JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 15, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.106.039479
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.106.039479v1
48/6/889    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, S.
Right arrow Articles by Naganawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, S.
Right arrow Articles by Naganawa, S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 48 No. 6 889-895
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.039479

Clinical Investigation

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Bone Metastases of Thyroid Cancer

Shinji Ito1,2, Katsuhiko Kato1, Mitsuru Ikeda3, Shingo Iwano1, Naoki Makino2, Masanori Tadokoro4, Shinji Abe5, Satoshi Nakano5, Masanari Nishino5, Takeo Ishigaki1 and Shinji Naganawa1

1 Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; 2 Department of Radiology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota, Japan; 3 Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University School of Health Sciences, Nagoya, Japan; 4 Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Health Science, Toyoake, Japan; and 5 Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Katsuhiko Kato, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan. E-mail: katokt{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp

We compared the efficacies of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We examined 47 patients (32 women, 15 men; mean age ± SD, 57.0 ± 10.7 y) with DTC who had undergone total thyroidectomy and were hospitalized to be given 131I therapy. All patients underwent both whole-body 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy. The skeletal system was classified into 11 anatomic segments and assessed for the presence of bone metastases. Bone metastases were verified either when positive findings were obtained on >2 imaging modalities—201Tl scintigraphy, 131I scintigraphy, and CT—or when MRI findings were positive if vertebral MRI was performed. Results: Bone metastases were confirmed in 59 of 517 (11%) segments in 18 (38%) of the 47 study patients. The sensitivities (visualization rate) for bone metastases on a segment basis using 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 50 of 59 (84.7%) and 46 of 59 (78.0%), respectively; the difference between these values was not statistically significant. There were only 2 (0.4%) false-positive cases in a total of 451 bone segments without bone metastases when examined by 18F-FDG PET, whereas 39 (8.6%) were false-positive when examined by 99mTc-bone scintigraphy. Therefore, the specificities of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 449 of 451 (99.6%) and 412 of 451 (91.4%), respectively; the difference between these values was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The overall accuracies of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 499 of 510 (97.8%) and 458 of 510 (89.8%), respectively; the difference between these was also statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The specificity and the overall accuracy of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with DTC are higher than those of 99mTc-bone scintigraphy, whereas the difference in the sensitivities of both modalities is not statistically significant. In comparison with 99mTc-bone scintigraphy, 18F-FDG PET is superior because of its lower incidence of false-positive results in the detection of bone metastases of DTC.

Key Words: bone metastases • differentiated thyroid carcinoma • 99mTc-bone scintigraphy • 18F-FDG PET

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M M Muresan, P Olivier, J Leclere, F Sirveaux, L Brunaud, M Klein, R Zarnegar, and G Weryha
Bone metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 37 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
E. Hindie, P. Zanotti-Fregonara, I. Keller, F. Duron, J.-Y. Devaux, M. Calzada-Nocaudie, E. Sarfati, J.-L. Moretti, P. Bouchard, and M.-E. Toubert
Bone metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer: impact of early 131I-based detection on outcome
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 799 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.