JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online August 17, 2007
J Nucl Med 2007, doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.040550
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.040550v1
48/9/1527    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, D. H.


Performance Measurement of the microPET Focus 120 Scanner

Jin Su Kim 1, Jae Sung Lee 1*, Ki Chun Im 2, Su Jin Kim 1, Seog-Young Kim 2, Dong Soo Lee 1, and Dae Hyuk Moon 2

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Interdisciplinary Programs in Radiation Applied Life Science Major, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jaes{at}snu.ac.kr.


   Abstract

The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. Methods: A 68Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a 22Na point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an 18F line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250~750 keV or 350~650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Results: Energy resolution at a 511-keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250~750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250~750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350~650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350~650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250~750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250~750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. Conclusion: The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.

Key Words: small-animal PET, performance measurement, instrumentation, molecular imaging, small-animal imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
S. J. Kim, J. S. Lee, K. C. Im, S.-Y. Kim, S.-A. Park, S. J. Lee, S. J. Oh, D. S. Lee, and D. H. Moon
Kinetic Modeling of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine for Quantitative Cell Proliferation Imaging in Subcutaneous Tumor Models in Mice
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 2057 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Vandervoort and V. Sossi
Impact of Contamination from Scattered Photons in Singles-Mode Transmission Data on Quantitative Small-Animal PET Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1852 - 1861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Kang and J.-K. Chung
Molecular-Genetic Imaging Based on Reporter Gene Expression
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 164S - 179S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S.-J. Kim, C. Nian, D. J. Doudet, and C. H.S. McIntosh
Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV With Sitagliptin (MK0431) Prolongs Islet Graft Survival in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice
Diabetes, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 1331 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.