Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation

Influence of Fc Modifications and IgG Subclass on Biodistribution of Humanized Antibodies Targeting L1CAM

Sai Kiran Sharma, Maya Suzuki, Hong Xu, Joshua A. Korsen, Zachary Samuels, Hongfen Guo, Brandon Nemieboka, Alessandra Piersigilli, Kimberly J. Edwards, Nai-Kong V. Cheung and Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 629-636; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262383
Sai Kiran Sharma
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maya Suzuki
2Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
3Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Xu
2Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
4Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua A. Korsen
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
5Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary Samuels
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongfen Guo
2Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
4Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon Nemieboka
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
6Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Piersigilli
7Tri-Institutional Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, and Rockefeller University, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly J. Edwards
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nai-Kong V. Cheung
2Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
5Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York;
6Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason S. Lewis
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
4Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
6Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
8Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and
9Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Immuno-PET is a powerful tool to noninvasively characterize the in vivo biodistribution of engineered antibodies. Methods: L1 cell adhesion molecule–targeting humanized (HuE71) IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies bearing identical variable heavy- and light-chain sequences but different fragment crystallizable (Fc) portions were radiolabeled with 89Zr, and the in vivo biodistribution was studied in SKOV3 ovarian cancer xenografted nude mice. Results: In addition to showing uptake in L1 cell adhesion molecule–expressing SKOV3 tumors, as does its parental counterpart HuE71 IgG1, the afucosylated variant having enhanced Fc-receptor affinity showed high nonspecific uptake in lymph nodes. On the other hand, aglycosylated HuE71 IgG1 with abrogated Fc-receptor binding did not show lymphoid uptake. The use of the IgG4 subclass showed high nonspecific uptake in the kidneys, which was prevented by mutating serine at position 228 to proline in the hinge region of the IgG4 antibody to mitigate in vivo fragment antigen-binding arm exchange. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the influence of Fc modifications and the choice of IgG subclass on the in vivo biodistribution of antibodies and the potential outcomes thereof.

  • immuno-PET
  • aglycosylated antibody
  • afucosylated antibody
  • Fab arm exchange

Monoclonal antibodies rank among the most sought-after class of pharmaceuticals being developed for the treatment of several diseases in humans (1). Their increasing utility has bolstered antibody-engineering efforts to improve efficacy and mitigate toxicities (2,3). Altering the glycosylation status, introducing point mutations in the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region, and changing the immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass are common strategies whereby the binding of an IgG to Fc γ-receptors (FcγR) on immune effector cells can be modulated (4–7). However, the impact of these modifications on antibody biodistribution has not been adequately examined. Arguably, most therapeutic antibodies are unnaturally engineered biomolecules synthesized using recombinant technologies; hence, their in vivo biodistribution cannot be taken for granted. Intriguingly, of all the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved antibodies, only a few have dynamic time-dependent in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetics data profiled in patients (8). Furthermore, only a handful of these antibodies have had preclinical biodistribution analysis before or after FDA approval (9). Longitudinal imaging by immuno-PET can fill this existing knowledge gap by enabling quantitation of the in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of antibodies while delineating their on-target binding and off-target disposition. Critically, immuno-PET and biodistribution studies performed in relevant preclinical animal models early in antibody drug development campaigns can serve as a harbinger for clinical translation and success of antibody therapeutics in human patients (10,11).

Most FDA-approved antibody therapeutics belong to the fully human or humanized IgG1 subclass. In addition to target-specific binding at the fragment antigen-binding end of the IgG molecule, human or humanized IgG1 antibodies bind strongly to activating FcγRs such as FcγRIIIa, which is expressed on immune effector cells such as natural killer cells to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), a key mechanism of action of several therapeutic antibodies. Furthermore, afucosylated IgG1 antibodies lacking a core fucose in the N-linked biantennary oligosaccharide units of the Fc region have stronger Fc–FcγRIIIa binding, leading to enhanced ADCC activity (Fig. 1) (12). On the other hand, aglycosylated IgG1 antibodies lacking the N-linked biantennary oligosaccharide unit in the Fc region have abrogated Fc–FcγR interactions (Fig. 1) (13). Of late, IgG4—the least abundant IgG in human serum—has emerged as a subclass of choice for the development of therapeutic antibodies, including those used for immunotherapy (14). The low affinity of IgG4 antibodies for activating FcγRs but high affinity for the inhibitory FcγRIIB renders them relatively benign for ADCC. In fact, IgG4s are considered antiinflammatory antibodies because of their ability to dampen immune responses against repetitive allergen exposure (15). These properties make IgG4 a subclass of choice for the design of immunotherapeutics such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which bind to programmed cell death protein 1 on effector T cells in the tumor microenvironment and render efficacy without eliciting secondary immune mechanisms such as ADCC (5,7,16). Collectively, all the aforementioned features highlight the importance of in vivo biomolecular interactions along the Fc–Fc receptor axis that are worth considering during the design and development of therapeutic antibodies (17).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Schematic describing the generation of Fc variants of humanized IgG1 and hinge-mutated IgG4 L1CAM-targeted antibodies. Fc-glycosylated variants of L1CAM-targeted humanized IgG1 antibody, HuE71-IgG1 (top center), were obtained by producing IgG1 antibody in GnT1−/− CHO cells that are defective for fucosylation and thus yield HuE71-IgG1-Afuco (top left) (25), whereas substituting asparagine at position 297 in Fc region to alanine (N297A) yielded aglycosylated variant, HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco (top right). Engrafting anti-L1CAM binding variable heavy- and variable light-chain sequences onto IgG4 framework yielded HuE71-IgG4 (bottom left). S228P in hinge region of HuE71-IgG4 yielded HuE71-IgG4M. Fuc = fucose; Glc = N-acetylglucosamine; Man = mannose; Gal = N-acetylgalactosamine.

In the work at hand, we asked 3 questions fundamental to the molecular composition of humanized IgGs targeting the cell surface glycoprotein L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), without interfering with the antibody’s ability to bind its cognate antigen or interact with the neonatal Fc receptor. Foremost, we asked how enhancement of Fc–FcγR affinity by afucosylation impacts the in vivo distribution of humanized IgG1. Next, we were curious to know how Fc silencing via antibody aglycosylation, which abrogates Fc–FcγR interaction, influences the in vivo distribution of humanized IgG1. Lastly, we wanted to know how the choice of IgG subclass—switching from IgG1 to IgG4 with and without fab arm exchange (FAE), and loss of most Fc functions—affects antibody distribution in vivo. To that end, we developed a panel of humanized antibodies (Fig. 1; Table 1) targeting human L1CAM, which is overexpressed in several malignancies (18,19). To noninvasively visualize the antibodies in vivo, we radiolabeled them with 89Zr and used immuno-PET in athymic nude mice bearing subcutaneously implanted L1CAM-expressing SKOV3 tumors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Antibodies Used in This Study and Their Biochemical and Functional Characteristics

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal Model

All animals were treated as per guidelines approved by the Research Animal Resource Center and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Female athymic nude (Nu/Nu) mice 8–10 wk old were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Animals were housed in ventilated cages, given food and water ad libitum, and allowed to acclimatize for 1 wk before inoculation of tumor cells. SKOV3 tumors were induced on the right shoulder via subcutaneous injection of 5 million cells in a 150-μL cell suspension of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of fresh medium and Matrigel (BD Biosciences). The xenografted mice were used for in vivo studies when the tumor volumes reached approximately 300 mm3.

PET Imaging

PET imaging was conducted using a mouse hotel on an Inveon PET/CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare) (20). SKOV3-xenografted mice were intravenously administered 89Zr-labeled antibodies (8 MBq; 45 μg suspended in 150 μL of phosphate-buffered saline per mouse; n = 2 mice per antibody variant). Animals were scanned under the influence of anesthesia by inhalation of 2% isoflurane (Baxter Healthcare) and medical air. PET data for each mouse were recorded via static scans at 48, 96, and 144 h after injection. The PET/CT images were calibrated and cropped before analysis and scaled using AMIDE software (Stanford University). The images were rendered using VivoQuant (Invicro).

Biodistribution

Ex vivo biodistribution analysis was performed on a separate cohort of SKOV3-xenografted mice that were intravenously administered 1.15 MBq (6.4 μg of each 89Zr-labeled antibody variant suspended in 150 μL of phosphate-buffered saline per mouse). Six animals were used per antibody variant, wherein 3 animals were injected with 89Zr-labeled antibody alone and 3 animals were injected with a mixture of 89Zr-labeled antibody and a 38-fold excess (mass) of the unlabeled antibody variant. Animals were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation at 144 h after injection. After euthanasia, tissues of interest were harvested via necropsy, weighed, and assayed for radioactivity on a γ-counter calibrated for 89Zr. Counts were converted into activity using a calibration curve generated from known standards. Count data were background- and decay-corrected to the time of injection, and the percentage injected dose (%ID) per gram for each tissue sample was calculated by normalization to the total activity injected.

Statistics

All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, version 9.1.0. Statistical comparisons of radioactivity concentrations in each organ across the various groups in the ex vivo biodistribution studies were done using nonparametric multiple Mann–Whitney tests to compare ranks. The Holm–Šídák multiple-comparison test was applied, and the threshold for P value comparison was set to 0.05.

RESULTS

A panel of IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies having identical variable heavy- and light-chain sequences targeting human L1CAM but modified Fc regions was generated (Table 1) to gain insights into the influence of Fc modifications and subclass on the in vivo biodistribution of IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies, respectively.

After purification of the various 89Zr-labeled antibodies, we obtained radioimmunoconjugates having an average molar activity of 26.6 MBq/nmol. A cell-based immunoreactivity assay confirmed the ability of the various radioimmunoconjugates to bind L1CAM-expressing SKOV3 cells (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) (21). Incubation of the radioimmunoconjugates in serum and evaluation by radio–instant thin-layer chromatography demonstrated less than 4% demetallation up to 7 d after radiosynthesis, suggesting high stability of the radioimmunoconjugates in a biologically relevant medium (Supplemental Fig. 2). Size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography of the 89Zr-labeled antibodies incubated without a radioprotectant in chelexed phosphate-buffered saline at 37°C showed more than 80% of the radioimmunoconjugates being stable and existing as monomers up to 6 d after radiosynthesis (Supplemental Figs. 3 and 4).

Athymic nude mice were used in our studies because of their ability to grow tumors from implanted human cancer cell lines and the presence of functional innate immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells in this strain. Macrophages and natural killer cells comprise 2 main Fc-dependent effector cells responsible for eliciting antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and ADCC, respectively (22). Furthermore, despite only 60%–70% homology between mouse and human FcγRs, human IgGs are reported to bind orthologous mouse FcγRs with similar strength, suggestive of potentially similar downstream biologic activities mediated by human Fc–murine FcγR interactions in mice (23). Immuno-PET imaging of the three 89Zr-labeled IgG1 variants—humanized (HuE71)-IgG1, HuE71-IgG1-Afuco, and HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco—demonstrated uptake of radioactivity in SKOV3 tumors (Figs. 2A–2C). However, the three IgG1 variants yielded distinct vivo distribution patterns of radioactivity. SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1 showed persistence of radioactivity in blood up to 96 h after injection, suggesting slow in vivo clearance of L1CAM-targeted antibodies in this model (Fig. 2A). Besides target-specific tumoral uptake of radioactivity, nonspecific uptake was found in the liver and joints of the long bones of mice. Similarly, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco yielded uptake of radioactivity in the tumor, liver, and joints of the long bones. However, this variant revealed high-intensity bilateral hot spots corresponding to the axillary and cervical lymph nodes (Fig. 2B) and demonstrated increased clearance from circulation relative to 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1. Additionally, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco outlined the spleen and showed a higher radioactivity concentration in long bone joints and the vertebral column. The faster clearance and elevated nonspecific tissue uptake patterns observed for 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco may be attributed to enhanced binding of the afucosylated Fc with mouse FcγRIV-expressing immune cells in the lymph nodes and reticuloendothelial system. The latter is exemplified by results from the analysis of Fc–FcγR binding by surface plasmon resonance (Table 2). Notably, conjugation of desferrioxamine to lysine residues distributed randomly in the Fc region of IgG1 molecules did not impact binding to murine FcγRIV and human FcγRIIIa-158V.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Delineation of differential in vivo profiles of Fc-modified L1CAM-targeted IgG1 variants in SKOV3-xenografted mice through immuno-PET imaging, ex vivo biodistribution analysis, and histopathology. (A–C) Longitudinal PET/CT images acquired at 48, 96, and 144 h after injection of 1.8 mg/kg (7.95 MBq, 45 μg) of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1 (A), 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco (B), and 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco (C) show distribution of radioactivity in blood (indicated by heart (H), tumor (T), liver (L), long bone joints, axillary lymph nodes (ALN), cervical lymph nodes (CLN), and spleen (Sp). Maximum-intensity projections (MIPs) were calibrated and scaled 0–15 %ID/g. (D) Ex vivo biodistribution profile (%ID/g vs. %ID) at 144 h after injection of 0.25 mg/kg (1.15 MBq, 6.4 μg) of 3 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted Fc-modified IgG1 variants and their corresponding low-specific-activity blocking dose groups in SKOV3-xenografted mice. Detailed % ID/g and %ID values can be found in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2. (E) Panel of representative low- and high-magnification hematoxylin- and eosin-stained images from histopathologic examination of axillary lymph nodes harvested from SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with the three 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted IgG1 Fc variants compared with low-magnification images of axillary lymph nodes harvested from uninjected SKOV3-xenografted mouse and healthy tumor-naïve nude mouse. Scale bars on low-magnification images represent 500 μm, whereas those on high-magnification images represent 200 μm. ILN = inguinal lymph node; *P ≤ 0.03. **P ≤ 0.01. ***P ≤ 0.0005.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Analysis of Fc–Fc Receptor Binding by Surface Plasmon Resonance (Biacore T200)

Previous studies found significant increases in the binding affinity of afucosylated IgG1 antibody to human FcγRIIIa but no change in the binding affinity to human FcγRI and human neonatal Fc receptor (12,24,25). So, we focused our surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis of the differentially glycosylated IgG1 Fc variants to human FcγRIIIa. Murine FcγRIV was included in the surface plasmon resonance assay since it is a functional ortholog of human FcγRIIIa, and binding to murine FcγRIV may contextualize findings from in vivo studies performed in mice (26). Notably, ADCC in humans is mediated via interaction of the Fc of target antigen-bound hIgG1 and human FcγRIIIa expressed on immune effector cells. Furthermore, afucosylated human or humanized IgG1 antibodies have been shown to target murine FcγRIV for enhanced tumor therapy by ADCC in mice (27). SPR analysis of the anti-L1CAM IgG1 variants used in our study demonstrated 3-fold higher affinity of the HuE71-IgG1-Afuco for murine FcγRIV than of the HuE71-IgG1. Interestingly, HuE71-IgG1-Afuco also showed a similar 3-fold higher binding to the 158V isoform of human FcγRIIIa. On the other hand, and as expected, HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco showed no binding to either mouse or human FcγRs. Lastly, immuno-PET of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco in SKOV3-xenografted mice displayed tumoral uptake of radioactivity with a relatively lower concentration in the liver and bone joints and no detectable uptake in lymph nodes (Fig. 2C). 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco demonstrated the longest persistence of radioactivity in systemic circulation, suggesting an enhanced in vivo half-life plausibly due to the lack of human Fc–murine FcγRIV interactions with resident immune effector cells in the lymph nodes and reticuloendothelial system.

Quantification of the in vivo biodistribution of the three L1CAM-targeted IgG1 variants was done in a separate cohort of SKOV3 xenografted mice injected with the 89Zr-labeled anti-L1CAM-targeted Fc-modified antibodies. Foremost, the three IgG1 variants displayed differential radioactivity concentrations in the blood. 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco showed less than 1 %ID/g remaining in circulation at 144 h after injection, whereas the other two variants showed up to 6 %ID/g at this time point. Next, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco demonstrated high liver uptake (10.8 ± 2.1 %ID/g) compared with the other two variants, which showed less than 6 %ID/g in this tissue. Most other nontarget tissues showed unremarkable differences in uptake of radioactivity between the three Fc-modified IgG1 variants. However, axillary lymph nodes isolated from SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco yielded a significantly lower radioactivity concentration in this tissue. Unlike PET images, only mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1 demonstrated a significantly higher radioactivity concentration in the bone (femur) than did xenografts injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco. Indeed, SKOV3 tumors showed high and specific uptake of radioactivity for all three 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted IgG1 variants. However, the tumoral uptake values (%ID/g) in mice dosed with the unblocked L1CAM-targeted 89Zr-radioimmunoconjugates demonstrated significantly decreased uptake of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco compared with radioimmunoconjugates of the other two IgG1 variants. The relatively low tumoral uptake (7.7 ± 2 %ID/g) of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco may be attributed to concentration of a significant proportion of the radioactivity or antibody in the liver and lymph nodes of SKOV3-xenografted mice. Determining the %ID taken up in the various tissues revealed that despite having the highest radioactivity concentration (%ID/g) for 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco, the axillary lymph nodes had less than 2% of the total injected radioactivity at 144 h after injection. Instead, the liver accumulated more radioactivity (17.6 ± 3.4 %ID) and turned out to be a major sink for the afucosylated IgG1 variant.

Importantly, the histopathologic examination of lymph nodes harvested from SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco showed no morphologic evidence of infiltrating neoplastic cells. Instead, these nodes demonstrated reactive hyperplasia characterized by marked paracortical and medullary histio- and plasmacytosis (Fig. 2E). The latter was a unique feature relative to lymph nodes harvested from SKOV3-xenografted mice and tumor-naïve mice that never received 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco. Along those lines, axillary lymph nodes harvested from SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1 and 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco showed minor sinus histiocytosis but displayed normal lymphoid tissue architecture (Fig. 2E).

Next, we studied the influence of IgG subclass on the in vivo biodistribution of antibody drugs. To delineate the in vivo biodistribution of IgG4 antibodies, we generated a humanized IgG4 variant of the L1CAM-targeting antibody and conducted serial PET imaging studies in SKOV3-xenografted mice. Serial PET imaging of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 revealed slow in vivo clearance of the antibody from blood and a high radioactivity concentration in the liver (Fig. 3A). In addition to tumoral uptake of radioactivity, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 showed a radioactivity concentration in the kidneys and axillary lymph nodes of SKOV3 xenografts. We hypothesized that uptake of radioactivity in the kidneys may be attributed to FAE, leading to instability of the antibody in vivo. FAE is an intrinsic property of the IgG4 subclass whereby two half-molecules (heavy-chain–light-chain pair) of the antibodies dissociate from one another at the hinge and recombine spontaneously with other IgG4 half-molecules in serum to form monovalent bispecific antibodies in vitro and in vivo (28). Introducing a point mutation from serine to proline at position 228 (S228P) in the hinge region of IgG4 antibodies has been shown to mitigate the propensity of FAE (6). To validate our hypothesis, an S228P hinge-mutated IgG4 variant—89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M—was synthesized and evaluated in vivo. 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M demonstrated gradual accretion of radioactivity in the SKOV3 tumor while showing little to no radioactivity in the kidneys (Fig. 3B). Of note, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M faintly highlighted the liver, axillary lymph nodes, and bone joints in this model.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Delineation of differential in vivo profiles of L1CAM-targeted IgG4 variants in SKOV3-xenografted mice through immuno-PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution analysis. (A–C) Longitudinal PET/CT images acquired at 48, 96, and 144 h after injection of 1.8 mg/kg (7.95 MBq, 45 μg) of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 (A), 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M (B), and 89Zr-Hu3F8-IgG4 (C) show distribution of radioactivity in blood (indicated by heart [H]), tumor (T), liver (L), kidneys (K), axillary lymph nodes (ALN), and long bone joints (B). Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) were calibrated and scaled 0%–15 %ID/g. (D) Ex vivo biodistribution profile (%ID/g vs. %ID) at 144 h after injection of 0.25 mg/kg (1.15 MBq, 6.4 μg) of 2 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted IgG4 variants and isotype control IgG4 antibody in SKOV3-xenografted mice. ILN = inguinal lymph node. *P ≤ 0.05. Detailed % ID/g and %ID values can be found in Supplemental Tables 3 and 4.

The use of an IgG4 variant of the anti-GD2 antibody, Hu3F8, as an isotype control and the similarity in radioactivity uptake in the kidneys of SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-Hu3F8-IgG4 and 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 further validated that the abnormal kidney uptake is attributed to FAE intrinsic to IgG4 antibodies (Fig. 3C). Further, results from an ex vivo biodistribution analysis performed on SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with the three 89Zr-labeled IgG4 antibodies corroborated findings from immuno-PET studies (Fig. 3D). Importantly, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M yielded a significantly lower radioactivity concentration (2.5 ± 0.56 %ID/g) in the kidneys than did 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 (7.4 ± 2.32 %ID/g; P = 0.02). Furthermore, blockade of tumoral uptake of radioactivity by coinjection of a 0.25 mg/kg dose of 89Zr-labeled IgG4 antibody with a 38-fold excess (mass) of unmodified L1CAM-targeted IgG4 antibodies in ex vivo biodistribution studies confirmed target-mediated uptake in SKOV3 tumors (Fig. 3D). Notably, 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M demonstrated increased tumoral uptake of radioactivity (16.1 ± 4.26 %ID/g) compared with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 (5.5 ± 2.4 %ID/g; P = 0.03) and 89Zr-Hu3F8-IgG4 (3.6 ± 1.76 %ID/g; P = 0.02). Concordant with PET data, 89Zr-Hu3F8-IgG4 yielded a high radioactivity concentration in the kidneys (15.2 ± 5.14 %ID/g) and showed between 1 and 8 %ID/g in most healthy tissues. Tumoral uptake (4.9 ± 0.46 %ID/g) of the isotype antibody may be attributed to enhanced permeability and retention in this compartment. Lastly, the high radioactivity concentration in multiple tissues harvested from mice injected with the 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M-blocking dose arm is most likely a result of persistence of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M in the blood at 144 h after injection.

DISCUSSION

Recent insights into pharmacologic modulation at the Fc–FcγR axis have made this molecular interaction an important consideration in the development of antibody-based drugs for cancer immunotherapy (16,17,29). Furthermore, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in FcγR-encoding genes have been implicated in disease etiology and clinical responses (30). Specifically, patients carrying the 158V/V genotype showed improved outcomes from rituximab therapy due, in part, to improved ADCC activity in vivo (31). Additionally, we have previously shown that stronger in vitro Fc–FcγR binding for an afucosylated variant of the humanized anti-GD2 IgG1 antibody yielded improved preclinical efficacy because of enhanced ADCC in vivo (25).

Our current findings with the afucosylated anti-L1CAM IgG1 variant concur broadly with two 89Zr-immuno-PET studies done using HER3-targeted humanized IgG1 antibodies—GSK2849330 and RG7116—which were Fc-glycoengineered for enhanced ADCC activity (32,33). The high uptake of radioactivity in the liver and spleen of xenograft models developed in immunodeficient SCID mice used in those studies was attributed to enhanced binding of the antibodies with FcγRs expressed on tissue-resident auxiliary immune cells in the reticuloendothelial system (32,33). However, neither of those antibodies showed elevated radioactivity concentrations in lymph nodes. The latter may be due, in part, to the higher immunodeficient status of SCID mice used in those studies and the presence of functional natural killer cells in athymic nude mice used in our study. Although suggestive of an Fc-mediated phenomenon, the pronounced lymph node uptake of radioactivity in mice injected with the afucosylated variant warrants further validation in immunocompetent syngeneic tumor models or xenograft models developed in mice reconstituted with a functional human immune system. Admittedly, immunodeficient mice impact the in vivo biodistribution of exogenously injected human or humanized IgG1 because of relatively low titers of endogenous IgG and the availability of unoccupied high-affinity FcγRs on tissue-resident immune cells in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (34). This phenomenon is exacerbated in highly immunodeficient mouse strains developed on the NOD-SCID background (35). However, low levels of serum IgG2a in athymic nude mice have also been implicated in the rapid clearance of exogenously injected human IgG1 and mouse IgG2a (36).

Along those lines, a comparison of the afucosylated versus parental L1CAM-targeting IgG1 in tumor-naïve athymic nude mice revealed a lower radioactivity concentration of 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco in the blood at 120 h after injection, suggesting faster in vivo pharmacokinetics (Supplemental Fig. 5), which is consistent with our findings for this variant in SKOV3-xenografted mice. Furthermore, the relatively high radioactivity concentration in the long bone joints of mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco is also indicative of faster in vivo catabolism of the radioimmunoconjugate, leading to the release of 89Zr for in vivo uptake and complexation with hydroxyapatite in the bone joints. When target expression is absent in the bones, radioactivity uptake in this tissue is commonly attributed to the in vivo catabolism of desferrioxamine-conjugated 89Zr-labeled antibodies in mice and the osteophilic nature of 89Zr (37). Intriguingly, there was no significant difference between radioactivity concentrations in the liver and those in the axillary lymph nodes harvested from tumor-naïve mice injected with either 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted IgG1 variant. That finding points to a potential contribution of the tumor—a target sink, which may account for a pronounced difference noted between 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1 and 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Afuco in SKOV3-xenografted animals. Taken together, our findings suggest that afucosylated IgG1 antibodies having improved Fc–FcγR binding and enhanced ADCC capability are likely to have significantly faster in vivo pharmacokinetics due to sequestration in the reticuloendothelial system and resident immune cells in lymph nodes. On the other hand, IgG1 aglycosylation yielded an Fc-silenced antibody, which showed no lymph node uptake when tested in the same animal model as its Fc-active counterparts.

In light of our findings with the L1CAM-targeting IgG4 variants, it is no surprise that several FDA-approved IgG4 antibody therapeutics harbor the S228P mutation to impart in vivo stability while minimizing therapeutic variability due to in vivo FAE (14). Of interest, lower uptake of radioactivity was found in the bone joints of SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with L1CAM-targeted 89Zr-labeled IgG4 antibodies than with their Fc-active IgG1 counterparts. Case in point, femurs harvested from SKOV3-xenografted mice injected with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4 and 89Zr-HuE71-IgG4M showed 4.0 ± 0.74 %ID/g (P = 0.03) and 4.4 ± 1.58 %ID/g (P = 0.047), respectively, compared with 89Zr-HuE71-IgG1, which yielded 8.3 ± 2.35 %ID/g in this tissue. Furthermore, radioactivity concentrations of 89Zr-labeled L1CAM-targeted IgG4 variants were comparable to that yielded by the Fc-silent IgG1 variant—89Zr-HuE71-IgG1-Aglyco (3.7 ± 0.75 %ID/g)—in this tissue. The latter is suggestive of slow in vivo catabolism and low nonspecific uptake in healthy nontarget tissue. Lastly, the nonspecific hepatic uptake of radioactivity highlights a plausible contribution of Fc–FcγR interactions between Fc-active radiolabeled IgG1s and parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells in the liver (38). It is known that the liver is involved in the vivo catabolism of radiometal-labeled antibodies, leading to initial accumulation of 89Zr-radiometabolites and subsequent complexation of free 89Zr in the long bone joints of mice (37,39,40).

Highlights aside, a limitation of the current work is that it uses antibody variants developed for a single tumor-associated antigen in a singular xenograft model developed on an immunodeficient background. Additionally, identification of cells having elevated expression of murine FcγRIV in lymph nodes leading to the manifestation of reactive hyperplasia, and pinpointing cells in the liver that bind ADCC-enhanced IgG1 antibodies to impact in vivo pharmacokinetics, are outstanding questions that warrant further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, our findings highlight the influence of Fc-glycosylation status and choice of IgG subclass on the in vivo biodistribution of the most widely used human or humanized antibody subclasses (IgG1 and IgG4) approved as therapeutics for human use. Our results demonstrate that deglycosylated IgG1 antibodies yield low nonspecific off-target uptake in healthy tissues, whereas S228P hinge-mutated IgG4 antibody eliminates FAE-mediated renal uptake of radioactivity. Importantly, this work illustrates the value of immuno-PET in delineating the in vivo biodistribution of ADCC-enhanced IgG1 antibodies and in macroscopically highlighting potential nontumor tissue depots. Doing so can inform antibody drug development efforts to uncover mechanisms leading to in vivo therapeutic benefit or toxicity. From a theranostic perspective, our results suggest that developing immuno-PET agents using ADCC-enhanced tumor-targeting IgG1 antibodies may yield false-positive results in lymph nodes because of Fc–FcγR interactions in vivo. Similarly, immuno-PET agents developed using tumor-targeting wild-type IgG4 antibodies may yield false-positive results from nonspecific uptake of radioactivity in the kidneys while grossly underestimating tumor burden because of loss of the radiotracer to in vivo FAE. In sum, we hope that the results described herein further motivate the use of molecular imaging to inform the preclinical development of novel antibody-based theranostic agents.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the MSKCC Small Animal Imaging Core, funded in part by NIH Small-Animal Imaging Research Program (SAIRP) grant R24 CA83084 and NIH center grant P30 CA08748 and by the Tri-Institutional Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, which was funded in part by NIH grant P30 CA08748. The work was also supported by an R01 CA176671 awarded to Jason Lewis and a diversity supplement R01 CA176671 awarded to Brandon Nemieboka. Brandon Nemieboka was supported by a Medical Scientist Training Program grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32GM007739 to the Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program. Jason Lewis was supported by R01 CA204167 and R35CA232130. Jason Lewis acknowledges funding support from the Mr. William H. Goodwin and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and the Center for Experimental Therapeutics at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Sai Kiran Sharma acknowledges the Tow Foundation for a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. Nai-Kong Cheung, Maya Suzuki, Brandon Nemieboka, Hong Xu, and Jason Lewis were named as inventors on the L1CAM patent (WO2018232188A1) filed by Memorial Sloan Kettering. Both Memorial Sloan Kettering and Nai-Kong Cheung have financial interest in Y-mAbs Therapeutics Inc., Abpro-Labs, and Eureka Therapeutics. Nai-Kong Cheung reports receiving commercial research grants from Y-mAbs Therapeutics Inc. and Abpro-Labs Inc. Nai-Kong Cheung was named as inventor on multiple patents filed by Memorial Sloan Kettering, including those licensed to Y-mAbs Therapeutics Inc., Biotec Pharmacon, and Abpro-labs. Nai-Kong Cheung is a Scientific Advisory Board member for Abpro-Labs and Eureka Therapeutics. Jason Lewis is an associate editor of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine but had no involvement or access to information regarding the peer review of this article. Sai Kiran Sharma is a member of the editorial board of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: What is the impact of Fc modification and choice of IgG subclass on the in vivo pharmacologic profile of humanized antitumor antibodies?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: Humanized IgG1 antibodies yield differential in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution based on the glycosylation status of the Fc. Afucosylated IgG1 antibodies with enhanced Fc–FcγR binding and ADCC activity yield faster in vivo pharmacokinetics and show nonspecific Fc-mediated sequestration in lymph nodes and the reticuloendothelial system. Aglycosylated IgG1 antibodies with abrogated Fc–FcγR binding yield lesser nonspecific uptake of the antibody and related radiocatabolites in vivo, yielding stealth targeting vectors. S228P hinge-mutated IgG4 antibodies overcome in vivo FAE to yield a better radiopharmacologic profile by eliminating uptake of antibody and associated radioactivity in the kidneys.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Using immuno-PET to characterize the in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution to uncover potential mechanism of action or toxicity of engineered antibodies can yield better and safe antibody-based drugs to improve patient care.

Footnotes

  • Published online August 05, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carter PJ,
    2. Lazar GA.
    Next generation antibody drugs: pursuit of the ‘high-hanging fruit.’ Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:197–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Weiner GJ.
    Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:361–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Mathieu M,
    3. Brezski RJ.
    IgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions. Protein Cell. 2018;9:63–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Arnold JN,
    2. Wormald MR,
    3. Sim RB,
    4. Rudd PM,
    5. Dwek RA.
    The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:21–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bruhns P,
    2. Iannascoli B,
    3. England P,
    4. et al
    . Specificity and affinity of human Fcgamma receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG subclasses. Blood. 2009;113:3716–3725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Silva JP,
    2. Vetterlein O,
    3. Jose J,
    4. Peters S,
    5. Kirby H.
    The S228P mutation prevents in vivo and in vitro IgG4 Fab-arm exchange as demonstrated using a combination of novel quantitative immunoassays and physiological matrix preparation. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:5462–5469.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Vidarsson G,
    2. Dekkers G,
    3. Rispens T.
    IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. 2014;5:520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. O’Donoghue JA,
    2. Lewis JS,
    3. Pandit-Taskar N,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry for 89Zr-trastuzumab in patients with esophagogastric cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:161–166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ulaner GA,
    2. Sobol NB,
    3. O’Donoghue JA,
    4. et al
    . CD38-targeted immuno-PET of multiple myeloma: from xenograft models to first-in-human imaging. Radiology. 2020;295:606–615.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Crawford A,
    2. Haber L,
    3. Kelly MP,
    4. et al
    . A mucin 16 bispecific T cell-engaging antibody for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:497:eaau7534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kelly MP,
    2. Makonnen S,
    3. Hickey C,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical PET imaging with the novel human antibody 89Zr-DFO-REGN3504 sensitively detects PD-L1 expression in tumors and normal tissues. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:1:e002025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Shields RL,
    2. Lai J,
    3. Keck R,
    4. et al
    . Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to human Fcgamma RIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26733–26740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Radaev S,
    2. Sun PD.
    Recognition of IgG by Fcgamma receptor: the role of Fc glycosylation and the binding of peptide inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:16478–16483.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Song X,
    3. Li K,
    4. Zhang T.
    FcgammaR-binding is an important functional attribute for immune checkpoint antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:292.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Davies AM,
    2. Sutton BJ.
    Human IgG4: a structural perspective. Immunol Rev. 2015;268:139–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dahan R,
    2. Sega E,
    3. Engelhardt J,
    4. Selby M,
    5. Korman AJ,
    6. Ravetch JV.
    FcgammaRs modulate the anti-tumor activity of antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:285–295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. DiLillo DJ,
    2. Ravetch JV.
    Fc-receptor interactions regulate both cytotoxic and immunomodulatory therapeutic antibody effector functions. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:704–713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Schäfer MK,
    2. Altevogt P.
    L1CAM malfunction in the nervous system and human carcinomas. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:2425–2437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ganesh K,
    2. Basnet H,
    3. Kaygusuz Y,
    4. et al
    . L1CAM defines the regenerative origin of metastasis-initiating cells in colorectal cancer. Nat Cancer. 2020;1:28–45.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Carter LM,
    2. Henry KE,
    3. Platzman A,
    4. Lewis JS.
    3D-printable platform for high-throughput small-animal imaging. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1691–1692.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lindmo T,
    2. Boven E,
    3. Cuttitta F,
    4. Fedorko J,
    5. Bunn PA Jr.
    . Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J Immunol Methods. 1984;72:77–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Budzynski W,
    2. Radzikowski C.
    Cytotoxic cells in immunodeficient athymic mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1994;16:319–346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Overdijk MB,
    2. Verploegen S,
    3. Ortiz Buijsse A,
    4. et al
    . Crosstalk between human IgG isotypes and murine effector cells. J Immunol. 2012;189:3430–3438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Junttila TT,
    2. Parsons K,
    3. Olsson C,
    4. et al
    . Superior in vivo efficacy of afucosylated trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4481–4489.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Guo H,
    3. Cheung IY,
    4. Cheung NK.
    Antitumor efficacy of anti-GD2 IgG1 is enhanced by Fc glyco-engineering. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4:631–638.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bruhns P.
    Properties of mouse and human IgG receptors and their contribution to disease models. Blood. 2012;119:5640–5649.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Braster R,
    2. Bogels M,
    3. Benonisson H,
    4. et al
    . Afucosylated IgG targets FcgammaRIV for enhanced tumor therapy in mice. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:2372.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rispens T,
    2. Ooijevaar-de Heer P,
    3. Bende O,
    4. Aalberse RC.
    Mechanism of immunoglobulin G4 Fab-arm exchange. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:10302–10311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Arlauckas SP,
    2. Garris CS,
    3. Kohler RH,
    4. et al
    . In vivo imaging reveals a tumor-associated macrophage-mediated resistance pathway in anti-PD-1 therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:389:eaal3604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Paul P,
    2. Pedini P,
    3. Lyonnet L,
    4. et al
    . FCGR3A and FCGR2A genotypes differentially impact allograft rejection and patients’ survival after lung transplant. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1208.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mellor JD,
    2. Brown MP,
    3. Irving HR,
    4. Zalcberg JR,
    5. Dobrovic A.
    A critical review of the role of Fc gamma receptor polymorphisms in the response to monoclonal antibodies in cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Alsaid H,
    2. Skedzielewski T,
    3. Rambo MV,
    4. et al
    . Non invasive imaging assessment of the biodistribution of GSK2849330, an ADCC and CDC optimized anti HER3 mAb, and its role in tumor macrophage recruitment in human tumor-bearing mice. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176075.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Terwisscha van Scheltinga AG,
    2. Lub-de Hooge MN,
    3. Abiraj K,
    4. et al
    . ImmunoPET and biodistribution with human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 targeting antibody 89Zr-RG7116. MAbs. 2014;6:1051–1058.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sharma SK,
    2. Chow A,
    3. Monette S,
    4. et al
    . Fc-mediated anomalous biodistribution of therapeutic antibodies in immunodeficient mouse models. Cancer Res. 2018;78:1820–1832.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Ulrich ML,
    3. Shih VF,
    4. et al
    . Mouse strains influence clearance and efficacy of antibody and antibody-drug conjugate via Fc-FcgammaR interaction. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18:780–787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Reddy N,
    2. Ong GL,
    3. Behr TM,
    4. Sharkey RM,
    5. Goldenberg DM,
    6. Mattes MJ.
    Rapid blood clearance of mouse IgG2a and human IgG1 in many nude and nu/+ mouse strains is due to low IgG2a serum concentrations. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1998;46:25–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Chomet M,
    2. Schreurs M,
    3. Bolijn MJ,
    4. et al
    . Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical 89Zr-immuno-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:694–707.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Jones PL,
    2. Brown BA,
    3. Sands H.
    Uptake and metabolism of 111In-labeled monoclonal antibody B6.2 by the rat liver. Cancer Res. 1990;50(suppl):852s–856s.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Meijs WE,
    2. Haisma HJ,
    3. Klok RP,
    4. et al
    . Zirconium-labeled monoclonal antibodies and their distribution in tumor-bearing nude mice. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:112–118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Motta-Hennessy C,
    2. Sharkey RM,
    3. Goldenberg DM.
    Metabolism of indium-111-labeled murine monoclonal antibody in tumor and normal tissue of the athymic mouse. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1510–1519.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication March 31, 2021.
  • Revision received July 15, 2021.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Fc Modifications and IgG Subclass on Biodistribution of Humanized Antibodies Targeting L1CAM
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Influence of Fc Modifications and IgG Subclass on Biodistribution of Humanized Antibodies Targeting L1CAM
Sai Kiran Sharma, Maya Suzuki, Hong Xu, Joshua A. Korsen, Zachary Samuels, Hongfen Guo, Brandon Nemieboka, Alessandra Piersigilli, Kimberly J. Edwards, Nai-Kong V. Cheung, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 629-636; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262383

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Influence of Fc Modifications and IgG Subclass on Biodistribution of Humanized Antibodies Targeting L1CAM
Sai Kiran Sharma, Maya Suzuki, Hong Xu, Joshua A. Korsen, Zachary Samuels, Hongfen Guo, Brandon Nemieboka, Alessandra Piersigilli, Kimberly J. Edwards, Nai-Kong V. Cheung, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 629-636; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262383
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In Vivo Biorthogonal Antibody Click for Dual Targeting and Augmented Efficacy in Cancer Treatment
  • Antibody Engineering for Nuclear Imaging and Radioimmunotherapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [11C]ZTP-1: An Effective Short-Lived Radioligand for PET of Rat and Monkey Brain Phosphodiesterase Type 4 Subtype B
  • Reduced Renal Uptake of Various Radiopharmaceuticals with Sodium Paraaminohippurate Coadministration in a Rat Model
  • In Vivo Visualization and Quantification of Brain Heat Shock Protein 90 with [11C]HSP990 in Healthy Aging and Neurodegeneration
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • immuno-PET
  • aglycosylated antibody
  • afucosylated antibody
  • Fab arm exchange
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire