JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 15, 2007
J Nucl Med 2007, doi:10.2967/jnumed.106.037382
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.106.037382v1
48/6/920    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doot, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mankoff, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doot, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mankoff, D. A.


Dynamic and Static Approaches to Quantifying 18F-FDG Uptake for Measuring Cancer Response to Therapy, Including the Effect of Granulocyte CSF

Robert K. Doot 1, Lisa K. Dunnwald 2, Erin K. Schubert 2, Mark Muzi 2, Lanell M. Peterson 2, Paul E. Kinahan 1, Brenda F. Kurland 3, and David A. Mankoff 4*

1 Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2 Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
3 Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
4 Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dam{at}u.washington.edu.


   Abstract

The response of cancer to chemotherapy can be quantified using 18F-FDG to indicate changes in tumor metabolism. Quantification using the standardized uptake value (SUV) is more feasible for clinical practice than is the metabolic rate of 18F-FDG (MRFDG), which requires longer, dynamic scanning. The relationship between MRFDG and SUV depends in part on how each accounts for blood clearance of tracer. We tested whether chemotherapy and treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) changed the blood clearance curves and therefore affected the relationship between MRFDG and SUV. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET before and after chemotherapy, including granulocyte CSF. The area under the curve (AUC) for blood clearance was determined before and after therapy. MRFDGs were determined by graphical analyses, whereas SUVs were calculated using the standard formula normalized by body weight. MRFDG and SUVs were compared with each other and with tumor response. Paired percentage changes in MRFDG and SUV were also divided into tertiles based on pretherapy SUV to investigate differences in the relative sensitivity of SUV changes to MRFDG changes due to baseline tumor uptake. Results: Despite a small but statistically significant 6% decrease in blood AUCs after therapy (P = 0.02), SUV and MRFDG did not differ significantly in slope (P = 0.53) or in correlation before and after therapy (r = 0.95 for both). Percentage changes in MRFDG and SUV between serial scans correlated with each other (r = 0.84) and with patient response (P ≤ 0.06). The maximum detectable percentage change in SUV and the slope of percentage changes in MRFDG versus SUV for the patient tertile with the lowest baseline SUVs (65% ± 5% [±SE], slope (m) = 0.40 ± 0.12, n = 13) were significantly lower than for the other patients (86% ± 3%, m = 0.85 ± 0.10, n = 26, P = 0.01 for both). Conclusion: Chemotherapy and granulocyte CSF treatment resulted in a lower 18F-FDG blood AUC. The maximum detectable percentage change in 18F-FDG uptake is less when quantifying via static SUV than via dynamic MRFDG. This effect is small in most patients but may have clinical significance for measuring the response of patients with a low pretherapy 18F-FDG uptake.

Key Words: SUV, MRFDG, 18F-FDG, granulocyte CSF, response to therapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. K. Dunnwald, J. R. Gralow, G. K. Ellis, R. B. Livingston, H. M. Linden, J. M. Specht, R. K. Doot, T. J. Lawton, W. E. Barlow, B. F. Kurland, et al.
Tumor Metabolism and Blood Flow Changes by Positron Emission Tomography: Relation to Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2008; 26(27): 4449 - 4457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.