Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleThe Illustrated Post

Freehand SPECT Combined with 3-Dimensional Light Detection and Ranging as Alternative Means of Specimen Scanning During Prostate Cancer Surgery

Giusi Pisano, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Anne-Claire Berrens, Leon J. Slof, Daphne D.D. Rietbergen, Henk G. van der Poel, Pim J. van Leeuwen and Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2024, 65 (11) 1816-1817; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268256
Giusi Pisano
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
2Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias N. van Oosterom
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Claire Berrens
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon J. Slof
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
4Design and Prototyping, Department of Medical Technology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daphne D.D. Rietbergen
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
5Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk G. van der Poel
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
6Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pim J. van Leeuwen
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;
3Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has rapidly been established as a target for prostate cancer management for diagnosis, staging, and image-guided therapy (1,2). Nonetheless, during de novo [99mTc]Tc-PSMA radioguided surgery, it is challenging to assess primary tumor margins. Recently, a solution has been proposed using small-bore 3-dimensional PET/CT (3,4).

Here, we report the case of a de novo prostate cancer patient scheduled for robot-assisted [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S radioguided surgery (531 MBq intravenously the day before surgery). The NCI-AvL institutional review board approved this study (IRBdm24-249). The morning of surgery, preoperative SPECT/CT (Fig. 1A) displayed elevated tracer uptake within the primary tumor site and in a suspected lymph node. After resection and without further tissue preparation, the prostate was scanned with an industrial 3-dimensional surface scanner (light detection and ranging [LiDAR]) and freehand SPECT (5). To allow synchronization of the signal and the detector orientation, the latter approach used an optically tracked crystal gamma camera (Fig. 1B). A 3-mm pixel spacing, an iterative reconstruction algorithm (maximum-likelihood expectation maximization, 20 iterations), and a 3-mm gaussian filter were used. The LiDAR scan and the molecular freehand [99mTc]Tc-PSMA SPECT, approximately taking 3 min each, were automatically fused via an asymmetrical refence tracker. Visualization and analysis occurred in 3DSlicer software, taking 3–4 min for the elaborate image display, providing a hybrid scan in either augmented or virtual reality (Fig. 1C). The prostate specimen scan could anatomically be related to the excised prostate tissue (Fig. 1D) and the [99mTc]Tc-PSMA uptake related to SPECT/CT findings (Fig. 1A). With SPECT intensity thresholds set at 16% of the maximum signal, margins did not display tumor involvement (Fig. 1D); at histopathology, bilateral adenocarcinoma was found in the prostate extending to extraprostatic tissue (posterolateral left region) and the left seminal vesicle (Gleason score of 4 + 5 = 9).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) [99mTc]Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT axial images showing focal bilateral uptake in prostate, more intense on the left (yellow arrows), and in left deep obturator node (red arrow). (B) Back-table specimen scanning setup, highlighting specimen tray with integrated optical reference trackers, 3-dimensional surface scanner (0.5-mm resolution, Artec Eva [Artec3D], LiDAR), and hand-held γ-camera (CrystalCam [Crystal Photonics]) combined with DeclipseSPECT (SurgicEye). (C) Hybrid freehand SPECT/LiDAR specimen scans indicating 2 hotspots in prostate (arrows). (D) Correlated images showing (top) histopathology of primary tumor (prostate cancer) and (bottom) excised prostate tissue.

This case shows that hybrid freehand SPECT/LiDAR prostate cancer specimen imaging is feasible, thus providing a low-cost and low–radiation-dose alternative to postoperative PET scanning. Further studies are needed to define optimal threshold levels and to investigate how specimen imaging impacts the surgical procedure.

DISCLOSURE

This research was supported by a Dutch Research Council NWO-TTW-VICI grant (TTW 16141), a NWO KICH grant (KICH1.ST03.21.030), and a KWF PPS grant 2022-PPS-1/14852. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 3, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Berrens A-C,
    2. Knipper S,
    3. Marra G,
    4. et al
    . State of the art in prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;54:43–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Berrens A-C,
    2. Scheltema M,
    3. Maurer T,
    4. et al
    . Delphi consensus project on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted surgery-outcomes from an international multidisciplinary panel. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51:2893–2902.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Darr C,
    2. Costa PF,
    3. Kahl T,
    4. et al
    . Intraoperative molecular positron emission tomography imaging for intraoperative assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;54:28–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fragoso Costa P,
    2. Shi K,
    3. Holm S,
    4. et al
    . Surgical radioguidance with beta-emitting radionuclides: challenges and possibilities—a position paper by the EANM. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51:2903–2921.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wendler T,
    2. Herrmann K,
    3. Schnelzer A,
    4. et al
    . First demonstration of 3-D lymphatic mapping in breast cancer using freehand SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1452–1461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication June 17, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication September 19, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 11
November 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Freehand SPECT Combined with 3-Dimensional Light Detection and Ranging as Alternative Means of Specimen Scanning During Prostate Cancer Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Freehand SPECT Combined with 3-Dimensional Light Detection and Ranging as Alternative Means of Specimen Scanning During Prostate Cancer Surgery
Giusi Pisano, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Anne-Claire Berrens, Leon J. Slof, Daphne D.D. Rietbergen, Henk G. van der Poel, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2024, 65 (11) 1816-1817; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268256

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Freehand SPECT Combined with 3-Dimensional Light Detection and Ranging as Alternative Means of Specimen Scanning During Prostate Cancer Surgery
Giusi Pisano, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Anne-Claire Berrens, Leon J. Slof, Daphne D.D. Rietbergen, Henk G. van der Poel, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2024, 65 (11) 1816-1817; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268256
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Uncommon Anomalous Biodistribution of 18F-DCFPyL Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: A Case Series
  • [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT Monitors Response to Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand Inhibitor in a Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Correlation with Histopathology
  • Evaluating Bone Healing with [18F]NaF PET/CT During Bone Segment Transport in Femoral Fracture Treatment
Show more The Illustrated Post

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire