Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

18F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study

Karl-Josef Langen and Felix M. Mottaghy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 801; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263837
Karl-Josef Langen
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix M. Mottaghy
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: We have read with interest the paper by Zaragori et al. about the role of PET using 6-18F-fluoro-L-DOPA (18F-FDOPA) in the prediction of molecular parameters by radiomics (1). We agree that radiomics is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of amino acid PET (2). This has been demonstrated, for example, for the differentiation of recurrent tumor from treatment-related changes (3,4).

Zaragori et al. report that radiomics features of static and dynamic 18F-FDOPA data in patients with a neuropathologic diagnosis of grade II, III, or IV glioma were able to predict IDH mutations and the 1p/19q codeletion with an area under the curve of 0.831 and 0.724, respectively. The authors conclude that 18F-FDOPA PET using a full set of radiomics features is an effective tool for the noninvasive prediction of IDH mutations and for prediction of the 1p/19q codeletion in routine practice.

Although we have no doubt about the quality of the study, we would like to point out a problem with the preselection of patients. For this study, 74 patients with grade II–IV gliomas were retrospectively selected from a larger collective. The authors assume that the results of the study are valid for the noninvasive prediction of molecular parameters in patients with suspected glioma, that is, in the setting of preoperative diagnostics in which, apart from clinical and radiologic parameters, no information is available about the histology of the tumors.

Previous studies investigating the final diagnosis of patients referred for amino acid PET with suspected brain tumor, however, reported that 20%–40% had benign lesions or nonglial tumors (e.g., inflammation, ischemia, or lymphoma) (5–7). The radiomic features of these lesions were not considered in the present analysis and could significantly affect the results of the study. Therefore, the validity of the study for noninvasive prediction of molecular parameters in the setting of preoperative diagnostics is at least doubtful.

A similar issue could also be observed in another recently published study (8), which investigated the prediction of TERTp mutation status in IDH wild-type (IDHwt) high-grade gliomas using pretreatment dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET radiomics. In that study, patients with IDHwt tumors were selected from a mixed population of patients, and the authors reported that radiomics based on time-to-peak images extracted from dynamic 18F-FET PET scans could predict the TERTp mutation status of IDHwt diffuse astrocytic high-grade gliomas with high accuracy preoperatively. Since the IDH mutation status in the preoperative population is not known, the analysis is considerably affected by the IDH-negative gliomas and benign lesions, and the validity of this study also—in the setting of preoperative diagnostics—has to be viewed with great caution.

Summarizing, we would like to point out that image analysis methods aiming at noninvasive prediction of molecular parameters have to be based on a representative preoperative population. Preselection of such populations based on postoperative histologic data leads to an erroneous and not clinically useful conclusion.

We conclude that the results of such studies can be considered only as hypotheses and have no relevance for clinical practice.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jan. 27, 2022.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zaragori T,
    2. Oster J,
    3. Roch V,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDOPA PET for the noninvasive prediction of glioma molecular parameters: a radiomics study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:147–157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lohmann P,
    2. Galldiks N,
    3. Kocher M,
    4. et al
    . Radiomics in neuro-oncology: basics, workflow, and applications. Methods. 2021;188:112–121.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ahrari S,
    2. Zaragori T,
    3. Rozenblum L,
    4. et al
    . Relevance of dynamic 18F-DOPA PET radiomics for differentiation of high-grade glioma progression from treatment-related changes. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1924.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lohmann P,
    2. Elahmadawy MA,
    3. Gutsche R,
    4. et al
    . FET PET radiomics for differentiating pseudoprogression from early tumor progression in glioma patients post-chemoradiation. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3835.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pichler R,
    2. Dunzinger A,
    3. Wurm G,
    4. et al
    . Is there a place for FET PET in the initial evaluation of brain lesions with unknown significance? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1521–1528.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Rapp M,
    2. Heinzel A,
    3. Galldiks N,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic performance of 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed cerebral lesions suggestive of glioma. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:229–235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hutterer M,
    2. Nowosielski M,
    3. Putzer D,
    4. et al
    . [F-18]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine PET: a valuable diagnostic tool in neuro-oncology, but not all that glitters is glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:341–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Kaiser L,
    3. Holzgreve A,
    4. et al
    . Prediction of TERTp-mutation status in IDH-wildtype high-grade gliomas using pre-treatment dynamic [18F]FET PET radiomics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4415–4425.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study
Karl-Josef Langen, Felix M. Mottaghy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 801; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263837

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study
Karl-Josef Langen, Felix M. Mottaghy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 801; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263837
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply to “The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study”
  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • FDA Reconsiders Rules Around Radiation Dosimetry for First-in-Human Studies of Investigational PET Radiopharmaceuticals
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire