JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online December 12, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.107.044669
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.044669v1
49/1/44    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, W.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, W.-D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 49 No. 1 44-49
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044669

Clinical Investigation

Cortical Flattening Applied to High-Resolution 18F-FDG PET

Johannes C. Klein1,2, Karl Herholz3,4, Klaus Wienhard1 and Wolf-Dieter Heiss1,4

1 Max-Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Cologne, Germany; 2 FMRIB Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 3 Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and 4 Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Johannes C. Klein, MD, Department of Neurology, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany. E-mail: johannes{at}fmrib.ox.ac.uk

Group studies using PET and other types of neuroimaging require some means to achieve congruence of brain structures across subjects, such that scans from individuals varying in brain shape and gyral anatomy can be analyzed together. Volume registration methods are the most widely used approach to achieve this congruence. They are fast and typically require little manual interaction, but, unfortunately, it is difficult to achieve a good match between cortical areas in volume space, especially where folding patterns vary across subjects. Cortical flattening is a recent, alternative strategy: Its key features are explicit definition of cortex, such that white matter or cerebrospinal fluid compartments are largely excluded from the analysis volume, and subsequent registration of the cortical sheet in its natural, 2-dimensional topology. This type of registration has been demonstrated to provide better matching of congruent cortical structures than volume methods and, thus, offers a potentially more robust way of analyzing PET data. Methods: Here, we explore the applicability of cortical flattening of coregistered MRI to 18F-FDG PET on the HRRT system (high-resolution research tomograph), the highest-resolution whole-head scanner available to date. Results: We report average values and SD of cortical metabolism in a pilot study of the dominant hemisphere in 9 control subjects and provide estimates of group sizes necessary for studies using this technique. Conclusion: We conclude that cortical flattening with subsequent surface registration is a feasible and promising strategy for group studies on the HRRT, providing the highest fidelity maps of human cortical glucose consumption to date.

Key Words: PET • 18F-FDG • cortical flattening • MRI • brain

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.