Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the metabolic characteristics of lipiodolized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the viability of lipiodolized HCCs. Methods: Thirty-six patients (age range, 32–73 y) with 38 lipiodolized HCCs who had undergone transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with lipiodol before 18F-FDG PET/CT (2–434 d) and 55 patients (age range, 36–77 y) with 57 treatment-naïve HCCs who had not been treated with TACE were retrospectively studied. All patients underwent hepatic lobectomy or transplantation within 1 mo after PET/CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. 18F-FDG uptake by lipiodolized and naïve HCCs was compared and correlated with tumor size, pathologic grade, serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration, and time interval between TACE and PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in evaluating the viability of lipiodolized HCC was compared. Results: Histologic examination showed 30 viable and 8 nonviable lipiodolized HCCs. Of the 30 viable tumors, 19 showed increased, 10 similar, and 1 decreased 18F-FDG uptake. Of the 8 nonviable HCCs, 3 showed increased and 5 decreased 18F-FDG uptake. Uptake by viable lipiodolized HCCs was correlated with tumor size (P < 0.05) but not correlated with pathologic grade, AFP concentration, or interval between TACE and PET/CT. In contrast, 18F-FDG uptake by naïve HCCs was significantly correlated with tumor size and pathologic grade (P < 0.05 for each comparison). When lipiodolized HCCs with 18F-FDG uptake that was greater than or similar to that in the surrounding normal liver were considered viable, the diagnostic sensitivity of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the early postembolic period (<3 mo) was 100% and 94%, respectively, and that in the late postembolic period was 93% and 79%, respectively. The specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT was 63% and 100%, respectively, in the acute period. Three viable lipiodolized HCCs with high AFP concentration were true-positives on PET/CT but false-negatives on contrast-enhanced CT images. Conclusion: After TACE, 18F-FDG uptake in lipiodolized HCCs was not correlated with pathologic grade, in contrast to uptake in treatment-naïve HCCs. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed a high diagnostic sensitivity in assessing the viability of lipiodolized HCCs, with moderate specificity. This method may be useful in determining the viability of lipiodolized HCCs in patients with increased serum AFP concentration or normal results on contrast-enhanced CT images.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide (1). Liver resection and liver transplantation are the treatments of choice for patients with HCC (2). However, only approximately 20% of HCC patients are treated surgically, primarily because the tumors are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the associated liver cirrhosis is too well developed to permit surgical insults to be endured (3,4). Palliative treatments for patients with inoperable HCC have included transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic chemotherapy, local injection therapy, immunotherapy, and radiofrequency thermal ablation therapy (4). Although TACE is effective as either a palliative or a curative treatment for HCC, the tumor recurrence rate after TACE is high, with reported 6- and 12-mo recurrence rates of 22.3% and 78%, respectively (5). If initial treatment is insufficient, it is important to accurately evaluate tumor viability before retreatment, either by surgery or by repeated TACE.
Multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT has become the standard imaging technique in patients with HCC and has been considered the most reliable method for assessing the efficacy of TACE (6,7). The ability of CT to determine tumor viability after TACE is, however, limited, because the retained hyperattenuating lipiodol material makes it difficult to detect contrast enhancement within a viable tumor (6,7).
18F-FDG PET is a functional imaging tool that provides metabolic information and can therefore sensitively detect both primary and metastatic tumors (8). 18F-FDG PET is of limited use in the diagnosis of primary HCCs, with a reported sensitivity of 50%–55% (9,10). This low sensitivity is attributable to high levels of glucose-6-phosphatase in HCCs, especially in well-differentiated tumors, which dephosphorylate the intracellular 18F-FDG-6-phosphate (9,11). Increased 18F-FDG uptake by primary HCCs has been observed when tumors are large or of high grade and in patients with high serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations (12).
Little is known about the characteristics of 18F-FDG uptake and the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET in patients with lipiodolized HCCs after TACE. 18F-FDG PET has been reported to be valuable in the assessment of tumor viability after TACE (9,13,14). The cited studies, however, suffered from certain limitations: they included not only patients with HCC but also patients with hepatic metastatic tumors; only a few patients underwent TACE; or PET scans, and not PET/CT scans, were used. Therefore, we evaluated the metabolic characteristics of lipiodolized HCCs and the clinical ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess the viability of such HCCs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
During 3 recent years, 149 patients with HCC underwent TACE with lipiodol and 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative tumor staging at our institution. Of these patients, 75 were treated with hepatic lobectomy or explantation for liver transplantation after PET/CT, whereas the remaining 74 patients did not undergo surgery because of extrahepatic metastases (n = 39), repeated TACE (n = 21), or other reasons (n = 14). Of the 75 patients who underwent surgery, 36 patients (32 men, 4 women; mean age ± SD, 54.4 ± 8.3 y; range, 32–73 y) with 38 lipiodolized HCCs were retrospectively analyzed. The other 39 patients were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: a small tumor (<2 cm in diameter), diabetes, an interval from PET/CT to surgery longer than 1 mo, invasive procedures performed between PET/CT and surgery, the absence of multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT at the time of PET, systemic chemotherapy before or after PET/CT, and nonvisualization of lipiodol material within the tumor.
For comparison, we assessed the metabolic characteristics of 57 HCCs in 55 consecutive treatment-naïve patients (45 men, 10 women; mean age ± SD, 53.9 ± 9.0 y; range, 36–78 y) who underwent PET/CT and surgery. None of these patients had small tumors (<2 cm), diabetes, an interval from PET/CT to surgery longer than 1 mo, invasive procedures between PET/CT and surgery, or systemic chemotherapy before or after PET/CT.
TACE
All patients underwent TACE before 18F-FDG PET/CT (median, 74.0 d prior; range, 2–434 d). Briefly, 0.5 mg of cisplatin (Cisplan; Dong-A Pharmaceutical Co.) per milliliter in distilled water was infused into the hepatic artery at a dose of 2 mg/kg over 15 min. Five to ten milliliters of iodized oil (Lipiodol; Guerbert), mixed with the same volume of cisplatin, were infused into the arteries feeding the HCC. Subsequently, the selected feeding artery was embolized with absorbable gelatin sponge particles (diameter, 1 mm; Gelfoam [Upjohn]). A 5-French 75-cm Rosch hepatic catheter and a microferret-18-infusion catheter (Cook) were used for hepatic arterial catheterization.
PET
18F-FDG PET/CT was performed using a PET/CT camera system (Biograph Sensation 16; Siemens Medical System), which provided an axial spatial resolution of 6.3 mm in full width at half maximum. All patients fasted for more than 6 h before scanning. Whole-blood glucose concentration measured before 18F-FDG administration was below 150 mg/dL. Images were acquired approximately 60 min after intravenous injection of 555 ± 103.6 MBq of 18F-FDG. CT was performed in a spiral mode (110 mAs, 120 kVp), from the base of the skull to the proximal thigh, for attenuation correction and image fusion, followed by a 3-dimensional caudocranial PET emission scan. The emission scan time per bed position was 2.5 min, and 6 or 7 bed positions were used. PET data were reconstructed iteratively without and with attenuation correction based on CT data and reoriented in axial, sagittal, and coronal slices.
Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced CT
Multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images were obtained using a Somatom Plus-S scanner (Siemens Medical System). Nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT scans in the arterial (36-s delay) and portal venous (72-s delay) phases were obtained after the administration of 150 mL of iopamidol (Iopamiro 300; Bracco) or iopromide (Ultravist 370; Schering) at a rate of 3 mL/s. The mean interval between multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT and PET/CT was 4.1 ± 14.3 d.
Histologic Examination
All patients underwent hepatic lobectomy (n = 22) or explantation for liver transplantation (n = 14) within 1 mo after PET/CT. We assessed the extent of necrosis, size, and differentiation grade of each tumor from pathology reports. Necrosis was determined semiquantitatively as the percentage of necrotic tissue relative to total tumor tissue, as assessed both macroscopically and microscopically. After hematoxylin–eosin staining, each tumor was microscopically examined using low power. Totally necrotic HCCs (100%) were defined as nonviable, and HCCs with 99% necrosis or less were defined as viable. Tumor size was determined by the longest diameter, and differentiation was graded using the Edmonson–Steiner classification (15), with grades I and II defined as low and grades III and IV as high.
Data Analysis
All PET/CT images were visually assessed by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians unaware of the pathologic and radiologic information. 18F-FDG uptake by each HCC was defined as grade I if there was no 18F-FDG uptake or if 18F-FDG uptake was lower than in the surrounding normal liver, grade II if 18F-FDG uptake was similar to that in the surrounding normal liver, or grade III if 18F-FDG uptake was greater than that in the surrounding liver (Fig. 1). Lipiodolized HCCs scored as grade II or grade III on both attenuation-corrected and noncorrected PET images were considered to be viable.
18F-FDG uptake of HCCs was analyzed according to tumor size, pathologic grade (low grade vs. high grade), serum AFP concentration (≤20 ng/mL vs. >20 ng/mL), presence of liver cirrhosis, and time interval between TACE and PET/CT (early postembolic period < 3 mo vs. late period ≥ 3 mo after TACE).
Multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images were reviewed by a radiologist unaware of the pathologic and radiologic information. A lipiodolized HCC was considered viable when the lesion showed enhancement during the arterial phase.
The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT in determining the viability of lipiodolized HCCs were assessed.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between lipiodolized and naïve HCC groups were analyzed using the Student t test. The χ2 test was used to compare categoric data. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics
The clinical and pathologic characteristics of lipiodolized and treatment-naïve HCCs are summarized in Table 1. The average size of lipiodolized HCCs in the longest dimension was 5.0 ± 2.5 cm (range, 2–11 cm). The mean interval from PET/CT to surgery was 13.3 ± 12.6 d, and the mean serum AFP concentration was 2,625.0 ± 8,279.7 ng/mL. Histologically, 8 (21%) lipiodolized HCCs showed 100% necrosis, 1 (2%) greater than 90% necrosis, 12 (31.5%) 50–90% necrosis, and 17 (44.7%) less than 50% necrosis. Thus, of the 38 lipiodolized HCCs, 30 were viable and 8 nonviable. Of the 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs, 17 (57%) were of low grade and 13 (43%) were of high grade.
The average size of treatment-naïve HCCs was 5.0 ± 3.2 cm (range, 2–14 cm) in the longest diameter. The mean interval from PET/CT to surgery was 10.0 ± 7.9 d, and the mean serum AFP concentration was 4,105.4 ± 14,328.9 ng/mL. Of the 57 treatment-naïve HCCs, 41 (72%) were classified as low grade and 16 (28%) as high grade.
No significant differences were observed among patients with lipiodolized and treatment-naïve HCCs for these criteria: interval from PET/CT to surgery, tumor size, serum AFP concentration, pathologic grade, or frequency of liver cirrhosis (P > 0.05).
Metabolic Characteristics of HCCs
18F-FDG uptake by lipiodolized HCCs is summarized in Table 2. Of the 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs, 19 (63%) were of grade III, 10 (33%) of grade II, and 1 (3%) of grade I 18F-FDG uptake. Of the 8 nonviable lipiodolized HCCs, 5 (63%) were of grade I and 3 (38%) of grade III 18F-FDG uptake. Of the 57 naïve HCCs, 27 (47%) were of grade III and 30 (53%) of grade II 18F-FDG uptake.
18F-FDG uptake by viable HCCs according to various clinical factors is summarized in Table 3. 18F-FDG uptake by viable lipiodolized HCCs was correlated with tumor size (P = 0.011). No significant differences in 18F-FDG uptake according to pathologic grade, serum AFP level, or presence of liver cirrhosis regardless of the interval from TACE (P > 0.05) were found. However, 18F-FDG uptake by naïve HCCs was greater for larger tumors (P < 0.001) and for tumors of high pathologic grade (P = 0.017).
The clinical characteristics of 18F-FDG uptake by the 8 nonviable lipiodolized HCCs are summarized in Table 4. In nonviable HCCs with grade I 18F-FDG uptake (n = 5), the median interval from TACE was 56 d (range, 36–88 d), and the average tumor size was 2.8 ± 0.6 cm. In nonviable HCCs with grade III 18F-FDG uptake (n = 3), the median interval from TACE to PET/CT was 39 d (range, 2–78 d), and the average tumor size was 4.3 ± 2.1 cm.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Viability
When lipiodolized HCCs with grade II or grade III 18F-FDG uptake were considered viable, the overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 97% and 63%, respectively. When only lipiodolized HCCs with grade III 18F-FDG uptake were considered viable, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 63% and 63%, respectively. On multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images, 26 of the 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs showed enhancement within the tumor, whereas all 8 nonviable HCCs showed no enhancement. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 87% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of PET/CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT in the early postembolic period was 100% and 94%, respectively, and that in the late postembolic period was 93% and 79%, respectively (Table 5).
Results of 18F-FDG PET/CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT were discordant for 6 tumors. None of these tumors showed any demonstrable viability on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images, whereas PET/CT images showed 18F-FDG uptake of grade II or III. Of these 6 tumors, 3—from patients with high serum AFP concentration—were viable (Fig. 2), whereas the other 3—from patients with normal AFP concentration—were nonviable histologically (Fig. 3).
On PET/CT images, only 1 tumor (size, 3.5 cm; 85% necrosis) showed grade I 18F-FDG uptake among 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs. The interval from TACE was 434 d, and the serum AFP concentration was 2.1 ng/mL. This viable tumor also showed no arterial enhancement on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images. Two tumors showed discrepancies in 18F-FDG uptake on attenuation-corrected and noncorrected images. One showed an overcorrection artifact attributable to lipiodol, which increased the activity of the lesion on corrected but not on non–attenuation-corrected images (Fig. 4). The second tumor showed a PET/CT misregistration artifact because of respiratory movement. Both of these lipiodolized HCCs were considered nonviable on 18F-FDG PET/CT images because non–attenuation-corrected images showed lower 18F-FDG uptake than did images of the surrounding normal liver.
DISCUSSION
HCCs have been shown to accumulate 18F-FDG to varying degrees, with the size and degree of differentiation of the tumor and serum AFP concentration being important predictors of tumor visualization by 18F-FDG PET. We found that 65% of low-grade and 62% of high-grade viable lipiodolized HCCs, compared with 37% of low-grade and 75% of high-grade treatment-naïve HCCs, showed increased 18F-FDG uptake. In addition, lipiodolized HCCs showed no difference in 18F-FDG uptake with respect to serum AFP concentration or other clinical factors, except tumor size. Previous studies have reported that only 50%–55% of primary HCCs, compared with normal liver parenchyma, show increased 18F-FDG uptake (9,10). The relatively low sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of HCC may be attributed to high levels of glucose-6-phosphatase, especially in low-grade and well-differentiated HCCs that show low expression of glucose transporter 1 (9,11,16,17). High levels of glucose-6-phosphatase cause dephosphorylation of 18F-FDG-6-phosphate and leakage of 18F-FDG back to the circulation. As the HCC stage becomes more advanced, lesions tend to become undifferentiated (18). Our findings were similar, in that the grade and size of treatment-naïve HCCs correlated with 18F-FDG uptake. Although Risse et al. reported that HCCs were not correlated with the degree of differentiation (19), this study included selected patients for 131I-lipiodol treatment and only 2 high-grade tumors. Thus, this interstudy difference from our study could affect the controversial result. Interestingly, however, we found that, in contrast to treatment-naïve HCCs, lipiodolized HCCs—particularly low-grade tumors—frequently showed increased 18F-FDG uptake. This may be caused by increased glycolysis in residual tumors after TACE. HCCs pretreated with TACE displayed significantly higher hexokinase II messenger RNA expression, and there was a significant correlation between the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) protein and hexokinase II messenger RNA (20). Furthermore, both HIF-1α and hexokinase II protein were colocalized in cancer cells near necrotic regions. HIF-1α expression was observed only after TACE upregulation of hexokinase II, allowing cancer cells to obtain sufficient energy for growth under the condition of acute hypoxia caused by TACE. During the abrupt devascularization caused by TACE, HIF-1α expressed in HCCs tends to induce hexokinase II expression, mediating a phenotypic change enabling cells to adapt to a hypoxic environment.
The increased 18F-FDG uptake observed in lipiodolized, compared with naïve, tumors may be also attributable to a more aggressive growth of residual viable tumor when TACE is not completely effective. TACE has been shown to stimulate tumor angiogenesis, thus increasing the proliferative activity of tumor cells to some degree (21–25). After TACE, tumor cells are exposed to an extremely hypoxic or even anoxic environment. Because of ischemic damage, vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, which act synergistically, are overexpressed after TACE (21,23). Levels of these angiogenic factors were found to be significant predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with HCC (26,27). The long-term survival of HCC patients after TACE remains unsatisfactory (28), and the 18-mo recurrence rate after TACE has been reported to be higher than that for untreated patients (5). Thus, the increase in 18F-FDG uptake after TACE may be caused by increased glycolysis and the aggressive behavior of any residual viable tumor.
Patients with HCCs detectable by 18F-FDG PET have been found to have significantly higher serum AFP concentrations than do patients with undetectable HCCs (12). Serum AFP concentration has been found to correlate significantly with standardized uptake value (SUV) or the tumor-to-normal ratio, indicating that AFP is involved in glucose metabolism and cell proliferation in HCC (29). We found, however, that 18F-FDG uptake was not correlated with serum AFP concentration, in patients with either lipiodolized HCCs or treatment-naïve HCCs. No correlation of AFP concentration and 18F-FDG uptake in our study might be attributable to the interstudy differences in patient population. It has been known that serum AFP values are frequently elevated in patients with chronic liver disease, even in the absence of HCC. In addition, many factors associated with raised AFP include the etiology and severity of liver disease, sex, and race (30). In contrast to the previous studies (12,29), our study population consisted of surgically resectable patients without distant metastasis, a high proportion of patients with high-grade tumors, and a relatively high proportion of patients with hepatitis B virus infections.
In our analysis, we regarded lipiodolized HCCs with 18F-FDG uptake either greater than or similar to that in the surrounding normal liver tissue as viable. These tumors were considered viable because PET/CT was able to identify the margins of lipiodolized HCCs, and necrotic tissue, compared with normal liver, usually shows significantly decreased 18F-FDG uptake (11). Of the 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs, 29 (97%) showed 18F-FDG uptake higher than or similar to that in the surrounding normal liver tissue and could therefore be correctly diagnosed as viable on PET/CT. However, 26 of these 30 viable lipiodolized HCCs showed enhancement on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. In comparing the results of 18F-FDG PET/CT with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT, we found that 6 tumors yielded discordant results. PET/CT correctly diagnosed 3 viable HCCs in patients with increased AFP levels, whereas these 3 patients were false-negatives on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. The other 3 nonviable HCCs in patients with normal AFP levels were true-negatives on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Torizuka et al. reported that increased or similar 18F-FDG uptake by a tumor with respect to surrounding normal tissue suggested the presence of residual viable tumor tissue, whereas decreased or absent 18F-FDG uptake indicated greater than 90% necrosis, showing that therapy had been effective (14). In addition, these PET findings appeared to reflect tumor viability more accurately than did intratumor lipiodol retention on CT. Chen et al. reported that 18F-FDG PET detected 20 of 30 (67%) recurrent HCCs in patients showing increasing AFP concentrations after surgical resection or interventional therapy, when results of conventional examinations were normal (31). These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT may be useful for detecting viable lipiodolized HCCs in patients with increased serum AFP but in whom no demonstrable viability is seen on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT images.
After TACE, HCCs undergo ischemic necrosis, and liver tissue surrounding the HCC may become inflamed, especially during the early postembolic period (32). 18F-FDG accumulates in inflammatory cells such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages (33). Of the 8 nonviable HCCs studied in the present report, 3 showed increased 18F-FDG uptake (false-positives). Because of the retrospective design of our study, how much inflammatory cells were infiltrated in false-positive cases could not be confirmed. However, because all of our false-positive cases were observed in the early postembolic period and 75% of viable HCCs in the early postembolic period showed increased 18F-FDG uptake regardless of pathologic grade, it was determined that inflammatory cells may contribute to the overall 18F-FDG uptake in nonviable lipiodolized HCCs, but also viable tumors, within 3 mo after TACE.
The presence of highly attenuating materials, such as metal and lipiodol (34), during 18F-FDG PET/CT may result in artifacts. If lipiodol affects 18F-FDG uptake, the error must be present more or less in lipiodolized HCCs. Uncorrected images may be helpful if the lesions are located in the periphery of the liver but not for central lesions. Moreover, respiratory motion artifacts at the interface between the lungs and diaphragm may be present on CT–attenuation-corrected PET images. These artifacts may be caused by undercorrection of attenuation of the upper liver, because lung volumes are larger on CT scans than on emission PET images (35,36). Therefore, we evaluated PET/CT images, including PET images that were not corrected for attenuation, to detect any artificially increased activity. We observed 2 lipiodolized HCCs with falsely elevated activity on attenuation-corrected, compared with noncorrected, PET/CT images, suggesting the importance of evaluating noncorrected images in the detection of viable lipiodolized HCCs.
Our study had several limitations. First, the retrospective design may introduce biases in the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Moreover, we included only patients who underwent surgery after 18F-FDG PET/CT for the determination of pathologic correlations. Thus, the relatively small number of nonviable HCCs may have affected the diagnostic specificity data. Second, we did not quantitatively measure 18F-FDG uptake. Although SUV is the most commonly used quantitative measurement of 18F-FDG uptake, SUV can be influenced by factors other than glucose metabolism and there is no absolute threshold for determining tumor viability. Because viable HCCs can be detected by contrast between the tumor and the surrounding liver, we evaluated HCC uptake of 18F-FDG by semiquantitative visual comparison with adjacent normal tissue. Increased or similar tumor 18F-FDG uptake, compared with that in surrounding normal liver, as measured by the SUV ratio, has been reported to indicate tumor viability after interventional therapy (14). Third, we defined HCCs with less than 99% necrosis on histology as viable. Because a small lipiodolized HCC with more than 90% necrosis may show decreased 18F-FDG uptake despite the presence of residual viable tumor, as a result of a partial-volume effect, care should be taken in evaluating such small tumors. However, in our study, there was only 1 lipiodolized HCC with more than 90% necrosis, which showed increased 18F-FDG uptake.
CONCLUSION
After TACE, 18F-FDG uptake was not correlated with pathologic grade, in contrast to treatment-naïve HCCs. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed high diagnostic sensitivity in detecting viable HCCs, with moderate specificity. This method may be useful in determining the viability of lipiodolized HCCs in patients with increased serum AFP concentration or normal results on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT.
- © 2010 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
REFERENCES
- Received for publication May 26, 2010.
- Accepted for publication September 7, 2010.