Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)

Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer

Helle D. Zacho, Randi F. Fonager, Julie B. Nielsen, Christian Haarmark, Helle W. Hendel, Martin B. Johansen, Jesper C. Mortensen and Lars J. Petersen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2019, jnumed.119.232686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.232686
Helle D. Zacho
1 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randi F. Fonager
1 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie B. Nielsen
1 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Haarmark
2 Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helle W. Hendel
2 Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin B. Johansen
1 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesper C. Mortensen
3 Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars J. Petersen
1 Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the interobserver agreement in 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods:NaF PET/CT scans were retrieved from all patients who participated in four recent prospective trials. Two experienced observers independently evaluated the NaF PET/CTs on a patient level using a three-category scale (no bone metastases [M0], equivocal for bone metastases, and bone metastases present [M1]) and on a dichotomous scale (M0/M1). In patients with no more than 10 lesions, the location and number of lesions were recorded. On a patient level, the diagnostic performance was calculated using a sensitivity analysis, where equivocal lesions were handled as M0 as well as M1. Results: NaF PET/CTs from 219 patients with PCa were included, of whom 129 patients were scanned for primary staging, 67 patients for biochemical recurrence, and 23 patients for metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Agreement between the observers was almost perfect on a patient level (three-category scale unweighted κ: 0.83 ± 0.05, linear weighted κ: 0.90 ± 0.06; dichotomous scale κ: 0.91 ± 0.07). On a lesion level (dichotomous scale), the observers agreed on the number as well as the location of bone metastases in 205 (93.6%) patients. In the remaining 14 patients, the readers disagreed on the number of lesions in 13 patients and the location of bone metastases in one patient. A final diagnosis of bone metastases was made in 211 of 219 patients. The sensitivity ranged from 0.86-0.92, specificity from 0.83-0.97, positive predictive value from 0.70-0.93, and negative predictive value from 0.94-0.96. Conclusion: The interobserver agreement of NaF PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa was very high among trained observers, both on a patient level and on a lesion level. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of NaF PET/CT was satisfactory, rendering NaF PET/CT a robust tool in the diagnostic armamentarium.

  • Bone
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT
  • bone metastases
  • interobserver agreement
  • kappa-value
  • prostate cancer
  • Copyright © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 6
June 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer
Helle D. Zacho, Randi F. Fonager, Julie B. Nielsen, Christian Haarmark, Helle W. Hendel, Martin B. Johansen, Jesper C. Mortensen, Lars J. Petersen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2019, jnumed.119.232686; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232686

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer
Helle D. Zacho, Randi F. Fonager, Julie B. Nielsen, Christian Haarmark, Helle W. Hendel, Martin B. Johansen, Jesper C. Mortensen, Lars J. Petersen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2019, jnumed.119.232686; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232686
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Radiation Dose Savings Associated with Personalized CT Scan Range in 18F-NaF Bone PET/CT
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Oncology: GU)

  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Detection of Additional Primary Neoplasms on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • 18F-sodium-fluoride PET/CT
  • bone metastases
  • interobserver agreement
  • kappa-value
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire