Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleThe Illustrated Post

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 False-Positive Uptake After Chemotherapy in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Metastatic Lesions

Vinicius Ludwig, Peter George Maliha, John Shen, David Tonnelet, Steve Raman, Mark S. Litwin and Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2024, 65 (8) 1328-1329; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267609
Vinicius Ludwig
1Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter George Maliha
1Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
2Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Centre de Recherche, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
3Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Shen
4Department of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
5Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Tonnelet
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, and QuantIF–LITIS, University of Rouen, Rouen, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Raman
7Department of Radiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S. Litwin
5Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremie Calais
1Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 38-y-old man with mixed, nonseminomatous germ cell carcinoma metastatic to the lung, liver, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was treated with left orchiectomy and 4 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide. CT performed 3 d after the end of the last cycle showed significant improvement but persistent liver and retroperitoneal lesions. A liver lesion biopsy performed 1 mo after chemotherapy was negative for residual tumor (fibrosis, necrosis, and abundant hemosiderin-laden macrophages, consistent with treatment effect). An [18F]FDG PET/CT scan performed 80 d after chemotherapy (Fig. 1) demonstrated uptake in some of the residual liver lesions (SUVmax, 4.8–5.8), suggesting potential residual active disease, and there was moderate uptake in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (SUVmax, 3.2). A PET/CT scan with a fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitor (FAPI), [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, was performed as part of an exploratory study, NCT04459273 (Fig. 1), 97 d after the last chemotherapy cycle. The liver lesions exhibited heterogeneous uptake (SUVmax, 2.6–4.9), and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes had moderate uptake (SUVmax, 3.2). Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, partial left lateral liver segmentectomy, and multiple wedge biopsies of liver lesions, performed 9 d after the [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET scan, showed necrotic tumor nodules with variable stages of fibrosis and no viable germ cell tumor. Eighteen months after surgery, the patient did not show any signs of disease progression, and abdominal CT demonstrated a decrease in the size of the liver lesions.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

[18F]FDG PET and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET maximum-intensity projections showing liver lesions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes (arrows). Hypoenhancing liver lesions in segments VII and III measuring 35 × 47 mm and 13 × 19 mm had increased [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (SUVmax, 4.9 and 4.4) and [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 4.8 and 5.8). Segment VIII lesion measuring 27 × 36 mm had mild peripheral rim of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (SUVmax, 2.6) and no [18F]FDG uptake. Residual retroperitoneal lymph node measuring 14 × 18 mm presented moderate [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (SUVmax, 3.2) and [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 3.2).

FAP-targeted PET imaging is promising in malignancies associated with a high content of FAP-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts. Some reports in the literature describe the potential use of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for therapy response assessment for a variety of cancers (1–5). However, FAP is also expressed by normal activated fibroblasts present in multiple fibroinflammatory conditions, remodeling processes, and wound healing. Nevertheless, posttreatment cancer cell apoptosis may not necessarily affect cancer-associated fibroblasts or decrease fibroblast activation. The ability of FAP tracer to assess therapy response is yet to be determined.

This case illustrates that postchemotherapy fibronecrotic tissue in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor can demonstrate [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET uptake and that caution is needed in the interpretation of posttherapy residual lesions.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 25, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhu Z,
    2. Cheng K,
    3. Yun Z,
    4. et al
    . [18F] AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT can predict treatment response and survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3425–3438.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Lin L,
    4. et al
    . [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 improves tumor staging and monitors early response to chemoradiotherapy in a patient with esophageal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:3188–3189.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Chen L,
    2. Zheng S,
    3. Chen L,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT for the early and late prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective study. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1899–1905.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Miao Y,
    2. Feng R,
    3. Yu T,
    4. et al
    . Value of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:213–220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hotta M,
    2. Rieger AC,
    3. Jafarvand MG,
    4. et al
    . Non-oncologic incidental uptake on FAPI PET/CT imaging. Br J Radiol. 2023;96:20220463.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication February 14, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication March 25, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 8
August 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 False-Positive Uptake After Chemotherapy in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Metastatic Lesions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 False-Positive Uptake After Chemotherapy in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Metastatic Lesions
Vinicius Ludwig, Peter George Maliha, John Shen, David Tonnelet, Steve Raman, Mark S. Litwin, Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2024, 65 (8) 1328-1329; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267609

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 False-Positive Uptake After Chemotherapy in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Metastatic Lesions
Vinicius Ludwig, Peter George Maliha, John Shen, David Tonnelet, Steve Raman, Mark S. Litwin, Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2024, 65 (8) 1328-1329; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267609
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Bone Healing with [18F]NaF PET/CT During Bone Segment Transport in Femoral Fracture Treatment
  • Noninvasive Characterization of Hepatic Lesions by Means of Glypican-3–Directed PET/CT
  • CCK2 Receptor Ligand [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-CCK-66 PET/CT Outperforms [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in a Patient with Small Cell Lung Cancer
Show more The Illustrated Post

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire