Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherSpecial Contribution

PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard

Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon, Joel S. Karp, Michael E. Casey, Frank P. DiFilippo, Horace Hines, Gerd Muehllehner, Vilim Simcic, Charles W. Stearns, Lars-Eric Adam, Steve Kohlmyer and Vesna Sossi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2002, 43 (10) 1398-1409;
Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel S. Karp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael E. Casey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank P. DiFilippo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Horace Hines
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerd Muehllehner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vilim Simcic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles W. Stearns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars-Eric Adam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Kohlmyer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vesna Sossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The NU 2-1994 standard document for PET performance measurements has recently been updated. The updated document, NU 2-2001, includes revised measurements for spatial resolution, intrinsic scatter fraction, sensitivity, counting rate performance, and accuracy of count loss and randoms corrections. The revised measurements are designed to allow testing of dedicated PET systems in both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional modes as well as coincidence gamma cameras, conditions not considered in the original NU 2-1994 standard. In addition, the updated measurements strive toward being more representative of clinical studies, in particular, whole-body imaging. Methods: Performance measurements following the NU 2-1994 and NU 2-2001 standards were performed on several different PET scanners. Differences between the procedures and resulting performance characteristics, as well as the rationale for these changes, were noted. Results: Spatial resolution is measured with a point source in all 3 directions, rather than a line source, as specified previously. For the measurements of intrinsic scatter fraction, sensitivity, and counting rate performance, a 70-cm line source is now specified, instead of a 19-cm-long cylindric phantom. The longer configuration permits measurement of these performance characteristics over the entire axial field of view of all current PET scanners and incorporates the effects of activity outside the scanner. A measurement of image quality has been added in an effort to measure overall image quality under clinically realistic conditions. This measurement replaces the individual measurements of uniformity and of the accuracy of corrections for attenuation and scatter. Conclusion: The changes from the NU 2-1994 standard to the NU 2-2001 standard strive toward establishing relevance with clinical studies. The tests in the updated standard also are, in general, simpler and less time-consuming to perform than those in the NU 2-1994 standard.

  • PET
  • performance measurements

Footnotes

  • Received Dec. 31, 2001; revision accepted Jun. 11, 2002.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon, PhD, 11316 Smoke Rise Ct., Fairfax Station, VA 22039.

    E-mail: daubew{at}bellatlantic.net

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 43 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 10
October 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard
Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon, Joel S. Karp, Michael E. Casey, Frank P. DiFilippo, Horace Hines, Gerd Muehllehner, Vilim Simcic, Charles W. Stearns, Lars-Eric Adam, Steve Kohlmyer, Vesna Sossi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2002, 43 (10) 1398-1409;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard
Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon, Joel S. Karp, Michael E. Casey, Frank P. DiFilippo, Horace Hines, Gerd Muehllehner, Vilim Simcic, Charles W. Stearns, Lars-Eric Adam, Steve Kohlmyer, Vesna Sossi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2002, 43 (10) 1398-1409;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis
  • Simulation of Tracer Dose Reduction in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Effects on Oncologic Reading, Image Quality, and Artifacts
  • Estrogen Receptor Binding (18F-FES PET) and Glycolytic Activity (18F-FDG PET) Predict Progression-Free Survival on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER+ Breast Cancer
  • A New PET Scanner with Semiconductor Detectors Enables Better Identification of Intratumoral Inhomogeneity
  • Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results
  • Impact of Acquisition Geometry, Image Processing, and Patient Size on Lesion Detection in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET
  • Imaging of Weak-Source Distributions in LSO-Based Small-Animal PET Scanners
  • Performance Measurement of the microPET Focus 120 Scanner
  • Optimizing Injected Dose in Clinical PET by Accurately Modeling the Counting-Rate Response Functions Specific to Individual Patient Scans
  • Imaging Characteristics of a 3-Dimensional GSO Whole-Body PET Camera
  • PET Performance Measurements for an LSO-Based Combined PET/CT Scanner Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 Standard
  • NEMA NU 2 Performance Tests for Scanners with Intrinsic Radioactivity
  • Performance of a Brain PET Camera Based on Anger-Logic Gadolinium Oxyorthosilicate Detectors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hot Spot Imaging in Cardiovascular Diseases: An Information Statement from SNMMI, ASNC, and EANM
  • Proceedings: PET Drugs—A Workshop on Inspections Management and Regulatory Considerations
  • Female Authors in Nuclear Medicine Journals: A Survey from 2014 to 2020
Show more Special Contribution

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire