Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Can PET-CT imaging biomarkers identify esophageal cancer (EC) patients who benefit from surgery following chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT)?

Sue Chua, Kenneth Miles, Balaji Ganeshan, Khaled Dawas, Raymond Endozo, Jamshed Bomanji, Glen Blackman and Ashley Groves
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 70;
Sue Chua
1Nuclear Medicine & PET, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Miles
2Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Balaji Ganeshan
2Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khaled Dawas
3Department of Surgery, GI Division, University College of London Hospital (UCLH), London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond Endozo
2Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamshed Bomanji
2Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen Blackman
4Department of Medicine, University College of London Hospital (UCLH), London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Groves
2Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

70

Objectives CRT is a mainstay of treatment for potentially operable EC, but not all patients benefit from post-CRT adjuvant surgery. There is a need for biomarkers to identify which patients would benefit from adjuvant surgery over CRT alone.

Methods We examined whether textural analysis (using proprietary 'TexRAD' software,www.texrad.org) of non-contrast CT(CTTA) and 18F-FDG PET images of baseline and post-treatment PET/CT scans, along with SUVmax and tumor metabolic area, could act as imaging biomarkers that identify patients benefiting from surgery after CRT. Imaging biomarkers were used to categorise 40 patients(adenocarcinoma 80%, SCC 20%) with potentially operable EC into subgroups based on good and poor imaging phenotypes, and results were correlated with mean overall survival(OS).

Results Stratification based on pre-CRT CTTA identified a sub-group of patients with significantly enhanced OS with CRT plus surgery vs CRT alone(46.0 vs 17.1 months respectively, p=0.028). Stratification by SUVmax post-CRT showed the low SUVmax group to have significantly longer OS with CRT plus surgery vs CRT alone(51.3 vs 30.3 months respectively,p=0.046). Stratifying by metabolic area showed the high metabolic area group survived significantly longer with CRT plus surgery vs CRT alone(41.2 vs 9.8 months, p=0.034). Textural analysis of PET images failed to show a significant relationship between texture and survival in baseline or post-treatment scans.

Conclusions CTTA features and 18F-FDG PET scan parameters have the potential to delineate imaging phenotypes which can predict CRT response and guide the use of adjuvant surgery in EC. This could enable more accurate stratification of patients into a subgroup who would clearly benefit from surgery.

Research Support CRT is a mainstay of therapy in esophageal cancer (EC), however there is uncertainty surrounding the role of post CRT surgery. There is a need to identify which EC patients benefit from post-CRT surgery given the significant associated risks. Textural analysis can be applied to already clinically obtained CT and FDG-PET images, without need for further image acquisition. CT texture analysis (CTTA) features and FDG uptake have been shown to be imaging biomarkers associated with a poor prognosis and lack of treatment response in several malignancies. This study assesses the potential for CTTA and PET textural analysis as well as PET metabolic parameters to define subgroups of patients in whom surgery significantly extends overall survival. Our results show CTTA, tumor metabolism and metabolic area, but not PET textural parameters, to correlate with OS. CTTA and tumor metabolic area identified subgroups of patients who clearly benefited from surgery.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can PET-CT imaging biomarkers identify esophageal cancer (EC) patients who benefit from surgery following chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT)?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Can PET-CT imaging biomarkers identify esophageal cancer (EC) patients who benefit from surgery following chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT)?
Sue Chua, Kenneth Miles, Balaji Ganeshan, Khaled Dawas, Raymond Endozo, Jamshed Bomanji, Glen Blackman, Ashley Groves
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 70;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Can PET-CT imaging biomarkers identify esophageal cancer (EC) patients who benefit from surgery following chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT)?
Sue Chua, Kenneth Miles, Balaji Ganeshan, Khaled Dawas, Raymond Endozo, Jamshed Bomanji, Glen Blackman, Ashley Groves
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 70;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.
  • Is childhood obesity linked to lymphoma?
  • Imaging characteristics of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed angio-immunoblastic T cell lymphoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Gastroesophageal/Pancreatic Cancer

  • Combination of baseline 18F-FDG intra-tumor uptake heterogeneity indices derived from genetic algorithm predicts therapy response and survival in esophageal cancer
  • Prognostic value of nodal SUVmax on pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with gastric cancer
  • Glucose level incorporated maximum standardized uptake value (glu-SUVmax) is the most important predictor of overall survival of surgically resected pancreatic cancer
Show more Gastroesophageal/Pancreatic Cancer

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire