JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online July 16, 2008
J Nucl Med 2008, doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.047738
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.047738v1
49/8/1232    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koopmans, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dullaart, R. P.F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koopmans, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dullaart, R. P.F.


111In-Octreotide Is Superior to 123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine for Scintigraphic Detection of Head and Neck Paragangliomas

Klaas Pieter Koopmans 1, Pieter L. Jager 1, Ido P. Kema 2, Michiel N. Kerstens 3, Frans Albers 4, and Robin P.F. Dullaart 3*

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
3 Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
4 Department of Ear Nose and Throat Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.p.f.dullaart{at}int.umcg.nl.


   Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic yield of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, and morphologic imaging (CT or MRI) in patients with head and neck paragangliomas. Methods: In a university hospital setting, patients considered to have head and neck paraganglioma were referred to the outpatient endocrinology department and underwent CT or MRI, SRS, and MIBG imaging. For validation, we used a composite reference standard consisting of clinical and histologic data and CT or MRI, with which SRS and MIBG imaging were compared. Urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine measurements were also obtained. Results: Twenty-nine consecutively referred patients (17 women and 12 men) were included and were found to have paraganglioma. Both morphologic and SRS were positive in 27 patients (sensitivity, 93%, and 95% confidence interval [CI], 77%–98%, compared with the composite reference standard), whereas MIBG was positive in only 13 patients (44%; 95% CI, 23%–61%) (P < 0.001, compared with SRS). On a lesion-based analysis, morphologic imaging detected 31 lesions (sensitivity, 82%; 95% CI, 65%–92%), SRS detected 34 (89%; 95% CI, 75%–97%), and MIBG detected 15 (42%; 95% CI, 26%–59%). SRS was superior to MIBG (P = 0.001). With SRS, a previously unknown carcinoid tumor was detected in 1 patient, and a carcinoid was suspected in another patient. MIBG detected an additional adrenal pheochromocytoma in 1 patient. Urinary metanephrine or normetanephrine excretion was elevated in 6 patients. The number of lesions on SRS and MIBG per patient correlated with the levels of abnormal metanephrine or normetanephrine excretion (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: SRS was superior to MIBG in patients with highly suspected head and neck paraganglioma.

Key Words: endocrinology, oncology, neuroendocrine, accuracy, MIBG scintigraphy, octreotide scintigraphy, paraganglioma







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.