Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Diagnostic Potential of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT with Estrogen Receptor– and Progesterone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Staging or Restaging for Metastatic Disease

Zahra Sabahi, Andrew Nguyen, Keith Wong, Sherrington Li, Nathan Papa, Elgene Lim, Rachel F. Dear, Alexander M. Menzies, Frances Boyle, Yoland Antill, Belinda E. Kiely, Benjamin C. Forster, Cindy Mak, Diana Adams, Lina Pugliano, Andrew Spillane, Shikha Sharma, Adam Hickey, Aron Poole, Shikha Agrawal, Sobia Khan, Narjess Ayati and Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 700-706; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268896
Zahra Sabahi
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Nguyen
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Wong
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sherrington Li
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Papa
2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elgene Lim
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel F. Dear
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
4Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander M. Menzies
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances Boyle
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoland Antill
7Department of Medical Oncology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia;
8Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Belinda E. Kiely
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
9Department of Medical Oncology, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin C. Forster
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cindy Mak
10Chris O’Brian Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana Adams
9Department of Medical Oncology, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lina Pugliano
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Spillane
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shikha Sharma
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Hickey
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aron Poole
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shikha Agrawal
2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sobia Khan
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Narjess Ayati
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Emmett
1Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
2Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia;
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

18F-FDG PET/CT has low sensitivity for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (ER/PR)–positive breast cancer. By contrast, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor is overexpressed in ER/PR-positive breast cancer. This study assessed the diagnostic potential of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT in staging or restaging metastatic ER/PR-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer. Methods: Patients with ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer with clinical suspicion for metastatic disease undergoing staging or restaging were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT, in addition to standard 18F-FDG PET/CT. ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative status was confirmed in prior biopsy samples (primary or metastatic). Conventional imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT, bone scan, and diagnostic CT) was required within 3 wk of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT. 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT were assessed visually and quantitatively. Visually, all scans were read masked by 2 readers, with a third reader if results were discordant. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled, all with ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative histopathology. Of these, 75% (15/20) had lobular-subtype cancer, 40% (8/20) had suspected metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 60% (12/20) underwent restaging after systemic therapy. Overall, 75% (15/20) of the 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT scans and 65% (13/20) of the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were positive on visual assessment. For 50% (10/20) of patients, both scans were positive, and for 10% (2/20) of patients, both scans were negative. In the staging group, 75% (6/8) of patients had positive 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT and 50% (4/8) of patients had positive 18F-FDG PET/CT. At restaging, 75% (9/12) of patients had positive 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT and 75% (9/12) of patients had positive 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sites of positive 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT and negative 18F-FDG PET/CT disease were identified in 50% (4/8) of staging patients and 42% (5/12) of restaging patients, whereas negative 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT and positive 18F-FDG PET/CT disease was found in none of the staging patients but 58% (7/12) of the restaging cohort. Of these, 71% (5/7) of patients had a reduction in their ER status in the most recent biopsy samples. Quantitatively, the median SUVmax was higher for 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT (20.5; interquartile range, 5.8–31.3) than for 18F-FDG PET/CT (7.4; interquartile range, 4.9–9.8). Conclusion: 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT has diagnostic potential in the staging of ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Further evaluation is warranted.

  • estrogen receptor
  • breast cancer
  • 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT
  • GRPR

Footnotes

  • Published online Mar. 27, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic Potential of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT with Estrogen Receptor– and Progesterone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Staging or Restaging for Metastatic Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic Potential of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT with Estrogen Receptor– and Progesterone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Staging or Restaging for Metastatic Disease
Zahra Sabahi, Andrew Nguyen, Keith Wong, Sherrington Li, Nathan Papa, Elgene Lim, Rachel F. Dear, Alexander M. Menzies, Frances Boyle, Yoland Antill, Belinda E. Kiely, Benjamin C. Forster, Cindy Mak, Diana Adams, Lina Pugliano, Andrew Spillane, Shikha Sharma, Adam Hickey, Aron Poole, Shikha Agrawal, Sobia Khan, Narjess Ayati, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 700-706; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268896

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic Potential of 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT with Estrogen Receptor– and Progesterone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Staging or Restaging for Metastatic Disease
Zahra Sabahi, Andrew Nguyen, Keith Wong, Sherrington Li, Nathan Papa, Elgene Lim, Rachel F. Dear, Alexander M. Menzies, Frances Boyle, Yoland Antill, Belinda E. Kiely, Benjamin C. Forster, Cindy Mak, Diana Adams, Lina Pugliano, Andrew Spillane, Shikha Sharma, Adam Hickey, Aron Poole, Shikha Agrawal, Sobia Khan, Narjess Ayati, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 700-706; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268896
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Use of Maximum-Intensity Projections and Deep Learning Adds Value to the Fully Automatic Segmentation of Lesions Avid for [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA in PET/CT
  • Additive Value of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in Detecting Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Center, Phase II Study
  • Assessment of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Dosimetry from High-Speed Whole-Body Recordings Provided by a 360° Cadmium–Zinc–Telluride Camera Compared with Results from a Conventional Anger-Camera Protocol
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • estrogen receptor
  • breast cancer
  • 68Ga-NeoB PET/CT
  • GRPR
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire