Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation
Open Access

Development of FAPI Tetramers to Improve Tumor Uptake and Efficacy of FAPI Radioligand Therapy

Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Jianyang Fang, Jianhao Chen, Lingxin Meng, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Zhide Guo, Qin Lin and Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2023, 64 (9) 1449-1455; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265599
Yizhen Pang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Zhao
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
3Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
4Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianyang Fang
5State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics and Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianhao Chen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lingxin Meng
5State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics and Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Long Sun
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hua Wu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhide Guo
5State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics and Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qin Lin
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haojun Chen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) have shown promise as cancer diagnostic agents; however, the relatively short tumor retention of FAPIs may limit their application in radioligand therapy. In this paper, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a FAPI tetramer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the tumor-targeting characteristics of radiolabeled FAPI multimers in vitro and in vivo, thereby providing information for the design of FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals based on the polyvalency principle. Methods: FAPI tetramers were synthesized on the basis of FAPI-46 and radiolabeled with 68Ga, 64Cu, and 177Lu. In vitro FAP-binding characteristics were identified using a competitive cell-binding experiment. To evaluate their pharmacokinetics, small-animal PET, SPECT, and ex vivo biodistribution analyses were performed on HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumor–bearing mice. In addition, the 2 tumor xenografts received radioligand therapy with 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, and the antitumor efficacy of the 177Lu-FAPI tetramer was evaluated and compared with that of the 177Lu-FAPI dimer and monomer. Results: 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were highly stable in phosphate-buffered saline and fetal bovine serum. The FAPI tetramer exhibited high FAP-binding affinity and specificity both in vitro and in vivo. 68Ga-, 64Cu-, and 177Lu-labeled FAPI tetramers exhibited higher tumor uptake, longer tumor retention, and slower clearance than FAPI dimers and FAPI-46 in HT-1080-FAP tumors. The uptake (percentage injected dose per gram) of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and 177Lu-FAPI-46 in HT-1080-FAP tumors at 24 h was 21.4 ± 1.7, 17.1 ± 3.9, and 3.4 ± 0.7, respectively. Moreover, 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 uptake in U87MG tumors was approximately 2-fold the uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 (SUVmean, 0.72 ± 0.02 vs. 0.42 ± 0.03, P < 0.001) and more than 4-fold the uptake of 68Ga-FAPI-46 (0.16 ± 0.01, P < 0.001). In the radioligand therapy study, remarkable tumor suppression was observed with the 177Lu-FAPI tetramer in both HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumor–bearing mice. Conclusion: The satisfactory FAP-binding affinity and specificity, as well as the favorable in vivo pharmacokinetics of the FAPI tetramer, make it a promising radiopharmaceutical for theranostic applications. Improved tumor uptake and prolonged retention of the 177Lu-FAPI tetramer resulted in excellent characteristics for FAPI imaging and radioligand therapy.

  • fibroblast activation protein
  • cancer-associated fibroblasts
  • tetramer
  • dimer
  • radioligand therapy

Cancer-associated fibroblasts, which are major components of the tumor stroma in many epithelial carcinomas, play a pivotal role in tumor growth, tissue remodeling, and immune evasion (1). Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a type II transmembrane glycoprotein, is overexpressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts but expressed at low levels in normal fibroblasts (2). Therefore, FAP is considered a promising target for tumor imaging and therapy.

Several quinoline-based FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) have been developed (3–6). 68Ga-FAPI-46 appeared to be the most promising derivatives in the series, providing a favorable tumor-to-background ratio and good tumor accumulation (3,7). However, their relatively short tumor retention may limit the use of radiolabeled FAPIs for radioligand therapy (8,9). Various chemical optimization strategies for theranostic applications, including cyclization, multimerization, and albumin binding, reportedly improve tumor uptake and prolong tumor retention of these radioligands (9–11).

In our previous study, a dimeric FAPI molecule, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, was designed and synthesized (12). Preclinical and clinical PET studies have demonstrated that 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 exhibits significantly higher tumor uptake and longer retention than 68Ga-FAPI-46 (12). Similar results were obtained for other FAPI dimers, including DOTAGA, (SA.FAPi)2, and BiOncoFAP (13,14). Therefore, polyvalency may be an effective strategy for developing FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals with higher tumor uptake because of their increased FAP-recognition ability. Moreover, FAP-targeted radioligand therapy could be more effective if further improvements in tumor retention and absolute uptake are achieved.

In this paper, we report the design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of a tetrameric FAPI molecule based on the polyvalency principle. It was constructed on the FAPI-46 motif with 4 diethylene glycol (mini–polyethylene glycol [PEG]) spacers between the 4 FAPI motifs, denoted as 4P(FAPI)4. This FAPI tetramer was conjugated to the chelator DOTA or NOTA and labeled with 68Ga or 64Cu for PET imaging. It was also labeled with 177Lu for radioligand therapy applications. This study aimed to investigate the tumor-targeting potential of FAPI tetramers in vitro and in vivo and whether this form is more effective than its monomeric and dimeric analogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemistry and Radiolabeling

Details of the reagents, chemicals, synthesis route, radiochemistry, and quality control of the FAPI tetramer are described in the supplemental materials (available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) (12). For 68Ga labeling, approximately 25.4 nmol of FAPI-46, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, or DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were dissolved in 1 mL of NaAc (0.25 M in water) and added to 4 mL of 68GaCl3 solution (1.3 GBq in 0.05 M HCl). The mixture was incubated at 95°C for 10 min. For 177Lu labeling, each of the aforementioned precursors was dissolved in 1 mL of NaAc (0.25 M in water) and added to 4 mL of 177LuCl3 solution (740 MBq in 0.05 M HCl). The mixture was incubated at 95°C for 30 min. To allow stable complexation of 64Cu, the DOTA group of the FAPI dimer or tetramer was replaced with NOTA. Approximately 26.7 nmol of NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 or NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were diluted with 450 μL of NaAc (0.5 M) and incubated with 50 μL of 64CuCl2 (740 MBq in 0.01 M HCl) at 90°C for 20 min. All 3 products were purified using a C18 Plus Short Cartridge (WAT020515; Waters Corp.). Radio–high-performance liquid chromatography was used for quality control.

Cell Culture and in Vitro Evaluation

A human fibrosarcoma cell line was stably transfected with FAP (HT-1080-FAP) and cultured, as previously described (15). A human glioblastoma cell line (U87MG, from the Chinese National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource) was cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Thermo Fischer Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific). HT-1080-FAP cells were seeded in 24-well plates using RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, and the medium was replaced with fresh medium without fetal bovine serum when the cells reached 80%–90% density. 68Ga-FAPI-46, 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, or 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 with 11.3 nmol of unlabeled FAPI-46 (for the blocking experiment) were added to the 24-well plates and incubated for 60, 90, and 120 min. For the competitive cell-binding assay, a gradient concentration (5.6 × 10−13 to 10−5 M) of FAPI-46, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, or DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was added to the cells and incubated with 68Ga-FAPI-46 for 60 min. Similarly, a gradient concentration (5.4 × 10−13 to 10−5 M) of NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 or NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was added to the cells and incubated with 68Ga-FAPI-46 for 60 min. After each step, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (1 mL) and lysed with 1 M NaOH (0.5 mL). The radioactivity (counts per minute) was determined with a γ-counter (WIZARD2 2480; PerkinElmer Inc.). All experiments were independently repeated 3 times. The 50% inhibitory concentrations were determined by fitting a nonlinear regression model to the data using Prism software, version 8 (GraphPad Software Inc.).

Preparation of Cell Line–Derived Xenograft Models

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of Xiamen University and performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals of the Xiamen University Laboratory Animal Center. For in vivo experiments, 6-wk-old BALB/c nude mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd.) were subcutaneously inoculated with HT-1080-FAP or U87 cells (5 × 106 in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline) in the right shoulder.

Small-Animal PET and SPECT Studies

Dynamic PET, static PET (with or without competition), and SPECT scans with radiolabeled monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric FAPIs were performed on HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Additionally, static PET with 68Ga-labeled monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric FAPIs was performed and compared in U87MG tumor–bearing mice.

Approximately 7.4 MBq of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was intravenously injected into HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice (n = 3) for the 60-min dynamic PET. For multiple-time-point static PET (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h after injection), 7.4 MBq of 68Ga-FAPI-46, 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, or 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were injected into HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumor–bearing mice (3/group). For longer-term observation, HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice were intravenously injected with 7.4 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 or 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 (3/group). For the in vivo blocking experiment, PET imaging was performed 1 h after the simultaneous administration of 30 nmol of unlabeled FAPI-46 and 7.4 MBq of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4.

SPECT scans were conducted from 1 to 96 h with 18.5 MBq of 177Lu-FAPI-46, 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, or 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice (3/group). Details of the machine settings, dynamic and static PET imaging procedures, static SPECT imaging procedures, imaging acquisition, and image reconstruction are presented in the supplemental materials.

Biodistribution Study

Three groups of HT-1080-FAP mice were injected with 0.74 MBq of 177Lu-FAPI-46, 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, or 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and were euthanized at different time points (24–48 h for monomers and 24–96 h for dimers and tetramers, 3/group). Blood, tumor, muscle, and major organs were weighed and measured using a γ-counter (WIZARD2 2480). Data were normalized to the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) using 1% of total counts.

FAP-Targeted Radioligand Therapy

When the tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm3, the mice were randomized into 4 groups for radioligand therapy with 177Lu-labeled monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric FAPIs (6/group): group A, saline; group B, 29.6 MBq of 177Lu-FAPI-46; group C, 29.6 MBq of 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2; and group D, 29.6 MBq of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4. The frequency of administering 177Lu radiopharmaceuticals to U87MG mice was based on the administration frequency used in our previous study on hepatocellular carcinoma patient–derived xenograft tumor models, which showed a significant reduction in tumor uptake after 72 h after injection (15). HT-1080-FAP, a FAP-transfected tumor xenograft with much higher levels of FAP expression than U87MG, was also used in this study. Therefore, the frequency of administration was higher in U87MG tumor–bearing mice (every 72 h, 3 doses in total) than in the HT-1080-FAP models (a single dose). Weight and tumor volume were monitored every 2 d, and the mice were euthanized when the average tumor volume exceeded 1,500 mm3, when the tumor was ulcerated, or when weight loss was more than 20%. To further assess radioligand therapy–related toxicity effects, the main organs were collected from the 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 group on day 22 after hematoxylin and eosin staining (16).

Statistics

Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Microsoft Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp.). The Student t test was used to determine differences between 2 groups, and 1-way ANOVA was used to compare differences among multiple groups. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Synthesis and Radiolabeling

Tetrameric FAPIs containing 4 PEG3 groups and the chelator DOTA or NOTA were synthesized (Fig. 1; Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2). 68Ga, 64Cu, and 177Lu were labeled in more than 90% yield with radiochemical purity of more than 95%. The specific activity was 32.0–36.4 GBq/μmol for 68Ga-labeled FAPI variants, 22.2–24.9 GBq/μmol for 64Cu-labeled FAPI variants, and 23.3–26.2 GBq/μmol for 177Lu-labeled FAPI variants.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Chemical structure of FAPI tetramer DOTA-4P(FAPI)4.

Regarding in vitro stability, neither significant demetallation nor free radioactivity was observed 4 h (68Ga-DOTA-4P[FAPI]4) or 24 h (177Lu-DOTA-4P[FAPI]4) after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline and fetal bovine serum via radio–high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, demonstrating the high stability of the products (Supplemental Fig. 3).

Cell-Binding Assay

In the cell uptake and blocking experiments, 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 yielded significantly higher uptake than 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and 68Ga-FAPI-46 (57.98% ± 0.27% vs. 32.40% ± 5.36% vs. 22.93% ± 0.33% at 120 min). Moreover, unlabeled FAPI-46 significantly blocked 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 binding to FAP (57.98% ± 0.27% vs. 1.79% ± 0.97% at 120 min, a 97% reduction), confirming the FAP-targeting specificity of the FAPI tetramer (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Cell uptake–blocking experiments and competitive cell-binding assay of FAPI-46, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 using HT-1080-FAP cells.

All 3 FAPI molecules (monomers, dimers, and tetramers) inhibited the binding of 68Ga-FAPI-46 to FAP-positive HT-1080-FAP cells in a dose-dependent manner. The 50% inhibitory concentrations for FAPI-46, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were comparable (11.38, 17.04, and 15.56 nM, respectively), indicating that tetramerization and dimerization have minimal effect on the FAP-binding affinity (Fig. 2). Additionally, the 50% inhibitory concentrations for NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 were also comparable (25.18 and 16.27 nM) (Supplemental Fig. 4).

Small-Animal PET Imaging of HT-1080-FAP Tumors

To comprehensively evaluate the in vivo pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, a 60-min dynamic PET scan was performed on HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice. As illustrated in Figure 3A, 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was rapidly taken up by the tumor, and the uptake increased from 10 to 60 min after injection. In contrast, the radiotracer uptake rapidly declined over the same period in the heart, kidneys, and liver. Additional late-time-point static scans performed on tumor-bearing mice revealed that tumor uptake remained constant up to 4 h after injection (Fig. 3B). Moreover, 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was eliminated predominantly through the kidneys and bladder, resulting in low background activity and favorable tumor-to-background ratios, especially at later time points. Similar tumor uptake and retention were observed for 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 (Fig. 3C); however, a significant decrease in tumor uptake over time was observed on 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET (Fig. 3D).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

(A) Dynamic time–activity curves of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in heart, liver, kidney, muscle, and tumor of HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice. (B–D) Representative PET images of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and 68Ga-FAPI-46 in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice.

In terms of semiquantitative analysis, no significant difference was observed regarding tumor uptake among the 3 radiotracers at 1 h after injection, whereas uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was significantly higher than that of FAPI dimer (SUVmean, 1.99 ± 0.09 vs. 1.71 ± 0.10, P = 0.018) and monomer (1.20 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) in HT-1080-FAP tumors at 4 h after injection (Supplemental Fig. 5). The difference in tumor uptake among the 3 radiotracers was more notable in U87MG tumor–bearing mice. As illustrated in Figure 4, the 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 uptake in U87MG tumors (1 h after injection) was approximately 2-fold higher than the 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 uptake (SUVmean, 0.72 ± 0.02 vs. 0.42 ± 0.03, P < 0.001) and more than 4-fold higher than the 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (0.16 ± 0.01, P < 0.001). In addition, washout of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 from the U87MG tumor during the experimental time span was minimal, whereas a significantly decreased tumor uptake of 68Ga-FAPI-46 was observed.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

(A–C) Representative PET images of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 (bar, SUVmean, 0–1.2) (A), 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 (bar, SUVmean, 0–1.2) (B), and 68Ga-FAPI-46 (bar, SUVmean, 0–0.3 because of low uptake) (C) in U87MG tumor–bearing mice. Arrows point toward tumor. (D) Tumor uptake of 3 radiotracers in U87MG tumors at 0.5–4 h after injection.

Target specificity was evaluated using an in vivo blocking assay. Coinjection with an excess of unlabeled FAPI-46 successfully blocked tumor uptake at 1 h after injection (SUVmean without blocking, 1.87 ± 0.08, vs. SUVmean with blocking, 0.16 ± 0.03; 92% reduction in tumor uptake), demonstrating that the uptake of the major fraction of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in tumors was FAP-mediated (Supplemental Fig. 6).

To observe the entire process of tracer accumulation and washout from the tumor tissue, a radionuclide with a longer half-life (12.7 h, 64Cu) was used to label the FAPI tetramers and dimers. During multiple-time-point static PET imaging, the uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in HT-1080 FAP tumors was higher than that of 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 at all examined time points, and 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 washout was slightly slower than 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 washout during the experimental period (Fig. 5). Uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in the kidney and liver was also higher than that of 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2, whereas uptake in other nontarget organs was similar for both radiotracers. A detailed semiquantitative analysis of 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 uptake in the tumor and main organs is presented in Supplemental Figure 7.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Representative PET imaging of 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2 in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice. Arrows point toward tumor.

SPECT Imaging and Biodistribution of 177Lu-Labeled FAPI Tetramer in HT-1080-FAP Tumors

Whole-body SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies were performed to further explore the in vivo characteristics of the 177Lu-labeled FAPI tetramer. Representative SPECT images of the FAPI tetramer, dimer, and monomer are presented in Figure 6 (3/group), and the ex vivo biodistribution data of the 3 tracers are presented in Supplemental Figure 8 (3 per group). Similar to the observation with 64Cu-labeled analogs, HT-1080-FAP tumors clearly contained 177Lu-labeled dimer and tetramer at all time points examined (Fig. 6). The uptake of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 reached 21.4 ± 1.7 %ID/g 24 h after injection, with relatively slow tumor clearance (19.2 ± 0.6 %ID/g, 18.8 ± 2.1 %ID/g, and 14.8 ± 0.9 %ID/g at 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively). The tumor uptake of 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 was 17.1 ± 3.9 %ID/g 24 h after injection, which was slightly lower than that of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4. Tumor washout of the FAPI dimer was faster than that of the tetramer, with uptake values of 18.8 ± 4.1 %ID/g, 13.8 ± 2.6 %ID/g, and 13.1 ± 0.7 %ID/g at 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively. Unsurprisingly, the tumor uptake of 177Lu-FAPI-46 was significantly lower than that of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 24 h after injection (3.4 ± 0.7 %ID/g, P < 0.001). Because 177Lu-FAPI-46 was rapidly cleared from the blood and exhibited extremely low accumulation in the tumor 48 h after injection (2.0 ± 0.4 %ID/g), no further scans were performed for this radiotracer.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Representative SPECT images of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and 177Lu-FAPI-46 in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice. Arrows point toward tumor.

Similar to that of 64Cu-labeled analogs, the uptake of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 in certain nontarget organs 48 h after injection was significantly higher than that of 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and 177Lu-FAPI-46 (kidney: 6.6 ± 0.2 %ID/g vs. 2.9 ± 1.5 %ID/g and 0.4 ± 0.01 %ID/g; liver: 6.3 ± 0.5 %ID/g vs. 2.6 ± 0.9 %ID/g and 0.5 ± 0.02 %ID/g; and spleen: 5.1 ± 0.7 %ID/g vs. 2.0 ± 0.8 %ID/g and 0.2 ± 0.04 %ID/g).

FAP-Targeted Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-FAPI Tetramer

In HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice, rapid tumor growth was observed in groups A (control) and B (29.6 MBq of 177Lu-FAPI-46 therapy). All tumor-bearing mice (6/6) in group A and most mice (5/6) in group B were euthanized by days 18 and 28, respectively, because of excessive tumor volumes (Figs. 7A and B). In groups C (29.6 MBq of 177Lu-DOTA-2P[FAPI]2) and D (29.6 MBq of 177Lu-DOTA-4P[FAPI]4), significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed, and most tumors started to shrink from day 6 and remained small until days 12–14, after which tumor volumes increased (Fig. 7B). No systemic toxicity due to radioligand therapy, determined by monitoring the body weight of the mice, was observed in any of the 4 groups. To further evaluate the toxic effects, hematoxylin and eosin staining of the selected nontarget organs was performed, which revealed no differences between the control and radioligand therapy groups (Supplemental Fig. 9).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4, 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2, and 177Lu-FAPI-46 in HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumor–bearing mice. (A) Tumor growth curves and weight changes after treatment in HT-1080-FAP tumors (6/group). (B) Tumor growth curves and weight changes after treatment in U87MG tumors (6/group).

In U87MG tumor–bearing mice, tumors in the control and 177Lu-FAPI-46 therapy groups both demonstrated fast growth, and all mice (6/6) in the control group and half the mice (3/6) in the 177Lu-FAPI-46 therapy group were euthanized by day 14 because of excessive tumor volumes. Although a better antitumor efficacy was observed in the 177Lu-FAPI dimer group (median survival time not reached) than in the control group (median survival, 12 d) and the 177Lu-FAPI-46 group (median survival, 14 d), the 177Lu-FAPI tetramer (median survival time not reached) yielded the greatest inhibition of tumor growth among all 4 groups (Fig. 7). In brief, the tumor volume in 177Lu-FAPI tetramer group was significantly less than in the FAPI dimer, FAPI-46, and control groups at day 14 after treatment (140.28 ± 76.36 mm3 vs. 616.14 ± 198.2 mm3 vs. 1,189.16 ± 435.26 mm3 vs. 1,830.18 ± 242.25 mm3; all P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In the past 3 y, many clinical studies have explored the potential of FAP-targeted radioligand therapy with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled FAPIs (8,9). However, most have revealed unsatisfactory therapeutic responses, mainly because of fast blood clearance accompanied by relatively short tumor retention. Therefore, various strategies have been developed to prolong the in vivo half-life of radiolabeled FAPIs to improve tumor uptake and retention.

An important strategy to enhance tumor uptake and retention is to harness the polyvalency effect of multimerization, which has been used in the development of arginylglycylaspartic acid peptides to improve their pharmacokinetics (17). Recently, we applied the multivalency concept to develop a dimeric FAPI molecule, DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 (12), which demonstrated enhanced tumor uptake and retention properties for dimers compared with monomers in patient-derived xenografts and patients with cancer. On the basis of those results, we synthesized tetrameric FAPI molecules with 4 repeating FAPI-46 units connected by 4 mini-PEG spacers. We hypothesized that multimerization to tetrameric FAPIs would further improve their tumor accumulation and retention because of adequate contact with the FAP-binding pocket located in the extracellular segment of cancer-associated fibroblasts.

The high labeling yield, radiochemical purity, and stability of the FAPI tetramer indicate that it is a convenient precursor for radiolabeling and application. Subsequently, radioligand-binding assays were used to examine the FAP-binding affinity of FAPI tetramers, dimers, and monomers. However, comparable 50% inhibitory concentrations were observed for all 3 FAPI variants. Multimeric FAPI molecules are not necessarily multivalent. The key to bivalency and tetravalency is the distance between the binding motifs. In this study, a FAP-binding affinity of the FAPI tetramer and dimer comparable to that of FAPI-46 indicates that the distance between binding motifs in DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 may not be sufficiently long for them to achieve tetravalency or bivalency. In addition, the bivalency and tetravalency of multimeric FAPI molecules also depend on FAP density. If FAP density is low, the distance between neighboring FAP sites will be long, and it may be more difficult for multiple multimers to simultaneously bind to FAP binding sites.

The tetramer 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 exhibited prominent uptake in the FAP-transfected tumor xenograft HT-1080-FAP, and its excretion route was primarily through the kidneys. However, it exhibited a similar initial tumor uptake and slightly longer tumor retention than those of 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and 68Ga-FAPI-46, as may be explained by the intense FAP expression in this special tumor xenograft. In another tumor xenograft, U87MG, the tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was significantly higher than that of 68Ga-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and 68Ga-FAPI-46. In the blocking study, the tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 decreased significantly when the mice were injected with unlabeled FAPI-46 1 h after injection, suggesting that the high tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 was primarily a factor of its excellent FAP-targeting ability in vivo.

However, the relatively short half-life of 68Ga limits the observation time of tumor retention. Therefore, the FAPI tetramer and dimer were labeled with 64Cu to further evaluate their in vivo characteristics. The tetramer 64Cu-NOTA-4P(FAPI)4 exhibited a slightly higher initial tumor uptake and longer retention than 64Cu-NOTA-2P(FAPI)2. Compared with the molecular size of the FAPI monomer and dimer, the larger size of the FAPI tetramer may explain its longer circulation time and slower tumor washout. In contrast, as the greater number of FAP binding sites on FAPI tetramers will increase the local concentration of other FAPI motifs in the vicinity of FAP sites, the locally increased FAPI concentration may explain the higher tumor uptake of radiolabeled FAPI tetramers and dimers than of their monomeric analogs (18). The higher liver uptake of 64Cu-labeled radiopharmaceuticals may be attributed to the dissociation of free copper ions from the radiopharmaceuticals in vivo (19,20), which was also observed in previous studies. The liver uptake of 64Cu-NOTA–arginylglycylaspartic acid–bombesin was relatively lower than that of other 64Cu-DOTA radiotracers but higher than that of 68Ga-NOTA–arginylglycylaspartic acid–bombesin, possibly because of the higher chelating ability of NOTA with 68Ga than of NOTA with 64Cu (21). However, other factors, such as radiotracer stability and metabolism, can also contribute to the increased liver uptake. Increased liver uptake of a 64Cu-NOTA agent was also reported in PEG2-RM26 studies, partly because of the transchelation of 64Cu2+ to the serum components or superoxide dismutase that can accumulate in the liver tissue (22). Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the liver uptake of 64Cu-labeled radiotracers.

Compared with FAPI dimers and monomers, the FAPI tetramer exhibited significantly higher uptake in certain nontarget organs, especially the kidney and liver, as reflected by PET and SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies. The relatively high uptake of the FAPI tetramer by the kidneys may be explained by different mechanisms. First, we speculate that the increased renal uptake of the FAPI tetramer may be partially related to the 4 mini-PEG spacers. PEGylation is a strategy widely used to improve the in vivo pharmacokinetics of radiotracers, induce hydrophilicity, and increase kidney uptake (23). Additionally, the difference in charge between the 3 FAPI molecules may cause differences in tubular reabsorption, as reported in previous studies (24). Because of the presence of more guanidine groups, tetrameric FAPI is more positively charged than dimeric and monomeric FAPI. The larger molecular size of the FAPI tetramer could cause a longer circulation time and greater retention in the liver. The fact that the background of 68Ga-labeled FAPI tetramer was higher than that of the dimer and monomer may have had unfavorable effects on diagnostic application. However, the FAPI tetramer applied in our study was designed to improve tumor uptake and retention so as to enhance the antitumor efficacy of FAP-targeted radioligand therapy. Furthermore, FAPI monomers, such as FAPI-04 and FAPI-46, are excellent PET imaging agents for detecting FAP-positive lesions because of their favorable pharmacokinetics and high binding specificity to FAP.

The increased tumor uptake and prolonged tumor retention of DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 encouraged us to apply it in FAP-targeted radioligand therapy. As expected, a single dose of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 demonstrated excellent antitumor ability in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice, whereas the tumors continued to grow in the control and 177Lu-FAPI-46 therapy groups. However, because HT-1080-FAP is a FAP-transfected tumor xenograft with extremely high FAP expression, both 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 and 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 rapidly eradicated the tumors, with no observed difference between them. Therefore, another tumor xenograft, U87MG, was used to evaluate the antitumor ability of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4. This human glioblastoma cell–derived xenograft adequately recruits mouse fibroblasts during tumor growth and has been reported as a FAP-positive tumor model (25). Impressively, 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 demonstrated significantly better antitumor efficacy than did 177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 and 177Lu-FAPI-46, indicating potential for the use of radiolabeled FAPI tetramers as theranostic agents.

However, the multimerization strategy may be a double-edged sword in the development of radiopharmaceuticals. In addition to improved tumor uptake and retention, it results in higher radiotracer uptake in normal organs, particularly the kidneys and liver. The increased accumulation of radioactivity in normal organs may result in the delivery of unnecessary radiation doses, which may affect the future clinical translation of these molecules into viable treatments. Whether the positive effects of increased tumor uptake offset the potential side effects of increased liver and kidney uptake is unclear. Increased liver and kidney uptake may be undesirable; however, it may be an acceptable trade-off if the benefits of increased tumor uptake are significant. In tumors with high expression of FAP, such as HT-1080-FAP, radioligand therapy with a FAPI dimer may lead to similar antitumor efficacy but fewer side effects than for a FAPI tetramer. However, 68Ga PET imaging and 177Lu-radioligand therapy in U87MG tumor–bearing mice revealed that the tetramer itself acts as a double titer of the dimer, thereby improving its antitumor efficacy. Therefore, radioligand therapy with a FAPI tetramer may be more appropriate than that with a FAPI dimer in tumors with moderate or mild expression of FAP. The selection of the dimer or tetramer ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of the treatment objectives and the potential benefits and risks associated with each option. Therefore, appropriate modifications by changing the linker or chelator are needed to improve the pharmacokinetics of FAPI-based radiopharmaceuticals (25), especially to improve their FAP-targeting capabilities and reduce radiotracer accumulation in noncancerous organs.

CONCLUSION

The radiolabeled FAPI tetramer exhibited higher accumulation and longer retention in the tumor than did its dimeric and monomeric counterparts. The improved pharmacologic properties of 177Lu-DOTA-4P(FAPI)4 resulted in excellent antitumor ability in HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumor–bearing mice. The information obtained here may guide the future development of FAP-targeted imaging and radioligand therapy.

DISCLOSURE

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071961, 82272037), the Fujian Research and Training Grants for Young and Middle-Aged Leaders in Healthcare, the Key Scientific Research Program for Yong Scholars in Fujian (2021ZQNZD016), the Fujian Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (2022J01310623), and the Key Medical and Health Projects in Xiamen (3502Z20209002). Liang Zhao was partially funded by the China Scholarship Council. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Compared with FAPI monomers and dimers, do FAPI tetramers demonstrate enhanced tumor uptake, prolonged tumor retention, and an improved radioligand therapeutic ability?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: FAPI tetrameric radiopharmaceuticals exhibited significantly increased tumor uptake and retention compared with their monomeric and dimeric counterparts. The 177Lu-FAPI tetramer demonstrated remarkable inhibition of tumor growth in both HT-1080-FAP and U87MG tumors, with negligible side effects.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The formation of FAPI tetramers via multimerization is a promising strategy in the development of FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jun. 15, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ostman A,
    2. Augsten M
    . Cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor growth: bystanders turning into key players. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:67–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Garin-Chesa P,
    2. Old LJ,
    3. Rettig WJ
    . Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:7235–7239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Loktev A,
    2. Lindner T,
    3. Burger EM,
    4. et al
    . Development of fibroblast activation protein-targeted radiotracers with improved tumor retention. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1421–1429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Flechsig P,
    3. Lindner T,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:801–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    1. Chen H,
    2. Pang Y,
    3. Wu J,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1820–1832.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Adeberg S,
    3. Syed M,
    4. et al
    . FAPI-74 PET/CT using either 18F-AlF or cold-kit 68Ga labeling: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and tumor delineation in lung cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:201–207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Naeimi M,
    2. Choyke PL,
    3. Dendl K,
    4. et al
    . Three-time-point PET analysis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a variety of cancers. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:618–622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Assadi M,
    2. Rekabpour SJ,
    3. Jafari E,
    4. et al
    . Feasibility and therapeutic potential of 177Lu-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-46 for patients with relapsed or refractory cancers: a preliminary study. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:e523–e530.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Pang Y,
    4. et al
    . Fibroblast activation protein-based theranostics in cancer research: a state-of-the-art review. Theranostics. 2022;12:1557–1569.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.
    1. Baum RP,
    2. Schuchardt C,
    3. Singh A,
    4. et al
    . Feasibility, biodistribution, and preliminary dosimetry in peptide-targeted radionuclide therapy of diverse adenocarcinomas using 177Lu-FAP-2286: first-in-humans results. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:415–423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Xu M,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Ding J,
    4. Chen J,
    5. Huo L,
    6. Liu Z
    . Albumin binder-conjugated fibroblast activation protein inhibitor radiopharmaceuticals for cancer therapy. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:952–958.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Niu B,
    3. Fang J,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis, preclinical evaluation, and a pilot clinical PET imaging study of 68Ga-labeled FAPI dimer. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:862–868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ballal S,
    2. Yadav MP,
    3. Moon ES,
    4. et al
    . Novel fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based targeted theranostics for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patients: a pilot study. Thyroid. 2022;32:65–77.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Galbiati A,
    2. Zana A,
    3. Bocci M,
    4. et al
    . A novel dimeric FAP-targeting small molecule-radio conjugate with high and prolonged tumour uptake. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1852–1858.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Pang Y,
    4. et al
    . Development of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based dimeric radiotracers with improved tumor retention and antitumor efficacy. Mol Pharm. 2022;19:3640–3651.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Guo Z,
    4. et al
    . Targeted radionuclide therapy in patient-derived xenografts using 177Lu-EB-RGD. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19:2034–2043.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Li ZB,
    2. Cai W,
    3. Cao Q,
    4. et al
    . 64Cu-labeled tetrameric and octameric RGD peptides for small-animal PET of tumor alphavbeta3 integrin expression. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1162–1171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Liu S
    . Radiolabeled cyclic RGD peptides as integrin alphavbeta3-targeted radiotracers: maximizing binding affinity via bivalency. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:2199–2213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jørgensen JT,
    2. Persson M,
    3. Madsen J,
    4. Kjaer A
    . High tumor uptake of 64Cu: implications for molecular imaging of tumor characteristics with copper-based PET tracers. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:345–350.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Roosenburg S,
    2. Laverman P,
    3. Joosten L,
    4. et al
    . PET and SPECT imaging of a radiolabeled minigastrin analogue conjugated with DOTA, NOTA, and NODAGA and labeled with 64Cu, 68Ga, and 111In. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:3930–3937.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Wang F,
    5. Chen X
    . 18F, 64Cu, and 68Ga labeled RGD-bombesin heterodimeric peptides for PET imaging of breast cancer. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:1016–1025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Baun C,
    2. Mitran B,
    3. Rinne SS,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation of the copper-64 labeled GRPR-antagonist RM26 in comparison with the cobalt-55 labeled counterpart for PET-imaging of prostate cancer. Molecules. 2020;25:5993.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Han Y,
    2. Yuan Z,
    3. Zhang P,
    4. Jiang S
    . Zwitterlation mitigates protein bioactivity loss in vitro over PEGylation. Chem Sci. 2018;9:8561–8566.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dijkgraaf I,
    2. Yim CB,
    3. Franssen GM,
    4. et al
    . PET imaging of alphavbeta3 integrin expression in tumours with 68Ga-labelled mono-, di- and tetrameric RGD peptides. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:128–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wen X,
    2. Xu P,
    3. Shi M,
    4. et al
    . Evans blue-modified radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor as long-acting cancer therapeutics. Theranostics. 2022;12:422–433.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication February 15, 2023.
  • Revision received April 27, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 9
September 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of FAPI Tetramers to Improve Tumor Uptake and Efficacy of FAPI Radioligand Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Development of FAPI Tetramers to Improve Tumor Uptake and Efficacy of FAPI Radioligand Therapy
Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Jianyang Fang, Jianhao Chen, Lingxin Meng, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Zhide Guo, Qin Lin, Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2023, 64 (9) 1449-1455; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265599

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Development of FAPI Tetramers to Improve Tumor Uptake and Efficacy of FAPI Radioligand Therapy
Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Jianyang Fang, Jianhao Chen, Lingxin Meng, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Zhide Guo, Qin Lin, Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2023, 64 (9) 1449-1455; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265599
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preclinical Evaluation of 68Ga/177Lu-Labeled FAP-Targeted Peptide for Tumor Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Therapy
  • Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Tracers and Their Preclinical, Translational, and Clinical Status in China
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Granzyme B PET Imaging Predicts Response to Immunotherapy in a Diet-Induced Obesity Model of Breast Cancer
  • Establishing In Vitro Dosimetric Models and Dose–Effect Relationships for 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein–Mediated Peptide Nucleic Acid–Based Pretargeting: A Proof-of-Principle Study
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • fibroblast activation protein
  • cancer-associated fibroblasts
  • tetramer
  • dimer
  • radioligand therapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire