JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online April 16, 2009
J Nucl Med 2009, doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.060731
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.108.060731v1
50/5/711    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mundler, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mundler, O.


18F-FDG Avidity of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: A New Molecular Imaging Signature?

David Taïeb 1*, Frederic Sebag 2, Anne Barlier 3, Laurent Tessonnier 1, Fausto F. Palazzo 2, Isabelle Morange 4, Patricia Niccoli-Sire 4, Nicolas Fakhry 5, Catherine De Micco 6, Serge Cammilleri 1, Alain Enjalbert 3, Jean-François Henry 2, and Olivier Mundler 1

1 Service Central de Biophysique et de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
2 Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
3 Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Conception, Marseille, France
4 Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Métabolismes, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
5 Service D'oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
6 Faculté de Médecine, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Marseille, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.taieb{at}ap-hm.fr.


   Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate 18F-FDG PET uptake in patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic chromaffin-derived tumors. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive unrelated patients with chromaffin tumors, including 9 patients with genetically determined disease, were studied. A combination of preoperative imaging work-up, surgical findings, and pathologic analyses was used to classify the patients into 2 groups: those with nonmetastatic disease (presumed benign, n = 18) and those with metastatic tumors (n = 10). 18F-FDG PET was performed in all cases. Visual and quantitative analyses were individually graded for each tumor. Somatic mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase subunits B and D and Von-Hippel Lindau genes were also evaluated in 6 benign sporadic tumor samples. Results: All but 2 patients showed significantly increased 18F-FDG uptake on visual analysis. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ranged from 1.9 to 42 (mean ± SD, 8.2 ± 9.7; median, 4.6) in nonmetastatic tumors and 2.3 to 29.3 (mean ± SD, 9.7 ± 8.4; median, 7.4) in metastatic tumors. No statistical difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.44), but succinate dehydrogenase–related tumors were notable in being the most 18F-FDG–avid tumors (SUVmax, 42, 29.3, 21, 17, and 5.3). Succinate dehydrogenase and Von-Hippel Lindau–related tumors had a significantly higher SUVmax than did neurofibromatosis type 1 and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A syndrome–related tumors (P = 0.02). 18F-FDG PET was superior to 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine in all metastatic patients but one. By contrast, 18F-FDG PET underestimated the extent of the disease, compared with 6-18F-fluorodopa PET, in 5 patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma. However, succinate dehydrogenase mutations (germline and somatic) and functional dedifferentiation do not adequately explain 18F-FDG uptake since most tumors were highly avid for 18F-FDG. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET positivity is almost a constant feature of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. It may be considered a molecular signature of such tumors, although which aspect of the plethora of molecular changes associated with dedifferentiation, germline genetic defects, or the adaptive response to hypoxia is responsible for this characteristic requires further elucidation.

Key Words: molecular imaging, PET/CT, neuroendocrine, FDG PET, pheochromocytoma, Warburg effect




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Tessonnier, F. Sebag, C. Ghander, C. De Micco, R. Reynaud, F. F. Palazzo, B. Conte-Devolx, J. F. Henry, O. Mundler, and D. Taieb
Limited Value of 18F-F-DOPA PET to Localize Pancreatic Insulin-Secreting Tumors in Adults with Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2010; 95(1): 303 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. J. L. M. Timmers, C. C. Chen, J. A. Carrasquillo, M. Whatley, A. Ling, B. Havekes, G. Eisenhofer, L. Martiniova, K. T. Adams, and K. Pacak
Comparison of 18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose, and 18F-Fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Localization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2009; 94(12): 4757 - 4767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.