Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

Vascular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Optimal 18F-FDG Circulation Time?

James H.F. Rudd, Maysoon Elkhawad and Zahi A. Fayad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2009, 50 (9) 1560; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.066456
James H.F. Rudd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maysoon Elkhawad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zahi A. Fayad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: We read with interest the paper by Menezes et al. (1) concerning the optimal circulation time for 18F-FDG in relation to atherosclerosis imaging. We think the paper considerably advances the knowledge base within this emerging field. We would like to raise a few points in relation to the work.

First, the reason for choosing to image patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is not clear. In order for one to draw conclusions about the optimum time to start PET/CT acquisition in atherosclerosis, surely the study of atherosclerosis patients would have been a better choice? Although the processes underlying both diseases are similar, inflammation may not be the dominant pathology at all stages of AAA (2). Given the decision to study patients with AAA, without intravenous contrast, it is hard to be sure that regions of interest were indeed placed on the wall of the aorta rather than on areas of thrombus.

Second, it is not clear whether the outcome variable used was a single hottest standardized uptake value within the aneurysm or whether a complete slice-by-slice analysis of the aorta was performed. Along the same line, was the 18F-FDG uptake in other regions of the aorta or in the carotid arteries measured? Those results, if available, would add considerable weight to the conclusions drawn because they would reflect atherosclerotic plaque inflammation rather than presumed atherosclerosis within AAA.

Finally, why did the authors choose the lumen of the aorta from which to derive background blood signal, rather than an adjacent vein such as the inferior vena cava or jugular as previously described (3,4)? The aortic lumen regions of interest may have been subject to partial-volume errors of activity spilling into the field. This possibility could explain some of the variability experienced in the later target-to-background measurements.

We congratulate the authors on their important study. We agree that standardization of imaging protocols (dose, acquisition mode, and imaging time points) across different vendors is crucial to the appropriate use of this technology for efficacy tests of novel antiatherosclerosis drugs and for possible prediction of future events.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Menezes LJ, Kotze CW, Hutton BF, et al. Vascular inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: when to image? J Nucl Med. 2009;50:854–857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Golledge J, Muller J, Daugherty A, Norman P. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2605–2613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Rudd JH, Myers KS, Bansilal S, et al. Atherosclerosis inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET: carotid, iliac, and femoral uptake reproducibility, quantification methods, and recommendations. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:871–878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Bashian GG, et al. In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1818–1824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 9
September 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vascular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Optimal 18F-FDG Circulation Time?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Vascular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Optimal 18F-FDG Circulation Time?
James H.F. Rudd, Maysoon Elkhawad, Zahi A. Fayad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2009, 50 (9) 1560; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066456

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vascular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Optimal 18F-FDG Circulation Time?
James H.F. Rudd, Maysoon Elkhawad, Zahi A. Fayad
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2009, 50 (9) 1560; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066456
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of Noninsulin-Dependent Type 2 Diabetes on Carotid Wall 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Uptake
  • Imaging Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation by Fluorodeoxyglucose With Positron Emission Tomography: Ready for Prime Time?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Sink Effect: Myth or Reality?
  • Thoughts on “Tumor Sink Effect in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: Myth or Reality?”
  • Reply: Posterior Cingulate Involvement Does Not Argue against LATE -- and Who Said It Does?
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire