JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online February 20, 2008
J Nucl Med 2008, doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.047506
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.047506v1
49/3/367    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krohn, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krohn, K. A.


Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol

Lanell M. Peterson 1, David A. Mankoff 1*, Thomas Lawton 2, Kevin Yagle 1, Erin K. Schubert 1, Svetlana Stekhova 1, Allen Gown 3, Jeanne M. Link 1, Timothy Tewson 4, and Kenneth A. Krohn 1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
2 Department of Pathology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
3 Phenopath Laboratories, Seattle, Washington
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dam{at}u.washington.edu.


   Abstract

The PET compound 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) has been developed and tested as an agent for the imaging of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in vivo. 18F-FES uptake has been shown to correlate with ER expression assayed in vitro by radioligand binding; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) rather than radioligand binding is used most often to measure ER expression in clinical practice. We therefore compared 18F-FES uptake with ER expression assayed in vitro by IHC with both qualitative and semiquantitative measures. Methods: Seventeen patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer were studied with dynamic 18F-FES PET; cancer tissue samples, collected close to the time of imaging, were assayed for ER expression by IHC. For each tumor, partial-volume-corrected measures of 18F-FES uptake were compared with ER expression measured by 3 different ER scoring methods: qualitative scoring (0–3+), the Allred score (0–10), and a computerized IHC index. Results: There was excellent agreement (r = 0.99) between observers using IHC as well as the different methods of measuring ER content (P < 0.001). ER-negative tumors had 18F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values of less than 1.0, whereas ER-positive tumors had values above 1.1. Correlation coefficients for the different measures of ER content and the different measures of 18F-FES uptake ranged from 0.57 to 0.73, with the best correlation being between the computerized IHC index and 18F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values. Conclusion: Our results showed good agreement between 18F-FES PET and ER expression measured by IHC. 18F-FES imaging may be a useful tool for aiding in the assessment of ER status, especially in patients with multiple tumors or for tumors that are difficult to biopsy.

Key Words: estrogen receptor, breast cancer, 18F-FES PET, IHC, tracer uptake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Link, H. M. Linden, L. Sundararajan, and K. A. Krohn
Tumor Receptor Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 149S - 163S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.