Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleSpecial Contribution

One Hundred Years of the Tracer Principle

Sebastian Hoberück, Klaus Zöphel, Martin G. Pomper, Steven P. Rowe and Andrei Gafita
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2023, 64 (12) 1998-2000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266458
Sebastian Hoberück
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany;
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Zöphel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany;
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin G. Pomper
4Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven P. Rowe
4Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Gafita
4Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This year, the tracer principle, a key concept within nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and radiotheranostics, is marking the centennial anniversary of its discovery (Fig. 1). Although Marie Curie pioneered the concept of using external radiation to diagnose and treat cancer during World War I, the first use of radioactivity to quantify a biologic process was reported by George de Hevesy in May 1923 (1). De Hevesy, a Nobel Prize winner, measured the uptake of radioactive lead (210Pb; at that time, thorium-B) in plants, in most cases fava beans, by electroscopic analyses (2) of their ashes. This experiment showed dose-dependent lead uptake in plants and revealed that radioactive lead can be displaced by stable lead and vice versa. But these findings followed an initial failure in 1911, when de Hevesy unsuccessfully tried to separate radioactive lead from stable lead (3). The initial experiment was performed at the request of Nobel Prize winner Ernest Rutherford (4), who developed an atomic model in 1911 that was later expanded on by Niels Bohr. Nevertheless, de Hevesy’s initial failure at the impossible separation ultimately led to the birth of the tracer method. He recognized that since both substances (in today’s terminology, the stable and the radioactive isotopes) are inseparable, they must be chemically and biologically identical. And hence, the measurable radioactive isotope can be used as an indicator for the corresponding stable isotope to quantify biologic processes.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Representative milestones of hundred-year journey of tracer principle from 1923 to 2023. FDA = Food and Drug Administration; SSTR = somatostatin receptor.

After de Hevesy’s 1923 report, the use of radioactive isotopes to quantify biologic processes rapidly escalated, with applications in plants, animals, and humans. In 1927, Blumgart and Weiss published the use of 214Bi to measure the blood circulation time from one arm to the other in both healthy individuals and patients and thus were the first to apply a radioactive substance for diagnostic purposes in humans (5–7). This effort is commonly considered the birth of clinical nuclear medicine (5) and led to enormous interest in using radioactive isotopes for medical applications. In the following period—until the mid 1930s—a major drawback to this approach became apparent, as the availability of radioactive isotopes of elements with biologic function was limited to those that were naturally occurring (e.g., phosphorus [32P] or potassium [40K]), which were generally not obtainable in quantities useable for diagnostic purposes.

The invention of the cyclotron by Ernest Lawrence in the early 1930s at the University of California Berkeley (8,9) and, shortly after, the discovery of artificial radioactivity by Joliot and Curie (10) and Enrico Fermi (11) opened the possibility for the early success of what later became nuclear medicine. 99mTc, the diagnostic workhorse of the radioisotopes, was first synthesized in 1938 in Berkeley, California, as well (12). Although it was not the first therapeutically used radionuclide (13), the early availability of several radioactive iodine isotopes (i.e., 128I, 130I, and 131I) enabled the first radioiodine therapy by Saul Hertz in 1941 (14), which paved the way for broad application of radioactive tracers in humans. Of particular interest, the use of radioiodine-based diagnostic imaging combined with radioiodine-based therapy was a profoundly important demonstration of the use of theranostics, long before that term became en vogue (15). Within the next few years, the implementation of nuclear medicine in clinical practice took place worldwide. Eighty years later, radioiodine therapy remains a cornerstone for the treatment of thyroid diseases (16).

After World War II, isotopes for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications could be synthesized on a large scale, and within the next few years the bottleneck was widened. Development of radioactive tracers for new target structures became of significant importance, particularly since the thyroid–iodine relationship was unique. Along with radiochemistry, development of new instrumentation with improved detection and visualization of radioactivity within the human body became the driver of innovation in early nuclear medicine.

By the 1950s, important advancements were made in instrumentation development, starting with electrography and Geiger–Müller tubes via the first rectilinear scanners and planar γ-cameras and subsequently improved on by the implementation of photomultipliers by Anger (17). The first steps toward positron emission imaging were made in the early 1950s by Sweet and Brownell at the Massachusetts General Hospital (18). In the same decade, Ter-Pogossian et al. studied respiratory and cerebral metabolism and oxygen tension in malignant tumors using the positron emitter 15O (19). The first modern transaxial PET scanner, which lead to the modern devices that we know today, was developed in the mid-1970s by the group of Phelps, Hoffman, and Ter-Pogossian at Washington University (19,20). In 1975, the group of Sokoloff at the National Institutes of Health reported for the first time the use of the tracer principle to investigate glucose metabolism (21). [14C]deoxyglucose was used in ex vivo experiments to assess cerebral glucose consumption using autoradiographic measures of the central nervous system. The first PET images depicting glucose metabolism in the human body using 18F-FDG were acquired at the University of Pennsylvania in the following year (22).

18F would prove to be the ideal radionuclide for PET imaging given its combination of a 108-min half-life, high positron yield, low positron energy, cyclotron production, and isosterism with hydrogen. After almost half a century, 18F-FDG remains the most versatile radioactive tracer in nuclear medicine, with impact across multiple disciplines, such as oncology, neurology, cardiology, and infectious diseases. The progress in the development of imaging devices and tracer design was accompanied by an important milestone in image processing, when Dahlbom et al. pioneered at UCLA the first whole-body PET reconstruction method (23).

In the late 1970s, receptor-binding tracers started to be discussed as a promising new class of radiopharmaceuticals (24). The first receptor-binding tracer was administered in humans by Henry Wagner in 1983 at the Johns Hopkins University; that is, 3-N-[11C]methylspiperone was applied to image neurodopamine receptors (25). But receptor-based systems were more complex than previously used active transport radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., iodide taken up by the thyroid). Parameters such as target-to-nontarget ratio, receptor affinity, and saturation ought to be considered for the interaction between receptor and radiopharmaceutical; in addition, the administered radioactivity needed to be optimized on the basis of this interaction. But the new class of receptor-binding tracers has proven to be instrumental for the future development of nuclear medicine. Particularly, the discovery of small-molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands in the early 2000s has been transformative for nuclear medicine in the modern era of molecular imaging and radiotheranostics (26–28). Two decades later, small-molecule PSMA ligands were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (29–31). Notably, the initial U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET was accomplished as a joint academic effort at UCLA and the University of California, San Francisco (30,32,33). But clinical translation of PSMA ligands followed 2 other major successes in nuclear medicine, that is, approval of the α-emitter 223Ra for advanced, bone-metastatic prostate cancer (34) and the somatostatin receptor-targeted radiotheranostics for neuroendocrine tumors (35). Overall, these recent successes have shifted the focus of radiopharmaceutical drug discovery toward development of receptor-binding radiopharmaceuticals that can be used as a pair for imaging (diagnostic biomarker) and therapeutic purposes in malignancies, so-called radiotheranostics (36). Several promising radiotheranostic agents are currently in different phases of clinical development and may soon expand the role of nuclear medicine in oncology. These include radiopharmaceuticals targeting the fibroblast activation protein tested in several solid malignancies including pancreatic cancer and sarcoma (37); the C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 in hematologic malignancies (38); the gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in prostate cancer, breast cancer, or small cell lung cancer (39); or the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in breast cancer (40,41). The continuous expansion of the radiopharmaceutical portfolio together with the recent development of PET instrumentation, that is, total-body digital PET scanners (42), may enable quantification of biologic process by molecular imaging at an unprecedented detail level.

With this short historic overview, we would like to pay tribute not only to de Hevesy and the fava beans but also to the humorous historical essay of Marshall Brucer from 1978 (43). Brucer tracked down the history of nuclear medicine to its roots in 1815, when William Prout detected uric acid and determined the atomic weight of urea in the feces of the boa constrictor. When researching for the next big thing in nuclear medicine after radioiodine, 18F-FDG, or PSMA ligands, one may account for de Hevesy’s initial failure and frustration, which ultimately led to the successful use of radioactive lead in the ashes of fava beans. We should see more in fava beans than a side dish for liver and Chianti or the mascot of a midsized German town called Erfurt (44). We are even still facing some of the same challenges that our early forebears faced: a century after medical use of radioactive tracers was curtailed by the availability of only naturally occurring isotopes, the nuclear medicine community is facing a similar issue, that is, a shortage of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto; Novartis) due to the “unexpected” high demand of the radiopharmaceutical after approval (45).

This hundred-year journey of the tracer principle is promising a bright future for the field of nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and radiotheranostics, which may have reached its prime time to become an independent specialty in the United States (46).

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 26, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hevesy G
    . The absorption and translocation of lead by plants: a contribution to the application of the method of radioactive indicators in the investigation of the change of substance in plants. Biochem J. 1923;17:439–445.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rutherford E,
    2. Geiger H
    . An electrical method of counting the number of α-particles from radio-active substances. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1908;81:141–161.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Feld M,
    2. de Roo M
    . Geschichte der Nuklearmedizin in Europa. Schattauer; 2000:11–12.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rutherford E
    . The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1911;21:669–688.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Carlsson S
    . A glance at the history of nuclear medicine. Acta Oncol. 1995;34:1095–1102.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Blumgart HL,
    2. Yens OC
    . Studies on the velocity of blood flow: I. The method utilized. J Clin Invest. 1927;4:1–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Blumgart HL,
    2. Weiss S
    . Studies on the velocity of blood flow: II. The velocity of blood flow in normal resting individuals, and a critique of the method used. J Clin Invest. 1927;4:15–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lawrence EO,
    2. Livingston MS
    . The production of high speed protons without the use of high voltages. Phys Rev. 1931;38:834.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Livingston MS.,
    2. Part I
    . History of the cyclotron. Phys Today. 1959;12:18–23.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Joliot F,
    2. Curie I
    . Artificial production of a new kind of radio-element. Nature. 1934;133:201–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Fermi E. Radioactivity induced by neutron bombardment. Nature. 1934;133:757.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Seaborg GT,
    2. Segrè E
    . Nuclear isomerism in element 43. Phys Rev. 1939;55:808–814.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lawrence JH
    . Nuclear physics and therapy: preliminary report on a new method for the treatment of leukemia and polycythemia. Radiology. 1940;35:51–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hertz S,
    2. Roberts A
    . Radioactive iodine in the study of thyroid physiology; the use of radioactive iodine therapy in hyperthyroidism. J Am Med Assoc. 1946;131:81–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Solnes LB,
    2. Werner RA,
    3. Jones KM,
    4. et al
    . Theranostics: leveraging molecular imaging and therapy to impact patient management and secure the future of nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:311–318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Haugen BR,
    2. Alexander EK,
    3. Bible KC,
    4. et al
    . 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Anger HO
    . A new instrument for mapping gamma-ray emitters. Biol Med Q Rep. 1957;38:27–33.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sweet WH,
    2. Brownell GL
    . Localization of brain tumors with positron emittors. Nucleonics. 1953;11:40–45.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. O’Connor C
    . A History of Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology: Imaging and Innovation. Washington University in St. Louis; 2013:1–200.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ter-Pogossian MM,
    2. Phelps ME,
    3. Hoffman EJ,
    4. Mullani NA
    . A positron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT). Radiology. 1975;114:89–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kennedy C,
    2. Des Rosiers MH,
    3. Jehle JW,
    4. Reivich M,
    5. Sharpe F,
    6. Sokoloff L
    . Mapping of functional neural pathways by autoradiographic survey of local metabolic rate with [14C]deoxyglucose. Science. 1979;187:850–853.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Hess S,
    2. Høilund-Carlsen PF,
    3. Alavi A
    . Historic images in nuclear medicine: 1976—the first issue of Clinical Nuclear Medicine and the first human FDG study. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:701–703.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dahlbom M,
    2. Hoffman EJ,
    3. Hoh CK,
    4. et al
    . Whole-body positron emission tomography: part I. Methods and performance characteristics. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1191–1199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Eckelman WC,
    2. Reba RC,
    3. Gibson RE,
    4. et al
    . Receptor-binding radiotracers: a class of potential radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 1979;20:350–357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wagner HN,
    2. Burns HD,
    3. Dannals RF,
    4. et al
    . Imaging dopamine receptors in the human brain by positron tomography. Science. 1983;221:1264–1266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pomper MG,
    2. Musachio JL,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al
    . 11C-MCG: synthesis, uptake selectivity, and primate PET of a probe for glutamate carboxypeptidase II (NAALADase). Mol Imaging. 2002;1:96–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.
    1. Banerjee SR,
    2. Foss CA,
    3. Castanares M,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis and evaluation of technetium-99m- and rhenium-labeled inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). J Med Chem. 2008;51:4504–4517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Pullambhatla M,
    3. Foss CA,
    4. et al
    . 2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7645–7653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. de Bono J,
    3. Chi KN,
    4. et al
    . Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Calais J,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:856–863.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Morris MJ,
    2. Rowe SP,
    3. Gorin MA,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from the CONDOR Phase III, Multicenter Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3674–3682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hope TA,
    2. Eiber M,
    3. Armstrong WR,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1635–1642.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Carlucci G,
    2. Ippisch R,
    3. Slavik R,
    4. Mishoe A,
    5. Blecha J,
    6. Zhu S
    . 68Ga-PSMA-11 NDA approval: a novel and successful academic partnership. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:149–155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Parker C,
    2. Nilsson S,
    3. Heinrich D,
    4. et al
    . Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Strosberg J,
    2. El-Haddad G,
    3. Wolin E,
    4. et al
    . Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Herrmann K,
    2. Schwaiger M,
    3. Lewis JS,
    4. et al
    . Radiotheranostics: a roadmap for future development. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e146–e156.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Calais J
    . FAP: The next billion dollar nuclear theranostics target? J Nucl Med. 2020;61:163–165.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Buck AK,
    2. Serfling SE,
    3. Lindner T,
    4. et al
    . CXCR4-targeted theranostics in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:4133–4144.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Maina T,
    2. Nock BA,
    3. Kulkarni H,
    4. Singh A,
    5. Baum RP
    . Theranostic prospects of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-radioantagonists in oncology. PET Clin. 2017;12:297–309.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. D’Huyvetter M,
    2. De Vos J,
    3. Caveliers V,
    4. et al
    . Phase I trial of 131I-GMIB-anti-HER2-VHH1, a new promising candidate for HER2-targeted radionuclide therapy in breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1097–1105.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Sorensen JB,
    3. Brun NC,
    4. Frejd FY,
    5. Tolmachev V
    . Theranostic pairing: ABY-025/251 targeting HER2 with 68Ga and 188Re—minimized radioligands using Affibody peptide scaffold technology [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl):3093.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Vandenberghe S,
    2. Moskal P,
    3. Karp JS
    . State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Brucer M
    . Nuclear medicine begins with a boa constrictor. J Nucl Med. 1978;19:581–598.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    Thuringia Rome: the broad beans irritate tourists in Erfurt. Archyde.com website. https://www.archyde.com/thuringia-rome-the-broad-beans-irritate-tourists-in-erfurt/. Published January 17, 2020. Accessed October 16, 2023.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ravi P,
    2. Whelpley B,
    3. Kelly E,
    4. et al
    . Clinical implementation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the United States: lessons learned and ongoing challenges. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:349–350.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Czernin J,
    2. Sonni I,
    3. Razmaria A,
    4. Calais J
    . The future of nuclear medicine as an independent specialty. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(suppl 2):3S–12S.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication July 26, 2023.
  • Revision received September 27, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 12
December 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
One Hundred Years of the Tracer Principle
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
One Hundred Years of the Tracer Principle
Sebastian Hoberück, Klaus Zöphel, Martin G. Pomper, Steven P. Rowe, Andrei Gafita
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2023, 64 (12) 1998-2000; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266458

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
One Hundred Years of the Tracer Principle
Sebastian Hoberück, Klaus Zöphel, Martin G. Pomper, Steven P. Rowe, Andrei Gafita
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2023, 64 (12) 1998-2000; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266458
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Computational Nuclear Oncology Toward Precision Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Ethical, Regulatory, and Socioeconomic Dimensions of Theranostic Digital Twins
  • Consensus Nomenclature for Radionuclide Therapy: Initial Recommendations from Nuclear Medicine Global Initiative
  • Computational Nuclear Oncology Toward Precision Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Current Tools, Techniques, and Uncharted Territories
Show more Special Contribution

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire