Abstract
The norepinephrine transporter (NET) has recently been suggested as a useful reporter gene. We have extended this effort by constructing an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-linked hNET-green fluorescent protein (GFP) hybrid reporter gene for both nuclear and optical imaging. Methods: A retroviral vector pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP was constructed and used to generate several reporter cell lines and xenografts. Transduced cells were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting based on GFP expression and used for both in vitro and in vivo imaging studies. Results: The transduced reporter cells accumulated 123I- or 124I-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) to high levels compared with the wild-type parent cell lines. Differences in MIBG accumulation between cell lines were primarily due to differences in influx (K1) rather than efflux (k2). The estimated MIBG distribution volumes (Vd) for transduced Jurkat, C6, and COS-7 cells were 572 ± 13, 754 ± 25, and 1,556 ± 38 mL/g, respectively. A correlation between radiotracer accumulation (K1) and GFP fluorescence intensity was also demonstrated. Sequential imaging studies of mice bearing pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP transduced and wild-type C6 xenografts demonstrated several advantages of 124I-MIBG small-animal PET compared with 123I-MIBG γ-camera/SPECT. This was primarily due to the longer half-life of 124I and to the retention and slow clearance (half-time, 63 ± 6 h) of MIBG from transduced xenografts compared with that from wild-type xenografts (half-time, 12 ± 1 h) and other organs (half-time, 2.6–21 h). Very high radioactivity ratios were observed at later imaging times; at 73 h after 124I-MIBG injection, the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenograft-to-muscle ratio was 293 ± 48 whereas the C6 xenograft-to-muscle ratio was 0.71 ± 0.19. Conclusion: These studies demonstrate the potential for a wider application of hNET reporter imaging and the future translation to patient studies using radiopharmaceuticals that are currently available for both SPECT and PET.
The norepinephrine transporter (NET) functions as a rapid norepinephrine reuptake system located at or near presynaptic terminals and terminates noradrenergic signaling by rapid reuptake of neuronally released norepinephrine. In this capacity, NET provides a finely regulated mechanism for noradrenergic-mediated behavioral and physiologic effects, including mood, depression, cognition, and regulation of feeding patterns, blood pressure, and heart rate. Human NET (hNET) is a transmembrane protein (617 amino acids) that mediates the transport of norepinephrine, dopamine, and epinephrine across the cell membrane (1). Human, bovine, rat, and mouse NET complementary DNAs (cDNAs) have been cloned (1,2). In humans, NET is encoded by a single gene of 14 exons and 13 introns. NET protein belongs to a family of Na+/Cl−-dependent transporters that have highly conserved hydrophobic amino acid sequences (12 or 13 transmembrane domains), with less conservation at their amino and carboxyl ends. NET is considered to be a homo-oligomer complex, where Na+ and Cl− ions provide an inward electrochemical gradient and adenosine triphosphate/adenosine triphosphatase are critical elements for neurotransmitter accumulation (2).
The expression of NET in mammals is almost exclusively restricted to the central and peripheral sympathetic nervous system (3). Because of its localized expression in the body, the hNET has recently been suggested as a human reporter gene (4–6). Advantages of hNET as a human reporter gene include the availability and established efficacy of several different radiopharmaceuticals for clinical imaging of endogenous hNET expression in neuroendocrine tumors and for imaging altered sympathetic enervation of the heart in various cardiac disease states (7,8). An extensive 20-y history of γ-camera/SPECT of hNET expression exists with 123I- or 131I-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) (9,10), and a less extensive 16-y history of PET exists with 11C-labeled hydroxyephedrine (HED) (11). Efforts to develop new and better radiolabeled norepinephrine analogs continue, particularly for imaging the hNET in brain, where the blood–brain barrier limits the access of currently available radiotracers, including MIBG and HED (12).
Because NET is a cell-surface transporter and binding of the ligand occurs at the cell membrane, radiopharmaceutical delivery to systemic tissues is rapid and determined by equilibration between blood and extracellular fluid. The signal generated by radioligand accumulation is “transport-amplified” and, therefore, substantially greater than that due to binding to the transporter alone. The human origin of the hNET protein is also important, as it is unlikely to generate an immune response. This is a considerable advantage and facilitates the design of reporter systems for application in long-term human subjects. Currently, the most widely used radionuclide-based reporter gene in both animal and patient studies is the herpes simplex virus-type 1 thymidine kinase gene (HSV1-tk) (13,14) and the sr39 variant (HSV1-tksr39) (15,16). Although HSV1-tk has been used widely as a suicide gene in many anticancer research studies and documented HSV1-tk immunogenicity is sparse (17), potential risks for long-term expression of this transgene remain a concern, especially for nonsuicide gene applications.
Other human genes have been proposed and developed as reporter genes; they include cell membrane transporter genes, such as the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) (18), as well as genes that encode for cell-surface and intracellular receptors, including the human somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (hSSTR2) (19) and the dopamine D2 (hD2R) receptor (20). Background expression of the hNIS reporter could be a problem; endogenous hNIS expression is at very high levels in thyrocytes and stomach but is lower in mammary, salivary, and lacrimal glands (21). The expression of the 2 receptors is more limited within the body; hD2R expression is largely limited to the striatal–nigral system of the brain, and hSSTR2 expression is largely limited to carcinoid tumors. Both transporters and receptors have clinically approved radiopharmaceuticals for imaging: 123I- or 131I-iodide (9,10), 111In-DTPA-octreotide (DTPA is diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) and 3-(2′-18F-fluoroethyl)spiperone (FESP) (22), respectively.
To further explore hNET as a potential human reporter gene, we constructed a constitutively expressing dual-reporter retroviral vector, pQCX-hNET linked with green fluorescent protein (GFP) through internal ribosome entry site (IRES), and used this vector to transduce 3 different cell lines. In vitro uptake studies using radiolabeled MIBG were performed in transduced and wild-type cells, and the resulting data were analyzed kinetically to yield estimates of MIBG influx (K1), efflux (k2), and volume of distribution (Vd). The focus of our study, however, was to compare 124I-MIBG PET with 123I-MIBG γ-camera and SPECT of hNET expression in the same animals, bearing xenografts that were generated from stably transduced and wild-type cell lines. These comparative studies demonstrated the advantages of 124I-MIBG PET and suggest that the optimal time for 124I-MIBG PET is late, ∼48–72 h in mice, when tissue background radioactivity is low.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Generation of pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP Retroviral Vector and Transduction of Tumor Cells
The pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP retroviral vector bearing the hNET and GFP genes separated by an IRES was developed by substitution of hNET for the hNIS gene in the previously developed vector pQCXhNIS-IRES-GFP (23). The full-length human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) cDNA was obtained by polymerase chain reaction using primers with flanking NotI (5′) and BamHI (3′) restriction sites. As a template, we used the retroviral plasmid M48EF1a/II-hNETIVSIRES-hyg kindly provided by Dr. Uwe Haberkorn (1). The resulting retroviral plasmid contains a constitutive cytomegalovirus promoter, which drives the expression of the hNET and IRES-linked GFP reporter genes (Fig. 1A).
SK-N-SH, C6, COS-7, and Jurkat cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. Cells were transduced with the pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP retroviral vector as previously described (24). GFP expression in transduced tumor cells was visualized by fluorescence microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse T-100. After transduction, the cells were expanded in culture for several days and prepared for subsequent fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and cell sorting as previously described (25).
MIBG Synthesis
The 123I-MIBG was obtained from MDS Nordion (Canada). The average radiochemical purity was in excess of 97% (determined by MDS Nordion using the Sep-Pak cartridge [Waters Corp.] method), and the specific activity was ∼322 MBq/μmol (8.7 mCi/μmol) according to the vendor. 124I-MIBG was prepared using minor modifications to the recently reported nucleophilic isotopic exchange method (26). To a reaction vial containing 2 mg of MIBG-hemisulfate is added 0.5 mg of SnSO4, 5 mg of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 11 mg of citric acid, and 0.1 mg CuSO4, and at the end is added no-carrier-added Na124I to an end volume of 0.8 mL. The reaction mixture is flushed with N2 and heated at 130°C for 30 min. On cooling, the mixture is passed through a C-18 Sep-Pak cartridge and the product is eluted with absolute ethanol. The final product is passed through a 0.22-μm filter into a sterile vial. The radiochemical purity of the final product was >95%, with an overall yield of >80%; the specific activity was 18.5 ± 5.2 MBq/μmol (0.5 ± 0.14 mCi/μmol). The maximum specific activity (no-carrier-added synthesis) for 123I- and 124I-labeled compounds is 8.9 and 1.2 TBq/μmol (241 and 33 Ci/μmol), respectively, due to the 7.4-fold difference in the rate of radioactive decay of the 2 isotopes.
Radiotracer Assay for hNET Expression In Vitro
Radiotracer MIBG uptake studies were performed in C6/hNET-IRES-GFP, COS-7/hNET-IRES-GFP, and Jurkat cells/hNET-IRES-GFP and in nontransduced wild-type cells using previously described methods (23). Briefly, cells (5 × 104/mL × 20 mL) were seeded onto 15-cm dishes. After a 24-h incubation period at 37°C with 5% CO2, the medium was aspirated and the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). MIBG uptake was initiated by adding 15 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium containing 0.0037 MBq/mL (0.1 μCi/mL) 124I-MIBG or 123I-MIBG. Cells were harvested after a 15- to 240-min incubation period, and the activity ratio in the cell pellet and medium was measured in a Packard γ-counter (United Technologies). All experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least twice.
The uptake profiles were fitted to a 1-compartment model to estimate the influx rate constant (K1, mL medium/g cells/min), the efflux rate constant (k2, min−1), and the volume of distribution (Vd, mL medium/g cells). The fitting was performed using KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software) (version 3.6.4).
Immunoblot Analysis
To evaluate the level of hNET protein expression in reporter cells (C6, Jurkat, and COS-7/hNET-IRES-GFP), positive control cell line (SK-N-SH wild-type), and wild-type cells, immunoblot analysis was performed. A purified mouse antibody against hNET (NET17–1; Mab Tech Inc.) was used at a final dilution of 1:500, and a 12-h incubation at +4°C was performed. The secondary antibody (peroxidase-conjugated antimouse IgG; Vector Laboratories Inc.) exposure was for 1 h at a 1:2,000 dilution. Peroxidase-bound protein bands were visualized using the electrochemoluminescence method (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
In Vivo Imaging
Two cohorts of animals were studied. Both cohorts included 6 athymic rnu/rnu mice (National Cancer Institute) bearing C6/hNET-IRES-GFP and C6 wild-type xenografts in opposite shoulders. All animal studies were performed under a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee. The mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane/oxygen. After the studies all animals were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation.
123I-MIBG γ-Camera/SPECT
Each animal was injected intravenously with 11.1 MBq (300 μCi) of 123I-MIBG and imaged on an X-SPECT dedicated small-animal γ-camera SPECT/CT scanner (Gamma Medica). A photopeak energy window of 143–175 keV and a low-energy, high-resolution (LEHR) parallel-hole collimator was used to acquire the 123I images. Planar dynamic imaging, at 1 frame per minute, was performed immediately after 123I-MIBG injection over 30 min. The full width half maximum (FWHM) spatial resolution was ∼7 mm (based on imaging of 99mTc line sources in air at a source-to-detector distance of 10 cm). A combined set of static planar and SPECT (64 projection images [at 32 azimuths of the dual-detector X-SPECT system] at 1 min per image) images was acquired at 4 and 24 h (cohort 1) and at 4, 24, and 48 h (cohort 2). Transverse images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection.
124I-MIBG microPET Imaging
The first cohort of mice (described above) was also imaged sequentially over 72 h, after intravenous injection of 7.4 MBq (200 μCi) of 124I-MIBG, using a Focus 120 microPET dedicated small-animal PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). 124I-MIBG was injected 48 h after 123I-MIBG was administered; PET before 124I-MIBG injection showed only background activity, demonstrating that residue 123I radioactivity was not visualized by the Focus 120 microPET scanner. The xenografts increased in size slightly during this 2-d interval, from 0.63 ± 0.053 to 0.71 ± 0.07 cm3 (12%) and from 0.61 ± 0.068 to 0.69 ± 0.09 cm3 (11%) for wild-type and pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP transduced C6 xenografts, respectively. Sequential 15-min list-mode acquisitions were obtained for each animal at 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h. A narrow energy window of 420–580 keV and a coincidence timing window of 6 ns were used. The resulting list-mode data were sorted into 2-dimensional histograms by Fourier rebinning; transverse images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection. The image data were corrected for nonuniformity of scanner response, dead time count losses, and physical decay to the time of injection. There was no correction applied for attenuation, scatter, or partial-volume averaging. The measured reconstructed spatial resolution of the Focus 120 is ∼1.6-mm FWHM at the center of the field of view.
Region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the acquired images was performed using ASIPro software (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.), and the maximum pixel value was recorded for each tissue/organ ROI. A system calibration factor (i.e., mCi/mL/cps/voxel) that was used for analysis derived from reconstructed images of a mouse-size water-filled cylinder containing 18F and was used to convert the 124I voxel count rates to activity concentrations (after adjustment for the 124I positron branching ratio). The resulting image data were then normalized to the administered activity to parameterize the microPET images in terms of %ID/g (percentage of injected dose per gram of tumor corrected for radioactive decay to the time of injection).
Iodide uptake in thyroid and stomach was not blocked, and radioactivity in these organs reflects radioactive iodide release after the slow catabolism of MIBG. Clearance half-times were calculated from either a single- or a double-exponential fit of the tissue washout profiles: tissue activity = A0·e^(−ka·t) or tissue activity = A0·e^(−ka·t) + B0·e^(−kb·t), respectively. The estimated “%dose/cm3” is given as Ao or Ao+ Bo, The “% total radioactivity” was calculated for tissues that required a 2-exponential fit of the washout data and reflects the percentage of radioactivity cleared by the first and second exponentials; this was calculated from 100·Ao/(Ao+ Bo) and 100·Bo/(Ao+ Bo) for the first and second exponentials, respectively.
Tissue Sampling
After the last imaging session, 72 h after 124I-MIBG injection, all animals were sacrificed; the xenografts as well as various tissues were removed and assayed for radioactivity in a Packard γ-counter (United Technologies).
Statistics
Statistical significance of differences between mean values was estimated with Excel (Microsoft) using the independent t test for unequal variances. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Development of hNET Reporter Cell Lines
To compare the efficiency of imaging the hNET as a reporter gene with 123I-MIBG/microSPECT and 124I-MIBG/microPET, a retroviral vector (pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP) encoding both hNET and GFP genes was constructed (Fig. 1A) and used to transduce C6, Jurkat, and COS-7 cell lines. COS-7 is a green monkey kidney cell line that has been used in several previous hNET imaging studies (6). To assess the potential for primary T cells' transduction and imaging with hNET, we choose Jurkat cells (a leukemia T cell line). Unlike primary human T cells, Jurkat cells can be maintained easily in culture in the absence of cytokines. C6 is a rat glioma cell line with good tumorigenic properties and a standard cell line in our laboratory. The pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP transduced cells were initially identified by fluorescence microscopy. FACS analyses of the transduced cells demonstrated a difference in transduction efficiency between different cell lines. As expected, COS-7 and C6 had a greater fraction of GFP expression (30% and 45%, respectively) compared with Jurkat cells (10%). Gene transfer in Jurkat cells usually results in only a 15%–20% transduction efficiency (27). Reporter cells were selected using FACS on the basis of GFP expression. After FACS sorting, 97% of C6 and COS-7 cells were GFP+; only 76% of Jurkat cells expressed GFP after the second round of sorting (Fig. 1B).
123I-MIBG and 124I-MIBG Uptake Study in Wild-Type and hNET Reporter Cells
The accumulation of iodine-labeled MIBG in tracer quantities was compared in C6/, Jurkat/, and COS-7/hNET-IRES2-GFP reporter cells and in corresponding wild-type cells. The 3 lines of reporter cells accumulated MIBG rapidly, reaching cell-to-medium ratios > 200 within 15 min of incubation. Plateau levels were reached by 90–120 min and the plateau level varied between the 3 transduced cell lines: COS-7 ≫ C6 > Jurkat (Fig. 2A). Wild-type C6, Jurkat, and Cos-7 cells accumulated MIBG to low levels (cell-to-medium ratio, ∼8–10), and these differences were highly significant compared with transduced C6/, Jurkat/, and COS-7/hNET-IRES2-GFP reporter cells (P < 0.00007, P < 0.00005, and P < 0.00001, respectively). The kinetic parameters derived from a 1-compartment fit of the 0- to 120-min MIBG uptake data (Table 1) indicate that the differences in MIBG uptake primarily reflect differences in K1, as the magnitude of k2 was similar in both wild-type and pQCXhNET-IRES-GFP transduced cells. The relationship between MIBG accumulation (K1) and GFP expression (fluorescence intensity) for the 3 transduced cell lines was plotted (Fig. 2B).
To confirm the level of hNET expression in the reporter cells, immunoblot analyses was performed. We found a very high level of hNET expression in transduced COS-7 cells (Fig. 2C, band 4) and less intense bands for transduced C6 and Jurkat cells (Fig. 2C, bands 2 and 6, respectively). No hNET protein bands appeared in wild-type C6 and Jurkat cells (bands 1 and 5, respectively), but weak-intensity bands were identified in COS-7 cells (Fig. 2C, band 3) and SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells (Fig. 2C, band 7). Both COS-7 and SK-N-SH cells have low levels of endogenous norepinephrine transporter expression (1).
123I-MIBG γ-Camera/microSPECT Imaging
γ-Camera (Fig. 3A) and SPECT (Fig. 3B) images of 123I-MIBG accumulation in C6/hNET-IRES-GFP and C6 wild-type xenografts were obtained at different times (at 4 and 24 h in cohort 1 and at 4, 24, and 48 h in cohort 2). As seen in the images, hNET-positive xenografts are better visualized (better signal-to-background) 24 h after 123I-MIBG administration compared with visualization of the 4-h images. The 48-h images were somewhat noisy due to isotope decay and a low count rate (3.7 half-lives from time of injection).
124I-MIBG microPET Imaging
To further explore the time course of MIBG uptake and clearance, we performed sequential microPET imaging over 72 h after intravenous injection of 124I-MIBG (Fig. 4). High levels of 124I-MIBG were seen in the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenograft between 4 and 48 h, whereas only background levels of radioactivity were observed in the C6 wild-type xenograft. Initially (at 1 h), high levels of radioactivity were also seen in the bladder, kidneys, intestine, liver, and thyroid. The sequential images show retention and a slow washout of radioactivity from the reporter-positive xenograft in comparison with the rapid washout of radioactivity in the wild-type xenograft and other tissues and organs.
Biodistribution Profiles
Time–activity profiles of 124I radioactivity in the 2 xenografts and in various tissues were generated from data obtained by ROI analysis of the sequential PET images (Fig. 4); the profiles of 124I-MIBG–derived radioactivity in the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP and C6 wild-type xenografts are shown in Figure 5A. Radioactivity in the reporter-transduced xenografts increased over the first 8 h and then slowly washed out with an exponential clearance half-time of 63 h (Table 2). In contrast, radioactivity in the wild-type xenografts peaked before the initial 1-h imaging session, and an exponential washout with a clearance half-time of 12 h was observed between 1 and 72 h (Table 2). Most organs showed a similar radioactivity uptake and washout profile, varying only in magnitude (Table 2). Intestine was an exception in that intestinal radioactivity peaked at 4 h and then cleared exponentially.
The time course of image contrast, reflected by the xenograft-to-muscle ratio, shows that the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenograft-to-muscle ratio continues to increase over 72 h (Fig. 5B). In contrast, the C6-to-muscle radioactivity ratio remained essentially constant over 72 h, with values ranging from 0.9 to 1.6.
The levels of radioactivity determined by well-counting of postmortem samples were consistent with the imaging results (Table 3). 124I-MIBG-derived radioactivity in the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP tumors (1.5 ± 0.3 %ID/g) was >100-fold greater than that in most other sampled tissues and organs. Exceptions included bladder (∼13-fold) and thyroid, stomach, and intestine (∼40- to 50-fold).
DISCUSSION
We confirm the potential of hNET as a useful human reporter gene and demonstrate the advantages of imaging with 124I-MIBG and PET. The hNET immunoblot, GFP-FACS, and in vitro MIBG uptake studies in 3 different cell lines demonstrate cell-specific differences in transduction/expression efficiency (Cos-7 ≫ C6 > Jurkat). These differences appear to be more related to transcriptional expression than to posttranslational effects or to differences in the insertion of hNET into the cell membrane or transport function, as a relatively constant relationship was maintained between the level of GFP expression and MIBG accumulation (Fig. 2B). The kinetic analysis was consistent with a 1-compartment (cell) model, where the equilibrium accumulation level (Vd) of MIBG was determined primarily by the influx rate (K1). Efflux was similar between cell lines and between transduced and wild-type cells; the mean equilibration half-time for transduced and wild-type cells calculated from the efflux values was 17 ± 8 and 21 ± 11 min, respectively. The kinetic data suggest that efflux of MIBG from the cells is “passive” and independent of transporter expression levels.
Imaging hNET Expression
The in vivo imaging studies demonstrated better image quality with 124I-MIBG and PET compared with 123I-MIBG and SPECT, particularly at the later time points. This better image quality was observed despite the lower specific activity of 124I-MIBG compared with that of 123I-MIBG. Previous studies have shown that higher levels (%ID/g or standardized uptake value) of 123I-MIBG were accumulated by hNET-expressing tissues using a radiopharmaceutical with very high specific activity compared with that measured using a commercially available product with lower specific activity (28,29). However, image quality (transduced tumor-to-background) was not appreciably different, due to the higher surrounding tissue (background) activity observed with high specific activity 123I-MIBG SPECT.
High levels of MIBG-derived radioactivity were measured in the transduced xenografts; radioactivity levels peaked at 8 h and then cleared in an exponential manner. A single 24-h 123I-MIBG uptake value in nude mice bearing a human neuroblastoma (PC12) or a bovine bNET-transduced (A431NET) cell line/xenograft has been reported, and the values (1.3 ± 0.3 %ID/g and 2.6 ± 0.9 %ID/g, respectively) were similar to that measured here for C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts (2.2 ± 0.9 %ID/g) (5). The wild-type A431 xenograft and muscle values (0.08 and 0.11 %ID/g) were also quite similar to that measured in this study (0.09 and 0.19 %ID/g, respectively). Given the difference between tissue sampling and PET measures, these studies demonstrate that very high NET-transduced tissue-to-muscle ratios can be achieved using radiolabeled MIBG and a “late imaging” paradigm. At 24 h, this ratio was 17:1, 24:1, and 30:1 for PC12, A431NET, and C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts, respectively. Although 124I-MIBG was slowly washing out of the transduced xenograft, imaging at later times (48 and 72 h) resulted in substantially higher C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenograft-to-muscle ratios (49:1 and 130:1, respectively) (Fig. 5B) because the washout and clearance of radioactivity from systemic tissues and the nontransduced xenograft was ∼5-fold more rapid (Fig. 5A).
The 2- and 4-h radioactivity values for hNET-transduced xenografts in rats reported by Altmann et al. (4) were similar to that observed in our study in mice, whereas the 24- and 48-h values in Altman et al. (4) were one fifth to one tenth of that reported here. The lower radioactivity values in the Altman et al. (4) study suggest a more rapid washout and clearance of 131I-MIBG radioactivity in their animals and may reflect a species difference between rats and mice. The estimated half-time of radioactivity clearance from their hNET-transduced xenografts can be calculated from the tissue-sampling data presented (1); a t1/2 of 11 ± 1 h was calculated and this is considerably shorter than the 63 ± 6 h obtained for C6 hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts in this study. Surprisingly, the calculated half-time of radioactivity clearance from wild-type xenografts in the Altman et al. study (4) was 13 ± 2 h and very similar to that for their hNET-transduced xenografts. In contrast, the clearance of 124I-MIBG from the C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts in this study was significantly slower, ∼5-fold, than in C6 wild-type xenografts and most host tissues (average, 13 ± 3 h; Table 2). We suggest that the slow clearance of 124I-MIBG from C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts reported here is not due to a difference in efflux rate between transduced and wild-type cells, as the in vitro studies showed similar MIBG efflux rate constants in wild-type and transduced cells. Rather, this difference more likely reflects rapid, local reuptake of 124I-MIBG in the transduced xenografts in comparison with that in normal host tissues and the wild-type xenografts.
Other radiolabeled ligands have been developed previously to image NET function and study noradrenergic innervation and activity, particularly in the heart and brain. Most success has been associated with imaging sympathetic enervation in normal and abnormal cardiac states, including diabetes, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and after heart transplantation using 11C-meta-hydroxyephedrine (HED), 11C-epinedrine (EPI) and PET (30,31). 11C-HED and PET has been shown to have certain advantages for imaging neuroendocrine tumors (neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma, gangliogliomas, etc.) compared with 123I-MIBG and SPECT due to differences in imaging resolution and sensitivity between PET and SPECT tomographs, as well as the differences in half-life of the PET and SPECT radionuclides (32–34). Only limited success has been achieved in developing novel ligands for imaging NET transporter function in the brain. This has been largely due to the blood–brain barrier and hydrophilicity of established ligands such as MIBG and HED; detailed discussions of the relevant issues are presented in a recent review (12).
Few direct comparisons between 11C-HED and 123I-MIBG imaging of neuroendocrine tumors have been performed. In a recent study of 19 consecutive patients, 11C-HED PET/CT (low-dose CT) studies were compared with attenuation-corrected 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT scans obtained 5- to ∼20 min and 24 h after tracer administration, respectively (32). 11C-HED PET/CT detected 80 of 81 tumor lesions and 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT detected 75 of 81 lesions; there were no false-positive lesions with either tracer. Lesion-to-background contrast varied; 11C-HED PET displayed greater contrast than 123I-MIBG SPECT in 26 lesions, whereas the reverse was observed in 16 lesions (the remaining 39 lesions were judged to have equal contrast). In a recent study of pheochromocytoma, 11C-HED PET was found to be superior to 131I-MIBG planar scintigraphy in detecting tumor (35). However, no comparative 11C-HED PET versus 124I-MIBG PET studies have yet been reported. The major potential advantages of 124I-MIBG PET are low background and high contrast using a “late imaging” paradigm, whereas 11C-HED PET will have dosimetry and count-rate advantages that will permit repeated imaging studies. A comparison of recently published 11C-HED microPET images of mice (6) with the 124I-MIBG microPET images of mice reported here clearly illustrates the differences in background radioactivity and contrast that can be achieved with a “late imaging” paradigm (Figs. 4 and 5). Nevertheless, each of these 2 ligands would be expected to have specific applications in hNET reporter studies in patients and will likely be used in parallel.
Regulation of NET Expression
The regulation of NET expression and function is complex and involves several cellular systems. This includes alternative splicing (1), N-glycosylation of the TM3 and TM4 extracellular loop that alters intracellular trafficking and transmembrane expression (36,37), and several intracellular signaling pathways and molecules that are involved in phosphorylation of NET, including cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), protein kinases A and C (38) that all impact on and regulate cell-surface expression and function. There are 3 known C-terminal variants of the hNET. Although no differences were observed among the NET isoforms with respect to the Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) for uptake of 3H-norepinephrine and the dissociation constant (KD) for binding of 3H-nisoxetine, there was a marked decrease in the maximum velocity (Vmax) and maximum binding capacity (Bmax) for the spliced isoforms (39). The differences in Vmax and Bmax were shown to be strongly correlated with the cell-surface expression of the hNET isoforms. The decrease in cell-surface expression of the transporter in the 2 truncated isoforms was considered to be due to the lack of 3 amino acids (leucine, alanine, and isoleucine) at the C-terminal end. Thus, only the dominant, nontruncated hNET isoform is optimal for reporter gene imaging studies.
Concern has been raised previously about the potential signaling and functional effects of using monoamine receptors as reporter genes. This concern prompted the group at the University of California at Los Angeles to generate a signaling-inert mutant dopamine 2 receptor (D2R) for their reporter gene studies (40). Chronic activation of transduced wild-type D2R by endogenous monoamines could result in G-protein– mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity and chronic reduction of cAMP levels. Because these effects could alter several other signaling pathways and biologic function of the transduced cells and tissue, they developed and studied several mutant D2Rs. They showed that the D2R80A variant has similar in vitro 3H-spiperone binding parameters compared with wild-type D2R, but there was complete uncoupling of ligand binding from activation of the G-protein system. Stimulation of D2R80A-transduced cells with dopamine had no effect on cAMP levels.
Although hNET is not a receptor, it remains to be shown whether transducing cells with the hNET gene and cell-surface expression of the transporter will result in significant changes in specific signaling molecules and pathways that alter the biologic state of the transduced cells and tissue. We did not observe any difference in growth rate of wild-type C6 and transduced C6/hNET-IRES-GFP xenografts in nude mice. However, it was recently shown that norepinephrine can induce increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and phosphorylated cephalochordate neurotrophin receptor (Trk) in isolated embryonic hippocampal neurons, and these increases can be prevented by ERK (external regulated kinase) and PI-3K (PI-kinase) inhibitors. These results indicate that norepinephrine-induced BDNF expression follows a cyclic pathway, suggestive of a positive feedback loop, and provides an in vitro model of intracellular signaling mechanisms activated by norepinephrine, via ligand–G-protein–coupled receptor–to–BDNF receptor tyrosine kinase transactivation. The similarity to the dopamine G-protein–coupled D2R receptor–to–adenylyl cyclase system described above is noted. These are important issues and further studies addressing them need to be performed.
Cell-specific functionality may be important for the general application of hNET as a reporter gene, as the cell-surface expression and function of hNET are complex and highly regulated. Issues related to alternative splicing during transcription, N-glycosylation of specific extracellular, modulation by endogenous or induced protein kinase C pathway activity, and the effects of circulating norepinephrine (and other monamines) need to be considered. These processes could have a significant effect on the magnitude of radiolabeled probe accumulation and the imaging readout of the hNET reporter in different transduced cells and tissue. Further studies will have to be performed to determine the magnitude and significance of these potential limitations.
CONCLUSION
These studies demonstrate the potential for a wider application of hNET reporter imaging with 124I-MIBG and PET and for the future translation to patient studies using radiopharmaceuticals that are currently available for both SPECT and PET.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Uwe Haberkorn for kindly providing hNET plasmid; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Radiopharmacy, Cyclotron, Flow Cytometry, and Small Animals Imaging facilities; as well as Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty, PhD, and Rashid E. Ghani, RPh, MBA, for assistance with data collection and extensive discussions. This work was supported by the following grants: NIH grant P50-CA84638, NIH grant R24-CA98023, NCI Center Support Core grant P30-CA-08748, and U.S. Department of Energy grant DE-FG02-86ER60407.
Footnotes
-
↵* Contributed equally to this work.
-
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
References
- Received for publication November 1, 2006.
- Accepted for publication January 20, 2007.