JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 15, 2007
J Nucl Med 2007, doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.039925
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.039925v1
48/7/1104    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henneman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henneman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.


Can LV Dyssynchrony as Assessed with Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Predict Response to CRT?

Maureen M. Henneman 1, Ji Chen 2, Petra Dibbets-Schneider 3, Marcel P. Stokkel 3, Gabe B. Bleeker 4, Claudia Ypenburg 1, Ernst E. van der Wall 4, Martin J. Schalij 1, Ernest V. Garcia 2, and Jeroen J. Bax 1*

1 Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2 Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
4 Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbax{at}knoware.nl.


   Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is now a well-recognized therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart failure. However, not all patients respond to CRT, and, therefore, preimplantation identification of responders is desirable. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the degree of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, as assessed with phase analysis from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS), can predict which patients will respond to CRT. Methods: Forty-two patients with severe heart failure, depressed LV ejection fraction, and wide QRS complex were prospectively included for implantation of a CRT device and underwent GMPS and 2-dimensional echocardiography as part of the clinical protocol. Clinical status was evaluated using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 6-min walk test, and quality-of-life score. The histogram bandwidth and phase SD (parameters indicating LV dyssynchrony) were assessed from GMPS, and the clinical status and echocardiographic variables were reassessed at 6-mo follow-up. Results: Responders (71%) and nonresponders (29%) had comparable baseline characteristics, except for histogram bandwidth (175° ± 63° vs. 117° ± 51° [P < 0.01]) and phase SD (56.3° ± 19.9° vs. 37°.1 ± 14.4° [P < 0.01]), which were significantly larger in responders compared with nonresponders. Moreover, receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an optimal cutoff value of 135° for histogram bandwidth (sensitivity and specificity of 70%) and of 43° for phase SD (sensitivity and specificity of 74%) for the prediction of response to CRT. Conclusion: Response to CRT is related to the presence of LV dyssynchrony assessed by phase analysis with GMPS. A cutoff value of 135° for histogram bandwidth and of 43° for phase SD could be used to predict response to CRT. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the present findings.

Key Words: left ventricular dyssynchrony, cardiac resynchronization therapy, SPECT, heart failure




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
S. D. Van Kriekinge, H. Nishina, M. Ohba, D. S. Berman, and G. Germano
Automatic Global and Regional Phase Analysis from Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging: Application to the Characterization of Ventricular Contraction in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1790 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. Chen, J. J. Bax, M. M. Henneman, M. J. Boogers, and E. V. Garcia
Is nuclear imaging a viable alternative technique to assess dyssynchrony?
Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii101 - iii105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Z.-Z. Song
Can LV Dyssynchrony as Assessed with Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Preferably Predict Response to CRT?
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 686 - 686.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. M. Henneman, J. J. Bax, J. Chen, and E. V. Garcia
Reply: Can LV Dyssynchrony as Assessed with Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Preferably Predict Response to CRT?
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 686 - 686.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.