Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 Receptors: Effects of Somatostatin Agonists and Antagonists

Renzo Cescato, Stefan Schulz, Beatrice Waser, Véronique Eltschinger, Jean E. Rivier, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Culler, Mihaela Ginj, Qisheng Liu, Agnes Schonbrunn and Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2006, 47 (3) 502-511;
Renzo Cescato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Schulz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrice Waser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Véronique Eltschinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean E. Rivier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jürgen Wester
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Culler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mihaela Ginj
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qisheng Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnes Schonbrunn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Claude Reubi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    sst2 internalization is induced by various agonists and is abolished by antagonist Coy-14. HEK-sst2 cells were treated for 30 min either with vehicle (no peptide [A]) or with various agonists at concentrations inducing submaximal internalization effect (100 nmol/L [B and C] and 10 nmol/L [D–F]). (H–L) Cells treated with same agonists at same concentrations as in B–F but in presence of excess of specific sst2-antagonist Coy-14 (5 [H], 10 [I], and 1 [J–L] μmol/L). Effect of antagonist alone (10 μmol/L [G]) is also shown. After incubation with peptides, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry. Clear punctate perinuclear staining is detectable for all tested agonists. This punctate staining is efficiently abolished by excess of antagonist Coy-14. Antagonist alone has no effect on internalization.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Dose response of agonist-induced sst2 internalization. HEK-sst2 cells were treated with 1 nmol/L, 10 nmol/L, 100 nmol/L, 1 μmol/L, or 10 μmol/L of various agonists. Also included are cells treated with 100 nmol/L TOC plus 5 μmol/L Coy-14 or with 1 μmol/L TOC plus 50 μmol/L Coy-14. After 30 min of incubation with peptides, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry, and internalized sst2 was quantified. (A) Representative experiment with dose-response curves for various agonists inducing sst2 internalization. TOC, Y-DOTA-TATE, and I-Gal-S-TATE are considerably more potent in inducing sst2 internalization than is DTPA-octreotide. TOC-induced internalization is efficiently abolished by excess of Coy-14. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of agonist-induced internalized sst2 using DTPA-octreotide and TOC. TOC is almost 2 orders of magnitude more potent in inducing sst2 internalization than is DTPA-octreotide.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    sst3 internalization is induced by various agonists and is efficiently abolished by sst3-specific antagonist sst3-ODN-8. HEK-sst3 cells were treated either with vehicle (no peptide [A]) or with various agonists at concentrations inducing submaximal internalization effect (100 nmol/L [B–D]). Cells treated with same agonists at same concentrations as in B–D but in presence of excess of specific sst3-antagonist sst3-ODN-8 (5 μmol/L [F–H]). Effect of antagonist alone (50 μmol/L [E]) is also illustrated. After incubation with peptides, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry. Clear perinuclear staining is detectable for all agonists tested. This staining is efficiently abolished by 50-fold excess of antagonist sst3-ODN-8. Antagonist alone has no effect on internalization.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Dose response of agonist-induced sst3 internalization. HEK-sst3 cells were treated with 1 nmol/L, 10 nmol/L, 100 nmol/L, 1 μmol/L, or 10 μmol/L of somatostatin-28 or KE108. Also included are cells treated with 100 nmol/L somatostatin-28 plus 5 μmol/L sst3-ODN-8 or with 1 μmol/L somatostatin-28 plus 50 μmol/L sst3-ODN-8. After incubation with peptides, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry, and internalized sst3 was quantified. This experiment shows that somatostatin-28 and KE108 are of similar potency in inducing sst3 internalization. Somatostatin-28–induced internalization effect is efficiently abolished by excess of sst3-ODN-8

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    sst5 internalization is induced by native somatostatin-28 but not by high-affinity synthetic sst5 agonists. HEK-sst5 cells were treated either with vehicle (no peptide); with 1 nmol/L, 10 nmol/L, 100 nmol/L, or 1 μmol/L somatostatin-28; or with 1 μmol/L KE108, 1 μmol/L BIM-23244, or 1 μmol/L L-817,818. After incubation with peptides, cells were processed for immunocytochemistry. Dose-response experiment with somatostatin-28 shows that it can elicit sst5 internalization. This is, however, not true for sst5 agonists KE108, BIM-23244, and L-817,818. Note also presence of intracellular sst5 even when cells were treated with vehicle alone (no peptide). All images are composed of 2 single pictures.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    sst2, sst3, and sst5 Binding Affinities and Internalization of Somatostatin and Somatostatin Analogs

    Receptor internalization
    Binding affinitysst2sst3sst5
    Compoundsst2sst3sst5HEK*CHO†AntagonizedHEK*AntagonizedHEK*
    Natural somatostatins
     Somatostatin-282.3 ± 0.1 (39)3.7 ± 0.3 (38)2.4 ± 0.2 (36)++ (0.71 ± 0.05)Yes+Yes+
     Somatostatin-140.7 ± 0.2 (5)3.3 ± 1.7 (4)10 ± 4 (4)+NDYes+ND+
    Various synthetic analogs
     [Tyr3]-octreotide (TOC)2.8 ± 0.6 (4)225 ± 82 (4)9.9 ± 1.8 (4)++ (0.51 ± 0.07)Yes−ND−
     Vapreotide acetate (RC160)1.8 ± 0.3 (5)233 ± 34 (4)4.8 ± 0.9 (5)++ (4.3 ± 1.4)ND−ND−
     Lanreotide (BIM-23014)1.6 ± 0.4 (2)438 ± 39 (2)7.4 ± 1.2 (2)++ (1.6 ± 0.1)ND−ND−
     KE1080.9 ± 0.1 (7)1.5 ± 0.2 (7)0.7 ± 0.1 (7)+NDYes+Yes−
     NOC-ATE3.6 ± 1.6 (3)302 ± 137 (3)17 ± 10 (3)+NDND−ND−
     BIM-232440.18 ± 0.02 (3)53 ± 7 (3)0.5 ± 0.2 (3)++ (0.08 ± 0.01)ND−ND−
     L-779,9760.6 ± 0.1 (4)>1,000 (4)>1,000 (4)++ (0.73 ± 0.18)ND−ND−
     L-817,818>1,000 (3)164 ± 17 (2)1.6 ± 0.4 (4)−—ND−ND−
    Chelated analogs
     DTPA-octreotide (MP2321)13 ± 2 (5)376 ± 84 (5)299 ± 51 (6)++ (23 ± 1)Yes−ND−
     DOTA-lanreotide (MP2353)26 ± 3 (6)771 ± 229 (6)73 ± 12 (6)++ (4.5 ± 0.4)Yes−ND−
     Y-DOTA-TOC11 ± 2 (6)389 ± 135 (5)114 ± 29 (5)++ (0.72 ± 0.14)Yes−ND−
     Y-DOTA-lanreotide23 ± 5 (4)290 ± 105 (4)16 ± 3 (4)+NDYes−ND−
     Y-DOTA-NOC3.3 ± 0.2 (3)26 ± 2 (3)10 ± 2 (3)++ (0.41 ± 0.01)Yes+Yes−
     Y-DOTA-TATE1.6 ± 0.4 (3)>1,000 (3)187 ± 50 (3)++ (0.61 ± 0.08)Yes−ND−
     Lu-DOTA-BOC-ATE2.4 ± 0.3 (2)11 ± 1 (2)8.3 ± 0.4 (2)++ (0.46 ± 0.11)Yes+ND−
     Lu-DOTA-NOC-ATE3.6 ± 0.3 (2)31 ± 2 (2)15 ± 1 (2)++ (1.0 ± 0.3)Yes+ND−
    I-Gluc/Gal-compounds
     I-Gluc-TOC2.2 ± 0.7 (3)357 ± 22 (3)64 ± 24 (3)++ (0.78 ± 0.12)Yes−ND−
     I-Gluc-TATE2.0 ± 0.5 (3)>1,000 (3)521 ± 269 (3)+NDYes−ND−
     I-Gluc-S-TATE2.0 ± 0.7 (3)398 ± 19 (3)310 ± 156 (3)++ (0.73 ± 0.21)Yes−ND−
     I-Gal-S-TATE2.0 ± 0.8 (3)491 ± 63 (3)413 ± 167 (3)++ (0.89 ± 0.31)Yes−ND−
    Antagonists
     Coy-14 (BIM-23A760)10 ± 4 (4)61 ± 14 (3)53 ± 19 (2)——NDNDNDND
     sst3-ODN-8>1,000 (3)6.7 ± 2.6 (3)>1,000 (3)NDNDND−NDND
    • ↵* For immunofluorescent internalization assay in HEK cells, + = internalized at agonist dose of at least 100 nmol/L, − = not internalized at agonist dose of greater than 100 nmol/L, and ND = not determined.

    • ↵† For internalization measured with ELISA in CHO-sst2 cells, + = internalized, − = not internalized, and ND = not determined. Values in parentheses are median effective concentration, EC50 (±SEM, n ≥ 2).

    • Binding affinities were measured using in vitro receptor autoradiography, as reported previously. Values were taken from previous reports (4,18,25–27,38,39) or represent our unpublished data. Binding affinity values are inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50), in nmol/L (mean ± SEM); number of independent studies is given in parentheses. Antagonized means abolition of receptor internalization in presence of excess concentrations of receptor-specific antagonist, either Coy-14 for sst2 or sst3-ODN-8 for sst3, performed with immunofluorescent internalization assay in HEK-sst2 or HEK-sst3 cells.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 3
March 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 Receptors: Effects of Somatostatin Agonists and Antagonists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 Receptors: Effects of Somatostatin Agonists and Antagonists
Renzo Cescato, Stefan Schulz, Beatrice Waser, Véronique Eltschinger, Jean E. Rivier, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Culler, Mihaela Ginj, Qisheng Liu, Agnes Schonbrunn, Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2006, 47 (3) 502-511;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 Receptors: Effects of Somatostatin Agonists and Antagonists
Renzo Cescato, Stefan Schulz, Beatrice Waser, Véronique Eltschinger, Jean E. Rivier, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Culler, Mihaela Ginj, Qisheng Liu, Agnes Schonbrunn, Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2006, 47 (3) 502-511;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature
  • Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapy Differentially Alters 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Normal Tissues Compared with Primary Tumors and Metastatic Lesions
  • Upregulation of Key Molecules for Targeted Imaging and Therapy
  • Hallmarks of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours: implications for treatment
  • The Somatostatin Analog 188Re-P2045 Inhibits the Growth of AR42J Pancreatic Tumor Xenografts
  • Unexpected Sensitivity of sst2 Antagonists to N-Terminal Radiometal Modifications
  • Positron-emission Tomography (PET) Imaging Agents for Diagnosis of Human Prostate Cancer: Agonist vs. Antagonist Ligands
  • Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Antagonist Versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Agonist Binding in Human Cancers In Vitro
  • Treatment with Octreotide Does Not Reduce Tumor Uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as Measured by PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • PET of Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Tumors Using 64Cu- and 68Ga-Somatostatin Antagonists: The Chelate Makes the Difference
  • 18F-Labeled Bombesin Analog for Specific and Effective Targeting of Prostate Tumors Expressing Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors
  • Radiolabeled Bicyclic Somatostatin-Based Analogs: A Novel Class of Potential Radiotracers for SPECT/PET of Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Shapeshifting Proteins: The Impact of Allosteric Modulation and Functional Selectivity on New Drug Discovery
  • Highly Efficient In Vivo Agonist-Induced Internalization of sst2 Receptors in Somatostatin Target Tissues
  • Peptide-Based Probes for Cancer Imaging
  • New Pansomatostatin Ligands and Their Chelated Versions: Affinity Profile, Agonist Activity, Internalization, and Tumor Targeting
  • Bombesin Receptor Antagonists May Be Preferable to Agonists for Tumor Targeting
  • Novel insights in somatostatin receptor physiology
  • Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists are preferable to agonists for in vivo peptide receptor targeting of tumors
  • Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Tumors: A Road from Basic Research to Clinical Applications
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire