Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

The effect of alternate background and kidney regions of interest and use of geometric mean versus posterior images on the computation of differential renal function with MAG-3

Mark Ahlman, W. Rowlett, David Springle, Ryan Parker, Kenneth Spicer and Leonie Gordon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2089;
Mark Ahlman
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Rowlett
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Springle
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Parker
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Spicer
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonie Gordon
1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Information

vol. 52 no. supplement 1 2089

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0161-5505
Online ISSN 
2159-662X
History 
  • Published online November 4, 2014.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2011

Author Information

  1. Mark Ahlman1,
  2. W. Rowlett1,
  3. David Springle1,
  4. Ryan Parker1,
  5. Kenneth Spicer1 and
  6. Leonie Gordon1
  1. 1Radiology & Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Article usage

Article usage: March 2015 to December 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Feb 2015200
Mar 2015500
Apr 20151200
Jun 2015300
Jul 2015900
Sep 2015500
Oct 2015700
Jan 2016100
Feb 2016700
Mar 2016700
May 2016500
Jun 2016300
Jul 2016100
Aug 2016400
Sep 2016100
Oct 2016100
Nov 2016100
Jan 2017300
Feb 2017400
Apr 2017900
May 2017300
Jun 2017300
Aug 2017200
Sep 2017400
Nov 2017300
Dec 2017100
Jan 2018600
Feb 2018100
Mar 2018600
Apr 2018100
May 2018100
Sep 20181000
Dec 2018500
Jan 2019300
Feb 2019100
Apr 2019700
May 2019300
Jun 2019200
Aug 2019100
Sep 2019400
Oct 2019100
Dec 2019100
Jan 2020400
Feb 2020800
Mar 2020200
Apr 2020300
May 2020900
Jun 2020200
Jul 2020300
Aug 2020100
Sep 2020100
Oct 2020100
Nov 2020200
Dec 2020300
Jan 20211500
Feb 20211000
Mar 20211000
Apr 20211000
May 20211300
Jun 2021200
Jul 2021600
Aug 2021200
Sep 2021400
Oct 2021400
Nov 2021400
Dec 2021300
Jan 2022500
Feb 20221300
Mar 2022200
Apr 2022400
May 20221500
Jun 2022100
Aug 2022300
Sep 2022400
Oct 2022200
Nov 2022300
Dec 2022300
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of alternate background and kidney regions of interest and use of geometric mean versus posterior images on the computation of differential renal function with MAG-3
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The effect of alternate background and kidney regions of interest and use of geometric mean versus posterior images on the computation of differential renal function with MAG-3
Mark Ahlman, W. Rowlett, David Springle, Ryan Parker, Kenneth Spicer, Leonie Gordon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2089;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The effect of alternate background and kidney regions of interest and use of geometric mean versus posterior images on the computation of differential renal function with MAG-3
Mark Ahlman, W. Rowlett, David Springle, Ryan Parker, Kenneth Spicer, Leonie Gordon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2089;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

  • Usefulness of dynamic FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of liver tumor
  • Variations in SUV values with reconstruction algorithms
  • Evaluation of ten automatic thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

Data Analysis and Management Posters

  • High Performance Virtual CT for Enhanced Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Dosimetry
  • Penalized direct estimation using joint similarity of kinetic images with partial dynamic data
  • Semi-automated quantification of osseous prostate metastatic burden to the spine and pelvis with sodium fluoride PET/CT
Show more Data Analysis and Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire