Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

PSMA-Directed Imaging and Therapy of Salivary Gland Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Caner Civan, Stefan Kasper, Christoph Berliner, Pedro Fragoso-Costa, Viktor Grünwald, Michael Pogorzelski, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Stephan Lang, David Kersting, Michael Nader, Katharina Lückerath, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler and Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2023, 64 (3) 372-378; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264342
Caner Civan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Kasper
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Berliner
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Fragoso-Costa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viktor Grünwald
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Pogorzelski
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
4Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Lang
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
5Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kersting
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Nader
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharina Lückerath
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Weber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - November 01, 2024

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

We analyzed the diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and the dosimetry, efficacy, and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) in salivary gland malignancies (SGMs). Methods: We identified 28 SGM patients with PSMA PET/CT from our database. CT and PSMA PET/CT images were evaluated separately by 3 masked readers in joint reading sessions. Pathologic findings were grouped into 6 TNM regions, and lesion-based disease extent was classified as no disease (n = 1, 4%), unifocal (n = 2, 7%), oligometastatic (n = 9, 32%), multifocal (n = 3, 11%), or disseminated (n = 13, 47%). For each region, the SUVmax of the lesion with the highest uptake was measured and the visual PSMA expression score was evaluated on a per-patient basis using PROMISE criteria. The association between PSMA expression and clinical and histopathologic markers was tested using the Student t test. Five patients underwent PSMA RLT with intratherapeutic dosimetry. Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, and adverse events were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results: Compared with CT, PSMA PET/CT demonstrated additional metastatic lesions in 11 of 28 (39%) patients, leading to upstaging of TNM and lesion-based disease extent in 3 (11%) and 6 (21%) patients, respectively. PSMA PET/CT detected CT-occult local tumor, regional lymph nodes, nonregional lymph nodes, and bone metastases in 1 (4%), 4 (14%), 2 (7%), and 4 (14%) patients, respectively; no additional lesions were detected in the other predefined regions. PSMA expression level was higher than liver in 6 patients (25%). A significantly higher SUVmax was observed in male than female patients (15.8 vs. 8.5, P = 0.007) and in bone than lung lesions (14.2 vs. 6.4, P = 0.006). PSMA RLT was discontinued after 1 cycle in 3 of 5 patients because of insufficient tumor doses. No adverse events of grade 4 or higher occurred. Conclusion: In SGMs, PSMA PET/CT demonstrated a superior detection rate and led to upstaging in about one third of patients when compared with CT. The male sex and the presence of bone metastases were associated with significantly higher PSMA expression. PSMA RLT was well tolerated, but most patients did not have more than 1 cycle because of insufficient tumor doses.

  • 177Lu-PSMA
  • 68Ga-PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • theranostics
  • salivary gland malignancies

Salivary gland malignancies (SGMs) are rare head and neck tumors that encompass 24 different histologic subtypes, with mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) being the most frequent (1–3). SGMs most commonly originate from the parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands and are characterized by slow growth and an indolent course but tend to show multiple recurrences and distant metastases (4). Although survival outcomes have improved with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in early and locally advanced stages of the disease, there is no consensus on systemic treatments in recurrent or metastatic disease (5). No further standard treatment has yet been established for recurrent or metastatic disease. SGMs show a high intrinsic resistance to classic cytotoxic drugs. Recently, small phase II trials demonstrated the tyrosine kinase inhibitors lenvatinib or axitinib to have activity in ACC (6,7). Further, for a subset of patients with such specific genetic alteration as NTRK fusions, BRAF mutations, or Her2/neu amplifications, molecule-targeted therapies are available (8,9). However, for most patients, no molecule-targeted therapies are available, and those patients are treated mostly with the cytotoxic drugs cisplatin, taxanes, anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, or 5-fluororuacil, with only a moderate response rate. Taken together, there is a huge unmet medical need to improve the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic SGMs.

Routine imaging is performed using MRI and CT (10). Additional 18F-FDG PET can increase sensitivity, especially with regard to N or M stage, impacting therapy management in 12.5% of cases (11). Furthermore, recent immunohistochemical and PET imaging studies have shown increased prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in ACC, implying that PSMA-targeted imaging may improve staging accuracy and that 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) can be feasible in a theranostic setup (12–15).

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic role of PSMA PET/CT and the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of PSMA RLT in patients with SGM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility Criteria

Our institutional database was screened for SGM patients undergoing PSMA PET/CT from May 2015 to October 2021. All patients gave written informed consent to undergo clinical PSMA imaging or therapy. The retrospective analysis of available data was approved by the local institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived (University of Duisburg–Essen, medical faculty, protocol 21-10370-BO).

PSMA PET/CT Image Acquisition

Values are presented as median and interquartile range. Images were acquired in accordance with the joint procedure guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: 63 min (26 min) or 98 min (21 min) after the administration of 116 MBq (44.5 MBq) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 21, 75%) or 281 MBq (97 MBq) of 18F-PSMA-1007 (n = 7, 25%), respectively (16). Images were acquired on a Biograph mCT (11/28, 39%) or Biograph Vision 600 (17/28, 61%) PET/CT system (Siemens Healthineers).

Image Interpretation

CT and PSMA PET/CT scans were analyzed separately 2 wk apart by 2 masked nuclear medicine physicians in joint consensus sessions and an additional board-certified radiologist for the CT reading session. The CT scans were read first, and for TNM-based analysis, pathologic findings were grouped into the following categories: local tumor, regional lymph nodes, nonregional lymph nodes, lung, bone, and other regions.

To assess the lesion-based disease extent, CT and PSMA PET/CT analysis results were each grouped into the following disease categories: no evidence of disease, unifocal disease (1 lesion), oligometastatic disease (2–5 lesions), multifocal disease (6–10 lesions), and disseminated disease (>10 lesions). For PSMA PET/CT analysis, the SUVmax of the lesion of each region with the highest uptake was measured. The PSMA expression score was assessed visually in accordance with PROMISE criteria on a per-patient level (17).

177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT

PSMA RLT was performed as therapy after exhaustion of established treatment options following the decision of a multidisciplinary tumor board. An overview of patient selection is provided in Figure 1. Key eligibility criteria were adequate bone marrow and kidney function in accordance with the procedure guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging for PSMA RLT (18) and a PSMA expression level of at least 2 (17). Each cycle, 6.8 ± 1.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-617 were administered intravenously, with a 6-wk interval between cycles. Progression-free survival was defined as the interval from treatment start until death or progressive disease according to RECIST, version 1.1, as analyzed by 2 readers in joint consensus sessions (19).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram describing SGM patient selection for PSMA-directed imaging and PSMA RLT.

Blood count, creatinine, transaminases, and symptoms were monitored before and during PSMA RLT, and toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (20).

Dosimetry

Posttherapeutic dosimetry of tumor lesions and kidneys was performed for all patients undergoing PSMA RLT and calculated according to OLINDA/MIRD recommendations (21). SPECT/CT imaging was performed on a Siemens Intevo SPECT/CT system using the xQuant reconstruction algorithm, allowing for quantitative 177Lu imaging as previously described (22). The chosen imaging schedule was set to include 4 time points (4, 24, 48, and 120–144 h) after injection, with at least 2 time points considered necessary to determine lesion or kidney doses. For logistic reasons, 2 or 3 time points were acquired for each cycle, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 27.0; IBM). The Student t test was used to assess differences in SUVmax dependent on sex, location of the primary, and disease site (bone vs. lung).

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

The study included 28 patients (11 men, 39%; 17 women, 61%). Histopathologic subtypes were ACC (24/28, 86%), adenocarcinoma (2/28, 7%), acinic cell carcinoma (1/28, 4%), and sebaceous carcinoma (1/28, 4%). The median age was 59 y (range, 30–75 y). The clinical indication for PSMA PET/CT was initial staging for 2 patients (7%), restaging for 12 (43%), and evaluation for PSMA RLT for 14 (50%). Five patients (18%) underwent PSMA RLT. Detailed patient characteristics are provided in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Patient Characteristics

Five of these patients (3 female, 2 male) received a total of 11 cycles of PSMA RLT (range, 1–6 cycles). The median age of PSMA RLT patients was 50 y (range, 40–65 y). Demographic and clinical information on the treatment cohort is provided in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Characteristics of PSMA RLT Cohort

CT Versus PSMA PET/CT Detection Accuracy

CT detected any disease in 25 of 28 (89%) patients, local tumor in 7 (25%), regional lymph nodes in 1 (4%), and distant metastases in 22 (79%). PSMA PET was positive in 27 (96%) patients and visualized local tumor in 8 (29%), regional lymph nodes in 5 (18%), and distant metastases in 25 (89%) (Fig. 2). PSMA PET/CT demonstrated additional metastatic lesions in 11 (39%) patients; in 8 (29%) patients, CT-negative regions were rated positive on PSMA PET/CT. PSMA PET/CT detected additional bone metastases in 2 patients (7%) and nonregional lymph node metastases in 1 patient (4%), with no disease shown on CT (TNM upstaging). PSMA PET/CT led to an up-shift of lesion-based disease extent in 6 (21%) patients (Table 3). Figure 3 shows an example SGM patient, in whom additional bone lesions were detected by PSMA PET/CT.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Pie charts demonstrating additional detection of diseased regions by PSMA PET/CT (orange) when compared with standalone CT (blue). Charts demonstrate percentage positive patients among 28 patients, separately for each region.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Analysis of Lesion-Based Disease Extent

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT of 69-y-old man with adenoid-cystic carcinoma of right submandibular gland after primary resection. Maximum-intensity projection (A) and axial slices (B–E) of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT reveal bone metastases in sixth left rib (white arrow) and sacral bone (black arrow) without CT correlate (F and G), confirmed by follow-up imaging 6 mo later.

In 6 (21%) patients 18F-FDG and PSMA PET/CT were performed within a 3-mo interval without interim progression on morphologic imaging. Of the 6 patients, 2 had higher detection efficacy for PSMA PET/CT, 2 had higher detection efficacy for 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 2 had equal detection efficacy for both modalities.

PSMA Ligand Uptake

PSMA expression score was 0 (n = 2, 7%), 1 (n = 4, 15%), 2 (n = 15, 56%), and 3 (n = 6, 22%), respectively (Fig. 4). The male sex (15.8 vs. 8.5, P = 0.007) was significantly associated with a higher SUVmax (Table 4). The mean SUVmax in tumor sites of patients with a primary tumor in the minor salivary glands was 12.8, versus 9.0 in those with a primary in the major salivary glands, without statistical significance (P = 0.31). SUVmax was significantly higher in bone than lung metastases (14.2 vs. 6.4, P = 0.006).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

PSMA expression score by PROMISE criteria for 27 patients. One patient without any detected lesion was excluded.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Comparison of SUVmax for Sex, Primary Location at Initial Diagnosis, Bone Metastasis vs. Lung Metastasis, and Subtype

PSMA RLT Absorbed Dose and Efficacy

In total, 5 patients received PSMA RLT. Dosimetry was performed for the kidneys and a total of 13 tumor lesions over 7 therapy cycles. The highest lesion-absorbed dose was 0.68 Gy/GBq (mean, 0.41 Gy/GBq; range, 0.06–0.68 Gy/GBq). The highest lesion uptake ratio after 24 h was 0.44 (mean, 0.16; range, 0.004–0.44). The mean effective half-life of the lesions was 7.7 min (range, 0.32–30.98 min). The mean kidney-absorbed dose was 0.37 Gy/GBq (range, 0.32–0.41 Gy/GBq). Dosimetry results for each cycle are shown in Table 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5.

Results of Individual Patient Dosimetry

PSMA RLT was discontinued in 3 patients after 1 cycle because visual lesion uptake was below liver uptake on the 24-h posttreatment 177Lu-PSMA scintigraphy. In these 3 patients, systemic treatment was initiated before progression occurred. Progression-free survival was 3 mo (n = 1) or not reached (n = 1, last follow-up: 12 mo) after initiation of PSMA RLT in the 2 patients remaining with more than 1 treatment cycle. The long-term response was observed in the only patient with acinic cell carcinoma, with the remainder having ACC. Supplemental Figure 1 shows a patient example (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

PSMA RLT Adverse Events and Follow-up

Changes in blood parameters did not meet the adverse-event criteria of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Xerostomia that was less than serious was reported by both patients undergoing more than 1 cycle of PSMA RLT, without worsening under treatment.

DISCUSSION

The results of our study indicate a superior detection rate for PSMA PET/CT in SGMs, with additional localization of lesions in 11 of 28 patients (39%) and TNM upstaging in 3 (11%) patients through the detection of CT-occult oligometastatic bone metastases. Therefore, in salivary gland tumors PSMA PET/CT may be a possible alternative to other hybrid imaging modalities such as 18F-FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI (11,23). In addition, PSMA PET/CT identifies candidates for PSMA RLT, which was well tolerated and induced a tumor response.

PSMA PET/CT revealed oligometastatic disease in 9 of 28 (32%) patients (Table 3). Accurate localization of disease supports planning of metastasis-directed therapy. Metastasis-directed therapy of oligometastatic head and neck cancer, including SGMs, has been shown to result in high disease-control rates (24), which underline the importance of sensitive imaging to further optimize this treatment option. PSMA PET/CT revealed multifocal or disseminated disease in 3 of 9 (33%) patients with CT oligometastatic disease. Detection of multifocal or disseminated disease may thereby more accurately identify patient candidates for systemic therapy not likely to benefit from local treatment alone.

Seventy-five percent of patients had at least 1 lesion with PSMA uptake equal to or higher than liver uptake, with significantly higher PSMA expression occurring in male patients and bone lesions (Table 4). Boxtel et al. likewise demonstrated high tumor uptake (13). Higher PSMA expression in male patients is not supported by current knowledge of PSMA regulation pathways, since high androgen levels suppress the PSMA encoding gene folate hydrolase 1, potentially reducing PSMA expression levels (25). This finding has been demonstrated in prostate cancer patients, in whom prolonged androgen-deprivation therapy was linked to increases in PSMA expression (26). Likewise, the androgen axis can be active in patients with SGMs, and the efficacy and safety of androgen receptor–targeted treatment is currently being investigated in a prospective single-arm clinical trial (NCT04325828). In line with this possibility, an immunohistochemistry study by Boxtel et al. showed higher PSMA expression in tumor cells of SGMs in women than in men, attributed to lower levels of circulating androgens (27). In contrast to immunohistochemistry findings, PSMA PET/CT allows for the in vivo noninvasive assessment of target PSMA expression in entire lesions and at multiple tumor sites. PSMA PET/CT indicates that male patients may be more suitable candidates for PSMA RLT. However, because the small sample size is conducive to the occurrence of type 1 errors, further analyses of larger cohorts are warranted.

In our case series, PSMA RLT was well tolerated. Events grade 3 or higher in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were not noted. There was no treatment-limiting xerostomia. In line with this finding, side effects of PSMA RLT were grade 1–2 in a study by Klein Nulent et al., and only 1 patient experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia (28). However, tumor-absorbed doses in our patients were unsatisfactory. Although high PSMA expression was noted on both PSMA PET/CT and early posttreatment SPECT/CT, retention times of PSMA uptake were short, resulting in lower absorbed doses than in prostate cancer. A potential explanation is the low detection threshold of PSMA PET/CT, resulting in a high target-to-background signal that may lead to an overestimation of PSMA expression (29).

To our knowledge, this was the largest study so far to evaluate the dosimetry of PSMA RLT in SGMs. Uijen et al. reviewed a total of 15 cycles of PSMA RLT in 10 non–prostate cancer patients, also including 2 patients with SGMs (30). Klein Nulent et al. demonstrated the first case of ACC treated with PSMA RLT, but treatment response or dosimetry data were not reported (14). Has Simsek et al. reported 1 ACC patient treated with PSMA RLT, revealing intense metastatic PSMA uptake on posttreatment imaging performed after 24 h (15). Klein Nulent et al. reported the first cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PSMA RLT in SGMs (28). Six patients with SGMs were treated with PSMA RLT, which resulted radiologically stable disease in 2 patients after 4 cycles and a clinical response such as pain relief, less dyspnea, and less fatigue in 4 patients after 2 or 4 cycles of PSMA RLT (28).

In our study, tumor stabilization over more than 1 y was observed for only 1 of 5 PSMA RLT patients, indicating that further improvement is needed. In the future, RLT may be improved by more stringent patient selection, application of higher-activity regimens, or introduction of α-based RLT. Further research focusing on histopathologic subtypes, specifically on PSMA RLT in acinic cell carcinoma, may be of interest.

Limitations of this study include its retrospective, single-center design and small sample size.

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET/CT demonstrated superior tumor detection and led to upstaging in about one third of SGM patients when compared with CT. The male sex and the presence of bone metastases were associated with significantly higher PSMA expression. PSMA RLT was tolerated well and stabilized disease in 1 patient. However, frequent discontinuation after 1 PSMA RLT cycle and low tumor-absorbed doses indicate that PSMA RLT for SGM needs further improvement.

DISCLOSURE

Wolfgang Fendler received financial support from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant FE1573/3-1/659216) and Wiedenfeld-Stiftung/Stiftung Krebsforschung Duisburg. Manuel Weber reports fees from Boston Scientific, Terumo, Eli Lilly, and Advanced Accelerator Applications, outside the submitted work. Christoph Berliner reports personal fees from Janssen (speakers’ bureau), ABX (image review), and Roche (image review) outside the submitted work. Ken Herrmann reports personal fees from Bayer, Sofie Biosciences, SIRTEX, Adacap, Curium, Endocyte, BTG, IPSEN, Siemens Healthineers, GE Healthcare, Amgen, Novartis, ymabs, Aktis Oncology, Theragnostics, and Pharma15; other fees from Sofie Biosciences; nonfinancial support from ABX; and grants from BTG, outside the submitted work. David Kersting is supported by the Universitätsmedizin Essen Clinician Scientist Academy/German Research Foundation and reports research funding from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Benedikt Schaarschmidt is supported by a research grant from PharmaCept, outside the submitted work. Wolfgang Fendler reports fees from Sofie Biosciences (research funding), Janssen (consultant, speakers’ bureau), Calyx (consultant), Bayer (consultant, speakers’ bureau), and Parexel (image review) outside the submitted work. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is PSMA a potential target for theranostic applications in SGMs?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: In SGMs, PSMA PET/CT has a higher detection rate than conventional imaging and led to upstaging in about one third of patients. 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment was tolerable and resulted in disease stabilization in 1 patient with acinic cell carcinoma.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Preliminary findings demonstrate a superior detection rate for PSMA PET/CT compared with CT in SGMs and a potential role for PSMA RLT in a subset of patients. Prospective studies on larger collectives are warranted.

Footnotes

  • Published online Sep. 22, 2022.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. El-Naggar AK,
    2. Chan JKC,
    3. Grandis JR,
    4. Takata T,
    5. Slootweg PJ, eds
    . WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017:162–185.
  2. 2.
    1. Atallah S,
    2. Casiraghi O,
    3. Fakhry N,
    4. et al
    . A prospective multicentre REFCOR study of 470 cases of head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: epidemiology and prognostic factors. Eur J Cancer. 2020;130:241–249.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Binesh F,
    2. Akhavan A,
    3. Masumi O,
    4. Mirvakili A,
    5. Behniafard N
    . Clinicopathological review and survival characteristics of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67:62–66.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lorini L,
    2. Ardighieri L,
    3. Bozzola A,
    4. et al
    . Prognosis and management of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2021;115:105213.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Colevas AD,
    2. Yom SS,
    3. Pfister DG,
    4. et al
    . NCCN guidelines insights: head and neck cancers, version 1.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:479–490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kang EJ,
    2. Ahn MJ,
    3. Ock CY,
    4. et al
    . Randomized phase II study of axitinib versus observation in patients with recurred or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 202;27:5272–5279.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tchekmedyian V,
    2. Sherman EJ,
    3. Dunn L,
    4. et al
    . Phase II study of lenvatinib in patients with progressive, recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1529–1527.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kurzrock R,
    2. Bowles D,
    3. Kang H,
    4. et al
    . Targeted therapy for advanced salivary gland carcinoma based on molecular profiling: results from MyPathway, a phase IIa multiple basket study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:412–421.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hong DS,
    2. DuBois SG,
    3. Kummar S,
    4. et al
    . Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:531–540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Luo Y,
    3. Li M,
    4. Yan H,
    5. Sun M,
    6. Fan T
    . Management of salivary gland carcinomas: a review. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3946–3956.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ruhlmann V,
    2. Poeppel TD,
    3. Veit J,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. De Keizer B,
    2. Krijger GC,
    3. Ververs FT,
    4. Van Es RJ,
    5. De Bree R,
    6. Willems S
    . 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT imaging of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:360–361.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. van Boxtel W,
    2. Lütje S,
    3. van Engen-van Grunsven IC,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT imaging for adenoid cystic carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma: a phase 2 imaging study. Theranostics. 2020;10:2273–2283.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Klein Nulent TJ,
    2. van Es RJ,
    3. Krijger GC,
    4. de Bree R,
    5. Willems SM,
    6. de Keizer B.
    Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging and immunohistochemistry in adenoid cystic carcinoma: a preliminary analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1614–1621.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Has Simsek D,
    2. Kuyumcu S,
    3. Agaoglu FY,
    4. Unal SN.
    Radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-PSMA in a case of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:764–766.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Eiber M,
    3. Beheshti M,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging—version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1014–1024.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Herrmann K,
    3. Calais J,
    4. et al
    . Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:469–478.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Fendler WP,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2536–2544.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Eisenhauer EA,
    2. Therasse P,
    3. Bogaerts J,
    4. et al
    . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program website. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf. Published November 27, 2017. Accessed December 15, 2022.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Sparks RB,
    3. Crowe E
    . OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tran-Gia J,
    2. Lassmann M
    . Characterization of noise and resolution for quantitative 177Lu SPECT/CT with xSPECT Quant. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:50–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kirchner J,
    2. Schaarschmidt BM,
    3. Sauerwein W,
    4. et al
    . 18F‐FDG PET/MRI vs MRI in patients with recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma. Head Neck. 2019;41:170–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Franzese C,
    2. Badalamenti M,
    3. Teriaca A,
    4. et al
    . Metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of oligometastatic head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147:1307–1313.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Watt F,
    2. Martorana A,
    3. Brookes DE,
    4. et al
    . A tissue-specific enhancer of the prostate-specific membrane antigen gene, FOLH1. Genomics. 2001;73:243–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bakht MK,
    2. Oh SW,
    3. Youn H,
    4. Cheon GJ,
    5. Kwak C,
    6. Kang KW
    . Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on the uptake of PSMA-targeted agents: emerging opportunities and challenges. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:202–211.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. van Boxtel W,
    2. Uijen MJ,
    3. Verhaegh GW,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of PSMA, c-MET and E-cadherin in salivary duct carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;110:105018.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Klein Nulent TJ,
    2. van Es RJ,
    3. Willems SM,
    4. et al
    . First experiences with 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for recurrent or metastatic salivary gland cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2021;11:126.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lückerath K,
    2. Stuparu AD,
    3. Wei L,
    4. et al
    . Detection threshold and reproducibility of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT in a mouse model of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1392–1397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Uijen MJ,
    2. Derks Y,
    3. Merkx R,
    4. et al
    . PSMA radioligand therapy for solid tumors other than prostate cancer: background, opportunities, challenges, and first clinical reports. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4350–4368.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication April 27, 2022.
  • Revision received September 16, 2022.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 3
March 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PSMA-Directed Imaging and Therapy of Salivary Gland Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PSMA-Directed Imaging and Therapy of Salivary Gland Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Caner Civan, Stefan Kasper, Christoph Berliner, Pedro Fragoso-Costa, Viktor Grünwald, Michael Pogorzelski, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Stephan Lang, David Kersting, Michael Nader, Katharina Lückerath, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2023, 64 (3) 372-378; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PSMA-Directed Imaging and Therapy of Salivary Gland Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Caner Civan, Stefan Kasper, Christoph Berliner, Pedro Fragoso-Costa, Viktor Grünwald, Michael Pogorzelski, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Stephan Lang, David Kersting, Michael Nader, Katharina Lückerath, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2023, 64 (3) 372-378; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264342
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Systematic Review of the First 40 Cases of 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in the Treatment of Non-prostatic Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 177Lu-PSMA
  • 68Ga-PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • theranostics
  • Salivary gland malignancies
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire