Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Clinical experience with a PET/CT scanner to account for intrafraction motion in radiation oncology

Amish Shah, Twyla Willoughby, Sanford Meeks, Anand Santhanam and Patrick Kupelian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 393P;
Amish Shah
1Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Twyla Willoughby
1Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanford Meeks
1Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anand Santhanam
1Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Kupelian
1Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1656

Objectives: To report on the feasibility of respiratory-gated lung radiotherapy with dependence on 4DPET and 4DCT for treatment planning rather than simulation with conventional CT.

Methods: Respiratory-correlated data from both a PET/CT system (Siemens Biograph 64) and a Philips CT system were acquired. Gated acquisition was performed with the Anzai and the Varian RPM systems, respectively. Correlation was measured between 4DCT and 4DPET, in phantom, based on respiratory phase by calculating the deviation from the mean tumor position for each phase relative to a fixed position (similar to bony anatomy). The accuracy of each external surrogate was also tested in phantom (Fig 1). Treatment planning and gated delivery were performed using two treatment planning systems in conjunction with a Varian linear accelerator. An end-to-end test for gated radiotherapy was performed and has shown reliable delivery of the intended plan developed from 4DPET/CT imaging. Five lung cancer patients have received respiratory-gated treatment using this methodology.

Results: When comparing between phases, less than 5% uncertainty in the phantom study provided good correlation between the 4DCT and 4DPET data. Insignificant differences were measured between the surrogate systems used for gated acquisition. Improvements of dose distributions on the moving targets improved with gated delivery. Localization uncertainty of the moving target was less than 3 mm.

Conclusions: We conclude that 4DPET/CT studies yield accurate respiratory-correlated information (spatial and temporal) of the tumor region. Also proven is the integration of a Siemens PET/CT system with BrainLab and Varian systems for gated radiotherapy.

Research Support: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando receives research funding from Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical experience with a PET/CT scanner to account for intrafraction motion in radiation oncology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical experience with a PET/CT scanner to account for intrafraction motion in radiation oncology
Amish Shah, Twyla Willoughby, Sanford Meeks, Anand Santhanam, Patrick Kupelian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 393P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical experience with a PET/CT scanner to account for intrafraction motion in radiation oncology
Amish Shah, Twyla Willoughby, Sanford Meeks, Anand Santhanam, Patrick Kupelian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 393P;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT
  • Comparison of gap compensation methods for small-diameter PET
  • Consistency of standardized uptake value with variation in PET reconstruction parameters
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT
  • Comparison of gap compensation methods for small-diameter PET
  • Consistency of standardized uptake value with variation in PET reconstruction parameters
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire