Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)

11C-choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: retrospective analysis in a large US patient series

Laure Michaud, Karim Touijer, Audrey Mauguen, Michael Zelefsky, Michael Morris, Serge Lyashschenko, Jeremy Durack, John Humm, Wolfgang Weber and Heiko Schöder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2019, jnumed.119.233098; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.233098
Laure Michaud
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karim Touijer
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Audrey Mauguen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Zelefsky
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Morris
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Lyashschenko
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Durack
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Humm
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Weber
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heiko Schöder
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate 11C-choline PET/CT detection performance for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) in a large non-European cohort in the context of emerging evidence for PSMA PET in this setting, and to map patterns of PCa recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11C-choline PET/CT scans from 287 patients who were enrolled onto an imaging protocol based on rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (mean:3.43 ng/mL, median:0.94 ng/mL, range:0.15–89.91) and suspected recurrent PCa. A total of 187 patients had undergone primary radical prostatectomy (RP; 79/187 had secondary radiotherapy), 30 had undergone primary radiotherapy (RT), and 70 had persistent PSA elevation after receiving initial treatment (69 post-RP, 1 post-RT). The level of suspicion for recurrence on 11C-choline PET/CT was scored (0:negative, 1:equivocal, 2:positive) by two readers. The correlation between 11C-choline PET/CT positivity and initial treatment, Gleason score, NCCN stage, PSA level, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and time between initial treatment and PET imaging was evaluated. Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were used to map 11C-choline recurrence patterns. Results: Considering scores 1 and 2 as positives, consensus between the two readers deemed 66% of the 11C-choline PET/CT scans as positive. When sorted by PSA level, 45% of patients with PSA<0.5 ng/mL, 56% of patients with PSA 0.5–0.99 ng/mL, 70% of patients with PSA 1.0–1.99 ng/mL, and 90% of patients with PSA ≥2.0 ng/mL scored either 1 or 2 on 11C-choline PET/CT scans. When considering scores of 2 only, 11C-choline PET/CT positivity was 54% (28%, 46%, 62%, and 81%, respectively, for patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL, 0.5–0.99 ng/mL, 1.0–1.99 ng/mL, and ≥2.0 ng/mL). In multivariate analysis, only the PSA level was significantly associated with scan positivity. Pattern analysis showed that pelvic lymph nodes were the most common site of recurrence, and 28% of patients had 11C-choline-positive suspected recurrences outside the initial treatment field. Conclusion: 11C-choline PET/CT can detect PCa recurrence even among patients with low PSA levels when interpretation accounts for the clinical context, providing a certain pre-test probability. Until PSMA agents are fully approved for PCa, choline PET/CT may provide clinical utility.

  • Molecular Imaging
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 11C-choline PET/CT
  • PSA relapse
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific antigen
  • recurrence
  • Copyright © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
11C-choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: retrospective analysis in a large US patient series
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
11C-choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: retrospective analysis in a large US patient series
Laure Michaud, Karim Touijer, Audrey Mauguen, Michael Zelefsky, Michael Morris, Serge Lyashschenko, Jeremy Durack, John Humm, Wolfgang Weber, Heiko Schöder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2019, jnumed.119.233098; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233098

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
11C-choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: retrospective analysis in a large US patient series
Laure Michaud, Karim Touijer, Audrey Mauguen, Michael Zelefsky, Michael Morris, Serge Lyashschenko, Jeremy Durack, John Humm, Wolfgang Weber, Heiko Schöder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2019, jnumed.119.233098; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233098
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Oncology: GU)

  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Detection of Additional Primary Neoplasms on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Molecular imaging
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 11C-choline PET/CT
  • PSA relapse
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific antigen
  • recurrence
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire