Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Comparison of measurement and simulation using GATE with optical photon tracking for a DOI PET detector

Fazal ur-Rehman, Bryan McIntosh and Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1540;
Fazal ur-Rehman
1University of Manitoba, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan McIntosh
2University of Manitoba, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Goertzen
3University of Manitoba, Dept. of Radiology, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1540

Objectives We are using GATE simulations to model a dual-ended readout LSO based PET detector with DOI capability. In this work we attempt to validate simulations of DOI resolution against previously published experimental results.

Methods Simulations including optical photon transport were performed using GATE ver. 4.0.0. Dual-ended readout detectors were simulated with LSO crystals of widths 1.0, 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 mm and length 20 mm. Side surfaces were set as rough-teflon-wrapped and end surfaces were polished. Each end was coupled to a 'perfect APD' surface. Crystals were irradiated with a pencil beam source of 511 keV photons oriented perpendicular to the long axis in steps of 2.5 mm. DOI position was calculated as the ratio APD1/(APD1+APD2). DOI resolution was determined as a ratio of the FWHM of the distribution of the ratio signal and its slope versus irradiation depth. Simulated data were compared against published experimental results (Shao et al., IEEE Trans Nuc Sci, 49(3) 2002; Yang et al., Phys Med Biol, 51 2006).

Results Table 1 shows the average DOI resolution for the simulated and experimental results. There is agreement in the trend of better resolution with thinner crystal, but systematic differences for events with energy > 350 keV (simulation better than experiment) and for energy < 350 keV (experiment better than simulation).

Conclusions While GATE results give the general trend in DOI resolution, there are systematic differences that need to be further explored. We are examining the source of these variations through refinements of the simulated optical surfaces.

Research Support Supported by funding from NSERC Discovery Grant 360020-2008 and Manitoba Health Research Council Studentship Award.


Embedded Image
  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of measurement and simulation using GATE with optical photon tracking for a DOI PET detector
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of measurement and simulation using GATE with optical photon tracking for a DOI PET detector
Fazal ur-Rehman, Bryan McIntosh , Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1540;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of measurement and simulation using GATE with optical photon tracking for a DOI PET detector
Fazal ur-Rehman, Bryan McIntosh , Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1540;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Instrumentation

  • Development of PET-Hat: Wearable PET system for brain research
  • First images from a combined PET and field-cycled MRI system
  • Development of prototype PET scanner using two-dimensional position sensitive CdTe detectors
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Instrumentation Posters

  • Feasibility of Low-Dose18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Patients using SiPM-based Detector PET: Quantitative and Qualitative Image Evaluation
  • Image quality of brain SPECT recorded with the whole-body Veriton CZT camera and a focal brain configuration of detectors, as compared with conventional SPECT and PET systems
  • Initial clinical experience with rapid high definition Na18F digital photon counting PET/CT imaging for whole-body osteoblastic disease assessment
Show more Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire