Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Whole-Body Biodistribution and Estimation of Radiation-Absorbed Doses of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Radioligand 11C-NNC 112 in Humans

Vanessa L. Cropley, Masahiro Fujita, John L. Musachio, Jinsoo Hong, Subroto Ghose, Janet Sangare, Pradeep J. Nathan, Victor W. Pike and Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2006, 47 (1) 100-104;
Vanessa L. Cropley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiro Fujita
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Musachio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinsoo Hong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subroto Ghose
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet Sangare
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pradeep J. Nathan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor W. Pike
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert B. Innis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The present study estimated radiation-absorbed doses of the dopamine D1 receptor radioligand [11C]((+)-8-chloro-5-(7-benzofuranyl)-7-hydroxy-3-methyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) (NNC 112) in humans, based on dynamic whole-body PET in healthy subjects. Methods: Whole-body PET was performed on 7 subjects after injection of 710 ± 85 MBq of 11C-NNC 112. Fourteen frames were acquired for a total of 120 min in 7 segments of the body. Regions of interest were drawn on compressed planar images of source organs that could be identified. Radiation dose estimates were calculated from organ residence times using the OLINDA 1.0 program. Results: The organs with the highest radiation-absorbed doses were the gallbladder, liver, lungs, kidneys, and urinary bladder wall. Biexponential fitting of mean bladder activity demonstrated that 15% of activity was excreted via the urine. With a 2.4-h voiding interval, the effective dose was 5.7 μSv/MBq (21.1 mrem/mCi). Conclusion: 11C-NNC 112 displays a favorable radiation dose profile in humans and would allow multiple PET examinations per year to be performed on the same subject.

  • 11C-NNC 112
  • PET
  • D1 receptor
  • dosimetry
  • effective dose

Abnormalities in dopamine have been implicated in several psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and drug dependence. Dopamine D1 receptors are highly distributed in the brain, with the highest density being found in the striatum and regions of the basal ganglia, followed by such regions of the cerebral cortex as the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, and amygdala (1,2). D1 receptors in the brain have been implicated in the regulation of motor and cognitive activity such as locomotor behavior, working memory, and executive functions (3–5).

[11C]((+)-8-Chloro-5-(7-benzofuranyl)-7-hydroxy-3- methyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) (NNC 112) is2 a high-affinity (dissociation constant, 0.18 nmol/L) dopamine D1 receptor radioligand that can image low-density D1 receptors in striatal and extrastriatal regions. 11C-NNC 112 displays higher specific-to-nonspecific ratios than does an older, commonly used ligand, 11C-SCH-23390 (6,7), and is highly reliable for PET quantification (7). Radiation-absorbed dose estimates of 11C-NNC 112 have not been reported; therefore, the present study was performed to obtain human dosimetry estimates of 11C-NNC 112 based on serial whole-body PET scans of healthy subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiopharmaceutical Preparation

The (+)-desmethyl NNC 112 (6) (1.0 mg per radiolabeling) was obtained from Professor Christer Halldin of the Karolinska Institutet. 11C-NNC 112, originally reported by Halldin et al. (6), was synthesized in radiolabeled form from 11C-methyl iodide via a captive solvent method using a commercially available radiochemistry “loop” module. The radiochemical purity of all the 11C-NNC 112 syntheses was greater than 99%, with an average specific activity of 47.0 ± 12.58 GBq/μmol (1.27 ± 0.34 Ci/μmol).

Subjects

The study was approved by the Radiation Safety Committee of the National Institutes of Health and the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Mental Health. Seven healthy volunteers (4 male and 3 female; mean age ± SD, 28 ± 8 y; range, 21–42 y) participated in the study. All subjects were free of current medical and psychiatric illness based on history, a physical examination, routine laboratory tests (including a complete blood count, chemistries, urinalysis, urine drug screening, and HIV and hepatitis B tests), and an electrocardiogram. Furthermore, after completion of the PET scan, standard screening laboratory tests were repeated on every subject.

PET Data Acquisition

Subjects underwent transmission and dynamic emission scans on an Advance tomograph (GE Healthcare). Before tracer injection, transmission scans using 68Ge rods were obtained on 7 segments of 15 cm each (the axial field of view of the Advance scanner) from the head to the upper thigh to permit measured attenuation correction. The duration of each transmission was 3 min. After intravenous bolus administration of 710 ± 85 MBq (19 ± 2 mCi) of 11C-NNC 112, dynamic emission scans of 14 frames were acquired by serial imaging of the body in the 7 contiguous segments. The duration of initial frames was 15 s at each segment, followed by frames of increasing length, with six 3-s intervals to move the bed to the next section and 13 s to move the bed back to the first bed position. The total scanning time approximated 120 min (4 × 0.25, 3 × 0.5, 3 × 1, 3 × 2, and 1 × 4 min for each of 7 body sections from head to mid thigh).

The tomographic PET images were compressed into a single anterior-posterior planar image. Planar images were analyzed instead of tomographic images to facilitate visualization of organs. A previous study in our laboratory (8) demonstrated that analysis of compressed planar images is comparable to that of tomographic images, but with a slight overestimation (i.e., conservative calculation) of organ radiation burden. Images were analyzed using pixelwise modeling computer software (PMOD 2.55; PMOD Group) on the compressed planar images. Regions of interest were drawn on source organs that could be identified. Large regions of interest were drawn to ensure that all accumulated radioactivity, which consisted of both parent and metabolite radioactivities, in each organ was encompassed. The “remainder of body” was calculated for each time point as the decayed value of all activity in the segment minus activity in the identified source organs.

Residence Time Calculation

At each time point, decayed data of the identified source organs were converted to the fraction of the injected dose by dividing the organ activities by the total injected activity and plotted versus time. The total injected activity was calculated as the entire activity in frame 1 in each of the 7 segments. Time–activity curves (percentage injected dose [%ID] vs. time) for the source organs were created. The area under the time–activity curve for each organ was calculated by the trapezoidal method up to the last data acquisition at 120 min. To be conservative, we calculated the area under the curve from the last data acquisition to infinity by assuming that the decline in radioactivity occurred by only physical decay, without any further biologic clearance. The area under the time–activity curve of source organ from time zero to infinity is equivalent to residence time (h).

Organ Absorbed Dose

The activity overlying the bladder represented the total urinary excretion during the scanning interval. For each subject, decay-corrected cumulative urine activity was fitted with a biexponential curve by limiting the urine activity to no more than 100% of the injected activity, and the total excretion in urine in terms of %ID and biologic half-life was determined. The dynamic bladder model (9) implemented in OLINDA/EXM version 1.0 (10) was used to calculate the residence time of the urinary bladder wall with urine-voiding intervals of 2.4 and 4.8 h. Organ absorbed doses were based on the OLINDA/EXM scheme of a 70-kg man, using the residence time of the source organs calculated above.

RESULTS

The injection of 11C-NNC 112 caused no significant change in heart rate or blood pressure, and no significant effects were observed in blood or urine tests performed approximately 5–30 min after termination of the scan. After injection of 11C-NNC 112, the brain, lungs, liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, small intestine, gallbladder, and urinary bladder were visually identified as organs with moderate to high activity in most subjects (Fig. 1). However, the heart was not visualized in 4 subjects, and the small intestine was not visualized in 2 subjects. For the heart and small intestine, the average time–activity curve and residence time were based on 3 and 5 subjects, respectively. Uptake of 11C-NNC 112 was highest in the lungs, with a peak of 28 %ID occurring at the first frame acquisition. Peak values of the %ID to the liver, brain, heart, kidneys, small intestine, and gallbladder were 22, 7, 5, 4, 4, and 1.4, respectively, and all occurred within 5 min. Figure 2 demonstrates the time–activity curves of the source organs at the average time that they were imaged.

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Compressed anteroposterior whole-body planar images showing distribution of radioactivity in representative healthy subject at approximately 1, 5, 22, and 90 min after 11C-NNC 112 injection.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

(A) Time–activity curves for 11C-NNC 112 serial PET of lungs and liver. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of 7 subjects and are not corrected for radioactive decay. (B) Time–activity curves for 11C-NNC 112 serial PET of 6 organs. Data are expressed as average of 7 subjects for brain, kidneys, spleen, and gallbladder; average of 5 subjects for small intestine; and average of 3 subjects for heart and are not corrected for radioactive decay. For clarity, SD error bars are not included.

The accumulated activity over the bladder was fitted with a biexponential curve to estimate the fraction of injected activity excreted via this route (Fig. 3). In some cases, the fitting of the biexponential curve did not converge; in these instances, the first 1 or 2 data points were eliminated because there were relatively high activities in surrounding soft tissue, compared with that in the urinary bladder. After this step, the biexponential curve well described the accumulation of radioactivity over the bladder, with a mean r2 value of 0.999. According to this fit, the average fraction excreted via urine was approximately 15%, and biologic half-lives were 0.04 and 1.5 h. In most subjects, at the end of the study, the small intestine showed decay-corrected activity of 9.7 %ID. Because of the short half-life, the rest of the injected activity would have decayed before excretion to the bladder or intestine.

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

Decay-corrected cumulative urinary excretion of radioactivity after injection of 11C-NNC 112. Data reflect mean ± SD bladder activity measured by PET in 7 subjects. Solid line reflects biexponential fitting of average bladder activity with PRISM software (version 4.0). Two-phase exponential association was used, defined as Y = Ymax1 × (1 − exp(−K1 × X)) + Ymax2 × (1 − exp(−K2 × X)), where Y = cumulative urinary excretion, Ymax1 and Ymax2 = 2 fractions of urinary excretion at the infinite time, X = h, and K1 and K2 = rate constants. Urine activity was constrained to not exceed 100% of injected activity (Ymax1 + Ymax2 ≤ 1), and half-times were defined as ln(2)/K1 and ln(2)/K2. Asymptote of curve indicates that approximately 15 %ID was excreted via urine. Fitting to biexponential curve yielded half-lives of 0.04 and 1.5 h.

The average residence times for the 7 subjects are shown in Figure 4. From the organ residence times and the percentage of activity excreted via the urine, radiation-absorbed dose was estimated for each subject, with urine-voiding intervals of 2.4 and 4.8 h. There was only a 2% difference in the dose to the urinary bladder wall at urine-voiding intervals of 2.4 and 4.8 h. The effective doses were 5.71 and 5.77 μSv/MBq, with 2.4- and 4.8-h voiding intervals, respectively. With a 2.4-h voiding interval, the organs with the highest radiation burden (μSv/MBq) were the gallbladder (32.4), followed by the liver (22.2), lungs (16.9), kidneys (16.6), and urinary bladder wall (15.7). Table 1 summarizes organ absorbed dose estimates for humans.

FIGURE 4. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4. 

For 7 subjects, average residence times (h) calculated from whole-body planar images of 11C-NNC 112. Values are mean ± SD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Radiation Dose Estimates of 11C-NNC 112

DISCUSSION

In the present study, serial whole-body 11C-NNC 112 PET studies were performed on healthy humans to estimate radiation-absorbed doses of 11C-NNC 112. Whole-body imaging of 11C-NNC 112 revealed that this D1 receptor radioligand caused only modest radiation exposure, with an effective dose of 5.7 μSv/MBq. With injected activities of 523–788 MBq (14–22 mCi), which are frequently used in brain-imaging studies, this effective dose of 5.7 μSv/MBq (21.1 mrem/mCi) would yield an effective dose of 2.98–4.49 mSv (0.29–0.46 rem). This would allow multiple PET studies per year to be performed on the same subject. Furthermore, the absence of effects on vital signs (heart rate and blood pressure) or on standard blood and urine tests after 11C-NNC 112 injection indicate that 11C-NNC 112 is also safe from a pharmacologic perspective.

The present study demonstrated that the gallbladder is the organ with the highest radiation burden (32.4 μSv/MBq), followed by the liver, lungs, and kidneys. Because planar images were used instead of tomographic images to improve visualization of organs, the gallbladder activities are likely to have included liver activities, and the dose to the gallbladder may have been overestimated. Because planar images were analyzed and large regions of interest were drawn, the present study may have, in general, slightly overestimated the radiation exposure of source organs, resulting in conservative estimates of organ radiation burden. High uptake of 11C-NNC 112 (peak uptake, 28 %ID) initially occurred in the lungs, contributing to the relatively high radiation burden to this organ. This high activity in the lungs at early times reflects distribution of 11C-NNC 112, although the clearance of 11C-NNC 112 from the lungs was rapid, decreasing to 50% of its peak value within 8 min after injection, based on non–decay-corrected data. Activity from injected 11C-NNC 112 at later times primarily reflects elimination of the tracer via the gastrointestinal and urinary routes. Because the distribution of radioactivity in peripheral organs does not match that of dopamine D1 receptors, and because 11C-NNC 112 was metabolized quickly, most of the activities detected in peripheral organs in this study were likely from radioactive metabolites not binding to the receptor. Biexponential fitting of bladder activity demonstrated that only 15% of total activity was excreted via urine. Although there may be errors in the parameter estimation for the urinary excretion because of the short data acquisition, the impact on dose estimations with a 2.4-h urine interval should be minimal because the data were acquired for 2 h—that is, 83% of the interval. Although uptake of 11C-NNC 112 reached a maximum within 5–10 min for all source organs, clearance of 11C-NNC 112 from the liver, gallbladder, and small intestine was quite slow. In most subjects, at the end of the study, the small intestine showed decayed-corrected activity of 9.7 %ID. Because of the short half-life of 11C (20.4 min), the rest of the injected activity (∼75%) would have decayed before excretion to the bladder or intestine.

The short half-life of 11C also raises the question of whether human biodistribution studies of 11C-labeled ligands need to be performed, provided that radiation dose estimates in rodents or nonhuman primates have been completed. Table 2 displays effective dose estimates of 11C-labeled ligands obtained from biodistribution studies on humans. For all the tracers listed in Table 2, the estimated effective dose is quite low, allowing multiple injections of the tracer per year in the same subject. With the exception of 1 study (11), which resulted in a conservative estimation of overall radiation burden from 11C-WAY 100635, the effective dose of the 11C tracers shows modest variation, ranging from 4.3 to 7.0 μSv/MBq. With inclusion of 11C-WAY 100635, the effective dose varies appreciably by a factor of 3.3. This relatively large discrepancy may be due to actual differences in radiation exposure from the different 11C-labeled tracers or, rather, may reflect differences in study design and analysis of data.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Comparison of Radiation Burden of 11C-NNC 112 with Other 11C-Labeled Radioligands in Humans

CONCLUSION

The dopamine D1 receptor radioligand 11C-NNC 112 appears to be safe for humans, yielding a relatively modest radiation burden that would permit multiple PET studies per year to be performed on the same subject.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Peter Herscovitch (chief) and the staff of the PET department for the successful completion of the study. We thank Cyrill Burger, PhD, Piotr Rudnicki, PhD, Krzysztof Mikolajczyk, PhD, and Michal Grodzki, PhD, for providing the PMOD 2.55 software and Jeih-San Liow, PhD, for technical assistance. This research was supported (in part) by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Mental Health.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Hall H, Sedvall G, Magnusson O, et al. Distribution of D1 and D2-dopamine receptors, and dopamine and its metabolites in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1994;11:245–256.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Meador-Woodruff JH, Damask SP, Wang J, et al. Dopamine receptor mRNA expression in human striatum and neocortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996;15:17–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Centonze D, Grande C, Saulle E, et al. Distinct roles of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in motor activity and striatal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8506–8512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    Sawaguchi T, Goldman-Rakic PS. The role of D1-dopamine receptor in working memory: local injections of dopamine antagonists into the prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkeys performing an oculomotor delayed response task. J Neurophysiol. 1994;71:515–528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Vallone D, Picetti R, Borrelli E. Structure and function of dopamine receptors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:125–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Halldin C, Foged C, Chou YH, et al. Carbon-11-NNC 112: a radioligand for PET examination of striatal and neocortical D1-dopamine receptors. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2061–2068.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Abi-Dargham A, Martinez D, Mawlawi O, et al. Measurement of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D1 receptor binding potential with [11C]NNC 112 in humans: validation and reproducibility. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:225–243.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Tipre DN, Lu JQ, Fujita M, et al. Radiation dosimetry estimates for the PET serotonin transporter probe [11C]DASB determined from whole-body imaging in nonhuman primates. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:81–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Cloutier RJ, Smith SA, Watson EE, et al. Dose to the fetus from radionuclides in the bladder. Health Phys. 1973;25:147–161.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Stabin M, Sparks GRB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Parsey R, Belanger VMJ, Sullivan GM, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 11C-WAY100,635 in humans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:614–619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Ribeiro MJ, Ricard M, Bourgeois S, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [11C]raclopride in healthy volunteers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:952–958.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Lu JQ, Ichise M, Liow JS, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the serotonin transporter ligand 11C-DASB determined from human whole-body PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1555–1559.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Graham MM, Peterson LM, Muzi M, et al. 1-[Carbon-11]-glucose radiation dosimetry and distribution in human imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1805–1810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Nakamura T, et al. Estimation of internal absorbed dose of L-[methyl-11C]methionine using whole-body positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:629–633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Santens P, De Vos F, Thierens H, et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of carbon 11-methoxyprogabidic acid, a possible ligand for GABA-receptors in the brain. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:307–310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Seltzer MA, Jahan SA, Sparks R, et al. Radiation dose estimates in humans for (11C)acetate whole-body PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1233–1236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Nugent AC, Neumeister A, Drevets WC, et al. Human biodistribution and dosimetry of the PET benzodiazepine receptor radioligand [11C]flumazenil [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(suppl):434P.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Marthi K, Hansen SB, Jakobsen S, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [N-methyl-11C]mirtazapine, an antidepressant affecting adrenoceptors. Appl Radiat Isot. 2003;59:175–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Slifstein M, Martinez D, Ekelund J, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the dopamine D2 ligand [11C]raclopride determined from human whole body PET [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(suppl 2):343P.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication August 4, 2005.
  • Accepted for publication October 7, 2005.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 1
January 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Whole-Body Biodistribution and Estimation of Radiation-Absorbed Doses of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Radioligand 11C-NNC 112 in Humans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Whole-Body Biodistribution and Estimation of Radiation-Absorbed Doses of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Radioligand 11C-NNC 112 in Humans
Vanessa L. Cropley, Masahiro Fujita, John L. Musachio, Jinsoo Hong, Subroto Ghose, Janet Sangare, Pradeep J. Nathan, Victor W. Pike, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2006, 47 (1) 100-104;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Whole-Body Biodistribution and Estimation of Radiation-Absorbed Doses of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Radioligand 11C-NNC 112 in Humans
Vanessa L. Cropley, Masahiro Fujita, John L. Musachio, Jinsoo Hong, Subroto Ghose, Janet Sangare, Pradeep J. Nathan, Victor W. Pike, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2006, 47 (1) 100-104;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Brain and Whole-Body Imaging in Rhesus Monkeys of 11C-NOP-1A, a Promising PET Radioligand for Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide Receptors
  • PET-Based Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Selective Tracer 11C-PD153035 in Humans
  • 1-11C-Methyl-4-Piperidinyl-N-Butyrate Radiation Dosimetry in Humans by Dynamic Organ-Specific Evaluation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire