Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)

68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic prostate cancer patients

Anouk C. de Jong, Minke Smits, Job van Riet, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Tessa Brabander, Paul Hamberg, Inge M. van Oort, Ronald de Wit, Martijn P. Lolkema, Niven Mehra, Marcel Segbers and Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2020, jnumed.119.241109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.241109
Anouk C. de Jong
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minke Smits
2 Radboud UMC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Job van Riet
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jurgen J. Fütterer
2 Radboud UMC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tessa Brabander
3 Erasmus MC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Hamberg
4 Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inge M. van Oort
2 Radboud UMC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald de Wit
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martijn P. Lolkema
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niven Mehra
2 Radboud UMC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcel Segbers
3 Erasmus MC, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

For individual treatment decisions in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), molecular diagnostics are increasingly used. Bone metastases are frequently the only source for obtaining metastatic tumor tissue. However, the success rate of computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsies for molecular analyses in mPC patients is only ~40%. Positron emission tomography (PET) using Gallium-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) is a promising tool to improve the harvest rate of bone biopsies for molecular analyses. Aim of this study was to determine the success rate of 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in mPC patients. Methods: Within a prospective multicenter whole-genome sequencing trial (NCT01855477), 69 mPC patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to bone biopsy. Primary endpoint was success rate (tumor percentage ≥30%) of 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies. At biopsy sites, 68Ga-PSMA uptake was quantified using rigid body image registration of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and interventional CT. Actionable somatic alterations were identified. Results: Success rate of 68Ga-PSMA guided biopsies for molecular analyses was 70%. At biopsy sites categorized as positive, inconclusive, or negative for 68Ga-PSMA uptake, 70%, 64%, and 36% of biopsies were tumor positive (≥30%), respectively (P = 0.0610). In tumor positive biopsies, 68Ga-PSMA uptake was significantly higher (P = 0.008), whereas radiodensity was significantly lower (P = 0.006). With an area under the curve of 0.84 and 0.70, both 68Ga-PSMA uptake (maximum standardized uptake value) and radiodensity (mean Hounsfield Units) were strong predictors for a positive biopsy. Actionable somatic alterations were detected in 73% of the sequenced biopsies. Conclusion: In patients with mPC, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT improves the success rate of CT-guided bone biopsies for molecular analyses, thereby identifying actionable somatic alterations in more patients. Therefore, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT may be considered for guidance of bone biopsies in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

  • Bone
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 68Ga-PSMA-PET
  • bone biopsy
  • molecular diagnostics
  • prostate cancer
  • whole genome sequencing
  • Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic prostate cancer patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic prostate cancer patients
Anouk C. de Jong, Minke Smits, Job van Riet, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Tessa Brabander, Paul Hamberg, Inge M. van Oort, Ronald de Wit, Martijn P. Lolkema, Niven Mehra, Marcel Segbers, Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2020, jnumed.119.241109; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.241109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic prostate cancer patients
Anouk C. de Jong, Minke Smits, Job van Riet, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Tessa Brabander, Paul Hamberg, Inge M. van Oort, Ronald de Wit, Martijn P. Lolkema, Niven Mehra, Marcel Segbers, Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2020, jnumed.119.241109; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.241109
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Oncology: GU)

  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Detection of Additional Primary Neoplasms on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 68Ga-PSMA-PET
  • bone biopsy
  • molecular diagnostics
  • prostate cancer
  • whole genome sequencing
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire