Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBRIEF COMMUNICATION

C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4–Directed Scintigraphy Using [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec in Primary Aldosteronism: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Johanna S. Enke, Kathrin Ritzel, Evelyn Asbach, Nic G. Reitsam, Bruno Märkl, Thomas Knösel, Denise Brüdgam, Malte Kircher, Christian H. Pfob, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Andreas Rinscheid, Bernd Nittbaur, Georgine Wienand, Margret Schottelius, Martin Reincke, Constantin Lapa and Alexander Dierks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2024, 65 (10) 1640-1644; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268169
Johanna S. Enke
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathrin Ritzel
2Department of Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyn Asbach
2Department of Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nic G. Reitsam
3Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno Märkl
3Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Knösel
4Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise Brüdgam
2Department of Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malte Kircher
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian H. Pfob
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph A. Bundschuh
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Rinscheid
5Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Nittbaur
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgine Wienand
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margret Schottelius
6Translational Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
7AGORA, Pôle de recherche sur le cancer, Lausanne, Switzerland; and
8SCCL Swiss Cancer Center Leman, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Reincke
2Department of Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantin Lapa
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Dierks
1Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)–directed imaging has gained clinical interest in aiding clinical diagnostics in primary aldosteronism (PA). We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility of CXCR4-directed scintigraphy using the novel CXCR-4 ligand [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec in patients with PA. Methods: Six patients (mean age ± SD, 49 ± 15 y) underwent CXCR4-directed scintigraphy (including planar imaging and SPECT/CT) 30, 120, and 240 min after injection of 435 ± 50 MBq of [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec. Adrenal CXCR4 expression was analyzed by calculating lesion-to-contralateral ratios (LCRs). Imaging results were correlated to clinical information. Histopathology and clinical follow-up served as the standard of reference. Results: Three subjects showed lateralization of adrenal tracer accumulation, with a mean maximum lesion-to-contralateral ratio of 1.65 (range, 1.52–1.70), which correlated with morphologic findings on CT. One individual underwent adrenalectomy and presented with complete biochemical and clinical remission at follow-up. Histopathologic workup confirmed unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma. Conclusion: [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy with SPECT in patients with PA is feasible and might offer a valuable alternative to CXCR4-directed imaging with [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET.

  • primary aldosteronism
  • scintigraphy
  • CXCR4-directed imaging

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary arterial hypertension (1) and is characterized by increased aldosterone secretion resulting in arterial hypertension and reactively increased cardiovascular morbidity. In most cases, PA is caused by bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (idiopathic hyperaldosteronism [IHA]) or unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). Differentiation is crucial, since PA can be cured by adrenalectomy in APA and treated by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in IHA.

Screening of selected patient groups with arterial hypertension is recommended by current endocrinologic guidelines. Measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration and renin levels and calculation of an aldosterone-to-renin ratio are used as screening tests for diagnosing PA. Imaging is performed for the detection of adrenal adenomas; however, morphologic imaging lacks further insight on the functional status of adenomas (2). Invasive catheterization in the form of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) remains the gold standard for differentiating subgroups of PA (3). However, the reliability and selective sampling of AVS highly depend on the experience of the performing physician (4). Noninvasive molecular imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) expression has gained clinical interest (5). CXCR4 is a commonly expressed surface receptor on immune cells (5), and overexpression has been described for most hematologic and for several solid neoplasms (5,6). High CXCR4 expression has been reported for aldosterone-producing cells in APA (7).

Previous works have shown that CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor can facilitate therapeutic decision-making by differentiating APA from IHA (7,8). A prospective randomized, controlled trial investigating the accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT is currently ongoing (CASTUS, NL9625) (9).

The recent development of the novel 99mTc-labeled CXCR4 ligand [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec allows CXCR4-targeted conventional scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, providing a broader availability of CXCR4-directed imaging with improved cost-effectiveness (10,11). In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic value of [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy/SPECT in patients with PA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich (reference project number 23-0750) and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. All individuals were part of the German Conn’s registry and gave written informed consent to imaging procedures.

Between January 2022 and March 2023, 6 patients with PA were referred to our institution for CXCR4-directed scintigraphy with [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec. All subjects had initially undergone native CT imaging and AVS.

After adrenalectomy in 1 subject (patient 4), histopathologic work-up included immunohistochemical staining of CXCR4 (as described in the supplemental materials, available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). In 4 patients, clinical follow-up was available 12 mo afterward. Two patients (patients 1 and 6) were lost to follow-up. Therapy response was assessed according to PA surgical outcome criteria (12) or stimulated renin levels (13). The supplemental materials provide further information.

[99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec Scintigraphy

Scans were performed using a dual-head γ-camera system (Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro; GE HealthCare). Patients underwent scintigraphy after intravenous injection of a mean of 435 ± 50 MBq (range, 377–511 MBq) of [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec. Planar whole-body scans were obtained 30, 120, and 240 min after tracer injection using a scan velocity of 30 cm/min (30-min scan) and 12 cm/min (120- and 240-min scans), respectively. A 20% energy window was centered over the 140-keV photopeak of 99mTc, as well as a lower scatter window ranging from 114 to 126 keV. After acquisition of planar scans, a SPECT/CT emission/transmission study was performed (180° acquisition per detector, 128 × 128 matrix, 3° steps, 8 s/frame for the 30- and 120-min SPECT/CT scans, and 16 s/frame for the 240-min scan). Images were reconstructed using an iterative ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm (10 subsets, 2 iterations), both with and without CT-based attenuation correction.

Transmission and emission images were fused on a dedicated nuclear medicine workstation (syngo.via; Siemens Healthcare).

Image Analysis

Images were visually assessed by 2 board-certified nuclear medicine physicians for asymmetry of tracer accumulation in the adrenal glands. For semiquantitative analysis, a volume of interest was placed over the adrenal glands in all SPECT/CT images (30, 120, and 240 min), and maximum counts, peak counts, and mean counts per VOI were extracted for each imaging time point. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean were calculated offline using the patient’s weight and volume (density, 1 g/cm3), the injected activity, the time to scanning after tracer injection, and the calibration factor for 99mTc for the used SPECT/CT camera.

Adrenal lesion-to-contralateral ratios (LCRs) for SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak were calculated by dividing the higher SUV by the SUV of the contralateral side to derive imaging LCRs, in accordance with CXCR4-directed PET/CT imaging of PA (8,14). Lateralization was described for an LCR of 1.3 and above.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are shown as mean ± SD or range. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics, version 29.0.0.0 (IBM Corp.)

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and individual laboratory findings are displayed in Table 1. Six patients (4 male, 2 female; age, 49 ± 15 y) were included. Mean systolic blood pressure at the initial consultation was 151 ± 14 mm Hg. All patients were pretreated with noninfluencing antihypertensive medication including doxazosin and verapamil.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Distinct Laboratory Findings of Included Patients Before [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec Scintigraphy

Individual findings from CT and AVS are displayed in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Distinct Findings of CT, AVS, and [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec Scintigraphy

[99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec Scintigraphy and Correlation to CT and AVS

CXCR4-directed scintigraphy was well tolerated by all patients, with no adverse effects recorded. Two of 6 patients showed consistent lateralization of adrenal tracer accumulation over all time points (Supplemental Table 1), with adenoma sizes of 16 and 19 mm. Patient 4 displayed inconsistent but clearly visible lateralization (maximum LCR, 1.52; adenoma size, 18 mm) (Fig. 1). Overall, a mean maximum LCR of 1.62 (range, 1.52–1.70) could be recorded in these individuals. Maximum LCRs were reached at 240 min after injection in all subjects. In the remaining 3 patients, no distinct lateralization of [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec uptake could be detected (Supplemental Table 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

[99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy and histopathologic findings of patient 4. Maximum-intensity projection (A), axial SPECT (B), CT (C), and fused SPECT/CT (D) images of abdomen depict intensive CXCR4 expression in left adrenal gland (arrows), corresponding to CT-graphic finding of 18-mm adenoma in left adrenal gland.

Focally enhanced tracer retention correlated with adrenal adenomas as detected by CT (mean size, 17.7 mm; range, 16–19 mm) in all 3 patients, whereas AVS did not detect any lateralization in 2 of 3 patients and produced inconsistent findings in patient 4. CT imaging revealed an 11-mm adenoma on the right adrenal gland in patient 6, which displayed no enhanced CXCR4 expression in CXCR4-directed imaging (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

[99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy of patient 6. Maximum-intensity projection (A), axial SPECT (B), CT (C), and fused SPECT/CT (D) images of abdomen depict no lateralization of CXCR4 expression to either adrenal gland. Native CT imaging revealed nodular lesion (arrows) in right adrenal gland, which did not depict elevated CXCR4 expression, consistent with non–aldosterone-producing adenoma. Patient received MRA treatment after [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy.

Follow-up

In consideration of clinical and diagnostic findings, adrenalectomy was recommended in patients 1 and 4. Patient 5 showed an equally high LCR, but AVS detected no lateralization despite selective sampling. Therefore, MRA treatment was recommended on an individual basis. Patient 1 refused surgery and requested MRA treatment. Thus, only patient 4 was referred for adrenalectomy of the left adrenal gland. Histopathologic work-up confirmed APA with a diameter of 17 mm and high CXCR4 expression (Fig. 3). At clinical follow-up 12 mo after surgery, all antihypertensive medication had been terminated in patient 4, indicating complete biochemical and clinical remission according to PA surgical outcome criteria (12). In the remaining patients, MRA therapy was started (Supplemental Table 2).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

In patient 4, immunohistochemistry confirmed intense CXCR4 expression of APA (A and C) after adrenalectomy, and physiologic CXCR4 staining was detected in outer part of normal adrenal cortex (A and B).

DISCUSSION

Because treatment of APA and IHA greatly differs, easily accessible and noninvasive methods for the clinical differentiation of PA are urgently needed. CXCR4-directed PET/CT has emerged as a complementary noninvasive tool in PA diagnostics (7,8) and is being further investigated for aiding clinical decision-making.

In this retrospective analysis, we report on a first cohort of 6 consecutive patients with PA and inconclusive findings in prior diagnostic work-up who underwent CXCR4-directed scintigraphy with [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec. Three of 6 patients presented with a lateralization to either side, which was already visually noticeable at 30 min after tracer injection.

One patient was referred for adrenalectomy, which confirmed the diagnosis of CXCR-expressing APA. Two patients showed no adequate response to MRA treatment at follow-up, possibly because of an insufficient dose of MRA. Furthermore, an additional primary hypertension component is often present in patients requiring additional antihypertensive medication. Patient 5 had demonstrated an LCR consistent with APA but no lateralization in AVS despite selective sampling. If no adequate treatment response is seen after increasing the MRA dose, adrenalectomy should be reevaluated.

Because scintigraphy is more broadly available than PET/CT imaging, [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy could offer a cost-effective, low-threshold imaging modality for differentiating APA from IHA. This proof-of-concept study provides the first evidence—to our knowledge—on the feasibility and utility of this imaging modality in the context of PA. However, several limitations must be acknowledged. We included a small sample size of 6 patients, and histologic proof of diagnosis was available in only one patient. The optimal time point for imaging with [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec could not be determined. In our study, the highest LCRs were reached after 4 h, suggesting that later imaging time points may be beneficial for diagnosing APA, but further studies addressing this topic are needed. Although different LCR cutoffs (ranging between 1.6 and 2.36 (8,14)) with high sensitivity and specificity have been proposed in CXCR4-directed PET/CT imaging, a defined cutoff has not yet been determined for [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy. In this proof-of-concept study, we considered relevant lateralization to be present if LCR was 1.3 or greater. However, this value is arbitrary and currently lacks histologic confirmation. All LCR values for SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean, were comparable. We advocate the use of a calculated SUVmax for the calculation of LCR in analogy to SUVmax in PET/CT imaging (7,8,14).

Last, all suspected adenomas were more than 1 cm in size in the longest diameter, and APAs with greater diameters presented with higher LCRs. As many APAs are smaller than 1 cm, the sensitivity of SPECT/CT, with its limitations in spatial resolution, needs to be further evaluated in this subcohort of patients (15).

This proof-of-concept study imaging with [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec showed promising results in aiding clinical decision-making in PA. Further prospective studies on larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and to define both optimal imaging protocols and quantitative cutoffs for lateralization.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive visualization of CXCR4 in patients with PA using [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec is safe and feasible. This technique offers a valuable alternative to CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT with broader availability for complementing classic diagnostic work-up in PA. Further research is warranted to corroborate its diagnostic performance, especially in comparison to CXCR4-directed PET/CT.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy feasible in the diagnostic work-up of PA?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: In this retrospective evaluation, 3 of 6 patients undergoing [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec scintigraphy showed lateralization of adrenal CXCR4 expression. One patient was referred for adrenalectomy, and histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of unilateral APA.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: CXCR4 visualization in patients with PA using [99mTc]Tc-pentixatec is feasible. It might offer a valuable alternative to CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT.

Footnotes

  • Published online Sep. 5, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mosso L,
    2. Carvajal C,
    3. González A,
    4. et al
    . Primary aldosteronism and hypertensive disease. Hypertension. 2003;42:161–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lim V,
    2. Guo Q,
    3. Grant CS,
    4. et al
    . Accuracy of adrenal imaging and adrenal venous sampling in predicting surgical cure of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:2712–2719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Funder JW,
    2. Carey RM,
    3. Mantero F,
    4. et al
    . The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:1889–1916.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Young WF,
    2. Stanson AW
    . What are the keys to successful adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in patients with primary aldosteronism? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;70:14–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Domanska UM,
    2. Kruizinga RC,
    3. Nagengast WB,
    4. et al
    . A review on CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in oncology: no place to hide. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:219–230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chatterjee S,
    2. Behnam Azad B,
    3. Nimmagadda S
    . The intricate role of CXCR4 in cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2014;124:31–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Heinze B,
    2. Fuss CT,
    3. Mulatero P,
    4. et al
    . Targeting CXCR4 (CXC chemokine receptor type 4) for molecular imaging of aldosterone-producing adenoma. Hypertension. 2018;71:317–325.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ding J,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Wen J,
    4. et al
    . Imaging CXCR4 expression in patients with suspected primary hyperaldosteronism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2656–2665.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chaman Baz AH,
    2. Van De Wiel E,
    3. Groenewoud H,
    4. et al
    . CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT versus adrenal vein sampling performance: a study protocol for a randomised two-step controlled diagnostic trial ultimately comparing hypertension outcome in primary aldosteronism (CASTUS). BMJ Open. 2022;12:e060779.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Konrad M,
    2. Rinscheid A,
    3. Wienand G,
    4. et al
    . [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec: development, extensive pre-clinical evaluation, and first human experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3937–3948.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Enke JS,
    2. Reitsam NG,
    3. Grosser B,
    4. et al
    . C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-directed scintigraphy of multiple myeloma using [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:163–164.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Williams TA,
    2. Lenders JWM,
    3. Mulatero P,
    4. et al
    . Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:689–699.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Köhler A,
    2. Sarkis AL,
    3. Heinrich DA,
    4. et al
    . Renin, a marker for left ventricular hypertrophy, in primary aldosteronism: a cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185:663–672.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gao Y,
    2. Ding J,
    3. Cui Y,
    4. et al
    . Functional nodules in primary aldosteronism: identification of CXCR4 expression with 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2023;33:996–1003.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bailey DL,
    2. Willowson KP
    . An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:83–89.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication June 2, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication August 13, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 10
October 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4–Directed Scintigraphy Using [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec in Primary Aldosteronism: A Proof-of-Concept Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4–Directed Scintigraphy Using [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec in Primary Aldosteronism: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Johanna S. Enke, Kathrin Ritzel, Evelyn Asbach, Nic G. Reitsam, Bruno Märkl, Thomas Knösel, Denise Brüdgam, Malte Kircher, Christian H. Pfob, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Andreas Rinscheid, Bernd Nittbaur, Georgine Wienand, Margret Schottelius, Martin Reincke, Constantin Lapa, Alexander Dierks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2024, 65 (10) 1640-1644; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268169

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4–Directed Scintigraphy Using [99mTc]Tc-Pentixatec in Primary Aldosteronism: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Johanna S. Enke, Kathrin Ritzel, Evelyn Asbach, Nic G. Reitsam, Bruno Märkl, Thomas Knösel, Denise Brüdgam, Malte Kircher, Christian H. Pfob, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Andreas Rinscheid, Bernd Nittbaur, Georgine Wienand, Margret Schottelius, Martin Reincke, Constantin Lapa, Alexander Dierks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2024, 65 (10) 1640-1644; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268169
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
  • Bioanalytic Hybrid System Merging 3-Dimensional Cell Culture and Chromatographic Precision for Unprecedented Preclinical Insights in Molecular Imaging
  • Radiances of Cerenkov-Emitting Radionuclides on the In Vivo Imaging System
Show more BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • primary aldosteronism
  • scintigraphy
  • CXCR4-directed imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire