Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFEATURED ARTICLE OF THE MONTH

Molecular Imaging of Myocardial Fibroblast Activation in Patients with Advanced Aortic Stenosis Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Pilot Study

Johanna Diekmann, Jonas Neuser, Manuel Röhrich, Thorsten Derlin, Carolin Zwadlo, Tobias Koenig, Desiree Weiberg, Felix Jäckle, Tibor Kempf, Tobias L. Ross, Jochen Tillmanns, James T. Thackeray, Julian Widder, Uwe Haberkorn, Johann Bauersachs and Frank M. Bengel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2023, 64 (8) 1279-1286; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265147
Johanna Diekmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Neuser
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Röhrich
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thorsten Derlin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolin Zwadlo
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Koenig
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Desiree Weiberg
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Jäckle
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tibor Kempf
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias L. Ross
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jochen Tillmanns
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James T. Thackeray
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian Widder
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johann Bauersachs
2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank M. Bengel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Using multimodal imaging, we investigated the extent and functional correlates of myocardial fibroblast activation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). AS may cause myocardial fibrosis, which is associated with disease progression and may limit response to TAVR. Novel radiopharmaceuticals identify upregulation of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) as a cellular substrate of cardiac profibrotic activity. Methods: Twenty-three AS patients underwent 68Ga-FAP inhibitor 46 (68Ga-FAPI) PET, cardiac MRI, and echocardiography within 1–3 d before TAVR. Imaging parameters were correlated and then were integrated with clinical and blood biomarkers. Control cohorts of subjects without a history of cardiac disease and with (n = 5) and without (n = 9) arterial hypertension were compared with matched AS subgroups. Results: Myocardial FAP volume varied significantly among AS subjects (range, 1.54–138 cm3, mean ± SD, 42.2 ± 35.6 cm3) and was significantly higher than in controls with (7.42 ± 8.56 cm3, P = 0.007) and without (2.90 ± 6.67 cm3; P < 0.001) hypertension. FAP volume correlated with N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (r = 0.58, P = 0.005), left ventricular ejection fraction (r = −0.58, P = 0.02), mass (r = 0.47, P = 0.03), and global longitudinal strain (r = 0.55, P = 0.01) but not with cardiac MRI T1 (spin–lattice relaxation time) and extracellular volume (P = not statistically significant). In-hospital improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after TAVR correlated with pre-TAVR FAP volume (r = 0.440, P = 0.035), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, and strain but not with other imaging parameters. Conclusion: FAP-targeted PET identifies varying degrees of left ventricular fibroblast activation in TAVR candidates with advanced AS. 68Ga-FAPI signal does not match other imaging parameters, generating the hypothesis that it may become useful as a tool for personalized selection of optimal TAVR candidates.

  • aortic stenosis
  • myocardial fibrosis
  • molecular imaging
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET

Advanced aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (1–3). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used, primarily in high-risk patients (4), although a broader use in lower-risk AS has been suggested (5). Myocardial fibrosis is thought to play a critical role in AS, in the response to therapy and in subsequent outcome (6). In TAVR recipients, the histologic severity of myocardial fibrosis varies significantly and independently predicts left ventricular (LV) remodeling and survival (7,8). Accordingly, myocardial fibrosis has emerged as an imaging target in AS. Strain analysis from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) provides indirect measures of fibrosis in cardiomyopathies (9,10) and in AS (11). In cardiac MRI (CMR), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) identifies scars and areas of replacement fibrosis (12). Parametric T1 (spin–lattice relaxation time) mapping describes altered tissue composition as an indicator of diffuse interstitial fibrosis (13,14). However, LGE and elevated T1 are, for example, also found in areas with extracellular expansion due to edema or infiltration (12), and T1 may have limited specificity for discriminating AS patients from healthy controls (15).

Recently, specific radioligands for fibroblast activation protein (FAP) have been developed for targeted PET and were initially used to characterize tumor stroma (16). FAP is a membrane-bound serine protease (17,18) that is highly expressed by activated myofibroblasts. In profibrotic conditions, it therefore identifies the biologic activity of tissue fibroblasts as a cell-based mechanism that is distinct from the extracellular matrix. The feasibility of noninvasive PET-based interrogation of cardiac 68Ga-FAPI expression has, for example, been shown after acute myocardial infarction (19–23). Moreover, among oncologic patients, a less intense but variable myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal was proportional to cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus (24).

We hypothesized that FAP-targeted PET will identify the presence and inter- and intraindividual heterogeneity of myocardial fibroblast activation in AS. We also hypothesized that this signal of profibrotic activity will be distinct from, and thereby complementary to, other imaging parameters that reflect tissue composition. We tested our hypotheses by a comprehensive global and regional integration of multimodality noninvasive imaging parameters and their relation to established clinical risk markers and short-term response to TAVR. We speculate that confirmation of our hypotheses may support the use of FAP-targeted PET in future studies seeking to optimize candidate selection for TAVR based on their individual fibrotic disease profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Participants

We included 23 patients (11 men, 12 women; mean age ± SD, 84.1 ± 3.3 y) who had undergone clinical evaluation including CMR, TTE, and FAP-targeted PET with 68Ga-FAP inhibitor 46 (68Ga-FAPI) before TAVR at Hannover Medical School. AS had been evaluated, and eligibility for TAVR determined, according to clinical guidelines (25). All patients had classic high-gradient AS and sinus rhythm. Patients equipped with a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator and who had severe renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min), chronic inflammatory disease, or eminent frailty were excluded. All patients gave written informed consent before undergoing imaging. The study was in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and the local ethical committee approved the project (approval 9553_BO_K_2021).

Radionuclide Imaging

FAP-targeted PET was conducted 1–3 d before TAVR, using the specific ligand 68Ga-FAPI-46, which was synthesized in house according to good manufacturing practices as previously described (26) and was used clinically according to §13.2b of the German Pharmaceuticals Act for determination of myocardial profibrotic activity. Static PET images were acquired for 20 min using a Biograph mCT 128 system (Siemens), beginning 60 min after intravenous injection of 118 ± 16 MBq of 68Ga-FAPI-46. Low-dose CT was used for attenuation correction. Images were iteratively reconstructed, using time-of-flight and point-spread function information (True X; Siemens). Peak and SUVmean were obtained for myocardium, blood pool (left atrium), and other organs (liver, spleen, bone marrow, lungs) using volumes of interest of 1 cm3 and commercial software (syngo.via, V50B; Siemens Healthcare). Myocardial FAP volume was determined using an isocontour volume of interest including all voxels above an individually determined threshold (blood pool SUVmean + 2 SDs) with exclusion of valve regions. Additionally, the area of FAP upregulation was calculated by polar map analysis as previously described (19). Segmental SUVmean was calculated using the American Heart Association 17-segment model and polar maps. Apical segments were merged for comparability to CMR and echocardiography.

CMR

CMR was performed using a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens) in 22 of 23 patients (97%) at 1–4 d before TAVR. In 2 of 22 patients, T1 mapping was not performed because of technical problems. Cine images were obtained using a balanced steady-state free-precession sequence (True FISP; Siemens). Parametric T1 maps were acquired in 3 short-axis slices (basal, midventricular, and apical LV) covering 16 segments (available for 16 patients), using the modified look-locker sequence before and after administration of contrast agent. LGE was imaged by phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences, 10–15 min after bolus injection of a 0.15 mmol/kg dose of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (Gadavist; Bayer Healthcare). Extracellular volume fraction was calculated from myocardial and blood T1 relaxation times before and after contrast administration, using the most recent hematocrit level. Global analysis included determination of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), volumes, mass, and extent of LGE, indexed by body surface area (27). Segmental analysis included native T1 and postcontrast T1 relaxation times, using the 16-segment model. Threshold analysis using the mean + 2 SDs of healthy controls’ identified segments with prolonged native T1 relaxation times (28). Cvi42 software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging) was used.

TTE

TTE was performed 1–3 d before and after TAVR, using an EPIQ7 equipped with an X5-1 transducer (Philips). LV strain images were recorded using standard apical views. Speckle tracking for measurement of global longitudinal strain and LVEF were assessed offline using a TomTec Imaging Systems ultrasound software. Segmental longitudinal strain was assessed using 18 segments, and 4 apical segments were merged for comparability to CMR and PET. Threshold analysis using the mean + 2 SDs of healthy controls (29) identified segments with impaired longitudinal strain.

Control Groups

From a historic sample of cancer patients having undergone 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for staging at the University of Heidelberg, 2 control groups were identified and matched to AS subgroups by age and sex. Imaging modalities, tracers, and evaluations were identical to the Hannover protocol (image acquisition 60 min after injection). First, a group of 9 control subjects (4 with glioblastoma, 3 with adenoid cystic carcinoma, 1 with pancreas carcinoma, and 1 with a suspected cancerous polyp) was selected and matched 1:2 to 18 AS patients. This group had no history of cardiac disease, cardiotoxic chemotherapy, or radiation therapy of the chest; no coronary calcification; and no known cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking, diabetes mellitus, or arterial hypertension. Second, 5 control subjects (all with pancreas carcinoma) with arterial hypertension were identified and matched to 5 AS patients.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 27 (IBM), for Microsoft Windows and Prism, version 9 (GraphPad Software). Categoric variables are presented with absolute and relative frequencies. For quantitative continuous variables, testing for a gaussian distribution was performed using Shapiro–Wilk tests. For data with a gaussian distribution, paired Student t tests or 1-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple-comparison tests were used depending on the number of compared groups. Paired continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon test; nonpaired continuous variables were compared using a 2-sided t test. Categoric variables was compared using the χ2 test. Nonparametric unpaired data were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for bivariate correlation analyses. All statistical analyses were performed 2-sided, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics are summarized in Supplemental Table 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). Mean age was 84 ± 3 y, and 52% were female. Most AS patients presented with a high burden of cardiovascular comorbidities (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2).

Myocardial 68Ga-FAPI Signal Is Elevated in AS and Shows Inter- and Intraindividual Variability

A wide range of myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal patterns was detected in the AS cohort (Fig. 1; Table 1). The area of significant FAP upregulation versus the blood pool ranged from 0% to 91% of the left ventricle (median, 20.0%; interquartile range, 4.0%–58.0%); Supplemental Fig. 1). Similarly, the global volume of elevated 68Ga-FAPI signal displayed high variance among patients, with a range of 1.5–138 cm3 (median, 33.4 cm3; interquartile range, 14.4–63.3 cm3). Mean myocardial SUV as a measure of 68Ga-FAPI signal intensity ranged from 1.9 to 3.5 (SUVmean, 2.5 ± 0.4). Interindividual regional LV distribution patterns were highly variable, whereas basal myocardial regions were more frequently involved.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Multimodal characterization of myocardial fibrosis in AS patients before TAVR. Shown are 2 cases with high and low myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal, as indicated by representative midventricular short-axis PET/CT image (column 2) and parametric polar maps of 68Ga-FAPI uptake (column 3; polar maps are 2-dimensional display of 3-dimensional LV activity with apex in center, base in periphery, anterior wall on top, inferior wall on bottom, septum on left, and lateral wall on right). High 68Ga-FAPI signal was associated with mild elevation of native T1 from CMR (column 1) and mild reduction of global longitudinal strain at TTE (column 4). Yet, neither CMR T1 nor TTE global longitudinal strain show similarly clear distinction between patients when compared with 68Ga-FAPI signal. GLS = global longitudinal strain.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

PET Parameters

Myocardial FAP volume was significantly higher in AS patients than in controls without hypertension (37.9 ± 35.4 cm3 vs. 2.90 ± 6.67 cm3, P < 0.001; Table 1; Supplemental Fig. 2). The area of FAP upregulation, SUVmean, and SUVpeak of the total left ventricle were equally higher in AS patients (P < 0.001 each). Additionally, matched comparison with hypertensive controls also showed that FAP volume was significantly higher in AS patients (43.1 ± 20.4 cm3 vs. 7.42 ± 8.56 cm3, P < 0.001; Supplemental Fig. 2).

68Ga-FAPI Signal Elevation Is Specific to Myocardium in AS

Signal intensity was very low in the blood pool, albeit slightly higher in AS than in controls (1.94 ± 0.31 vs. 1.43 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), confirming the feasibility of detecting mild 68Ga-FAPI signal elevation in the heart. Additionally, no elevated signal and no difference between AS and controls was identified in potential networking organs such as lung, liver, spleen, and bone marrow, suggesting that profibrotic activity in AS is specific to the myocardium (Table 1). No significant correlation between myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal and the SUV of other organs was detected (Supplemental Fig. 3).

Global Myocardial 68Ga-FAPI Signal Correlates with Markers of Heart Failure Severity in AS

FAP volume significantly correlated with the levels of serum N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (r = 0.58, P = 0.004; Supplemental Fig. 4). No other correlations between 68Ga-FAPI imaging parameters and blood biomarkers were observed. CMR parameters are summarized in Table 2. Of note, FAP volume correlated significantly with volume, LV mass, and LVEF (all P < 0.05; Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. 5). No significant correlations between FAP volume and global mapping parameters could be detected (T1 global native: r = −0.058, P = 0.804; T1 global contrast: r = −0.143, P = 0.525, extracellular volume fraction global: r = 0.011, P = 0.990).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

CMR

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Regression plot for myocardial volume of elevated 68Ga-FAPI signal (FAP volume) and LV function parameters derived from CMR: end-systolic volume (A), end-diastolic volume (B), LV mass (C), and LVEF (D). EDV = end-diastolic volume.

Also, TTE was available for all patients before and after TAVR (in-hospital follow-up, Table 3). Mean aortic valve area was severely reduced (0.68 ± 0.18 cm2, severe AS < 1 cm2) (30), and mean transaortic pressure gradient was severely increased (50.4 ± 8.1 mm Hg, severe AS > 40 mm Hg) (30) before TAVR. FAP volume significantly correlated with TTE-derived cardiac function (Fig. 3), including LVEF before TAVR (r = −0.58, P = 0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (r = 0.58, P = 0.012) and tended to correlate with the mean transaortic gradient (r = 0.44, P = 0.07).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

TTE and TAVR Procedure

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Regression plot for myocardial volume of elevated 68Ga-FAPI signal (FAP volume) and LV function parameters derived from TTE: LVEF before TAVR (A), LVEF after TAVR (B), mean transaortic gradient (C), and global longitudinal strain (D). GLS = global longitudinal strain.

Segmental 68Ga-FAPI Signal Is Not Identical to Other Imaging Markers of Fibrosis in AS

In total, 299 segments with complete data from PET, CMR, and TTE were analyzed. Segmental 68Ga-FAPI SUVmean was significantly higher in basal than in midventricular (P [ANOVA] = 0.022) and apical segments (P [ANOVA] = 0.034, Fig. 4). Segmental SUVmean correlated weakly but significantly with segmental longitudinal strain from TTE (r = 0.119, P = 0.002; Supplemental Fig. 6), native T1 (r = 0.271, P < 0.001), and postcontrast T1 from CMR (r = −0.330, P < 0.001). To define 68Ga-FAPI signal elevation in a segment, an SUVmean more than 2 SDs above the blood pool level was chosen. This yielded 110 of 299 segments (37%) as 68Ga-FAPI–positive (Fig. 5). The native T1 relaxation time was mildly but significantly longer in the 68Ga-FAPI–positive segments (973 ± 35 vs. 961 ± 37 ms for 68Ga-FAPI–negative, P = 0.015), and longitudinal strain was mildly but significantly reduced (−13.0 ± 7.1 vs. −16.0% ± 8.4%, P = 0.003) in 68Ga-FAPI–positive segments. Also, 19 of 299 segments (6%) showed LGE, but only 11 of 19 (58%) segments with LGE were 68Ga-FAPI–positive. There was a relevant mismatch between 68Ga-FAPI positivity and elevated T1 at CMR (congruent signal in 51/110 segments), as well as impaired longitudinal strain at TTE (congruent signal in 78/110 segments), suggesting that the 3 modalities do not identify the same components of the fibrotic process.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Segmental analysis: SUVmean of 68Ga-FAPI ligand at PET was significantly higher in basal than midventricular and distal myocardial segments.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Classification of segments into 68Ga-FAPI–upregulated (FAPI+) and 68Ga-FAPI–negative segments (FAPI−) when compared with blood pool background signal, illustrated by patient example (polar map). Native T1 relaxation time was significantly longer in 68Ga-FAPI–positive segments. More LGE was found in 68Ga-FAPI–positive segments, and global longitudinal strain was significantly impaired in 68Ga-FAPI–positive segments. Yet, agreement between 68Ga-FAPI, T1, and longitudinal strain elevation was only partial. FAPI+ = 68Ga-FAPI–upregulated; FAPI− = 68Ga-FAPI–negative; LS = longitudinal strain.

68Ga-FAPI Signal Is Predictive of Short-Term Change in LVEF After TAVR

After TAVR, LVEF did not change significantly in the entire group (60.1% ± 5.9% vs. 61.8% ± 3.7% before, P = 0.19). Individually, however, in-hospital LVEF improvement significantly correlated with myocardial FAP volume (r = 0.440, P = 0.035), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (r = 0.480, P = 0.024), and global longitudinal strain (r = 0.440, P = 0.013; Fig. 6). No correlation between in-hospital LVEF improvement and other parameters from CMR or TTE was observed.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Regression plot for in-hospital LVEF improvement in percentage and myocardial volume of elevated 68Ga-FAPI signal (FAP volume) (A), preprocedural levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (B), and preprocedural global longitudinal strain (%) (C). GLS = global longitudinal strain; NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide.

DISCUSSION

AS is the most common valvular disease in the Western world, and early treatment is recommended in symptomatic patients (25). However, symptoms often occur late, after adverse cardiac remodeling has led to overt heart failure. Progressive valve narrowing causing an increased afterload, along with adaptive LV hypertrophy, facilitates the transition to heart failure (6,31). It is thought that myocyte death and interstitial fibrosis are key mechanisms in this transformation (32). With new 68Ga-FAPI tracers, imaging of activated fibroblasts is now feasible. In oncologic patients, myocardial FAP upregulation was incidentally identified and associated with preexisting cardiovascular comorbidities (33). More recently, further studies have demonstrated the feasibility of myocardial 68Ga-FAPI imaging, particularly after acute myocardial infarction (19,20,22–24). A strong and specific 68Ga-FAPI signal was detected in the infarct region, where fibroblasts need to form a robust scar. Yet, in addition to this area of replacement fibrosis, there was also an elevated 68Ga-FAPI signal in viable periinfarct tissue, as a possible substrate for development of interstitial fibrosis.

Ex vivo analysis of human heart tissue identified significant 68Ga-FAPI expression in the LV tissue of failing hearts, whereas normal hearts had minimal 68Ga-FAPI expression (34). Thus, FAP is a suitable target marker of activated cardiac fibroblasts, and 68Ga-FAPI radioligands (16,26) are promising for noninvasive detection. Our study was the first, to our knowledge, to describe high inter- and intraindividual heterogeneity for myocardial 68Ga-FAPI uptake patterns in AS patients before TAVR. Expectedly 68Ga-FAPI uptake was not as intense and not as extensive as in patients with acute myocardial infarction but was significantly higher than in our matching controls, indicating that the myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal is not caused primarily by the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities. Nevertheless, there were various regional distribution patterns and differences between individuals. These differences help to generate a hypothesis that the range of 68Ga-FAPI signal may be associated with the benefit from TAVR, which is known to be variable (25). Of note, a higher myocardial FAP volume led to a greater direct improvement of in-hospital LVEF after TAVR. This finding is somewhat unexpected, as more severe fibrosis is thought to inhibit LVEF improvement. It should be considered, however, that 68Ga-FAPI signal identifies not the extracellular matrix component of fibrosis but rather the activation state of fibroblasts as the cellular substrate of profibrotic activity. FAP elevation may potentially reflect a more dynamic remodeling process that involves reversible fibrotic cell activity, as opposed to a burnt-out chronic fibrotic state including irreversible scarring. However, because of the study design, our interpretations need to be verified by prospective studies and should be considered hypothesis-generating at this point.

Interestingly, in our patient cohort, higher preprocedural levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide significantly correlated with a greater global volume of fibroblast activation, which supports the possibility that FAP-targeted imaging has potential value as a prognostic biomarker. Globally, the PET results also correlated with functional measures and markers of extracellular matrix expansion and stiffness from CMR and TTE, but no exact regional matching—such as with LGE and T1 relaxation times and longitudinal strain—was detected. T1 relaxation times (28) and extracellular volume fraction (35) were in the expected range for this cohort. The underlying reason for these findings remains uncertain. Targeted imaging of activated fibroblasts may be a complementary asset with potential prognostic value in a multimodal fibrosis imaging toolbox and may be further explored for guidance of existing and novel therapies in AS.

Some limitations of this study should be considered. First, the patient population was small, consistent with the hypothesis-generating nature of this early observational project. Indeed, patients were carefully selected to derive a homogeneous cohort without low-flow, low-gradient AS. Another focus was the availability of all imaging modalities, thereby excluding subjects with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, reduced glomerular filtration rate, arrhythmia, or poor TTE windows. Second, because patients had significant cardiovascular comorbidities, myocardial 68Ga-FAPI signal may have been affected by other factors, including preexisting cardiovascular medication. Coronary angiography and CMR ruled out ischemic cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis in all patients; however, 48% of patients had preexisting coronary artery disease. Ultimately, effects on cardiac fibroblast activation cannot be ruled out. Yet, this reflects the expected clinical reality of AS before TAVR, and the heterogeneity of observed 68Ga-FAPI signals provides a foundation for testing prognostic value in larger samples in future projects. Third, PET, CMR, and TTE were performed at different time points using different systems. Coregistration was performed as thoroughly as possible, but slight local mismatches cannot be completely ruled out. Last, a longer-term follow-up after TAVR was not available and will have to be a focus of larger-sample subsequent projects to explore whether TAVR can be guided by 68Ga-FAPI imaging. Lastly, the matching control patients from our collaborating site in Heidelberg were oncologic patients undergoing 68Ga-FAPI PET for staging without in-depth information on severity or a detailed individual history of cardiovascular comorbidities. Cardiovascular diagnoses were retrospectively obtained from medical records.

CONCLUSION

Molecular imaging identifies globally and regionally heterogeneous fibroblast activation in the LV myocardium of patients with severe AS. The 68Ga-FAPI signal correlates with LV dysfunction and altered extracellular matrix composition, but the FAPI-PET signal remains a distinct imaging biomarker that cannot be replaced by other clinical, blood, or imaging parameters. The present work provides a stimulus for subsequent studies focusing on strategies for image-guided therapy in AS, including fibroblast activation–targeted assays.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Clinical Research Unit KFO 311 [Johann Bauersachs and Frank Bengel] and the Clinician Scientist Program PRACTIS [Johanna Diekmann]), the Leducq Foundation (Transatlantic Network “Immunofib” [Frank Bengel, James Thackeray, and Johanna Diekmann]), and “REBIRTH—Research Center for Translational Regenerative Medicine” (State of Lower Saxony [James Thackeray, Johann Bauersachs, and Frank Bengel]). Uwe Haberkorn has a patent application for quinolone‐based FAP‐targeting agents for imaging and therapy in nuclear medicine and has shares of a consultancy group for iTheranostics outside the submitted work. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is FAP-targeted PET a valuable marker of individual profibrotic activity in patients with AS, and is the PET signal linked to TAVR response?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: Using a multimodality, multiparametric correlative analysis, this cross-sectional, observational cohort study confirmed that noninvasive imaging of fibroblast activation in the myocardium of patients with advanced AS is feasible using the radiotracer 68Ga-FAPI-46 and targeted PET. The severity and regional pattern of fibroblast activation were heterogeneous among patients, and higher FAP volumes determined greater direct functional improvement immediately after TAVR.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The observed heterogeneity of fibroblast activation provides a foundation for further studies testing its role as a predictor of outcome and response to valvular replacement or other therapies. The novel imaging assay may be integrated with other imaging and blood biomarkers for a future concept of fibrosis-targeted, image-guided therapeutic decision-making in AS.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Precursor for 68Ga-FAPI-46 was kindly provided by Uwe Haberkorn.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jun. 8, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rosenhek R,
    2. Zilberszac R,
    3. Schemper M,
    4. et al
    . Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:151–156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.
    1. Coffey S,
    2. Cox B,
    3. Williams MJ
    . The prevalence, incidence, progression, and risks of aortic valve sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2852–2861.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Généreux P,
    2. Stone GW,
    3. O’Gara PT,
    4. et al
    . Natural history, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies for patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2263–2288.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vahanian A,
    2. Beyersdorf F,
    3. Praz F,
    4. et al
    . 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ullah W,
    2. Gowda SN,
    3. Khan MS,
    4. et al
    . Early intervention or watchful waiting for asymptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020;21:897–904.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dweck MR,
    2. Boon NA,
    3. Newby DE
    . Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1854–1863.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Herrmann S,
    2. Fries B,
    3. Salinger T,
    4. et al
    . Myocardial fibrosis predicts 10-year survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e007131.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Puls M,
    2. Beuthner BE,
    3. Topci R,
    4. et al
    . Impact of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular remodelling, recovery, and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in different haemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1903–1914.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pagourelias ED,
    2. Mirea O,
    3. Duchenne J,
    4. et al
    . Speckle tracking deformation imaging to detect regional fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comparison between 2D and 3D echo modalities. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:1262–1272.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Krämer J,
    2. Niemann M,
    3. Liu D,
    4. et al
    . Two-dimensional speckle tracking as a non-invasive tool for identification of myocardial fibrosis in Fabry disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1587–1596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hoffmann R,
    2. Altiok E,
    3. Friedman Z,
    4. Becker M,
    5. Frick M
    . Myocardial deformation imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in comparison to late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance for analysis of myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1083–1088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bing R,
    2. Cavalcante JL,
    3. Everett RJ,
    4. Clavel MA,
    5. Newby DE,
    6. Dweck MR
    . Imaging and impact of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:283–296.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Puntmann VO,
    2. Peker E,
    3. Chandrashekhar Y,
    4. Nagel E
    . T1 Mapping in characterizing myocardial disease: a comprehensive review. Circ Res. 2016;119:277–299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Messroghli DR,
    2. Moon JC,
    3. Ferreira VM,
    4. et al
    . Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:75.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Podlesnikar T,
    2. Delgado V,
    3. Bax JJ
    . Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to assess myocardial fibrosis in valvular heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34:97–112.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Flechsig P,
    3. Lindner T,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:801–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tillmanns J,
    2. Hoffmann D,
    3. Habbaba Y,
    4. et al
    . Fibroblast activation protein alpha expression identifies activated fibroblasts after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;87:194–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Furtado MB,
    2. Nim HT,
    3. Boyd SE,
    4. Rosenthal NA
    . View from the heart: cardiac fibroblasts in development, scarring and regeneration. Development. 2016;143:387–397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Diekmann J,
    2. Koenig T,
    3. Zwadlo C,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging identifies fibroblast activation beyond the infarct region after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1835–1837.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    1. Kessler L,
    2. Kupusovic J,
    3. Ferdinandus J,
    4. et al
    . Visualization of fibroblast activation after myocardial infarction using 68Ga-FAPI PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:807–813.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    1. Notohamiprodjo S,
    2. Nekolla SG,
    3. Robu S,
    4. et al
    . Imaging of cardiac fibroblast activation in a patient after acute myocardial infarction using 68Ga-FAPI-04. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29:2254–2261.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    1. Varasteh Z,
    2. Mohanta S,
    3. Robu S,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of fibroblast activity after myocardial infarction using a 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor, FAPI-04. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1743–1749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Diekmann J,
    2. Koenig T,
    3. Thackeray JT,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac fibroblast activation in patients early after acute myocardial infarction: integration with magnetic resonance tissue characterization and subsequent functional outcome. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1415–1423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Siebermair J,
    2. Kohler MI,
    3. Kupusovic J,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac fibroblast activation detected by Ga-68 FAPI PET imaging as a potential novel biomarker of cardiac injury/remodeling. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28:812–821.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Vahanian A,
    2. Beyersdorf F,
    3. Praz F,
    4. et al
    . 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. EuroIntervention. 2022;17:e1126–e1196.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Loktev A,
    2. Lindner T,
    3. Burger EM,
    4. et al
    . Development of fibroblast activation protein-targeted radiotracers with improved tumor retention. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1421–1429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kawel-Boehm N,
    2. Maceira A,
    3. Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER,
    4. et al
    . Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bull S,
    2. White SK,
    3. Piechnik SK,
    4. et al
    . Human non-contrast T1 values and correlation with histology in diffuse fibrosis. Heart. 2013;99:932–937.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sugimoto T,
    2. Dulgheru R,
    3. Bernard A,
    4. et al
    . Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal left ventricular 2D strain: results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:833–840.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Baumgartner H,
    2. Hung J,
    3. Bermejo J,
    4. et al
    . Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:372–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chin CWL,
    2. Everett RJ,
    3. Kwiecinski J,
    4. et al
    . Myocardial fibrosis and cardiac decompensation in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1320–1333.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hein S,
    2. Arnon E,
    3. Kostin S,
    4. et al
    . Progression from compensated hypertrophy to failure in the pressure-overloaded human heart: structural deterioration and compensatory mechanisms. Circulation. 2003;107:984–991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Heckmann MB,
    2. Reinhardt F,
    3. Finke D,
    4. et al
    . Relationship between cardiac fibroblast activation protein activity by positron emission tomography and cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:e010628.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Aghajanian H,
    2. Kimura T,
    3. Rurik JG,
    4. et al
    . Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature. 2019;573:430–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Nagaraju CK,
    2. Dries E,
    3. Popovic N,
    4. et al
    . Global fibroblast activation throughout the left ventricle but localized fibrosis after myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication November 7, 2022.
  • Revision received April 10, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 8
August 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Imaging of Myocardial Fibroblast Activation in Patients with Advanced Aortic Stenosis Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Molecular Imaging of Myocardial Fibroblast Activation in Patients with Advanced Aortic Stenosis Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Pilot Study
Johanna Diekmann, Jonas Neuser, Manuel Röhrich, Thorsten Derlin, Carolin Zwadlo, Tobias Koenig, Desiree Weiberg, Felix Jäckle, Tibor Kempf, Tobias L. Ross, Jochen Tillmanns, James T. Thackeray, Julian Widder, Uwe Haberkorn, Johann Bauersachs, Frank M. Bengel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2023, 64 (8) 1279-1286; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265147

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular Imaging of Myocardial Fibroblast Activation in Patients with Advanced Aortic Stenosis Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Pilot Study
Johanna Diekmann, Jonas Neuser, Manuel Röhrich, Thorsten Derlin, Carolin Zwadlo, Tobias Koenig, Desiree Weiberg, Felix Jäckle, Tibor Kempf, Tobias L. Ross, Jochen Tillmanns, James T. Thackeray, Julian Widder, Uwe Haberkorn, Johann Bauersachs, Frank M. Bengel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2023, 64 (8) 1279-1286; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265147
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Nuclear Cardiology Surrogate Biomarkers in Clinical Trials
  • Myocardial Fibrosis: Emerging Target for Cardiac Molecular Imaging and Opportunity for Image-Guided Therapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • MHC-I–Driven Antitumor Immunity Counterbalances Low Absorbed Doses of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • IL13Rα2-Targeting Antibodies for Immuno-PET in Solid Malignancies
  • Pilot Study of Nectin-4–Targeted PET Imaging Agent 68Ga-FZ-NR-1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer from Bench to First-in-Human
Show more FEATURED ARTICLE OF THE MONTH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • aortic stenosis
  • myocardial fibrosis
  • Molecular imaging
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire