Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleNeurology

Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET

Mony J. de Leon, Yi Li, Nobuyuki Okamura, Wai H. Tsui, Les A. Saint-Louis, Lidia Glodzik, Ricardo S. Osorio, Juan Fortea, Tracy Butler, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Silvia Fossati, Hee-Jin Kim, Roxana O. Carare, Maiken Nedergaard, Helene Benveniste and Henry Rusinek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2017, 58 (9) 1471-1476; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.187211
Mony J. de Leon
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Li
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nobuyuki Okamura
2Department of Pharmacology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Tohoku, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wai H. Tsui
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Les A. Saint-Louis
3Manhattan Diagnostic Radiology, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lidia Glodzik
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
4Department of Radiology, New York University Center School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo S. Osorio
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Fortea
5Memory Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracy Butler
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Pirraglia
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Fossati
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
6Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hee-Jin Kim
1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, New York
7Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roxana O. Carare
8Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maiken Nedergaard
9Center for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
10Center for Basic and Translational Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helene Benveniste
11Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry Rusinek
4Department of Radiology, New York University Center School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Evidence supporting the hypothesis that reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) clearance is involved in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease (AD) comes primarily from rodent models. However, unlike rodents, in which predominant extracranial CSF egress is via olfactory nerves traversing the cribriform plate, human CSF clearance pathways are not well characterized. Dynamic PET with 18F‐THK5117, a tracer for tau pathology, was used to estimate the ventricular CSF time–activity as a biomarker for CSF clearance. We tested 3 hypotheses: extracranial CSF is detected at the superior turbinates; CSF clearance is reduced in AD; and CSF clearance is inversely associated with amyloid deposition. Methods: Fifteen subjects, 8 with AD and 7 normal control volunteers, were examined with 18F‐THK5117. Ten subjects additionally underwent 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) PET scanning, and 8 were 11C-PiB–positive. Ventricular time–activity curves of 18F‐THK5117 were used to identify highly correlated time–activity curves from extracranial voxels. Results: For all subjects, the greatest density of CSF-positive extracranial voxels was in the nasal turbinates. Tracer concentration analyses validated the superior nasal turbinate CSF signal intensity. AD patients showed ventricular tracer clearance reduced by 23% and 66% fewer superior turbinate CSF egress sites. Ventricular CSF clearance was inversely associated with amyloid deposition. Conclusion: The human nasal turbinate is part of the CSF clearance system. Lateral ventricle and superior nasal turbinate CSF clearance abnormalities are found in AD. Ventricular CSF clearance reductions are associated with increased brain amyloid depositions. These data suggest that PET-measured CSF clearance is a biomarker of potential interest in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

  • neurology
  • PET/CT
  • research methods
  • Alzheimer disease
  • CSF clearance
  • dynamic PET
  • THK5117

Impairments in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) turnover have been suspected for many years in the etiology of Alzheimer disease (AD) and propagation of amyloid-β (Aβ) lesions (1–4). However, there are no noninvasive imaging tools to evaluate CSF clearance.

Impaired CSF clearance is observed in mouse aging (5) and AD (6) models. In rodents and other mammals, CSF is primarily cleared along olfactory nerves that traverse the cribriform plate, draining into lymphatic vessels in the nasal mucosa (7–10). Rodent CSF clearance is rapid because radiolabeled albumin (11), Indian ink (7), and paramagnetic contrast (10) injected into the CSF reach the turbinates within minutes. Much less is known about human CSF clearance anatomy. Arachnoid granulations, arguably considered important human CSF egress sites (12), are not found in the rodent. The only evidence for a human nasal turbinate CSF efflux pathway comes from postmortem studies (13,14).

Low-molecular-weight radiotracers enter and egress the CSF through the choroid plexus and perivascular drainage (12), yet CSF time–activity curves have not been explored in the PET literature. Using in vivo dynamic PET with 18F‐THK5117 and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) tracers in healthy elderly and AD subjects, we estimated ventricular CSF time–activity curves to confirm 3 hypotheses: CSF is cleared via the superior nasal turbinates; CSF clearance is reduced in AD; and the magnitude of Aβ binding is inversely associated with the CSF clearance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants and Clinical Assessments

With ethics committee approval, written informed consent was obtained from 15 participants or their legal care takers. Eight probable AD patients were recruited from the memory clinic of Tohoku University Hospital, and 7 healthy normal (NL) volunteer controls were recruited from the community (Table 1). All subjects were diagnosed at a consensus conference, and the diagnosis of AD was made in accordance with the criteria of the National Institute of Neurologic and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association (15). All participants underwent high-resolution T1-weighted MRI and PET examination with the 18F‐THK5117 tracer. Ten of these subjects, 5 NL and 5 AD, also underwent 11C-PiB PET scanning.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Study Subjects

Image Acquisition and Processing

Dynamic PET Acquisition

The PET radiotracers were administered in 2 imaging sessions within 2 wk. The radiotracers included 18F‐THK5117, a 2-arylquinoline derivative validated for neurofibrillary pathology (16), and 11C‐PiB, an analog of thioflavin-T validated for brain Aβ plaques (17). Both tracers were prepared at the Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center of Tohoku University, both have low molecular weight (<328 g/mole), and both freely cross the blood–brain barrier (16, 18). 18F‐THK5117, 185 mBq, and 11C-PiB, 296 mBq, were administered by intravenous bolus injection. Dynamic PET data were acquired axially along the canthomeatal plane in list mode continuously up to 90 min using a SET-3000 G/X PET scanner (Shimadzu (19)). The supplemental materials (available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) list the timing of the reconstructed PET image frames. The scanner is equipped with high-energy resolution germanium oxyorthosilicate scintillators that provide 4.5-mm (transverse) and 5.4-mm (axial) spatial resolutions (full width at half maximum, at 10 cm off axis). Attenuation correction was based on a transmission image from a rotating 137Cs point source. The field of view superiorly encompassed the skull and inferiorly the foramen magnum and maxilla.

MRI Acquisition

Each subject underwent MRI on a SIGNA 1.5 T magnet (GE Healthcare). The protocol included a T1‐weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo axial sequence with parameters echo time/repetition time, 2.4/22 ms; flip angle, 20°; acquisition matrix, 256 × 256 × 110; 1 excitation; axial field of view, 22 cm; bandwidth, 122Hz/px; voxel size, 0.86 × 0.86 × 1.0. In all cases, the MRI field of view covered the PET field of view.

PET Image Workflow

PET data were reconstructed to a 128 × 128 × 79 matrix of 2 × 2 × 2.6 mm voxels. After decay correction and SUV normalization, each dynamic PET frame was coregistered with the corresponding T1-weighted MR image using statistical parametric mapping (SPM 12) software (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). PET images were sampled in their original space and partial volume corrected using a modified 1-tissue model (20).

MRI Regional Segmentation

To explore CSF egress, an extracranial shell region of interest (ROI) was defined on MRI. The shell included scalp, bone, and soft tissues (muscle, nasal turbinates, and globes of the eye) and extended inferiorly to the foramen magnum and maxilla. It excluded brain, subarachnoid CSF, and air (Fig. 1). The following shell ROIs were drawn on the MRI by a reader masked to the PET data. (1) The superior nasal turbinates were sampled at a distance 5.2 mm (2 voxels) inferior to the frontal lobe to minimize partial-volume effects from the brain. The anterior boundary was at the crista galli. The ROI dimensions were 18 mm anterior–posterior (A-P), 14 mm left-right (L-R), and 10 mm craniocaudal. (2) The middle nasal turbinates were sampled inferior to the superior turbinate with the following ROI dimensions: 34 mm A-P, 16 mm L-R, and 18 mm craniocaudal. (3) The globes of the eyes and lateral pterygoid muscle were sampled bilaterally and both ROIs were 12 mm A-P, 12 mm L-R, and 6 mm cranio-caudal.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Extracranial shell and ROIs. Extracranial shell region (A–D) is in aqua. The following subregions were examined: superior (red) and middle turbinates (yellow) (A), pterygoid muscle (blue) (B), globes of the eye (black) and superior turbinate (red) (C), and ventricular CSF (filled red) (D).

The MRI brain was segmented into lateral ventricle, neocortical gray and white matter, and cerebellar hemisphere gray matter using Free-Surfer (version 5.1, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). The ventricular CSF ROI was shrunk by 2 voxels (5.2 mm) to minimize partial-volume contamination from brain tissue (Fig. 1D). Image-derived arterial blood tracer concentrations were sampled from the internal carotid artery (21) and venous blood sampled at the junction of the superior sagittal and transverse sinus.

Mapping CSF Clearance in Shell

CSF-positive voxels were identified in each subject using a seeding procedure similar to one used to identify neural networks in resting functional MRI (22). The time–activity curve of every shell voxel was correlated (Pearson Product r) with the time–activity curve from the ventricular CSF (supplemental materials). Voxels with correlations of r > 0.95 were considered potentially CSF-positive and further tested for tracer concentrations.

Tracer Concentration Estimations and CSF Validation

Voxel tracer concentrations were derived from the SUV data normalized by the corresponding cerebellar gray matter time frames and were examined as area under the curve (AUC) and as the rate of change. For THK5117, the 35- to 80-min time period (AUC35–80 min) was selected because blood concentrations were consistently low and confirmed in another study (23). The CSF validation for each shell region was determined by contrasting the average tracer concentrations of the positive shell voxels, against tracer concentrations from ventricular CSF, blood, and brain.

Measures of Tracer Binding

Conventional time frames were used to estimate tracer binding, 50–80 min for 18F‐THK5117 and 50–70 min for 11C-PiB. Both measures were normalized by their respective cerebellar gray matter SUV to form the SUV ratio (SUVR). SUVR values of 1.5 or more defined positive voxels (24).

Statistical Analysis

Correlations were examined with Spearman tests and partial correlations using Quade’s index of matched correlation (25). Between-group contrasts were made with the Mann–Whitney U (U) test. Within-subject anatomic specificity tests were examined with the related-samples Wilcoxon (W) signed-rank tests. The Holm–Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons was used for P value adjustment (26). All tests were 2-sided, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 when not adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Study 1: Anatomic Distribution and Validation of Nasal Cavity CSF

Nasal Cavity CSF

Across all subjects, the time–activity curve correlation analysis showed a 3-fold-greater percentage of CSF-positive extracranial voxels (red) in the nasal cavity (yellow) than in the rest of the total shell in blue (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Extracranial distribution of CSF time–activity curve correlated voxels. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) MR images from a representative NL show 3-dimensional extracranial shell region in blue and yellow (total nasal cavity). (C) Percentage distribution (±SEM) (n = 5 subjects) of shell and nasal cavity voxels whose tau PET derived time–activity curve are correlated with ventricular CSF time–activity curve, within range of r = 0.90–0.99. Data show 3-fold-greater percentage of CSF-correlated voxels in nasal cavity than in total shell. Shell voxels correlated at r > 0.95 were considered CSF-positive and are mapped in red in A and B.

ROI Analyses

All subjects had CSF-positive voxels in the superior turbinate ROI (Fig. 3). Among the extracranial ROIs, the superior turbinate ROI had the greatest tracer concentration. Both superior and middle turbinate ROIs show greater than 23% CSF-positive voxel density, whereas the globe of the eye, pterygoid muscle, and total shell showed less than 5% (Table 2). After partial-volume correction the superior turbinate concentration remained the greater (supplemental materials). A high density of CSF-positive nasal turbinate voxels was confirmed in 4 normal subjects (supplemental materials) using 11C-cocaine, a PET tracer with little neocortical uptake, rapid clearance, and no nasal turbinate binding. Supplemental Video 1 depicts for 1 NL the extracranial CSF transit over 9 min.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Midsagittal MR image with superimposed PET data from all subjects. CSF-positive voxels falling into superior turbinate ROI are mapped in red.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Shell Regions (n = 15)

CSF Validation of Positive Shell Voxels

The CSF origin of the positive superior turbinate voxels was supported by tracer concentration analyses (n = 15). The average tracer concentration of the positive turbinate voxels (1.27 ± 0.25) did not differ from the ventricular CSF (1.27 ± 0.34, P > 0.05). However, positive superior turbinate voxels had significantly lower tracer concentrations than brain (2.69 ± 0.40, W = 3.41, P < 0.01) and were higher than blood (arterial: 0.94 ± 0.31, W = −2.56, P ≤ 0.01, and venous: 0.96 ± 0.22, W = −2.33, P < 0.05; Fig. 4).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Tau tracer concentrations for 5 tissue types over time. Averaged tau tracer counts (SUV) ± SEM for all study subjects plotted over 35–80 min. Tracer concentrations from CSF-positive superior turbinate and ventricular CSF do not differ from each other, but both are significantly different from blood and brain (P < 0.05).

Study 2: CSF Clearance in AD

The ventricular AUC35–80 min was 23% lower in AD than NL (0.53 ±.08 and 0.69 ± 0.09, respectively, U = 7, P = 0.01). The rate of ventricular CSF clearance was reduced 33% in AD (0.29 ± 0.08 and 0.43 ± 0.10, respectively, U = 4, P < 0.01; Figs. 5A and 5B). Sixty-six percent fewer CSF-positive superior turbinate voxels were found in AD than NL (39.4 ± 18.5 vs. 115.1 ± 71.1, U = 7, P = 0.01; Fig. 5C). The significance of these results was unchanged after partial-volume correction.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Ventricular and superior turbinate CSF clearance in AD. As compared with NL, AD subjects show reduced magnitude of ventricular tracer (AUC35–80 min) (A), reduced rate of ventricular tracer clearance (B), and lower number of CSF-positive superior turbinate voxels (C).

Study 3: CSF Clearance and Amyloid Positivity

Eight of 10 subjects, including 5 AD and 3 NL, were 11C-PiB–positive. Both the ventricular AUC35–80 min and the rate of ventricular CSF clearance from THK-5117 were inversely correlated with gray matter amyloid binding (ρ = 0.93, P < 0.01 and ρ = 0.74, P < 0.05, respectively, Fig. 6). Demonstrating the precision of the ventricle measurement, the THK5117 AUC35–80 min and 11C-PiB AUC35–80 min were highly correlated (ρ = 0.83, P < 0.01; supplemental materials). Compared with THK5117, 11C-PiB showed greater binding in the turbinate cavity (THK-5117 SUVR = 0.58 ± 0.12 and 11C-PiB SUVR = 1.31 ± 0.32, n = 10). Therefore, the 11C-PiB turbinates were not explored.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Amyloid binding and CSF clearance: relationship, for 8 11C-PiB–positive subjects, between gray matter amyloid binding SUVR and ventricular tracer AUC35–80 min, ρ = 0.93, P < 0.01 (A), and rate of ventricular tracer clearance, ρ = 0.74, P < 0.05 (B).

Examination of Confounds

Five potential confounds were examined. First, elevated tau binding in AD would be expected to reduce the available tau tracer to be cleared to CSF. The extent of this effect was estimated by comparing the ventricular AUC35–80 min after cerebellar normalization, a reference region without specific binding, with whole brain normalization, which includes all specific and nonspecific binding sites (supplemental materials). Relative to cerebellar normalization, whole-brain normalization reduced the AUC by 28% in normal and 31% in AD. The between-group AUC differences went from 30% to 36% and remained significant (U = 5, P < 0.01), suggesting a relatively greater between-group tracer clearance effect than tracer binding effect. Similarly, after statistical adjustment for the total brain binding, the between-group ventricular AUC35–80 min effect remained significant (F = 7.8, P = 0.02). Second, partial-volume errors for the ventricular and extracranial regions were minimized by individually sampling the PET at a 5-mm distance or greater from brain. Additional partial-volume corrections did not change the region or group contrasts. Third, we examined the effect of the larger AD ventricle (58.3 mL ± 14.1) than normal (32.2 mL ± 11.9, U = 50, P < 0.01). After adjustment for ventricular volume, the ventricle AUC35–80 min and its rate of change remained lower in AD (both F = 5.0, P < 0.05). Fourth, no 18F‐THK5117 binding was observed in the nasal turbinates, and there were no between-group turbinate binding differences (SUVR NL = 0.56 ± 0.10 and SUVR AD = 0.62 ± 0.06, P > 0.05). These data rule out contamination from the nasal mucosa. Fifth, we modeled the effects of reduced flow on the AUC10–35 min and AUC35–80 min. The results demonstrate negligible flow effects after 10 min, thus supporting our conservative 35-min start point (supplemental materials).

DISCUSSION

Human Nasal Turbinate CSF Egress

All nonhuman mammals studied show similar CSF egress pathways that include the choroid plexus, cerebral ventricles, perivascular spaces, and a predominant olfactory nerve drainage site (12,13,27). It is through these pathways that Aβ and other molecules carried in the CSF are removed from the brain (27,28). Human egress sites are poorly understood. It is believed that CSF drains via paraneural pathways and via arachnoid granulations located in the brain and spinal cord (a structure not found in the rodent) (12).

Our results using dynamic PET with 18F‐THK5117 show that CSF can be detected in the superior nasal turbinates in all subjects. This finding was replicated using 11C-cocaine. Our validation study shows that superior turbinate tracer concentrations uniquely differ from other extracranial regions but not from the ventricular CSF concentrations. These results are anatomically consistent with in vivo rodent (11) and postmortem human observations (13,14) demonstrating a CSF egress pathway through the cribriform plate, as well as the rapid intranasal delivery of macromolecules to the CSF (29).

CSF Egress in AD

Our results show that ventricular CSF clearance is 23% lower in AD than NL and the number of CSF-positive superior turbinate voxels reduced by 66%. Impairments in CSF turnover have been hypothesized for many years in the etiology of AD and propagation of Aβ (1–4). Unfortunately, neither the animal model nor human evidence is well developed. The pioneering human studies by Bateman et al. (30) used intravenously administered 13C6-leucine to reveal the time course of labeled Aβ in lumbar puncture–derived CSF. They demonstrated that Aβ clearance, but not Aβ production, was reduced in AD (31). However, their method does not distinguish between impaired membrane transport of Aβ (4) and impaired CSF clearance, which carries the Aβ. Suggesting CSF clearance abnormalities in AD, impaired glymphatic CSF clearance was recently observed in aged wild-type mice (5) and in an AD mouse model (6). The known driving forces behind CSF clearance include cardiac output, vasocontractility, and CSF production, facilitated by aquaporin-4 function on egress channels (12). Further, environmental factors such as impaired sleep (32), low activity level (33), and brain inflammation (34) can adversely affect clearance, and all are affected by aging (12,35,36). However, the cause and chronology of impaired CSF clearance and Aβ pathology is unknown. Impaired CSF clearance could both promote and be a consequence of Aβ pathology. Furthermore, surgical CSF drainage therapy failed to show cognitive benefit in an AD population, highlighting the complexity of these relationships (37). Nevertheless, our cross-sectional observation of reduced CSF clearance in AD and of an inverse association between reduced CSF clearance and elevated brain Aβ levels presents the first, to our knowledge, in vivo support for the hypothesis. Longitudinal study is needed to validate the hypothesis and sort out the chronologic relationships between reduced CSF clearance and brain Aβ plaques.

Our study has several limitations. The correlated timing of the THK5117 tracer delivery from ventricle to extracranial sites, the basis of our nasal turbinate CSF detection strategy, could be limited by intermittent obstacles to CSF flow. Perivascular CSF channels in AD brain accumulate Aβ (9), and specific and nonspecific tracer binding can directly obstruct clearance by binding in clearance sites or by reducing the concentration available for clearance. We selected the r > 0.95 threshold to maintain precision in identifying extracranial CSF voxels.

Unlike tau tracer AV1451 (38), we found no evidence for THK5117 uptake in choroid plexus. Such uptake would confound the ventricular PET signal. For this reason, 11C-PiB, which shows binding in the nasal turbinates, was not used to estimate turbinate clearance. On the other hand, 11C-cocaine, which does not show cortical or turbinate binding, was valuable as a validator. In our study of ventricular CSF clearance, we controlled for the total tissue binding of THK5117 and concluded that the between-group clearance effect was largely unchanged. Similarly, we observed that THK5117 and 11C-PiB estimates of ventricular CSF clearance were highly correlated within subjects, a finding supportive of the method’s precision when sampling the CSF directly.

Our estimates of nasal tracer concentrations are not precise because of the relatively poor spatial resolution and resultant partial-volume errors. Spatial resolution limitations are likely to have affected the tracer concentrations in the sparsely packed turbinate voxels, which did not show clearance reductions in AD. Spatial resolution also limited measurement of CSF clearance from the arachnoid granulations. On the other hand, the larger lateral ventricle provided robust CSF tracer concentration estimates and performed well as a clearance biomarker.

For the present, PET provides the only noninvasive strategy for estimating CSF clearance. Recently, Benveniste et al. reported using MRI that intrathecal contrast administration in an animal model could be used to image CSF bulk flow (10), but this approach is not feasible in clinical practice. Phase-contrast MRI is the only other noninvasive approach to estimate CSF flow in humans. However, it is increasingly recognized that the results are imprecise and of limited clinical utility because of slow CSF velocity rates (12). Overall, despite suboptimal tracers and obvious spatial resolution limitations, we provide the first evidence that dynamic PET yields important insight into CSF clearance. Our results highlight the importance of a ventricular clearance biomarker and suggest exploiting the nasal pathway for the sampling CSF molecules cleared from the brain. Finally, we view our study as a preliminary proof of concept, needing larger sample sizes, test–retest reliability, and longitudinal observations. Future studies will be served by developing comprehensive PET models that consider CSF flow in addition to estimating tracer uptake into tissue.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic PET was used to estimate in humans the CSF clearance in ventricular and extracranial regions. As in other mammals, we find that the human nasal turbinates are part of the CSF egress system. Ventricular CSF and superior nasal turbinate clearance measures were reduced in AD in comparison to control. Consistent with the clearance hypothesis of AD, ventricular CSF clearance was inversely related to Aβ deposition. PET-based CSF clearance measures may be of interest in the evaluation of the propagation and clearance of Aβ and other abnormal proteins.

DISCLOSURE

This study was supported by NIH/NIA grants AG035137, AG032554, AG022374, AG13616, AG12101, AG08051, NIH-HLB HL111724, and HL118624 and Cohen Veterans Bioscience. The work at Tohoku University was supported by Health and Labor Sciences research grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (23390297), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (26117003), a grant from the Japan Advanced Molecular Imaging Program (J-AMP) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and the research fund from GE Healthcare and Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Mony J. de Leon, Yi Li, and Henry Rusinek applied for a patent to be assigned to NYU, based on this work. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We offer a very special thanks to Professor Roy Weller, U. of Southampton, U.K., and Charles Nicholson, NYU Professor Emeritus, for their insightful comments and to Drs. Esther Fisher, Yeona Kang, and Edouardo Honig for their expert participation in the early stages of this project. We are most grateful to Drs. Nora D. Volkow and Gene-Jack Wang from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, for contributing the 11C-cocaine images.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Mar. 16, 2017.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hardy J,
    2. Selkoe DJ
    . The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297:353–356.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.
    1. Silverberg GD,
    2. Heit G,
    3. Huhn S,
    4. et al
    . The cerebrospinal fluid production rate is reduced in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Neurology. 2001;57:1763–1766.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Ethell DW
    . Disruption of cerebrospinal fluid flow through the olfactory system may contribute to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41:1021–1030.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tarasoff-Conway JM,
    2. Carare RO,
    3. Osorio RS,
    4. et al
    . Clearance systems in the brain: implications for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:457–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kress BT,
    2. Iliff JJ,
    3. Xia M,
    4. et al
    . Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann Neurol. 2014;76:845–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Peng W,
    2. Achariyar TM,
    3. Li B,
    4. et al
    . Suppression of glymphatic fluid transport in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;93:215–225.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kida S,
    2. Pantazis A,
    3. Weller RO
    . CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat: anatomy, histology and immunological significance. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1993;19:480–488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Weller RO,
    2. Djuanda E,
    3. Yow HY,
    4. Carare RO
    . Lymphatic drainage of the brain and the pathophysiology of neurological disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2009;117:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Carare RO,
    2. Bernardes-Silva M,
    3. Newman TA,
    4. et al
    . Solutes, but not cells, drain from the brain parenchyma dextran: flouspheres, cerebral amyloid angiopathy and neuroimmunology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2008;34:131–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Illiff JJ,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Yu M,
    4. et al
    . Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1299–1309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nagra G,
    2. Koh L,
    3. Zakharov A,
    4. Armstrong D,
    5. Johnston M
    . Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid transport across the cribriform plate into lymphatics in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291:R1383–R1389.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hladky SB,
    2. Barrand MA
    . Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2014;11:26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Johnston M,
    2. Zakharov A,
    3. Papaiconomou C,
    4. Salmasi G,
    5. Armstrong D
    . Evidence of connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatic vessels in humans, non-human primates and other mammalian species. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2004;1:2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Pan WR,
    2. Suami H,
    3. Corlett RJ,
    4. Ashton MW
    . Lymphatic drainage of the nasal fossae and nasopharynx: preliminary anatomical and radiological study with clinical implications. Head Neck. 2009;31:52–57.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. McKhann GM,
    2. Knopman DS,
    3. Chertkow H,
    4. et al
    . The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Okamura N,
    2. Furumoto S,
    3. Harada R,
    4. et al
    . Novel 18F-labeled arylquinoline derivatives for noninvasive imaging of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1420–1427.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Klunk WE,
    2. Engler H,
    3. Nordberg A,
    4. et al
    . Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Price JC,
    2. Klunk WE,
    3. Lopresti BJ,
    4. et al
    . Kinetic modeling of amyloid binding in humans using PET imaging and Pittsburgh compound-B. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:1528–1547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Matsumoto K,
    2. Kitamura K,
    3. Mizuta T,
    4. et al
    . Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:83–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Schwarz CG,
    2. Senjem ML,
    3. Gunter JL,
    4. et al
    . Optimizing PiB-PET SUVR change-over-time measurement by a large-scale analysis of longitudinal reliability, plausibility, separability, and correlation with MMSE. Neuroimage. 2017;144(part A):113–127.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Su Y,
    2. Blazey TM,
    3. Snyder AZ,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative amyloid imaging using image-derived arterial input function. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lee MH,
    2. Smyser CD,
    3. Shimony JS
    . Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR. 2013;34:1866–1872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Jonasson M,
    2. Wall A,
    3. Chiotis K,
    4. et al
    . Tracer kinetic analysis of (S)-18F-THK5117 as a PET tracer for assessing tau pathology. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:574–581.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Tsui W,
    3. Rusinek H,
    4. et al
    . Cortical laminar binding of PET amyloid and tau tracers in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:270–273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Quade D
    . Rank analysis of covariance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62:1187–1200.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Holm S
    . A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1970;6:65–70.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pollay M
    . The function and structure of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow system. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010;7:9–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Weller RO,
    2. Kida S,
    3. Zhang ET
    . Pathways of fluid drainage from the brain: morphological aspects and immunological significance in rat and man. Brain Pathol. 1992;2:277–284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lochhead JJ,
    2. Wolak DJ,
    3. Pizzo ME,
    4. Thorne RG
    . Rapid transport within cerebral perivascular spaces underlies widespread tracer distribution in the brain after intranasal administration. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:371–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bateman RJ,
    2. Munsell LY,
    3. Morris JC,
    4. Swarm R,
    5. Yarasheski KE,
    6. Holtzman DM
    . Human amyloid-beta synthesis and clearance rates as measured in cerebrospinal fluid in vivo. Nat Med. 2006;12:856–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mawuenyega KG,
    2. Sigurdson W,
    3. Ovod V,
    4. et al
    . Decreased clearance of CNS beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2010;330:1774.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kang JE,
    2. Lim MM,
    3. Bateman RJ,
    4. et al
    . Amyloid-beta dynamics are regulated by orexin and the sleep-wake cycle. Science. 2009;326:1005–1007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cirrito JR,
    2. Yamada KA,
    3. Finn MB,
    4. et al
    . Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-beta levels in vivo. Neuron. 2005;48:913–922.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Minter MR,
    2. Taylor JM,
    3. Crack PJ
    . The contribution of neuroinflammation to amyloid toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2016;136:457–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Iliff JJ,
    2. Wang M,
    3. Zeppenfeld DM,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J Neurosci. 2013;33:18190–18199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Tolppanen AM,
    2. Solomon A,
    3. Kulmala J,
    4. et al
    . Leisure-time physical activity from mid- to late life, body mass index, and risk of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:434–443.e6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Silverberg GD,
    2. Mayo M,
    3. Saul T,
    4. Fellmann J,
    5. Carvalho J,
    6. McGuire D
    . Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2008;71:202–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Sepulcre J,
    2. Schultz AP,
    3. Sabuncu Johnson KA
    . In vivo tau, amyloid, and gray matter profiles in the aging brain. J Neurosci. 2016;36:7364–7374.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication November 14, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication February 27, 2017.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 9
September 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET
Mony J. de Leon, Yi Li, Nobuyuki Okamura, Wai H. Tsui, Les A. Saint-Louis, Lidia Glodzik, Ricardo S. Osorio, Juan Fortea, Tracy Butler, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Silvia Fossati, Hee-Jin Kim, Roxana O. Carare, Maiken Nedergaard, Helene Benveniste, Henry Rusinek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (9) 1471-1476; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET
Mony J. de Leon, Yi Li, Nobuyuki Okamura, Wai H. Tsui, Les A. Saint-Louis, Lidia Glodzik, Ricardo S. Osorio, Juan Fortea, Tracy Butler, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Silvia Fossati, Hee-Jin Kim, Roxana O. Carare, Maiken Nedergaard, Helene Benveniste, Henry Rusinek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (9) 1471-1476; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187211
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying Ventricular CSF Clearance in the Human Brain Using Dynamic 18F-FDG PET: Insights into Age-Related Glymphatic Impairment
  • Scale-free dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid regions is associated with Alzheimers disease-related pathology
  • Dysregulated Neurofluid Coupling as a New Noninvasive Biomarker for Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Non-invasive MRI of Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid-Barrier Function: a Functional Biomarker of Early Alzheimers Disease Pathology
  • Characterization of oscillations in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid using ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging
  • Reduced glymphatic function after traumatic brain injury measured using diffusion MRI
  • "FDA-approved carbonic anhydrase inhibitors reduce Amyloid {beta} pathology and improve cognition, by ameliorating cerebrovascular health and glial fitness"
  • Dynamics of brain-fluid circulation are altered in the mature-onset Tet-off APP mouse model of amyloidosis
  • Impaired peri-olfactory cerebrospinal fluid clearance mediated cognitive decline after dyssomnia
  • Impairment of CSF Egress through the Cribriform Plate plays an Apical role in Alzheimers disease Etiology
  • Choroid plexus enlargement is associated with neuroinflammation and reduction of blood brain barrier permeability in depression
  • Increased serum peripheral C-reactive protein is associated with reduced small-molecule brain perfusion in healthy volunteers and subjects with major depressive disorder
  • Glymphatic failure as a final common pathway to dementia
  • Dynamic 11C-PiB PET Shows Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Alterations in Alzheimer Disease and Multiple Sclerosis
  • Anatomical basis and physiological role of cerebrospinal fluid transport through the murine cribriform plate
  • Dynamic 11C-PiB PET shows cerebrospinal fluid flow alterations in Alzheimers disease and multiple sclerosis
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid, Hyposmia, and Dementia in Alzheimer Disease: Insights from Dynamic PET and a Hypothesis
  • Reply: Cerebrospinal Fluid, Hyposmia, and Dementia in Alzheimer Disease: Insights from Dynamic PET and a Hypothesis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurology

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
Show more Neurology

Clinical

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Neurology
  • PET/CT
  • research methods
  • Alzheimer disease
  • CSF clearance
  • dynamic PET
  • THK5117
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire