Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Practice of Molecular Radiotherapy

Bone-Seeking Radionuclides For Therapy

Val J. Lewington
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2005, 46 (1 suppl) 38S-47S;
Val J. Lewington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Systemic therapy using bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has clear advantages for the treatment of multisite metastatic pain. Evidence supporting the use of β-particle, electron, and α-particle–emitting radiopharmaceuticals is reviewed here. Appropriate patient selection relies on correlating clinical symptoms with focal abnormalities on conventional bone scintigraphy. Time to symptom relief and response duration vary with the physical half-life and dose rate of the radionuclide used, offering the opportunity to tailor radiopharmaceutical choice to individual patient circumstances. Toxicity is limited to temporary myelosuppression, governed by the administered activity and underlying bone marrow reserve. Optimal responses are achieved in patients with a modest skeletal tumor burden, suggesting that targeted therapy should be considered early in the management of bone metastases. The development of reliable dosimetric models will facilitate patient-specific prescribing to deliver enhanced symptom response within acceptable toxicity limits. It is likely that targeted therapy will be most effective in the context of multimodality tumor management. Further research is required to examine the potential of radionuclides in combination with external-beam irradiation, bisphosphonates, or chemotherapy. This approach might allow targeted therapy to progress beyond symptom palliation to early intervention for survival gain.

  • bone pain palliation
  • metastasis
  • targeted radionuclide therapy
  • dosimetry

Bone pain is a common symptom in advancing malignancy and often determines quality of life in the later stages of disease (1). Improved survival resulting from advances in hormone treatment and chemotherapy, paradoxically, has increased the population of patients with skeletal metastases seeking symptom relief. The long-term management of refractory bone pain requires a multidisciplinary approach and close cross-specialty liaisons.

Moderate, localized skeletal symptoms are usually controlled by conventional analgesics, prescribed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder, followed by single-fraction external-beam radiotherapy for persisting, limiting discomfort (2). This approach becomes less useful in the context of progressive skeletal metastases, which result in poorly localized or migratory multisite pain. Wide-field, hemibody radiotherapy is an effective treatment option, but potential benefit is often outweighed by significant bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity. Bisphosphonates target osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and reduce the skeletal complication rate arising from osteolytic metastases in breast cancer and myeloma (3,4). Their role in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is less well established, and controlled trials are required to determine the optimal agent, mode of administration, dose, and treatment duration (5).

Acting systemically, targeted therapy using bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals are well suited to the management of disseminated disease when repeated local treatment becomes impractical. The potential toxicity of systemic administration is reduced by relatively selective tumor targeting.

Radionuclide therapy for bone pain palliation has been used successfully for more than 30 y. The early development of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals was governed by scientific standards in place in the 1970s and 1980s and, in many cases, would not meet current criteria for evidence-based practice. The lack of randomized controlled trials, however, does not diminish the quality of experience reported in earlier peer-reviewed publications that provided incontrovertible support for the efficacy and tolerability of targeted therapy.

RADIONUCLIDE SELECTION CRITERIA

Treatment success depends on matching the physiologic characteristics of the target tissue to a specific pharmaceutical carrier and optimal radionuclide. Bone targeting relies on selective uptake and prolonged retention at sites of increased osteoblastic activity. Some therapeutic radionuclides, such as 89Sr and 223Ra, have a natural affinity for metabolically active bone. Others, including samarium and rhenium, form stable complexes with bone-seeking cations, such as phosphate and diphosphonate.

It is important that the physical half-life of the radionuclide used matches the biologic turnover of the radiopharmaceutical in vivo. The clinical significance of half-life as a determinant of dose rate and time to response is discussed more fully later in this article. Particle range influences treatment-related toxicity. Whereas the energy of short-range electron- or α-particles is largely absorbed within the target cell, longer-range β-particles may irradiate surrounding healthy tissues, contributing to unwanted side effects.

Experience has focused largely on β-particle–emitting radionuclides, although recent attention has been drawn to electron- and α-emitters. The physical characteristics of therapeutic radionuclides for bone pain palliation are summarized in Table 1. Evidence supporting the use of different radiopharmaceuticals is discussed here, and administered activities, typical responses, and retreatment intervals are listed in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Physical Characteristics of Therapeutic Radionuclides for Bone Pain Palliation

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Administered Activities, Typical Response Times and Duration, and Retreatment Intervals for Bone-Seeking Radionuclides

RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS FOR BONE PAIN PALLIATION

32P

32P decays by 1.7 MeVEmax β-emission and has a physical half-life of 14.3 d. The maximum particle range in tissue is approximately 8.5 mm. Eighty-five percent of total body phosphate is held within the skeleton, bound as inorganic phosphate to hydroxyapatite. Radiophosphorus, administered intravenously as 32P-sodium orthophosphate for skeletal targeting, was used extensively in the 1970s to treat metastatic HRPC (6). Equal success after oral administration has been reported more recently (7). Approximately 5%–10% of the administered activity is renally excreted within 24 h.

Animal data demonstrate increased radiophosphorus uptake in reactive bone surrounding osteoblastic metastases by a factor of 3:1 to 5:1 compared with normal bone. The red marrow absorbed dose approaches 6.5 mGy/MBq, reflecting contributions from the inorganic bone matrix and from the cellular component of the marrow space (6,8).

Published experience includes a range of fractionated treatment schedules, administering activities of 300–740 MBq over 7–40 d (9). Pretreatment with testosterone or parathormone was shown to stimulate osteoblastic activity around metastases, enhancing the therapeutic ratio by up to 20:1 in tumor versus normal bone (10). The potential benefit of this approach was outweighed by the risk of soft tissue tumor progression in hormone-sensitive tumors. Limited rodent dosimetry data predicted total bone doses in the order of 0.4–1.7 cGy/MBq, but these results cannot be reliably extrapolated to the metastatic human skeleton (8).

Pain relief was reported by 50%–87% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with 200–800 MBq of 32P administered in daily 20- to 80-MBq fractions after androgen priming. Symptom benefit occured within 5–14 d, with mean response duration of 2–4 mo (11).

The main disadvantage of 32P therapy is dose-limiting myelosuppression with reversible pancytopenia maximal at 5–6 wk after administration (12). Toxicity appears cumulative and activity related. Although toxic deaths are very rare, 9 of 30 patients in one study required transfusion support after treatment (13,14). Complications arising from leukopenia and thrombocytopenia have not been considered in depth.

Although 32P is rarely used for bone pain palliation in North America and Western Europe, the significant cost advantage and ease of oral administration compared with licensed alternatives have regenerated interest in this agent as the radiopharmaceutical of choice for bone pain palliation elsewhere in the world. An open-label study comparing single, oral administration of 444 MBq of 32P with intravenous administration of 148 MBq of 89Sr demonstrated equal efficacy and toxicity in 31 patients with painful skeletal metastases. Clinically significant myelosuppression was not observed (7).

89Sr

89SrCl2 decays by 1.4 MeV (Emax) β-emission with a physical half-life of 50.5 d. The maximum particle range in tissue is approximately 7 mm. As a group II metal, strontium has a natural affinity for metabolically active bone. Biodistribution studies undertaken using the γ-emitter 85Sr demonstrated a therapeutic ratio of 10:1 for tumor to normal bone (15). Excretion is predominantly renal, dictated by skeletal tumor burden and glomerular filtration rate (16). Strontium plasma renal clearance is significantly reduced in patients with bone metastases compared with the International Commission on Radiological Protection standard man. The biologic half-life in normal bone is around 14 d compared with more than 50 d in osteoblastic metastases.

Tumor absorbed doses of 21 ± 4–231 ± 56 cGy/MBq have been calculated (17). No activity–response relationship has been demonstrated, although pooled data from several small studies suggested a threshold activity of 1 MBq/kg below which 89SrCl2 therapy appeared ineffective and a response plateau above 1.5 MBq/kg (18). The licensed administered activity is 148 MBq.

A systematic review of published data reported pain relief in approximately 74% of patients (19). Most series were published before the introduction of quality-of-life assessments and are therefore based on subjective response criteria, supported by objective reductions in analgesic strength and dose. A double-blind randomized study confirmed that 89SrCl2 is more effective than stable 86Sr and 88Sr as a placebo (20). 89SrCl2 was subsequently shown to be as effective as both local field and hemibody external-beam radiotherapy in relieving existing bone pain but delayed the development of new pain at preexisting, clinically silent sites (21). This observation was confirmed in the Trans-Canada study (22) but later contradicted by Smeland et al. (23). This discrepancy may reflect the higher 89SrCl2 activity (400 MBq) administered in the Trans-Canada trial compared with the 148-MBq licensed activity used in the Smeland study.

The toxicity of treatment is limited to temporary myelosuppression, which typically occurs <6 wk after therapy. Recovery is typically slow over the next 6 wk, dictated by tumor skeletal extent and bone marrow reserve.

The potential of combined chemoradiation therapy has been assessed in randomized phase 2 trials. 89SrCl2 with low-dose cisplatin achieved 91% pain response compared with 63% pain response with 89SrCl2 alone (P < 0.01) and appeared to slow the rate of skeletal metastatic progression (24). Tu et al. (25) reported improved survival using 6 weekly administrations of 89SrCl2 with doxorubicin after induction chemotherapy compared with 6 weekly administrations of doxorubicin alone. A nonrandomized study using 12 weekly administrations of estramustine phosphate, vinblastine, and 89SrCl2 recorded effective, durable symptom palliation, >50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in 48% of treated patients, and reduced demand for subsequent palliative radiotherapy (26). In all 3 studies, combined chemoradiation therapy was consistently well tolerated without significant additional hematologic toxicity.

186Re

186Re is a medium-energy β-emitter (Emax = 1.07 MeV) with a physical half-life of 89 h. Rhenium forms a stable bisphosphonate complex with hydroxyethylidene disphosphonate (HEDP). Peak skeletal uptake occurs 3 h after intravenous administration. The mean biologic half-life in bone metastases ranges between 45 ± 6 h (mean ± SD) and 59 ± 10 in breast and prostate lesions, respectively (27). Uptake is directly proportional to the metastatic tumor burden, as assessed by the bone scan index (BSI). Clearance is predominantly renal, with 69% ± 15% occurring within 24 h of administration (28).

Activity-escalation studies have established the maximum tolerated activity per single administration as 2,405 and 2,690 MBq in breast and prostate cancer, respectively (29). Lesion-to-marrow absorbed dose estimates in the range of 20–30:1 have been reported using conventional MIRD calculations (30). Subsequent revision by the same group, based on Monte Carlo modeling, suggested significantly higher absorbed dose to osteoblastic lesions than previously predicted (31).

Eighty to ninety percent of patients reported symptom benefit after a single 186Re-HEDP administration. Response was typically rapid, occurring within 24–48 h of activity administration. Placebo-controlled, randomized studies confirmed the efficacy of 186Re-HEDP (32,33).

Toxicity is limited to temporary myelosuppression, with platelet and neutrophil nadirs at 4 wk after therapy. Recovery occurs within 8 wk and is usually complete. In the prostate cancer population, hematologic toxicity can be reliably predicted from the BSI normalized to body surface area (29). Toxicity is less predictable in breast cancer patients, probably because of the effects of previous combination chemotherapy (34). Limited data support an activity–response relationship using 186Re-HEDP in patients with HRPC. Symptom benefit was reported in more than 70% of patients using activities in the range of 1.85–2.4 GBq (35). Temporary changes in biochemical markers have been observed in patients treated with higher activities. In a single study, O’Sullivan et al. (36) documented a transient decrease in PSA in HRPC patients receiving more than 3.5 GBq 186Re-HEDP with peripheral stem cell rescue. de Klerk et al. (37) previously reported a temporary fall in bone alkaline phosphatase in patients receiving relatively high administered activities in phase 1 trials.

Temporary pain flare has been reported in up to 50% of patients treated with 186Re-HEDP, with case reports of cranial nerve palsy (38). This is attributed to endosseous edema and is controlled by temporary analgesic increase and corticosteroids.

188Re

The therapeutic potential of 188Re has generated recent interest. 188Re has a short physical half-life of 16.9 h and a maximum β-particle energy of 2.1 MeV. The maximum β-range in tissue is approximately 10 mm. 188Re is produced from a 188W (188W/188Re) generator, which offers significant advantages in terms of availability and convenience compared with other therapeutic radionuclides. As with 186Re, targeting is achieved by chelation with HEDP.

Blood clearance is rapid after intravenous injection, with 41% renal clearance within 8 h of administration. The mean effective whole-body half-life is 11.6 ± 2.1 h compared with 15.9 ± 3.5 h in bone metastases. Absorbed doses for bone metastases are in the range of 3.83 ± 2 mGy/MBq, in comparison with 0.61 ± 0.2 mGy/MBq for bone marrow and 0.07 ± 0.02 mGy/MBq for whole body (39). Open-label activity-escalation studies over the range of 1.3–4.4 GBq reported symptom benefit in 64% of patients with HRPC, with 75% response in the 4.4-GBq cohort (40). Toxicity was hematologic, reaching WHO grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at higher administered activities. The maximum tolerated activity was established at 4.4 GBq in patients with normal marrow reserve, reduced to 3.3 GBq in patients with pretreatment platelet levels <20 × 109/L. Similar response rates, associated with improved Karnofsky status, have been confirmed in subsequent studies (41).

The short physical half-life and high dose rate are predicted to lead to rapid symptom response. Fractionated therapy has been shown to prolong response duration and progression-free survival in a small series (42). Further randomized clinical trials are in progress.

153Sm

153Sm has a physical half-life of 46.3 h and decays by the emission of a 0.81 MeV (Emax) β-particle. Samarium forms a stable complex with ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP). Clearance is biexponential after intravenous administration, comprising rapid bone uptake (half-life = 5.5 min) and plasma renal clearance (half-life = 65 min) (43). Fifty percent of injected activity is excreted renally within 8 h of administration. Total skeletal uptake ranges between 55% and 75%, depending on the skeletal tumor burden (44). 153Sm-EDTMP targets hydroxyapatite at sites of increased osteoblastic activity, the tumor-to-normal bone ratio being 4:1–7:1 (45). Autoradiographic studies confirm that activity is associated with the bone surface (46). The short-range β-emission mean pathlength is 3.1 mm in soft tissues and 1.7 m in bone.

Sixty-five to eighty percent of patients reported pain relief after 153Sm-EDTMP administration in early phase 1/2 open-label studies (47,48). Symptom response is typically rapid, occurring within 1 wk of administration, frequently within 48 h. Response duration is typically 8 wk (range, 4–35 wk) (48). An activity-escalation study (37–111 MBq/kg) reported symptom benefit in 70%–80% of 36 patients with HRPC. Pain relief was observed at each activity level but not in all patients in each cohort (49). Toxicity was limited to activity-dependent, temporary myelosuppression with a nadir at 6 wk. Subsequent phase 2 dose escalation studies confirmed the maximum tolerated marrow dose as 2 Gy (50). The maximum tolerated activity was 166 MBq/kg (51).

Larger, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies reported consistently high clinical efficacy on the basis of visual analog score and physician’s global assessment and established the optimal administered activity as 37 MBq/kg (52,53).

A trend toward improved response rates, superior response quality, and prolonged survival was reported in patients receiving higher administered activities (49,53). Higher activities correlated with improved PSA and alkaline phosphatase (49).

Treatment has been repeated safely for recurrent symptoms and appears well tolerated (54). Pain flare is rare, occurring in approximately 10% of published series (55). High-activity therapy with peripheral blood stem cell rescue has been used to treat bone metastases and osteosarcoma (56). Lesion-absorbed doses of 39–241 Gy were estimated after administration of 37–1,110 MBq/kg of 153Sm-EDTMP.

117mSn

The premise that the efficacy of other bone-seeking radionuclides is limited by myelotoxicity has stimulated interest in the therapeutic potential of short-range electron emitters. 117mSn(4+) decays by the emission of low-energy conversion electrons (Emax = 0.13 and 0.16 MeV) and a low-abundance 159 keV γ-photon. The physical half-life is 13.6 d. Optimal blood and soft tissue clearance is achieved by chelation with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) (57). Dosimetric studies in a mouse femur model determined the mean femoral marrow absorbed dose as 0.043 cGy/MBq compared with a mean absorbed dose to bone of 1.07 cGy/MBq (58). Human studies confirm biexponential whole-body clearance after intravenous 117mSn-DTPA injection. The average soft tissue biologic half-time is 1.45 d, accounting for 22.4% of the administered activity. The bone component accounts for 77.6% of injected activity and shows no biologic clearance, and 22.4% of administered activity is cleared renally. Peak bone uptake occurs in normal bone within 24 h, but metastatic skeletal uptake occurs slowly over 3–7 d (59). The first phase 1 activity escalation study conducted over the activity range of 66–573 MBq reported symptom benefit in 9 of 10 evaluable patients with no significant myelotoxicity (60). A later phase 1/2 activity escalation study in 47 patients with painful bone metastases reported a 75% overall pain response (range, 60%–83%), with complete pain relief in 30% (61). The typical response time was 19 ± 15 d using activities of ≤5.29 MBq/kg and 5 ± 3 d in patients receiving activities of ≥6.61 MBq/kg. Myelotoxicity was minimal, with 1 patient experiencing grade 3 white cell count toxicity. The outcomes of additional trials are awaited.

223Ra

Recent attention has focused on the α-emitter 223Ra, administered as 223Ra-chloride (223RaCl2). Like calcium, radium has a natural affinity for metabolically active bone. The physical half-life is 11.4 d. Blood clearance is rapid after intravenous administration. Peak skeletal uptake occurs within 1 h of injection, with no subsequent redistribution (62). Unlike most other bone-seeking radionuclides, excretion is predominantly via the gastrointestinal tract, with less than 10% renal clearance (62). 223Ra decays by the emission of 4 α-particles via daughter isotopes to stable 207Pb. The total decay energy is 28 MeV. 223RaCl2 is selectively concentrated on bone surfaces relative to soft tissues in murine models, leading to relative marrow sparing. Limited absorbed dose estimates indicate a tumor-to-marrow ratio of 30:1. Preclinical and pilot phase 1 activity-ranging studies have failed to demonstrate limiting toxicity. Temporary myelosuppression is reported but has not exceeded WHO grade 1, even at high activities (200 kBq/kg) in heavily pretreated patients. The low-grade toxicity reported is attributed to the short (100-μm) α-particle range in tissue. Common side effects include diarrhea and nausea or vomiting, which appear activity related in a small phase 1 study. Phase 1 data suggest superior response after fractionated administration compared with a single high-activity therapy. Phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies are in progress.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

The most common explanation for treatment failure is inappropriate patient selection. It is essential that patients undergo tracer 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) bone scintigraphy shortly before planned treatment administration. Foci of increased uptake on the bone scan can then be correlated with a “body map” of the patient’s symptoms to ensure that sites of discomfort can be directly attributed to osteoblastic bone metastases. An example of symptom mapping is given in Figures 1A and 1B. Common sources of symptom confusion in this patient population include vertebral collapse, nerve root entrapment, fracture, and visceral pain, none of which will respond to radionuclide therapy.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Posterior whole-body 99mTc-MDP bone image of patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. (B) Pain sites (cross-hatched) correlate exactly with foci of increased osteoblastic activity.

Optimal results are obtained where pain sites match areas of increased 99mTc-MDP uptake that are likely to concentrate and retain bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. Response is less predictable in patients with a predominantly osteolytic pattern of skeletal metastasis, presumably because poor uptake and retention result in a lower metastatic absorbed radiation dose.

Patients should be hematologically and biochemically stable before treatment. Hemopoietic reserve can be assessed by correlating the peripheral full blood count with tumor extent on conventional bone scintigraphy. Diffuse infiltration, the superscan appearance, or increased uptake in the proximal long bones indicate extensive marrow replacement by tumor and are unfavorable prognostic features. 99mTc-MDP imaging predicts myelotoxicity more reliably than bone marrow scintigraphy (63). In the palliative care setting, formal bone marrow examination is rarely appropriate.

Poor renal function will delay clearance of most bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, leading to a higher whole-body dose and, potentially, increased toxicity. Modest renal impairment is common in the elderly HRPC population, but outflow obstruction at the vesicoureteric junction or bladder neck should be treated appropriately before radionuclide administration (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Unsuspected bilateral vesicoureteric junction obstruction in advanced prostate cancer. Lumbar discomfort was relieved by ureteric stenting. Targeted radionuclide therapy would not have controlled dominant symptom, and poor excretion might have increased renal and whole-body doses.

Contraindications to treatment include acute or chronic renal failure, risk of imminent pathologic fracture, and acute spinal cord compression, which should be regarded as a surgical or radiotherapy emergency. Urinary incontinence presents a contamination risk and should be managed by bladder catheterization before radiopharmaceutical administration. Criteria for patient selection are summarized in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Criteria for Patient Selection for Bone-Seeking Radionuclide Therapy

The value of early treatment is well recognized. Although patients with extensive skeletal disease may report dramatic pain relief, the quality of response is generally better in patients with a moderate skeletal tumor burden (18,63). Taken with evidence that treatment delays the development of new pain in preexisting, clinically silent sites, there is a strong argument for early intervention, particularly in HRPC (21,22). Clinical trials investigating the potential of targeted therapy in patients with asymptomatic bone metastases are in progress.

Growing understanding of the characteristics of specific radiopharmaceuticals allows treatment selection to be tailored to individual patient circumstances. Important considerations include time to response, predicted response duration, and bone marrow reserve. Patients with relatively early metastases (Fig. 3), a favorable prognosis (life expectancy >6 mo), reasonable pain control using conventional analgesics, and normal marrow function are particularly likely to derive sustained benefit from 89SrCl2. By comparison, patients with more advanced metastases (Fig. 4), severe pain, and limited marrow reserve would be more appropriately treated using 153Sm-EDTMP or 186Re-HEDP.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

99mTc-MDP bone image of patient with early metastases.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

99mTc-MDP bone image of patient with diffuse metastases.

RETREATMENT

Treatment can be repeated safely for recurrent pain (64). Selection criteria for re-treatment should repeat the rationale outlined for the first administration and include bone scintigraphy and hematologic and renal assessment. It may be preferable to treat single-site pain recurrence using external-beam radiotherapy, keeping unsealed source treatment in reserve for multifocal symptom relapse. The quality of response may decrease with successive treatments, although most studies report continuing benefit (65).

TOXICITY

The critical organ for treatment using bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals is the bone marrow. Most patients develop temporary myelosuppression 4–8 wk after therapy, with full or partial recovery over the next 3 mo. The rate and completeness of recovery depend on the radionuclide administered, prescribed activity, and, critically, on underlying bone marrow reserve. The latter is particularly relevant in patients who have received previous chemotherapy or external-beam radiotherapy where large or overlapping treatment fields have included a significant proportion of remaining bone marrow. Myelotoxicity is cumulative in patients receiving repeated radionuclide therapies for recurrent symptoms, but the toxicity of repeated therapy is not easily distinguished from the effects of underlying tumor progression.

Toxicity is increased in patients with subclinical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which affects 10%–20% of patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. It is recommended that patients with extensive disease be routinely screened for DIC pretreatment (66).

Acute myeloid leukemia was reported in 2 patients 17 and 26 mo after 89SrCl2 therapy (67). A causal relationship was inferred on the basis of historical 90Sr data, but both patients had been heavily pretreated with external-beam irradiation, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and investigational drugs, making the postulated link between 89Sr and leukemogenesis unclear. The current trend toward earlier intervention for patients with longer life expectancies than previous treatment populations justifies increased vigilance, although any leukemogenic risk is likely to be outweighed by the benefit of long-term pain control. There is no evidence that targeted therapy increases the toxicity of subsequent chemotherapy.

MECHANISM OF ACTION AND FUTURE DIRECTION OF TARGETED THERAPY

The mechanism of bone pain palliation by ionizing radiation is poorly understood. Experience from external-beam irradiation indicates that the absorbed dose required to achieve pain relief is significantly lower than would be necessary to achieve a tumoricidal effect. Pain palliation, therefore, cannot depend solely on clonogenic cell kill.

The etiology of metastatic pain is likely to involve both mechanical and humoral factors. Mechanical factors include direct bone invasion, microfractures, increased intramedullary pressure, and periosteal stretching. High–dose-rate, external-beam irradiation induces tumor shrinkage, thereby reducing pressure effects and periosteal stimulation. These effects are not instantaneous, however, and mechanical change cannot explain the rapid symptom relief reported after hemibody radiotherapy. Similarly, the lower dose rate delivered by targeted radionuclides is unlikely to improve pain resulting from mechanical stress within 48 h as documented after 153Sm-EDTMP and 186Re-HEDP therapy.

The observation that pain palliation is independent of tumor radiosensitivity suggests that the site of action of palliative radiotherapy might be the interface between tumor and normal bone, or normal bone itself (68). Exposure to ionizing radiation is known to activate the early-response gene cascade, regulating downstream genes that, in turn, modify cellular cytokine and growth factor release (69). Radiation-induced humoral changes within normal osteocytes and in the surrounding microenvironment may be an important mechanism in symptom relief.

Time-to-response differences after the administration of long–and short–half-life targeted radionuclides are a function of dose rate and suggest a “threshold” absorbed dose for pain relief. This threshold would be achieved early using a short–half-life isotope, such as 153Sm or 186Re, but would be delayed after 89Sr administration. The observation from both external-beam and targeted therapy data that around 25% of patients fail radiation therapy supports the theory that pain palliation may be determined by the radiosensitivity of normal bone at the leading edge of a metastasis. As the radiosensitivity of normal tissues is genetically determined, it would be logical to consider repeat treatment or dose escalation when initial therapy is unsuccessful.

The identification of biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation has provided new markers of treatment efficacy and additional insight into possible mechanisms of action of radionuclide therapy. Serum procollagen type IC terminal peptide (PICP) is a marker of bone turnover. A reduction in PICP concentration was shown to correlate with clinical response to 89SrCl2 therapy in patients with HRPC (70). In addition, the rate of production of markers of bone resorption, such as urinary pyridinium collagen cross- links, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline, decreases after palliative 89SrCl2 therapy (71). More important, 89SrCl2 therapy reduces the secretion of cell adhesion molecules (E-selectins) in patients with HRPC. Cell adhesion molecule expression determines metastatic progression in a range of malignancies (72). The observation that radionuclide therapy inhibits E-selectin release suggests that the therapeutic potential of radionuclide treatment could extend beyond symptom palliation. A sustained reduction in E-selectin production might be expected to slow the rate of skeletal metastatic progression. This could be achieved by activity escalation to increase tumor dose or by fractionation.

The efficacy and toxicity of activity escalation with peripheral stem cell support has been reported: a phase 1 trial using 186Re-HEDP in 25 patients with HRPC who were administered single activities of 2.5–5 GBq followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue at 14 d (36). The injected activity correlated with PSA response but not with hematologic toxicity, which was dependent on the whole-body absorbed dose. A multifactorial algorithm based on pretreatment biochemical and physiologic parameters was then developed and accurately predicted whole-body dose. A change of emphasis from activity escalation trials to whole-body dose-escalation studies was recommended (73). This approach would allow patient-specific activity prescription within acceptable toxicity limits. The importance of patient-specific prescribing was highlighted previously in a small series of patients receiving 153Sm-EDTMP therapy (74). The administered activity predicted to deliver a 2-Gy marrow dose varied between 35% and 63% of the 37 MBq/kg approved activity.

On current evidence, single-administration, high-activity treatment to deliver a sustained response is unlikely to be achievable within acceptable toxicity limits. Fractionated therapy may be more realistic. The short-range electron 117mSn-DTPA or α-emitting radionuclides (223Ra) are less likely to cause cumulative myelosuppression than long-range β-emitters and offer the best hope for repeated administration. It is critical that future trials be dosimetry based. Recent in vitro studies have shown that the C4–2B prostate cancer cell line exhibits osteoblast-like properties within the bone microenvironment and directly contributes to mineralized matrix formation (75). This observation suggests that single cells may be targeted using bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals and has major implications for the future of targeted therapy. The hypothesis that high-dose therapy can target micrometastases formed the basis of activity-escalation studies using 186Re-HEDP (36). On radiobiologic grounds, the range of β-emitting radionuclides is likely to be too long for efficient energy deposition within single cells. By contrast, targeting using a bone-seeking, high-linear energy transfer α-particle emitter might be expected to achieve cell kill. The opportunity to influence skeletal tumor progression marks a significant transition from treatment delivered with palliative intent to potentially tumoricidal therapy. Further trials will be necessary to assess the value of fractionated α-particle therapy in early disease.

Several study protocols have used radionuclide therapy as an adjuvant to external-beam radiation therapy. Exposure to high-dose-rate external-beam irradiation might be expected to alter the uptake of bone-seeking radiopharmceuticals in the irradiated site, depending on the precise sequence of treatment delivery. To date, the timing of isotope administration in relation to external-beam radiation therapy has not been standardized, and the potential of response enhancement remains theoretic.

CONCLUSION

The case for radionuclide therapy within a multimodality management strategy for metastatic bone pain is strong. Response rates are consistently high, irrespective of the radiopharmaceutical prescribed and treatment is well tolerated, even in heavily pretreated patients. Further research is required to evaluate emerging treatments, examine fractionated therapy for prolonged response duration, and assess the benefits of chemoradiation. The therapeutic potential of targeted therapy will not be accepted by the wider oncology community unless studies are conducted according to internationally recognized outcome and toxicity criteria.

It is vital that future clinical trial designs incorporate prospective whole-body and tumor dosimetry. Reliance on activity-escalation studies without measuring tumor absorbed dose allows treatment to be delivered reasonably safely but prevents assessment of a dose–response relationship. The goal of patient-specific activity prescription offers the only realistic prospect of enhancing response rates within predictable toxicity limits and of progressing beyond symptom palliation to earlier intervention for survival gain.

Footnotes

  • Received June 15, 2004; revision accepted Nov. 17, 2004.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Val J. Lewington, BM, MSc, FRCP, Consultant Nuclear Medicine Physician, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, U.K.

    E-mail: val.lewington{at}rmh.nthames.nhs.uk

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Twycross RG, Fairfield S. Pain in advanced cancer. Pain. 1982;14:303–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1990.
  3. ↵
    Body JJ. Effectiveness and cost of bisphosphonate therapy in tumor bone disease. Cancer. 2003;97(suppl):859–865.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Coleman RE. Optimizing treatment of bone metastases by Aredia™ and Zometa™. Breast Cancer. 2000;7:361–369.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hamdy NA, Papapoulos SE. The palliative management of skeletal metastases in prostate cancer: use of bone-seeking radionuclides and bisphosphonates. Semin Nucl Med. 2001;31:62–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Potsaid M, Irwin R, Castronova F. Phosphorous 32 EHDP clinical study of patients with prostate carcinoma and bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:548–549.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Nair N. Relative efficacy of P-23 and Sr-89 in palliation in skeletal metastases. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:256–261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Spiers FW, Beddoe AH, King SD. The absorbed dose to bone marrow in the treatment of polycythaemia by P-32. Br J Radiol. 1976;49:133–140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Silberstein EB. The treatment of painful osseous metastases with phosphorus 32 labeled phosphates. Semin Oncol. 1993;3(suppl):10–21.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Maxfield JR Jr, Maxfield JGS, Maxfield WS. The use of radioactive phosphorus and testosterone in metastatic bone lesions from breast and prostate. South Med J. 1958;51:320–327.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Burnet NG, Williams G, Howard N. Phosphorus 32 for intractable bony pain from carcinoma of the prostate. Clin Oncol. 1990;2:220–223.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    Silberstein EB, Elgazzar AH, Kapilivsky A. Phosphorus-32 radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of painful osseous metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 1992;22:17–27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cheung A, Driedger AA. Evaluation of radioactive phosphorus in the palliation of metastatic bone lesions from carcinoma of the breast and prostate. Radiology. 1980;134:209–212.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Ariel IM, Hassouna H. Carcinoma of the prostate: the treatment of bone metastases by radioactive phosphorus. Int Surgery. 1985;70:63–66.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Blake GM, Zivanovic MA, Blacquiere RM, Fine DR, McEwan AJ, Ackery DM. Strontium-89 therapy: measurement of absorbed dose to skeletal metastases. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:549–557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Blake GM, Zivanovic MA, McEwan AJ, Ackery DM. Sr-89 therapy: strontium kinetics in disseminated carcinoma of the prostate. J Nucl Med. 1986;12:447–454.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Breen SL, Powe JE, Porter AT. Dose estimation in strontium-89 radiotherapy of metastatic prostatic carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1316–1323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Laing AH, Ackery DM, Bayly RJ, et al. Strontium-89 therapy for pain palliation in prostatic skeletal malignancy. Br J Radiol. 1991;64:816–822.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    McEwan AJB. Palliation of bone pain. In: Murray IPC, Ell PJ, eds. Nuclear Medicine in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1998:1083–1099.
  20. ↵
    Lewington VJ, McEwan AJ, Ackery DM, et al. A prospective randomised double-blind crossover study to examine the efficacy of strontium-89 in pain palliation in patients with advanced prostatic cancer metastatic to bone. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:954–958.
  21. ↵
    Quilty PM. Kirk D, Bolger JJ, et al. A comparison of the effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 1994;31:33–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Porter AT, McEwan AJ, Powe JE, et al. Results of a randomized phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of strontium-89 adjuvant to local field external beam irradiation in the management of endocrine resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25:805–813.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Smeland S, Erikstein B, Aas M, et al. Role of strontium-89 as adjuvant to palliative external beam radiotherapy is questionable: results of a double blind randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:1397–1404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Sciuto R, Festa A, Rea S, et al. Effects of low-dose cisplatin on 89Sr therapy for painful bone metastases from prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:79–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Tu SM, Millikan RE, Mengistu B, et al. Bone targeted therapy for advanced androgen independent carcinoma of the prostate: randomised phase II trial. Lancet. 2001;357:336–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ackerley W, Butera JM, Wehbe T, et al. A multi-institutional concurrent chemoradiation trial of strontium-89, estramustine and vinblastine for hormone refractory prostate carcinoma involving bone. Cancer. 2002;94:1654–1660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    de Klerk JMH, van Dijk A, van Rijk PP, Zonnenberg BA, van het Schip AD. Pharmacokinetics of rhenium-186 after administration of Re-186-HEDP to patients with bone metastases [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1082.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    de Klerk JMH, van Dijk A, van het Schip AD, Zonnenberg BA, van Rijk PP. Pharmacokinetics of rhenium-186 after administration of Re-186-HEDP to patients with bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:646–651.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    de Klerk JMH, Zonnenberg BA, van het Schip AD, et al. Dose escalation study of Re-186 HEDP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994;21:1113–1120.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Maxon HR III, Deutsch EA, Thomas SR, et al. Re-186(Sn)-HEDP for treatment of multiple metastatic foci in bone: human biodistribution and dosimetric studies. Radiology. 1988;166:501–507.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Samaratunga RC, Thomas SR, Hinnefeld JD, et al. A Monte Carlo simulation model for radiation dose to metastatic skeletal tumor from rhenium-186(Sn)-HEDP. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:336–350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Maxon HR, Schroder LE, Hertzberg VS, et al. Rhenium-186(Sn)HEDP for treatment of painful osseous metastases: results of a double-blind crossover comparison with placebo. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1877–1881.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Han SH, de Klerk JM, Tan S, et al. The PLACORHEN study: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized radionuclide study with 186Re-etidronate in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients with painful bone metastases. Placebo Controlled Rhenium Study. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1150–1156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    de Klerk JMH, van het Schip AD, Zonnenberg BA, van Dijk A, Blijhan GH, van Rijk PP. Phase I study of Re-186-HEDP in patients with bone metastases originating from breast cancer. In: de Klerk JMH. Re-186-HEDP in Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease: Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity [thesis]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht, Faculteit Geneeskunde; 1994;81–95.
  35. ↵
    Quirijinen JMSP, Han SH, Zonnenberg BA, et al. Efficacy of rhenium-186 etidronate in prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone pain. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1511–1515.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    O’Sullivan JM, McCready VR, Flux G, et al. High activity rhenium-186 HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue: a phase I study in progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:1715–1720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    de Klerk JMH, Zonnenberg BA, van het Schip AD, et al. Dose escalation study of rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidinediphosphonate in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994;21:1114–1120.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Zonnenberg BA, de Klerk JMH, van Rijk PP, et al. Re-186 HEDP for treatment of painful bone metastases in patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancer: preliminary results. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:639–642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Liepe K, Hliscs R, Kropp J, Runge R, Knapp FF, Franke WG. Dosimetry of 188Re-hydroxyethylidenediphosphonate in human prostate cancer skeletal metastases. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:953–960.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Palmedo H, Guhlke S, Bender H, et al. Dose escalation study with rhenium-188 hydroxyethylidenediphosphonate in prostate cancer patients with osseous metastases. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:123–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Liepe K, Kropp J, Runge R, Kotzerke J. Therapeutic efficiency of rhenium-188-HEDP in human prostate cancer skeletal metastases. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:625–629.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Palmedo H, Manka-Waluch A, Albers P, et al. Repeated bone targeted therapy for hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: randomized phase II trials with the new high-energy radiopharmaceutical rhenium-188 hydroxythylidinediphosphonate. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2869–2875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Singh A, Holmes RA, Farhangi M, et al. Human pharmacokinetics of samarium-153 EDTMP in metastatic cancer. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:1814–1818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Faranghi M, Holmes RA, Vorhut Q, Logan K, Singh A. Samarium-153 EDTMP: pharmacokinetics, toxicity and pain response using an escalating dose schedule in treatment of metastatic bone cancer. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1451–1458.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Ahonen A, Joensuu H, Hiltunen J, et al. Samarium-153-EDTMP in bone metastases. J Nucl Biol Med. 1994;34(suppl):123–127.
  46. ↵
    van Rensburg AJ, Alberts AS, Louw WK. Quantifying the radiation dosage to individual skeletal lesions treated with samarium-153 EDTMP. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2110–2115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Podoloff DA, Kasi LP, Kim EE, Fosella F, Bhadkamar VA. Evaluation of Sm-153 EDTMP as a bone imaging agent during a therapeutic trial [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1991;32(suppl):918P.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Turner JH, Claringbold PG. A phase II study of treatment of painful multifocal skeletal metastases with single and repeated dose samarium-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:1085–1086.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Collins C, Eary JF, Donaldson G, et al. Samarium-153 EDTMP in bone metastases of hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1839–1844.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Turner JH, Martindale AA, Sorby P, et al. Samarium-153 EDTMP therapy of disseminated skeletal metastases. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15:784–795.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    Turner JH, Claringbold PG, Hetherington EL, Sorby P, Martindale AA. A phase I study of samarium-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate therapy for disseminated skeletal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1926–1931.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  52. ↵
    Serafini AN, Houston SJ, Resche I, et al. Palliation of pain associated with metastatic bone cancer using samarium-153 lexidronam: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1574–1581.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Resche I, Chatal JF, Pecking A, et al. A dose-controlled study of Sm-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate in the treatment of patients with painful bone metastases. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33:1583–1591.
  54. ↵
    Bushnell D, Quick D, Reid R, et al. Multiple administration of Sm-153 lexidronam in the treatment of painful bone metastases [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1996;37(suppl):31P.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    Serafini AN. Therapy of metastatic bone pain. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:895–906.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Anderson PM, Wiseman GA, Dispenzieri A, et al. High-dose samarium-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate: low toxicity of skeletal irradiation in patients with osteosarcoma and bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1953–1954.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Srivastava SC, Meinken GE, Richards P, et al. The development and in vivo behavior of tin-containing radiopharmaceuticals I: chemistry, preparation and biodistribution in small animals. Int J Nucl Med Biol. 1985;12:167–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Bishayee A, Rao DV, Srivastava SC, Bouchet LG, Bolch WE, Howell RW. Marrow sparing effects of 117mSn (4+) diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid for radionuclide therapy of bone cancer. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:2043–2050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    Krishnamurthy GT, Swailem FM, Srivastava SC, et al. Tin-117m(4+)DTPA: pharmacokinetics and imaging characteristics in patients with metastatic bone pain. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:230–237.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    Atkins HL, Mausner LF, Srivastava SC, et al. Biodistribution of Sn-117m(4+)DTPA for palliative therapy of painful osseous metastases. Radiology. 1993;186:279–283.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    Srivastava SC, Atkins HL, Krishnamurthy GT, et al. Treatment of metastatic bone pain with tin-117m stannic diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid: a phase I/II clinical study. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:61–68.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  62. ↵
    Henriksen G, Fisher DR, Roeske JC, Bruland OS, Larsen RH. Targeting of osseous sites with alpha-emitting 223Ra: comparison with the β-emitter 89Sr in mice. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:252–259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    de Klerk JM, Zonnenberg BA, van Net Scip AD, van Dijk A, Huiske AW, van Rijk PP. Can bone marrow scintigraphy predict platelet toxicity after treatment with 186Re-HEDP? Nucl Med Commun. 1999;20:833–836.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    Silberstein EB. Systemic radiopharmaceutical therapy of painful osteoblastic metastases. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2000;10:240–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Fuster D, Herranz R, Alcover J, Mareos, et al. Treatment of metastatic bone pain with repeated doses of strontium-89 in patients with prostate neoplasm. Rev Exp Nucl Med. 2000;19:270–274.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    Paszkowski AL, Hewitt DJ, Taylor A Jr. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in a patient treated with strontium-89 for metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24:852–854.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    Kossman SE, Weiss MA. Acute myelogenous leukemia after exposure to strontium-89 for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer. 2000;88:620–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Hoskin PJ, Ford HT, Harmer CL. Hemibody irradiation for metastatic bone pain in two histologically distinct groups of patients. Clin Oncol. 1989;1:67–69.
  69. ↵
    Weichselbaum RR, Hallahan D, Fuks Z, Kufe D. Radiation induction of immediate early genes: effectors of the radiation stress response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30:229–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Papatheofanis FJ. Serum PCIP as a bone formation marker in Sr-89 and external beam radiotherapy of prostatic bony metastases. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:594–598.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  71. ↵
    Papatheofanis FJ. Quantitation of biochemical markers of bone resorption following strontium-89 chloride therapy for metastatic prostatic carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1175–1179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Paptheofanis FJ. Decreased serum E-selectin concentration after 89Sr-chloride therapy for metastatic prostate cancer bone pain. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1021–1024.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    Buffa F, Flux GD, Guy MJ, et al. A model-based method for the prediction of whole body absorbed dose and bone marrow toxicity for Re-186 HEDP treatment of skeletal metastases from prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1114–1124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    Cameron PJ, Klemp PF, Martindale AA, Turner JH. Prospective Sm-153 EDTMP dosimetry by whole body scintigraphy. Nuc Med Commun. 1999;20:609–615.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    Lin DL, Tarnowski CP, Zhang J, et al. Bone metastatic LNCaP-derivative C4–2B prostate cancer cell line mineralizes in vitro. The Prostate. 2001;47:212–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (1 suppl)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 1 suppl
January 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bone-Seeking Radionuclides For Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Bone-Seeking Radionuclides For Therapy
Val J. Lewington
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2005, 46 (1 suppl) 38S-47S;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bone-Seeking Radionuclides For Therapy
Val J. Lewington
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2005, 46 (1 suppl) 38S-47S;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RADIONUCLIDE SELECTION CRITERIA
    • RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS FOR BONE PAIN PALLIATION
    • PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA
    • RETREATMENT
    • TOXICITY
    • MECHANISM OF ACTION AND FUTURE DIRECTION OF TARGETED THERAPY
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Molecular radiotheragnostics in prostate cancer
  • The Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms
  • Phase 2 Study of a High Dose of 186Re-HEDP for Bone Pain Palliation in Patients with Widespread Skeletal Metastases
  • Therapeutic Effects of a 186Re-Complex-Conjugated Bisphosphonate for the Palliation of Metastatic Bone Pain in an Animal Model
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Non-Radioiodine-Avid Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Dosimetry of Internal Emitters
  • Molecular Imaging as In Vivo Molecular Pathology for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Follow-Up After Therapy
Show more Clinical Practice of Molecular Radiotherapy

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire