Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Direct comparison of neck pinhole (PH) dual tracer (DT) & dual phase (DP) sestamibi accuracies with & without SPECT/CT for parathyroid adenoma (PA) localization

Sherif Heiba, Manli Jiang, Javier Rivera, Hongju Son, Eric Genden, Kaare Weber, William Inabnet, Lale Kostakoglu, Ina Savitch and Josef Machac
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 72;
Sherif Heiba
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manli Jiang
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Rivera
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongju Son
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Genden
2Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaare Weber
3Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Inabnet
3Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lale Kostakoglu
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ina Savitch
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josef Machac
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

72

Objectives There is uncertainty about accuracies of dual-phase (DP) Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI) & DT (MIBI/I-123) parathyroid imaging protocols with the newly added SPECT/CT. Conversely, MIBI SPECT/CT was shown to be helpful in PA localization (LOC), however, it may not have optimal resolution as PH particularly when PA is close to or within thyroid. This study compares PH DP & DT accuracies with & without (W/WO) MIBI SPECT/CT in primary hyperparathyroidism patients (PHP).

Methods 155 PHP with pathologically confirmed diagnosis (Dx) had PH DT/DP & early neck/chest MIBI SPECT/CT. PH DP W/WO SPECT/CT was reviewed for PA Dx & LOC by 2 observers. A separate review of PH DT W/WO SPECT/CT was performed. Confidences in PA Dx & LOC were scored as certain, probable or uncertain. Furthermore, PA was classified as clearly or unclearly distinguishable from Thyroid. Contribution of delayed MIBI to PH DT was additionally scored as essential, confirming or non-contributory. Final Dx was classified as PA, parathyroid hyperplasia, & other/no pathology.

Results Of 153 confirmed PA, PH DT SPECT/CT was correct in Dx/LOC of 142 PA, significantly higher than PH DP SPECT/CT (104 PA). The ability to clearly distinguish PA from thyroid was higher in PH DT than DP W/WO SPECT/CT. Consequently, certainty of PA Dx was higher in PH DT than DP W/WO SPECT/CT. Certainty of PA LOC in both PH DT & DP were higher with than without SPECT/CT. In PH DT, delayed MIBI was essential for Dx/LOC of 24 uncertain PA.

Conclusions In our large group PHP, accuracy & certainty of PA Dx/LOC were both higher in PH DT SPECT/CT than PH DP SPECT/CT. PH DT better identified PA than PH DP, while SPECT/CT improved certainty of PA LOC in both. In PH DT, delayed MIBI addition showed limited contribution & thus should be only considered if PH DT findings for PA Dx/LOC are uncertain

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct comparison of neck pinhole (PH) dual tracer (DT) & dual phase (DP) sestamibi accuracies with & without SPECT/CT for parathyroid adenoma (PA) localization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Direct comparison of neck pinhole (PH) dual tracer (DT) & dual phase (DP) sestamibi accuracies with & without SPECT/CT for parathyroid adenoma (PA) localization
Sherif Heiba, Manli Jiang, Javier Rivera, Hongju Son, Eric Genden, Kaare Weber, William Inabnet, Lale Kostakoglu, Ina Savitch, Josef Machac
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 72;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Direct comparison of neck pinhole (PH) dual tracer (DT) & dual phase (DP) sestamibi accuracies with & without SPECT/CT for parathyroid adenoma (PA) localization
Sherif Heiba, Manli Jiang, Javier Rivera, Hongju Son, Eric Genden, Kaare Weber, William Inabnet, Lale Kostakoglu, Ina Savitch, Josef Machac
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 72;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • Review of utilization of surveillance scans in lymphoma patients: A pilot study
  • Real world use of diagnostic procedures in renal cell carcinoma
  • Prompt and early bleed on tagged red blood cell imaging is associated with a higher rate of positive angiograms
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • A systematic literature review of clinical comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence for PET in oncology
  • Is FDG PET/CT cost-effective for pre-operation staging of potentially operative non-small cell lung cancer? From Chinese healthcare system perspective
  • Comparison of PET vs MRI for evaluation of treated high grade primary brain tumors
Show more Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire