JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online December 12, 2007
J Nucl Med 2007, doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.045179
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.045179v1
49/1/151    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Champion, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hindié, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Champion, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hindié, E.


CELLDOSE: A Monte Carlo Code to Assess Electron Dose Distribution—S Values for 131I in Spheres of Various Sizes

Christophe Champion 1*, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara 2, and Elif Hindié 3

1 Laboratoire de Physique Moléculaire et des Collisions, Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, Institut de Physique, Metz, France
2 DSV/I2BM/SHFJ/LIME, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Orsay, France
3 Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Imagerie moléculaire diagnostique et ciblage thérapeutique; Ecole Doctorale B2T, IUH; Université Paris 7, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: champion{at}univ-metz.fr.


   Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation can be particularly suitable for modeling the microscopic distribution of energy received by normal tissues or cancer cells and for evaluating the relative merits of different radiopharmaceuticals. We used a new code, CELLDOSE, to assess electron dose for isolated spheres with radii varying from 2,500 µm down to 0.05 µm, in which 131I is homogeneously distributed. Methods: All electron emissions of 131I were considered, including the whole {beta}- 131I spectrum, 108 internal conversion electrons, and 21 Auger electrons. The Monte Carlo track-structure code used follows all electrons down to an energy threshold Ecutoff = 7.4 eV. Results: Calculated S values were in good agreement with published analytic methods, lying in between reported results for all experimental points. Our S values were also close to other published data using a Monte Carlo code. Contrary to the latter published results, our results show that dose distribution inside spheres is not homogeneous, with the dose at the outmost layer being approximately half that at the center. The fraction of electron energy retained within the spheres decreased with decreasing radius (r): 87.1% for r = 2,500 µm, 8.73% for r = 50 µm, and 1.18% for r = 5 µm. Thus, a radioiodine concentration that delivers a dose of 100 Gy to a micrometastasis of 2,500 µm radius would deliver 10 Gy in a cluster of 50 µm and only 1.4 Gy in an isolated cell. The specific contribution from Auger electrons varied from 0.25% for the largest sphere up to 76.8% for the smallest sphere. Conclusion: The dose to a tumor cell will depend on its position in a metastasis. For the treatment of very small metastases, 131I may not be the isotope of choice. When trying to kill isolated cells or a small cluster of cells with 131I, it is important to get the iodine as close as possible to the nucleus to get the enhancement factor from Auger electrons. The Monte Carlo code CELLDOSE can be used to assess the electron map deposit for any isotope.

Key Words: Monte Carlo simulation, cell dosimetry, 131I







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.