye and Dr. Jonathan Sorger of Intuitive Surgical for his assistance with software modifications of the Da Vinci Si robotic surgical system.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jul. 14, 2014.

  • © 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Krag DN,
    2. Anderson SJ,
    3. Julian TB,
    4. et al
    . Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927–933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Valsecchi ME,
    2. Silbermins D,
    3. de Rosa N,
    4. Wong SL,
    5. Lyman GH
    . Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1479–1487.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Briganti A,
    2. Blute ML,
    3. Eastham JH,
    4. et al
    . Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1251–1265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Touijer KA,
    2. Ahallal Y,
    3. Guillonneau BD
    . Indications for and anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: practice patterns of uro-oncologists in North America. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:1517–1521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yuh BE,
    2. Ruel NH,
    3. Mejia R,
    4. Wilson CM,
    5. Wilson TG
    . Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1004–1010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Winter A,
    2. Kneib T,
    3. Henke RP,
    4. Wawroschek F
    . Sentinel lymph node dissection in more than 1200 prostate cancer cases: rate and prediction of lymph node involvement depending on preoperative tumor characteristics. Int J Urol. 2014;21:58–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Holl G,
    2. Dorn R,
    3. Wengenmair H,
    4. Weckermann D,
    5. Sciuk J
    . Validation of sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: experience in more than 2,000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1377–1382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    FDA approves Lymphoseek to help locate lymph nodes in patients with certain cancers. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(5):20N.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Leong SP,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Ross M,
    4. et al
    . A phase 2 study of 99mTc-tilmanocept in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma and breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:961–969.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Sondak VK,
    2. King DW,
    3. Zager JS,
    4. et al
    . Combined analysis of phase III trials evaluating [99mTc]tilmanocept and vital blue dye for identification of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:680–688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wallace AM,
    2. Han LK,
    3. Povoski SP,
    4. et al
    . Comparative evaluation of [99mTc]tilmanocept for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients: results of two phase 3 trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2590–2599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Marcinow AM,
    2. Hall N,
    3. Byrum E,
    4. Teknos TN,
    5. Old MO,
    6. Agrawal A
    . Use of a novel receptor-targeted (CD206) radiotracer, 99mTc-tilmanocept, and SPECT/CT for sentinel lymph node detection in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: initial institutional report in an ongoing phase 3 study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:895–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Stroup SP,
    2. Kane CJ,
    3. Farchshchi-Heydari S,
    4. et al
    . Preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping of the prostate using PET/CT fusion imaging and Ga-68-labeled tilmanocept in a dog model. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012;29:673–680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wallace AM,
    2. Ellner SJ,
    3. Mendez J,
    4. et al
    . Minimally invasive sentinel lymph node mapping of the pig colon with Lymphoseek. Surgery. 2006;139:217–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Vera DR,
    2. Wisner ER,
    3. Stadalnik RC
    . Sentinel node imaging via a nonparticulate receptor-binding radiotracer. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:530–535.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Vera DR,
    2. Wallace AM,
    3. Hoh CK,
    4. Mattrey RF
    . A synthetic macromolecule for sentinel node detection: [99mTc]DTPA-mannosyl-dextran. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:951–959.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hoh CK,
    2. Wallace AM,
    3. Vera DR
    . Preclinical studies of [99mTc]DPTA-mannosyl-dextran. Nucl Med Biol. 2003;30:457–464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Qin Z,
    2. Hall DJ,
    3. Liss MA,
    4. et al
    . Optimization via specific fluorescence brightness of a receptor-targeted probe for optical imaging and positron emission tomography of sentinel lymph nodes. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:101315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Warncke SH,
    2. Mattei A,
    3. Fuechsel FG,
    4. Z’Brun S,
    5. Krause T,
    6. Studer UE
    . Detection rate and operating time required for gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node resection after injection of technetium-99m nanocolloid into the prostate with and without preoperative imaging. Eur Urol. 2007;52:126–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. van der Poel HG,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Brouwer OR,
    4. Valdes Olmos RA,
    5. van Leeuwen FW
    . Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:826–833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Messing EM,
    2. Manola J,
    3. Sarosdy M,
    4. Wilding G,
    5. Crawford ED,
    6. Trump D
    . Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1781–1788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. Joslyn SA,
    2. Konety BR
    . Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:121–125.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Passoni NM,
    2. Abdollah F,
    3. Suardi N,
    4. et al
    . Head-to-head comparison of lymph node density and number of positive lymph nodes in stratifying the outcome of patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:e21–e28.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.
    1. Briganti A,
    2. Karnes JR,
    3. Da Pozzo LF,
    4. et al
    . Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer: a new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol. 2009;55:261–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Abdollah F,
    2. Suardi N,
    3. Cozzarini C,
    4. et al
    . Selecting the optimal candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a long-term survival analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63:998–1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Weingärtner K,
    2. Ramaswamy A,
    3. Bittinger A,
    4. Gerharz EW,
    5. Voge D,
    6. Riedmiller H
    . Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol. 1996;156:1969–1971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Yee DS,
    2. Katz DJ,
    3. Godoy G,
    4. et al
    . Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical technique and initial experience. Urology. 2010;75:1199–1204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mattei A,
    2. Fuechsel FG,
    3. Bhatta Dhar N,
    4. et al
    . The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study. Eur Urol. 2008;53:118–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wawroschek F,
    2. Vogt H,
    3. Weckermann D,
    4. Wagner T,
    5. Harzmann R
    . The sentinel lymph node concept in prostate cancer: first results of gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node identification. Eur Urol. 1999;36:595–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jeschke S,
    2. Beri A,
    3. Grull M,
    4. et al
    . Laparoscopic radioisotope-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in staging of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:126–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Briganti A,
    2. Chun FK,
    3. Salonia A,
    4. et al
    . Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1006–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Weckermann D,
    2. Hamm M,
    3. Dorn R,
    4. Wagner T,
    5. Wawroschek F,
    6. Harzmann R
    . Sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Experience after more than 800 interventions [in German].Urologe A. 2006;45:723–727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Jeschke S,
    2. Lusuardi L,
    3. Myatt A,
    4. Hruby S,
    5. Pirich C,
    6. Janetschek G
    . Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology. 2012;80:1080–1086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Vermeeren L,
    4. et al
    . Comparing the hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-nanocolloid for sentinel node identification: a validation study using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1034–1040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Liss MA,
    2. Stroup SP,
    3. Qin Z,
    4. Hall DJ,
    5. Kane CJ,
    6. Vera DR
    . Robotic-assisted fluorescent-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in a preclinical model. Urology. In press.
  • Received for publication March 30, 2014.
  • Accepted for publication May 5, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 9
September 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Fluorescence Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Preclinical Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Fluorescence Imaging
Michael A. Liss, Salman Farshchi-Heydari, Zhengtao Qin, Sean A. Hickey, David J. Hall, Christopher J. Kane, David R. Vera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2014, 55 (9) 1552-1556; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.140871

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preclinical Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Fluorescence Imaging
Michael A. Liss, Salman Farshchi-Heydari, Zhengtao Qin, Sean A. Hickey, David J. Hall, Christopher J. Kane, David R. Vera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2014, 55 (9) 1552-1556; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.140871
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Fluorescence-Based Molecular Imaging of Porcine Urinary Bladder Sentinel Lymph Nodes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • fluorescent tilmanocept
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping
  • Robotic-Assisted Surgery
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire