Abstract
Molecular imaging is paving the way for precision and personalized medicine. In view of the significant biologic and clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer, molecular imaging is expected to play an important role in the evaluation of this prevalent disease. The natural history of prostate cancer spans from an indolent localized process to biochemical relapse after radical treatment with curative intent to a lethal castrate-resistant metastatic disease. The ongoing unraveling of the complex tumor biology of prostate cancer uniquely positions molecular imaging with PET to contribute significantly to every clinical phase of prostate cancer evaluation. The purpose of this article was to provide a concise review of the current state of affairs and potential future developments in the diagnostic utility of PET in prostate cancer.
- correlative imaging
- molecular imaging
- oncology
- PET
- PET/CT
- PET/MRI
- radiopharmaceuticals
- cancer
- imaging
- molecular
- prostate
Prostate cancer remains a major public health problem in developed countries. The disease is characterized by evolution from a clinically localized hormone-naïve state to an eventually castrate-resistant metastatic state (1). The widespread use of screening serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in downward stage migration and increased diagnosis of localized low-grade prostate cancers, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment (2). On the other hand, small high-grade tumors may be underdiagnosed and undertreated. There can be a high sampling error of about 40% with a standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy procedure that may then lead to repeated biopsies (including saturation and transperineal biopsy) at still high sampling errors of up to 70% (3). Although localized disease is treated with curative intent, up to 35% of patients (or higher in select high-risk groups) may experience biochemical recurrence within a decade of primary therapy (4). Stratification of men with biochemical recurrence is pivotal in clinical decision making for prescribing and sequencing appropriate treatments that may include salvage therapy for local recurrence and systemic therapy for metastatic disease. When men develop a castrate-resistant state, the prognosis is poor and treatment is directed toward attempts to enhance survival and comfort.
Imaging can provide clinically important information at every phase of this heterogeneous disease. All major imaging modalities, including ultrasound, CT, MR imaging (including multiparametric imaging and spectroscopy), and bone scintigraphy, have been used with documented strengths and limitations. PET is a quantitative imaging tool for interrogation of the underlying tumor biology. Several promising radiotracers are currently being investigated for PET imaging evaluation of prostate cancer including, but not limited to, 18F-FDG; 18F- and 11C-choline; 11C-acetate; 16α-18F-fluoro-5α -dihydrotestosterone, targeted to the androgen receptor; anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid, a synthetic l-leucine analog; and PET radiotracers based on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate stem cell antigen, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR).
GLUCOSE METABOLISM
A hallmark of cancer is the Warburg effect of elevated glucose metabolism in malignant tissue relative to normal tissue. This forms the basis for increased accumulation of 18F-FDG in cancer (5). However, 18F-FDG uptake in tissue is not specific for cancer and benign conditions may also display high tracer localization. 18F-FDG PET/CT is generally limited in the detection and initial staging of primary prostate cancer because many primary tumors are small, slow-growing, well-differentiated, and multiple with low-level tumor uptake that can overlap with that of normal tissue and coexisting benign prostatic hyperplasia. Poorly differentiated tumors and prostatitis both may demonstrate high uptake.
18F-FDG PET/CT may detect occult metastatic disease in a small number of men who present with biochemical recurrence. It has restricted utility for the detection of local recurrence in the treated prostate bed because of overlap of uptake between recurrent tumor and posttherapy tissue changes. Furthermore, high urine activity in the nearby bladder can obscure local tumor uptake (6). 18F-FDG PET/CT may be most useful in the evaluation of the extent and treatment response of castrate-resistant metastatic disease (7).
LIPOGENESIS
Malignancy-induced increased cellular membrane synthesis is the basis for imaging prostate cancer with 11C-acetate, 11C-choline, and 18F-fluorocholine PET radiotracers (8). Acetate is transported across the cellular membrane through monocarboxylate transporter and participates in the de novo synthesis of fatty acids from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA through the action of fatty acid synthase, which is upregulated in prostate cancer (9). Choline enters the cell via choline transporters and is used for biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine in the tumor cell membrane through malignancy-induced overexpression of choline kinase (9). Similar to 18F-FDG, uptake of radiolabeled acetate and choline derivatives by the primary prostate tumor may overlap with that of benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate gland tissue.
11C-acetate may be useful for pelvic nodal staging and treatment planning in men with intermediate-risk (T2b–T2c or Gleason score 7 or PSA 10–20 ng/mL) to high-risk (T3a or Gleason score 8–10 or PSA > 20 ng/mL) prostate cancer (10). 11C-acetate may also be useful in the localization of tumor recurrence in men with biochemical failure, with a detection rate that tends to be positively associated with increasing serum PSA level (11).
Both 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine have received much attention over the past several years, particularly in Europe and Japan, for imaging of men with prostate cancer. Recently, 11C-choline was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for production and use to detect recurrent prostate cancer at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota (12). 11C-choline has the advantage of low excreted urine activity if scanning is performed sufficiently early after radiotracer injection, whereas 18F-fluorocholine has the advantage of longer half-life that facilitates regional tracer distribution without the need for on-site cyclotron and radiochemistry facilities.
A systematic review and metaanalysis by Umbehr et al. of 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine PET for the initial staging of prostate cancer reported a pooled sensitivity and specificity, on a per-patient basis (10 studies, n = 637 patients), of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68%–93%) and 79% (95% CI, 53%–93%), respectively (13). In restaging patients with biochemical recurrence, the metaanalysis demonstrated, on a per-patient basis (12 studies, n = 1,055 patients), a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI, 79%–89%) and 88% (95% CI, 73%–95%), respectively (13).
Evangelista et al. published a systematic review and metaanalysis (19 studies, including 12 studies for all sites of disease, 3 for lymph node metastases, and 4 for local recurrence, n = 1,555 patients) of the use of choline PET and PET/CT in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer (14). This metaanalysis reported a pooled sensitivity of 85.6% (95% CI, 82.9%–88.1%) and pooled specificity of 92.6% (95% CI, 90.1%–94.6%) for all sites of disease (prostatic fossa, lymph nodes, and bone), a pooled sensitivity of 75.4% (95% CI, 66.9%–82.6%) and pooled specificity of 82% (95% CI, 68.6%–91.4%) for prostatic fossa recurrence, and a pooled sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 90.5%–100%) and pooled specificity of 81.8% (95% CI, 48.2%–97.7%) for lymph node metastases. In the latter case, the reported perfect pooled sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastases may have been overestimated given the small number of relevant publications included in the metaanalysis.
Overall, there is limited but promising evidence for the use of choline PET/CT to stage patients with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Relatively robust evidence suggests that choline PET/CT can be helpful for the evaluation of locoregional and distant metastatic disease in men with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer with a detection rate that is positively associated with increasing PSA level, increasing PSA velocity, and decreasing PSA doubling time. The current recommendation is for considering choline PET/CT as the first-line diagnostic procedure in patients with biochemical relapse showing PSA levels greater than 1 ng/mL, PSA velocity higher than 1 ng/mL/y, or PSA doubling time less than 6 mo (15).
AMINO ACID TRANSPORT
Anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-18F-FACBC) is a synthetic nonmetabolized amino acid analog that accumulates in prostate cancer via overexpression of the ASC (alanine, serine, and cysteine) transport system and other amino acid transport systems (16). The early studies of anti-18F-FACBC in prostate cancer have been encouraging and demonstrate an advantage over 111In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy with relatively high tumor uptake and little urinary excretion of the tracer (Fig. 1) (17). A recent study suggested that anti-18F-FACBC may be advantageous over 11C-choline for localization of disease in biochemical failure (18). On the basis of the early encouraging results, additional studies will be needed in a larger cohort of patients to decipher the exact role of anti-18F-FACBC in the imaging evaluation of patients with prostate cancer.
ANDROGEN RECEPTOR
18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) is a labeled analog targeting the androgen receptor, which plays an important role in the development, growth, and maintenance of the prostate gland. Studies of comparisons to 18F-FDG have suggested that there may be diverse metabolic phenotypes of castrate-resistant cancers (androgen receptor–predominant, glycolysis-predominant, or androgen receptor/glycolysis-concordant) and that 18F-FDHT is probably suited as a pharmacodynamic response marker, rather than a treatment response marker, in the phase 1 clinical trials of new antiandrogenic drugs (19).
PSMA
PSMA is a type II cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein (also known as folate hydrolase I or glutamate carboxypeptidase II) that is upregulated in prostate cancer and provides a rational target for diagnostic imaging and directed therapy. PSMA does not have a known naturally occurring ligand, and despite what is implied from the label, it has a low degree of expression in the small intestine, proximal renal tubule, salivary glands, brain, and neovasculature of some nonprostate tumors (e.g., kidney, bladder, pancreas, lung). Investigators have developed and evaluated, in preclinical animal and pilot human studies, several radiolabeled ligands using various platforms that include antibodies or antibody fragments targeting the intracellular (binding to apoptotic or necrotic cells) or extracellular (binding to viable cells) motifs of the antigen. These PSMA-based radiotracers include 89Zr-desferrioxamine B (DFO)-7E11; 64Cu-labeled aptamers; and 11C-, 18F-, 68Ga-, 64Cu-, and 86Y-labeled low-molecular-weight inhibitors of PSMA including 18F-labeled N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl] carbamoyl]-4-[18F]fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine and 18F-labeled phosphoramidate peptidomimetic with some formulations that can also be labeled with radionuclides such as 177Lu or 90Y for targeted radioimmunotherapy (Fig. 2) (20).
BONE MATRIX
The bone uptake of 18F-NaF is related to chemisorption with exchange of 18F− ion for OH− ion on the surface of the hydroxyapatite matrix of bone to form fluoroapatite and migration of 18F− ion into the crystalline matrix of bone. 18F-NaF PET/CT has been shown to provide higher sensitivity and specificity than 99mTc-based planar and single-photon CT bone scintigraphy for detection of osseous metastases in men with prostate cancer (21). The clinical use of 18F-NaF PET/CT is projected to grow on the basis of increasing availability of PET/CT scanners, commercial regional distribution of 18F-labeled radiotracers, lingering uncertainty on the supply of 99mTc-labeled compounds, and the recent decision by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for scan reimbursement through participation in the National Oncologic PET Registry.
OTHER PROMISING BIOMARKERS
Several other approaches are also in the preclinical stages of development and testing for molecular imaging of prostate cancer with PET. For example, 68Ga-DOTA-CHCO-Gly-4-aminobenzyl-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met-NH is a radiolabeled ligand based on bombesin, which is an amino acid analog of the human gastrin-releasing peptide that binds to the GRPR. GRPR is overexpressed in prostate cancer.
Researchers have also developed radiolabeled ligands targeting free PSA (e.g., 89Zr-5A10 monoclonal antibody), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) (e.g., 124I-anti-PSCA antibody fragments), and thymidine kinase for assessing cellular proliferation and cellular stress (e.g., 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-b-d-arabinofuranosyl)thymidine). There have also been reporter gene–reporter probe approaches for direct visualization and characterization of sentinel lymph nodes in prostate cancer using the reporter gene herpes simplex virus type 1 TK and reporter probe 9-(4-18F-fluoro-3-[hydroxymethyl]butyl)guanine (22).
POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES WITH PET/MR IMAGING
PET/MR imaging provides combined structural, metabolic, and functional imaging information that can potentially affect patient management and outcome. It may also enhance patient convenience by providing a 1-stop diagnostic imaging work-up, reducing patient anxiety, total scan time, and recalls for repeated scanning (23). Simultaneous acquisition of multiparametric MR and PET images with an appropriate radiotracer may be particularly valuable for identifying high-yield candidate biopsy sites that could reduce false-negative initial and repeated biopsies. Moreover, combined PET/MR imaging could facilitate the use of targeted focal therapy and the determination of its efficacy (Fig. 3) (24). Another interesting prospect is the potential utility of dual-modality imaging agents in this clinical setting (25).
CONCLUSION
PET with several radiotracers can assess the underlying altered biology of prostate cancer, including glucose metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, DNA synthesis, and expression and activity levels of a variety of receptors, enzymes, and other cancer-specific and nonspecific biomarkers. The combination of PET with MR imaging, in view of the recent emergence of hybrid PET/MR imaging systems, may also provide additional opportunities for facilitating targeted biopsy, focal therapy, and 1-stop imaging localization of disease sites in patients with biochemical failure. Additional potential applications may include not only the assessment but also the deciphering of new insights into the biologic changes induced by various novel therapies. Molecular imaging with PET is therefore aligned seamlessly with the concept of precision and personalized medical care, which is applicable to all clinical phases of prostate cancer.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, grants R01-CA111613 and R21-142426. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
- © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.