Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Breast Cancer

Molecular breast imaging to screen for breast cancer in myocardial perfusion patients

Carrie Hruska, Duong Truong, Douglas Collins, Cindy Tortorelli, J Wells Askew, Todd Miller, Deborah Rhodes and Michael O'Connor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 238;
Carrie Hruska
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duong Truong
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Collins
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cindy Tortorelli
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Wells Askew
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Miller
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Rhodes
2Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael O'Connor
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

238

Objectives Molecular breast imaging (MBI) images the functional uptake of a radiopharmaceutical, 99mTc-sestamibi, with a dedicated dual-head semiconductor-based gamma camera. 99mTc-sestamibi is also commonly used in cardiac stress testing. We offered MBI as an additional test to women presenting for a stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) study. Our objective was to evaluate MBI’s ability to detect breast cancer in this population.

Methods MBI was performed during the waiting period after stress injection, hence, no additional exam time or radiation dose was required. Bilateral MBI acquisitions in the CC and MLO views were performed for 3 min/view. A radiologist interpreted the MBI studies and any suspicious findings were reviewed with past mammogram.

Results 198 women presenting for MPI underwent MBI. Average age was 64 years (range 37-88 years). MBI was negative in 184 patients and positive in 14 patients (16 lesions). MBI detected 6 breast tumors in 6 patients, comprising 3 known malignancies and 3 additional cancers detected only by MBI (recent screening mammogram was negative). Two high-risk lesions were detected by MBI only (radial scar and atypical papilloma). Positive uptake was detected in 7 benign lesions; 2 led to further diagnostic workup and 5 were determined benign based on review of past mammogram and clinical history. MBI was also positive in one patient with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Conclusions MBI may be a valuable additional test for detecting breast cancer in women undergoing MPI. In this population, MBI detected mammographically occult cancers and high-risk lesions, while producing very few false positive results.

Research Support This work was supported by Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular breast imaging to screen for breast cancer in myocardial perfusion patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Molecular breast imaging to screen for breast cancer in myocardial perfusion patients
Carrie Hruska, Duong Truong, Douglas Collins, Cindy Tortorelli, J Wells Askew, Todd Miller, Deborah Rhodes, Michael O'Connor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 238;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular breast imaging to screen for breast cancer in myocardial perfusion patients
Carrie Hruska, Duong Truong, Douglas Collins, Cindy Tortorelli, J Wells Askew, Todd Miller, Deborah Rhodes, Michael O'Connor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 238;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Breast Cancer

  • A comparative study on the value of FDG PET/CT and sentinel node biopsy for axillary staging in primary breast cancer
  • PET/CT-MRI for staging of breast cancer patients: Preliminary experience
  • Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
Show more Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer II

  • Impact of a Gaussian filter applied to post-reconstruction PET images on radiomic features to predict complete pathological response in breast cancer
  • The F18 FDG PET in breast carcinoma: Do patient characteristics, tumor histology or receptor status, have any impact on final staging?
  • Brown fat activation demonstrated on FDG PET/CT predicts survival outcome
Show more Breast Cancer II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire