|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Departments of Radiology and Bioengineering, Bio-X Program, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University, Stanford, California
2 California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI), UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
4 Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sgambhir{at}stanford.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
This study evaluates the quantitative biodistribution of commercially available CdSe quantum dots (QD) in mice. Methods: 64Cu-Labeled 800- or 525-nm emission wavelength QD (21- or 12-nm diameter), with or without 2,000 MW (molecular weight) polyethylene glycol (PEG), were injected intravenously into mice (5.55 MBq/25 pmol QD) and studied using well counting or by serial microPET and region-of-interest analysis. Results: Both methods show rapid uptake by the liver (27.4–38.9 %ID/g) (%ID/g is percentage injected dose per gram tissue) and spleen (8.0–12.4 %ID/g). Size has no influence on biodistribution within the range tested here. Pegylated QD have slightly slower uptake into liver and spleen (6 vs. 2 min) and show additional low-level bone uptake (6.5–6.9 %ID/g). No evidence of clearance from these organs was observed. Conclusion: Rapid reticuloendothelial system clearance of QD will require modification of QD for optimal utility in imaging living subjects. Formal quantitative biodistribution/imaging studies will be helpful in studying many types of nanoparticles, including quantum dots.
Key Words: quantum dot, biodistribution, nanoparticle, PET, molecular imaging
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, Z. Cheng, C. Davis, A. M. Lutz, M. L. Schipper, C. H. Nielsen, and S. S. Gambhir Targeted Microbubbles for Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis: Assessment of Whole-Body Biodistribution with Dynamic Micro-PET in Mice Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 212 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Keren, C. Zavaleta, Z. Cheng, A. de la Zerda, O. Gheysens, and S. S. Gambhir Noninvasive molecular imaging of small living subjects using Raman spectroscopy PNAS, April 15, 2008; 105(15): 5844 - 5849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cai, K. Chen, Z.-B. Li, S. S. Gambhir, and X. Chen Dual-Function Probe for PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor Vasculature J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1862 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-H. Lee Quantum Dots: A Quantum Jump for Molecular Imaging? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1408 - 1410. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |