Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

Radiation risks to lymphoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG studies

Lilia Hardin, James Ravenel, Leonie Gordon, Walter Huda and Eugene Mah
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1360;
Lilia Hardin
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Ravenel
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonie Gordon
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Huda
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugene Mah
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Charleston, SC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1360

Objectives To investigate radiation risks to patients undergoing 18F-FDG studies that take into account patient age, sex, and weight.

Methods We obtained patient demographics and weights of 54 consecutive patients with lymphoma who each underwent a18F-FDG PET study. The administered activity was converted into an effective dose using the patient size dependent dosimetry data provided in ICRP Publication 80. Patient effective doses were converted into estimates of the lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and cancer mortality using age and sex dependent risk factors provided in BEIR VII.

Results The average patient age/weight in this study was 43 years/68 kg for males and 33 years/61 kg for females. Patient effective dose are proportional to patient weight(-0.784) (r2 >0.99). The average administered activity was 410 MBq, which resulted in an average effective dose of 8.5 mSv for males and 8.9 mSv for females. The average cancer incidence was 0.71/1,000 cases for males, and 1.27/1,000 cases for females, with cancer mortality being about half the incidence. Cancer rates for the youngest patients were an order of magnitude higher than those for the oldest patients.

Conclusions Average lifetime attributable cancer risks to lymphoma patients from a single FDG-PET study is approximately 1 per 1,000, but are strongly influenced by patient age, gender and weight. Cancer risk in younger patients is magnitude of order greater.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation risks to lymphoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radiation risks to lymphoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG studies
Lilia Hardin, James Ravenel, Leonie Gordon, Walter Huda, Eugene Mah
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1360;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiation risks to lymphoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG studies
Lilia Hardin, James Ravenel, Leonie Gordon, Walter Huda, Eugene Mah
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1360;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

  • Cost analysis of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in cancer patients: “Single step” examination vs stand-alone modalities
  • Variability in cholescintigraphy (HIDA) protocols in hospitals across the state of Alabama
  • 18FDG PET/CT vs. 123I-MIBG imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: Diagnostic comparison and survival analysis
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research Posters

  • Cost analysis of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in cancer patients: “Single step” examination vs stand-alone modalities
  • Variability in cholescintigraphy (HIDA) protocols in hospitals across the state of Alabama
  • 18FDG PET/CT vs. 123I-MIBG imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: Diagnostic comparison and survival analysis
Show more Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire